M 6.4 Southern California | |
Safe-Word User ID: 16204395 United States 12/14/2012 09:38 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 29798474 Mexico 12/14/2012 09:41 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 24061376 United States 12/14/2012 09:45 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Safe-Word User ID: 16204395 United States 12/14/2012 09:51 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 7554855 Canada 12/14/2012 10:08 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Odd. I was just thinking the same thing. I've never seen them proffer such an explanation on one particular "medium sized" quake before! It's as though USGS is trying to reassure everyone in So Cal that there's "nothing to worry about - the tone of the press release seems to imply "that it's just some little anomalous quake that means little or nothing" - although at 6.4 how "little & meaningless" it is certainly is subject to debate. Quoting: MarkinAZ As Shakespeare said "Me Thinks the lady doth protest too much!" I wonder what they REALLY know or suspect strongly that they're now trying to cover up? Something is going on and it's far more than just this one quake that USGS is trying so hard to "blow off" as though it is nothing. Any ideas? I've never seen this kind of explanation on the USGS site for a specific quake. Quoting: hapless moran A 6.4 a few years ago was considered a 7.4! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 29378280 United States 12/14/2012 10:21 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | 1) scientists recently discovered the dinosaurs were extinct BEFORE the big meteor shower: [link to geology.about.com] (can find lots more if you google it) due to vulcanism in the sea. for tards, vulcanism = volcanic activity. Shallow earthquake reported near seamount volcano | The ... theextinctionprotocol.wordpress.com/.../shallow-earthquake-reported... Nov 15, 2012 – 6.0 magnitude earthquake strikes the southern coastline of Chile ... The basaltic volcano rises to within 650 m of the sea surface and has a 2-km-wide summit .... Earthquake swarm report at California's Coso Volcanic Field: .. [link to theextinctionprotocol.wordpress.com] Is a volcano eruption at the Salton Sea imminent? - San Diego ... www.examiner.com/.../is-a-volcano-erruption-at-the-salton-sea-immi... Oct 27, 2012 – The Salton Buttes, a line of four small volcanoes on the Salton Sea's ... Rock Hill, one of four Salton Buttes, small volcanoes on the southern San Andreas ... Abbott is worried that a major earthquake could create a path for the magma ... an Earth sciences lecturer at California State University-Long Beach ... [link to www.examiner.com] THIS: [link to theextinctionprotocol.wordpress.com] ← Forget the Mayan calendar. Now, please, worry about volcanoes Violent pair of earthquakes strike off coast of California → Scientists find dome of ‘violent’ submarine volcano off the coast of Baja, California Posted on December 14, 2012 so put that shit together.... also the 'new' lava field off coast of oregon (two years ago got active). start watching these offshore quakes and tying them in with undersea volcanic fields..... hello. duh. |
Sweet User ID: 28643574 United States 12/14/2012 10:27 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1347486 United States 12/14/2012 10:28 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | i'm on page two of the thread, pardon me if this has been mentioned but what i see people missing already is that this was an underwater volcanic eruption....now let us put these things together: Quoting: Anonymous Coward 29378280 1) scientists recently discovered the dinosaurs were extinct BEFORE the big meteor shower: [link to geology.about.com] (can find lots more if you google it) due to vulcanism in the sea. for tards, vulcanism = volcanic activity. Shallow earthquake reported near seamount volcano | The ... theextinctionprotocol.wordpress.com/.../shallow-earthquake-reported... Nov 15, 2012 – 6.0 magnitude earthquake strikes the southern coastline of Chile ... The basaltic volcano rises to within 650 m of the sea surface and has a 2-km-wide summit .... Earthquake swarm report at California's Coso Volcanic Field: .. [link to theextinctionprotocol.wordpress.com] Is a volcano eruption at the Salton Sea imminent? - San Diego ... www.examiner.com/.../is-a-volcano-erruption-at-the-salton-sea-immi... Oct 27, 2012 – The Salton Buttes, a line of four small volcanoes on the Salton Sea's ... Rock Hill, one of four Salton Buttes, small volcanoes on the southern San Andreas ... Abbott is worried that a major earthquake could create a path for the magma ... an Earth sciences lecturer at California State University-Long Beach ... [link to www.examiner.com] THIS: [link to theextinctionprotocol.wordpress.com] ← Forget the Mayan calendar. Now, please, worry about volcanoes Violent pair of earthquakes strike off coast of California → Scientists find dome of ‘violent’ submarine volcano off the coast of Baja, California Posted on December 14, 2012 so put that shit together.... also the 'new' lava field off coast of oregon (two years ago got active). start watching these offshore quakes and tying them in with undersea volcanic fields..... hello. duh. Good info. Thanks. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 29859428 Argentina 12/14/2012 10:30 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 29858832 United Kingdom 12/14/2012 10:31 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 7631061 United Kingdom 12/14/2012 10:37 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 15676325 United States 12/14/2012 10:39 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Well I know the earth rings all over after a quake that size, but this looks like more to come. The big spike was way after the 6+ duo. Rockin' in the USA! [link to earthquake.usgs.gov] |
