MOTIVE??? What was Adam Lanza's MOTIVE??? Why is no-one discussing this? No crime is committed without a motive. OR DID ADAM NOT DO THIS CRIME?

Yeah, still waiting for the theater cameras, OR just ONE person who saw a crazy orange haired guy in line buying a ticket

I don't think this is as easy as you're presenting it. In any case: Why did he shoot them? WHAT WAS ADAM LANZA'S MOTIVE?

Yup, all the other "random" shootings didn't involve kids. Now the public is horrified and traumatized. Looks like "they" finally found the key.

There is no motive involved. The answer is SSRI. My background is in Chemistry/Chemical Engineering.

Okay, I have a question. I've known a few people with Asbergers syndrome (I'm not a psychologist and don't work in that field), and I have to say they struck me as being totally non-violent, even passive. Is this the norm?

Antidepressant-induced akathisia-related homicides associated with diminishing mutations in metabolizing genes of the CYP450 family

[link to www.dovepress.com]

People with aspergers hold things in, but if get frustrated, can get quite aggressive, not realizing what they are doing.

This event focuses on guns and mental illness. The convo has been about mental illness on MSM. Those with mental illness should not possess guns. We know that, and of course, they can't possess one legally.
But what if the definitions of mental illness should be changed to include a lot more people? Say, maybe those who frequent conspiracy sites? Those who always talk about the government coming for their guns all the time? Those who talk about aliens and fallen angels surely are not sane, are they? Maybe they should not take any chances, and put those "fringers" on the list of Those Who May Not Own Guns. Jared Loughner was a conspiracy enthusiast. And the media made sure we knew it. I'm sure we'll be fed info stating that Lanza was also.

Don't ask me, I'm just a random observer like you. I'm sure that detectives are combing thru his house looking for anything that can shed light on his background. I'm sure his computer and cell phone are being checked. Interviews with his doctors and psychologists if he had any. Medical records being looked into. Probably trying to figure out what video games he played to see if that may have helped him shoot. Probably looking into local gun ranges or places where he may have practiced firing. Who knows man. But for me, on this one, I'm leaning towards a kid who maybe w the help of his brother (maybe the living brother is the sick and twisted one and set his brother up? Ever see the movie RAMPAGE?) just went off.

There is nothing yet to suggest that he was on any drugs. Read this account of the young man and then tell me where the drugs or mental illness or POSSIBLE MOTIVE were.

The word here is that he might possibly have had a 'personality disorder', but that has not been confirmed by any family members or acquaintances. This has only been speculated on by law enforcement officers who are trying to come up with a motive for the massacre. By all accounts, Adam was a nerdish computer geek, a 90-pound-weakling with a protective older brother. Adam never had any trouble with the law and had no history of violence.

[link to www.thechronicleherald.ca]

Thanks, didn't know that.

This is what the MSM is pointing you towards, but what is the evidence and common sense telling you? Still no proof that he was even on any drugs or even had an mental health issues. It's all been hearsay.

Spoken like a true shill.

The last thing you put is redundant, in order for guns = security and safety they also have to = death even if the later isn't expressed. It's sound reasoning that as mass murders picked up so would negative gun reaction.
As for the shooter part it seems grasping. Even if true you would then be suggesting that the media caused that and that the media is ran by tptb. Not to mention public opinion is still very much pro gun as of right now. Hell a lot of people are suggesting that every teacher be armed to try and prevent this from happening. Even if the media isn't.
While everyone does snap for a reason, the reason is not always readily apparent, especially if it was chemical.
It hasn't even been a day yet, investigations take time.

The media marks scapegoats like it always has "Entertainment did it" "Guns Did it" ect. ect. ect. Yet the fact of the matter is after every shooting people say the exact same thing on here, and it never happens. The entire point of events like this is to trick everyone into thinking they want and need what they give. This event has not done that, and I don't see why they would want to ban guns as illustrated in my last post. They already control guns, and to remove every gun would require manpower, time, dedication, money, and cooperation the government does not have.
Again I ask you to think how would the government go about seizing millions of weapons from millions of homes?

You are so right! Just like in the US, it used to be "illegal alien", then "undocumented immigrant", now it's just "immigrant". Back in the day any student from outside the US was referred to as a foreign student, several years ago they became "International students". Most people don't realize it, but this is a form of mind control.

There was a tweet during the time the story was developing that was a repost of an email sent to the community by hte school touting their new security plan - and it said the school doors would be locked at @0930 every school day. He came in just before that...

The reason folk - other than folk like us - are not discussing the motive, is because it's all speculation unless the perp published a manifesto, left a note, told a friend, etc... None of that has come out, so we can say whatever we want, but until we know it's all just stream of consciousness spreculation... Not that that's bad. But it is what it is.

MCB

The whole story doesn't add up. One reporter described the school grounds as "surprisingly organized chaos", lots of waiting around and such. If my child was unaccounted for, then I would not have been as composed as they make them seem.

