Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 1,634 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 156,476
Pageviews Today: 223,763Threads Today: 54Posts Today: 1,281
01:48 AM


Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
Back to Thread
REPORT COPYRIGHT VIOLATION IN REPLY
Message Subject URGENT ALERT: both 'Sandy Hook' and 'Ryan Lanza' have the same Numerology value as 'Mayan Calendar'
Poster Handle Anonymous Coward
Post Content
NWO is not real. You are all a bunch idiots making up a fairy tale when 20 children were murdered today. You conspirafags are the real sheep, you believe everything you hear from idiots like Alexander Jones and David dIcke. This numerology crap means nothing and is probably just a coincidence. You could take any of the numerous false doomsday claims from next week and relate them to the shooting. I'll go back to living my life like a normal human being instead of sitting in my mother's basement wearing a tinfoil hat and hiding from the Illuminati.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 23487706




"Coincidence" is NOT an option in this case, as the Statistics prove.



You have to choose between:


A - Conspiracy


B - Supernatural phenomenon related to the collective unconscious of humanity being focused on the concerns about the End of the Mayan Calendar




"Coincidence" is NOT an option
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 24687842



Typical conspiracy theorist response. Only including the options that suit their absurd claims.

 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 23487706




The only possible explanation for your post is that you didn't read the entire thread, and so you didn't see the part when it was demonstrated that the probabilities of a "random coincidence" are less than ONE in TEN THOUSAND.


And random coincidences with probabilities of less than one in ten thousand doesn't happen in an event of worldwide repercussion, exactly one week before the end of the Mayan Calendar.


So, start to cry, because the option "coincidence" was SCIENTIFICALLY DISCARDED.

Statistics works BOTH WAYS. It can not be used ONLY when it's to prove the point of view of "skeptics" and "debunkers"...
 
Please verify you're human:




Reason for copyright violation:



News