THE INQUISADOR User ID: 27677169 United States 12/14/2012 10:42 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Well I know the earth rings all over after a quake that size, but this looks like more to come. The big spike was way after the 6+ duo. Rockin' in the USA! Quoting: Anonymous Coward 15676325 [link to earthquake.usgs.gov] Just looking at the LISS plots,Something IS up... :nose23l36: SCOTLAND FOREVER America is the Grand Experiment..Let us not Fail.. Listed Number 1 in the Guinness World Record Book of EXTRA LARGE Steel Balls Opinions are like Farts..Only the very best linger on and on Great Men wake up to slay spam tards. Most are content to chase lizards. Therein lies the difference. Live Brave.LIVE FREE. Murphy is my patron Saint. I SIGN MY NEG KARMA |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 7631061 United Kingdom 12/14/2012 10:42 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 7335818 United States 12/14/2012 10:56 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 27026395 New Zealand 12/14/2012 11:00 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | No earthquakes in New Zealand in the 5 hours since the California quake hit. It's a little unusual. [link to beta.geonet.org.nz] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 29847592 Portugal 12/14/2012 11:06 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | No earthquakes in New Zealand in the 5 hours since the California quake hit. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 27026395 It's a little unusual. [link to beta.geonet.org.nz] it's sooo wired! |
the worm is warm User ID: 29378280 United States 12/14/2012 11:13 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 29727256 United States 12/14/2012 11:13 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Just checked the live earhquakes map and noticed that the "original" 6.4 (or 6.3) EQ had two different depths reported. One source said 10 km, the other said 20 km. Small differences often happen, but I don't recall seeing a difference of 10 km in depths being reported for the same earthquake before. Does anyone else think this is strange or have an explanation for it? |
debunk that junk User ID: 29378280 United States 12/14/2012 11:14 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
MatangLawin User ID: 18128221 United States 12/14/2012 11:17 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I don't like this. There are no known fault lines in that area. I think this is a precursor quake. Be careful Californians and get your bug-out bags ready. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 7631061 United Kingdom 12/14/2012 11:18 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 9266723 United States 12/14/2012 11:21 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | So, let me get this straight. There was a marginal quake in California and now it's DOOM ON? Quoting: DarthDickheadus:AmericanSith Well damn, guess I picked the wrong day to stop sniffin' glue. 6.4 isn't marginal, also topped off with a few aftershocks even around utah. plus that entire pacific plate (alaska, california mexico, chile) has been lit up for weeks. this is quite possibly the beginning of something larger. People say this about every earthquake ever. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 29862814 United States 12/14/2012 11:29 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | M4.1 aftershock near San Diego, pretty much directly on San Andreas fault. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 29848241 [link to earthquake.usgs.gov] Event Time 2012-12-14 10:50:57 UTC 2012-12-14 02:50:57 UTC-08:00 at epicenter 2012-12-14 11:50:57 UTC+01:00 system time Location 33.265°N 116.091°W depth=50.2km (31.2mi) Nearby Cities 13km (8mi) WSW of Salton City, California 46km (29mi) S of Coachella, California 48km (30mi) SSE of La Quinta, California 51km (32mi) SSE of Indio, California 374km (232mi) W of Phoenix, Arizona If it was on San Andreas, in no way would it be an aftershock of the one offshore Catalina. Might be related - like some type domino effect - but not an aftershock |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 29862814 United States 12/14/2012 11:30 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 28580921 United States 12/14/2012 11:31 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Just means the first shaker was too deep to cause an actual fault rupture. The second one is closer to the surface. Quoting: MatangLawin I don't like this. There are no known fault lines in that area. I think this is a precursor quake. Be careful Californians and get your bug-out bags ready. Quakes have been very quiet before and after this 6.4 also, comparatively to activity as of "late". |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 29862814 United States 12/14/2012 11:31 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 28580921 United States 12/14/2012 11:33 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Just means the first shaker was too deep to cause an actual fault rupture. The second one is closer to the surface. Quoting: MatangLawin I don't like this. There are no known fault lines in that area. I think this is a precursor quake. Be careful Californians and get your bug-out bags ready. Quakes have been very quiet before and after this 6.4 also, comparatively to activity as of "late". Worldwide, not just Cali... |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 29378280 United States 12/14/2012 11:36 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Just means the first shaker was too deep to cause an actual fault rupture. The second one is closer to the surface. Quoting: MatangLawin I don't like this. There are no known fault lines in that area. I think this is a precursor quake. Be careful Californians and get your bug-out bags ready. what part of 'undersea lava field' did you miss? |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 29848241 Germany 12/14/2012 11:38 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Just checked the live earhquakes map and noticed that the "original" 6.4 (or 6.3) EQ had two different depths reported. One source said 10 km, the other said 20 km. Small differences often happen, but I don't recall seeing a difference of 10 km in depths being reported for the same earthquake before. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 29727256 Does anyone else think this is strange or have an explanation for it? It's not unusual. The first depth is often a preliminary value only from automatically gathered information from the seismographs. After a seismologist has reviewed all the data it often changes. What I find odd is that there have clearly been two different quakes in the M6 range only seconds (or a few minutes) apart. Some of the LISS stations show this, but best noticeable it is on the live seismograph at ABC. Here's a screenshot which clearly shows two big quakes within a few minutes: [link to www.abload.de] |