Also, where are the different pictures. Why is the media only circulating the same few pictures of the aftermath of the school grounds? I know it is a crime scene and children are involved but it just seems a little fishy.

Another thing, what is the motive? I know it is early in the investigation however, this alleged suspect is said to be either a genius with personality issues or a retard wherever you get your info from. He has no established connection to the school. It also doesn't make sense that he would be let in the premises if his mother no longer works/volunteers there AND if he is a weirdo! Ask yourself, if you know this guy has issues, as the principal of the school are you really going to let him on if he has NO BUSINESS being there?

If this kid was really a special needs individual, there is no way that his parents probably ever let him handle a gun. And if he was some kind of emotionally detached kid? Hell to the no would they do so. If you have a relative who is on antidepressants then you know what I mean. There is always a fear that they could do something abnormal. Where did he learn to shoot? How did he become a good marksman? Where did he get tactical gear?

Then there's the strange ties to the Libor scandal. I don't believe in coincidence. James Holmes shooting was similar. Same thing with the photos too. Everyone just copy and pasted the same info on the "different" news outlets. Nothing original in the mainstream.

Then what about how the msm fucked the brother over by plastering his picture and info all over the place? They potentially put him in danger. That is horrible journalism. I don't care if the id found was his. They jumped the gun and gave out false information on so many levels by dropping the second shooter who was arrested in the woods or somewhere nearby,the story of "missing" individuals and multiple dead bodies in different states.

It stinks to high heaven. Doesn't add up. Seems staged and contrived. Lots of speculation on the media's part which is only tugging at the hearts of emotional Americans. If this really happened, then it is a shame. But how can we be sure?

Yes; in Brave New World it's called "newspeak".

I forgot to add the term 'gunman'. 'Gunman' is now more commonly used than 'killer', and always in a negative sense. A gunman is not just someone who uses a gun for whatever purposes; a gunman kills.

Strange that those people who use guns to kill for a living (like soldiers and cops [and hunters]) are never referred to as 'gunmen'. Like the term 'shooter', 'gunman' is equated with 'killer'.

...No clear cut motive & this stinks to high holy heaven...Did U get a good look @ this kid...? He would have trouble swattin' a fly...

As many hollow-point bullets as there are citizens, a few times over? Setting a few examples (i.e., killing or imprisoning those who do not go along with the decree) would certainly encourage the public to be compliant. The few thousand hold-outs would be easy enough to ferret out and round up, eventually.

My thoughts, too. Apparently, he was the type of kid who wore a pocket protector (or so his brother claimed). I had to look up what a pocket protector is, but anyone this fastidious is not the kind of person to kill children wholesale (certainly not in a messy fashion, anyway).

[link to www.google.ca (secure)]

for truth and in memory of those slain for the NWO agenda.

First of all, some people said he was smart, not all autistic are stupid he was an honor student. I wouldn't put it past the govt that this was a special op. They could have set up the house and killed the boy at the school. It also could have been caused by psych meds. Most shootings like this have meds or govt involvement. Did they get a guy in the woods or not? Now his father was a VP for GE and that is a pretty powerful company in the military industrial complex. Its possible it was an op but we have to let the facts come out first. I dont hear any mention if he had a therapist. Some therapists have capability to create or program these people. There's been 60 years research into this and its no joke. Let the facts come out.

The fact is -- the facts will never come out. This is arguably the biggest media event (massacre-wise) since 9/11. I'm hedging my bets that this is just as staged as 9/11 was. HOW MANY FACTS HAVE COME OUT IN THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA ABOUT 9/11? If you're waiting for facts, you'll wait a long time. Spin will emerge immediately, along with disinfo to sow confusion, but facts will have to be ferreted out, piece by piece, by alternative investigators and will not appear in the MSM.

'SECURED building'???

You can walk right into most schools in this country...

That's what freaks me out..

Last night I talked to a friend who's a teacher at a local elementary school.. She told of instance (among other few) where even a parent disregarded a general policy of checking in at the school office before entering further into a building.
When stopped and asked to sign in the parent flat out said.. 'NO.. You ain't gonna stop me..' and continued walking..

No one wants to think TPTB are up to the same old tricks, especially in this case. However, you have brought up valid points for all of us who investigated and are familiar with the on goings of 911. So beware people. I am not a bibletard but remember it says we will all be deceived during this time.

I just saw Rudy Guilliani on TV talking about this shooting and it turned my stomach because I know he is aware of what really occurred on 911.

Last Edited by duncog2012 on 12/15/2012 10:40 AM

It will all boil down to the UN's gun control agenda.

Agreed. Plus, Adam was really just a skinny little uncoordinated typical computer geek, not an athlete or someone with physical discipline and training. Any adult could easily have tackled him or thrown something at him to set him off-balance and then tackle him. Heck, he likely would have tripped over his own feet, trying to see past that mask.