If all elementary school children could carry guns, then this tragedy would have never happened !!!!!

C'mon, they are kids.
The teachers and other adult personnel should be trained and carry guns. As well as all types of security.

And not only in schools but all public places.

yeah why not ...so they can shoot their teacher whenever they want or shoot one another in the class....are you kidding??? this is a retard idea, giving guns to childrens....how old are you???

for all the idea i've heard since this shooting this is the most retard

Last Edited by NagUrSol on 12/15/2012 02:50 PM

If all elementary school children could carry guns, then this tragedy will happen every day

yay!

the best solution to a gun tragedy is giving every one a gun!!!!

You are seriously stupid, OP.

No because the kids won't use their guns if they know people will shoot back. Guns protect everyone, actually. Having guns is much, much, much more effective than having security guards, police officers, doctors and nurses around. It's even more effective than medication like Ritalin.

This. I'm pretty stupid but this takes the portal black forest lie cake.

Oh jesus christ.

Are you retarded?

The "people" in school are treated like ignorant children because that is what they are!

Their (kids) frontal lobe isn't fully developed, that area controls judgement, impulse control & their emotions. Do you understand what that means? No, I can see you don't.

It means you don't hand over a deadly weapon to a child that may or may not be able to control an impulse to hurt someone if they suddenly become offended, embarrassed, ashamed for whatever reason. If they become overly emotional and pissed off they might just pull the trigger.

A lot of adults can't handle the responsibility of gun ownership but you think a 5 yr old is capable?

I hope you don't have a gun.

Sooo, everyone could have a gun? no exeption? Give the power to take a life to every retard in this country??

Vive la France !

Guns are a zero-sum game. A zero-sum game means that a participant's gain (or loss) of utility is exactly balanced by the losses (or gains) of the utility of the other participant(s). If the total gains of the participants are added up, and the total losses are subtracted, they will sum to zero.

So that means everyone should be able to take a piece of their cake. Everyone has the right to protect themselves, including children.

Not only they could, but they should, they must, in order to make the equation work, the zero-sum game to function properly.

You know it doesn't have to be a gun. It could be a ceremonial dagger like the Sikhs. The Sikh children would have been able to protect themselves against this killer because they would have taken out their ceremonial daggers and stabbed him to death.

you should clearly go back to school...and get shot by a kid...

you should clearly go back to school

I'm posting from a school. It's saturday at the university. I had a course on saturday.

They could have rushed him with pencils drawn, if they even use pencils anymore. Why didn't they all throw their cell phones at his head, or iPods?
What are they teaching in elementary school ffs?

Canadians say "It's Saturday at university", you fail.

He is stupid or you? Intelligent people don't respond to trolling attempts on teh internetz.

lol no, it's better to carry a samurai sword, they can be like little ninjas, like Naruto

so you're a troll?

this title just explained why guns don't protect anybody. Nancy Lanza was killed by her own guns.

If everybody (adults) carries a gun, how to do if they fight each other? count the homicide, too many already.

Don't start the morning to kids this way:
Hurry, Honey, finish your milk and cookies, bring your teddy bear and gun to kindergarten: the teddy bear is toy but gun is not; And this is front and that is rear-- don't point the gun opposite way...

Fuck off troll.