...
The only thing in my reply that was directed to you specifically was the misquote.
Quoting: SecondPrecession That's how your post started, but that's not where it finished. If you wanted to make a general statement not in reply to me you should have made a second separate post. Yes, you speak in generalities a lot, you've been doing it for the last several posts, but that does not mean it's not in response to me specifically and indeed you've again stated those generalities while responding to my posts.
I don't have to make a second post to communicate generalized statements directed at no one in particular.
My post was a reply to you because the quotes got all fucked up, and I was pointing out that I had been misquoted by you specifically.
I even said after that statement, "With that said....", and went on to speak in general terms about the scientific process at large.
Nothing about those broad statements were directed specifically at you.
You are calling me a liar because the last generalized statement in my post hit a nerve.
In case you failed to notice my post was composed of ALL generalized statements, except my opening statement which was only directed at you to
point out that the quoted material was not mine. Is this your protocol for debate, to make it personal and question a person's motives from the jump-off by calling them intellectually dishonest?
Does it really surprise you when people make personal threats to you after this habitual manner of discourse? It's no wonder you keep getting yourself into trouble, you make yourself an easy target.
Like I said, good luck. I think you'll need it.
