Through the Looking Glass

Burisch is a near anagram of 'Rubbish'. Coincedental, of course, but still, it was one of my first thoughts when I read the early interview transcript at Camelot. [link to projectcamelot.org]

What always struck me as odd, was how Burisch blew his whistle over very sensitive info (Looking Glass, J Rod etc.) in a manner as if he had no fear for possible consequence, from the organisations whose secrets he blew wide open.

Furthermore, Burisch even worked for those guys again, after he spilled the beans.

He also visited a private meeting in Vegas, where he held a speech in which he said some pretty nasty things to his mostly uniformed audience.

Here was a man who knew he had nothing to fear from anybody, because he had obviously powerful & influencial friends in all the right places.

Also his heroic action in which he managed to send the EBE back to his own time & planet, through a sort of Stargate device & the mild reprecussions he faced by his 'bosses'.

The longer I monitored Dan Burisch the less I got convinced of his genuine sincerity.

According to the Looking Glass (and Yellow Pages), that is accurate. All time-line variations, event variations, etc., converge to an area in time. All of it converging is too powerful a manifestation for any 'thing' to make it something it is not.

Correct. Future viewings are ALWAYS probabilities, no exceptions.

Looking Glass tech did not take place within the mind, though it used consciousness. My understanding is that different 'users' would get different 'viewings' of 'novelty points' which would be the most pronounced in the viewings...compared, to say everyday living of a singular individual.

The part of 'killing person looking in' is up in the air with my knowledge. There may have been a different tech used for fully immersing one's consciousness into the 'viewing', as far as everything I know. Much of that tech is used in a place we all know well: DREAMLAND.

Now it can be understood why parts of Area 51 were/are called Dreamland. For one, it uses the 'memory', or beliefs and biases, to interpret the experience being 'envisioned', therefore skewing the results. It is as if it is a safety mechanism for viewing (got an agenda?). They could not get an accurate reading many times because the person involved would inject their own sub-conscious into the experience - instead of being a pure conduit - and would taint the information received. Some, I would imagine, may have 'lost' their minds, but who knows.

And this point, as you can see, one's with an agenda could not properly use the tech. For them it would render the tech 'useless'.

the very good news is
it matters not what you are in our material dimension, traveling from star to star by default relies on ability to "navigate" non material dimensions

our universe is self aware

= local issues do not travel

universal environment satisfying motives do