School shooting in Newtown CT-Breaking on Fox News

A 20 yo is not likely to have a child in kindergarten.


.

Every time something like this happens some dumb ass on glp says
It's a Psy op...can't it just be what it is??

I think it's supposed to say in the 20s, not exactly 20 years ols.

To be honest, this sounds more like Illuminati-Mk-Ultra-Obama Administration-related, but hey, anything's possible.............................

But still, though, Brief, we can discuss that AND grieve over these children and adults. You sounded to me like you were being an insensitive sarcastic bastard.

This has me in a full on panic attack.

I'm ill.

What the hell is up? Why kill children.

[link to www.aljazeera.com]

Satan

Dont be a retard.

A 20 yo is not likely to have a child in kindergarten.


.

Dont be a retard.

Every time something like this happens some dumb ass on glp says
It's a Psy op...can't it just be what it is??

The person isn't retarded. Satan and his demons do exist. Their influence is everywhere.

SHootings at the Mall

Shootings at the School...

Home Invasions on the rise...


and LIBTARDS say: The World will be a more Happy Place without GOD and Religion..

Well here ya go..

Welcome to a **GODLESS WORLD**

Maybe. DUH!

Just too much of a coincidence...but once again feel bad for the kids and parents.

The right to own a firearm, is based on the right to self-defense, i.e., the right to those means to defend oneself against those who wish to destroy one’s life. The right to self-defense is itself is a corollary of the right to life (a corollary is here defined as a self-evident implication of a general principle).

It would be absurd to say one has the right to life, but does not have the right to the means necessary to protect that life. It would be like saying one has the right to life, but not the right to purchase food. Yet, this is what opponents to the right to own a gun are really against: the right to life.

Unfortunately, it is the right to life, that is ignored in the debate over the right to bear arms, both by its opponents, and by its so-called defenders!

The field of battle on which gun control should be fought is exactly on this issue: man’s rights. Statistical arguments on gun control are a red herring — as the leftists’ appeals to hungry children or the environmentalists’ appeals to clean parks are also meant to distract their opponents from the fundamental issues at stake. While the National Rifle Association (NRA) and other defenders of the right to bear arms argue over statistics and interpreting the Constitution, the real issues remain untouched and are sacrificed to the enemies of our freedom.