Northern Pacific keeps having large earthquake activity from side to side, including hits in the same area of the western Alaskan islands! WTF!?

Just look at this!
Whenever one side of the Northern Pacific has a large earthquake within days the other side has a large earthquake.
Along with a specific area of the western Alaskan Aleutian islands having a moderate earthquake.
This has occurred the past 4 times in a row!
Also notice the Alaska quakes have increased slightly 4 times in a row as well.

:pacificthread1: :pacificthread2:
:pacificthread3::quakesupdatedec:


I don't believe this kind of activity is normal 4 times in a row, do you?


Just to add to the topic I'll give a few more updates.
I've covered this activity previous here:
Thread: Northern Pacific fault is destabilizing! Amazing Evidence, clear pattern developing! Large earthquakes NOT RANDOM! (lower Americas connected too)
4 times now calls for this a new thread.

Other odd updates

Historical pattern data does tell us answers and what to look for.
For example somebody else whom has read the data I've been posting made a fairly accurate warning after the Indonesia 7.2 on 12/10.
Here is the thread and details
Thread: 7.2 Indonesia!!!!





Remember this thread?
Thread: Pole Shift, Crustal displacement evidence is here! Vast Plate movement sequence proved between Indonesia, Alaska and Americas

Even though "they" turned off the main buoy I used by Indonesia to forecast it's quite clear something is up.

This happened on 12/10
Thread: 7.2 Indonesia!!!!

Then this yesterday on 12/14
Thread: M5.9 Quake Alaska

Indonesia leading to Alaska once again!

It'll be interesting to now see if pressure is redirected to the Lower Americas once again also.




Remember folks the answers are out there.. paying attention and documenting data/statistical information does wonders.

the tectonic plate is getting ready to move away and go back to from where it came in the begining. All the plates are doing this. EndTimes ya know.

Itwill be a nice ride, enjoy; just stay far away from the edges and youwillnot get hurt.

Interesting theories, have you shown them around to get differing opinions.

Each time I read your thread I get lost , I try to follow but there's a lot of misdirection and wandering in your explanation to follow.

The pics are blurry, and the pics have no captions to reference where and what you write about. Who knows maybe it me...

I'm trying as best I can to share the data.
I understand personal difficulties that can occur which is why I posted screenshots of data and a youtube video covering this data as well.
If that's not enough you can't go to USGS and search earthquake activity to pull up the same stats.

Thank you for sharing.

I looked at your data again, you say that Indonesia leads to Maine, and then towards the end of your theory, you say " there it is, Indonesia leads to Alaska" ....

I really would like to see the correlation, and if there is correlation, then can can you tell me what is going to follow the PNG 6.0 quake that just hit as I type this?.

Will it be Maine or Alaska or Chile?..

Adding this :


Thousands of squid carcasses washing up on Calif. beaches

[link to endtimeheadlines.wordpress.com]

I looked at your data again, you say that Indonesia leads to Maine, and then towards the end of your theory, you say " there it is, Indonesia leads to Alaska" ....

I really would like to see the correlation, and if there is correlation, then can can you tell me what is going to follow the PNG 6.0 quake that just hit as I type this?.

Will it be Maine or Alaska or Chile?..

Its simply the fractal binaryisms of inverse opposites inundated with languid slumberings concerning the zonal character of mass superheating isolated strips of molten strata parallel and subsequently premeditated in the opposing thumps of dischordant yet seemingly supposable readings. Inexplicably and metaphorically speaking of course.

Okay.. Thanks for that.

I feel you left out Chile, I've seen better data for the Chile / Indonesia / Alaska correlation. If your data showed the quakes you quote as happening one right after another, then I'd say you were on to something. The quakes you choose are cherry picked from the Ring of Fire.

Just about any day, anyone can choose 3 locations along the ring of fire and show they hit " within days " of each other, it's called tectonics of the Ring of Fire.

If the hours between these cherry picked quakes were the same, I'd say you have a sound theory, but they are not.

If the location were EXACTLY the same, which they are not, they are close by ( by thousands of miles ) then I'd think you'd be onto something.

There is a lot of miles between Russia Kamchatka and Japan for those areas to be a correlation to you "same" area theory.

Good luck, I think you need to work better at it, I'm willing to see more empirical data before passing judgement though.

Give him time to go check in with Nancy and see if he can answer or if he should deflect again.

Yes, but is it truly proportional to the cosine of the triangle?.