I promise i will not debate over any definition to my definition, i don't have one, don't need one, don't even care, but i can prove through logic how banning a machine-made gun, putting hundreds of thousands out of work, isn't going to stop people from using "projectiles".

Ban the pantyhose, for it has been used to make a slingshot!
The pencil an arrow.
The earth.. you guessed it, a rock!
and ban ice cream because it causes more indirect deaths like everything else that needs to be banned in the world.

Hey, does nobody at GLP want to ban guns or have they just not formulated even their own definition of gun? I mean, don't need to because i don't mind guns, but for someone who wishes they were banned, you better hope to know what you're saying.

"Ban guns"
Why?
"Because they're bad"
Then ban sugar
"Why?"
Because it's b-b-b-bad to the bone.


Fellow gun advocates, remember, logic does not hurt stupid people; we are all in danger.