Why gun control is bigger than the Second Amendment

Hey everybody a "tough guy"

How is this pinned?!? Shameful!

People need to understand and take heed: As goes the Second Amendment, so goes all other Constitutional Rights.

Any restriction, limitation or outright nullification of the Second Amendment will serve as precedent, and pretense, for restricting, limiting and nullifying all other rights.

There is nothing in the Constitution that makes one right greater or lesser than the other. Thus, the same "argument" used to restrict one right can be employed for the restriction of all others.

People need to realize that precedent set involving any one right in the bill of Rights can and will be used by those in power with respect to all other rights.

People don't need guns, so let's restrict their ownership. Well, people don't "need" the internet either. I mean, you have phones (some of them free), can get your news from television, etc. And really, if people have nothing to hide, they should have no problem with a routine health and welfare search of their homes. For the public good of course.

We are witnessing the debate to open Pandora's box. And we are being conditioned to accept more and more government control of and intrusion into our lives. Twenty years ago, did anyone dream they would have to submit to a "strip search" before being allowed to fly on an airplane?

Funny how that works, ain't it?
Hypocrits, Psychopaths, and Communists disguised as Liberals are destroying what used to be The Greatest Country on Earth.

All it takes to make a semi automatic assault rifle shoot almost on par with an automatic is a slide stock and knowing how to bump fire.



I'm pretty sure you cant do that with a revolver. And I'm pretty sure a semi automatic rifle clip can carry 30 bullets as opposed to 6 in a revolver. So, it's reasonable to say a semi automatic assault style rifle is more dangerous than a revolver (in terms of being able to kill multiple people quickly)

A "tough guy" with a bullet stopping bat and fists.Maybe he will come visit Chicago sometime. They just eat guys like him up.

The first item of business when the communists take over a nation is to disarm the people: Cuba, Russia, China, Hungry...America is next.

Dear God, your country seems more dangerous than Congo or Kosovo. You guys must be so badass.

I know people who can shoot 100 rounds through a revolver within minutes with the use of speed loaders. Your ignorance is rife with obvious blatancy.

Who gets to define who is a nutjob?

Professionals?

You guys need tighter regulation for revolvers too then.

The semi-auto assault rifles are more accurate and generally have more powerful rounds that any revolver. There's probably also a reason no ones pulled off a massacre with a revolver and speed loaders ... it's a hell of a lot easier with an AR. So as for ignorance - look in the mirror!

Don't you get it? Gun control would keep innocent people like the Sandy Hook victims from defenidng themselves. Meanwhile, the criminals would find ways to get guns illegally. What if someone broke into your home? What if that gun was the only thing between you and death? Would you apperciate gun control then?

It's a good thing that the pro-guns are a minority anyway. They will slowly disappear as the world evolves and they can't keep up with it. Just as those who believed the sun revolves around earth. A relic of the past.

+ another 1

Gun control doesn't necessarily mean an outright ban on every gun. A double barrel shotgun is very sufficient for shooting or deterring a home invader and shouldn't be affected by reasonable gun control.

More idiocy!!! HAH! A revolver has minimal moving parts and is nearly 100% straight every shot. In fact groups shot into a target from a revolver are less than 1/4 of an inch apart and occasionally even hit the same bullet hole twice.

Pwned again. Quit dude...really just stop.

Last Edited by Chip on 12/16/2012 12:13 PM

What other constitutional rights?

They have already gone.

Gun Control is truly for future generations of weasels that will embrace a gunless culture and the balless "men" in the future will worship authority even more than they already do now.

Wow! Again with the incorrect information!!! Lat year the ATF attempted to push through bans on certain shotguns without legislation backing it. Shotguns BTW are the most powerful weapon a civilian can own.

I'm going to correct you at every turn...I have all day.

U can not ban guns, does not workout, never has. There will b lots after a ban.

In AZ when that whack job shot Giffords in AZ, he used a 9mm glock pistol.

The shooter was using one Sig Sauer and one Glock pistol, according to CNN. Later details emerged that the primary weapon was the Bushmaster "assault-style" rifle.

Is this stat wrong?

Since the gun ban in Australia, armed robberies are up 69%, assaults with guns up 28%, gun murders increased 19%, and home invasions jumped 21%. More proof that not only does gun control not work, it makes it safer for the criminals at large. In their words

Read more: [link to freedomoutpost.com]

Great. So obviously revolvers are the superior weapon. You should pass the memo on to the worlds militaries - they better replace their rifles with good old revolvers!

Seriously, stop and think about what your arguing here.

Pwned? ha!

How the fuck do you commies not understand gun control doesnt stop this kind of shooting? Lets pretend it wasnt a gov psy-op, or a fake drill.

If someone wants to slaughter someone, they will. Gun or no gun, they will get it done.

Focusing on the gun is the work of mentally deranged people that have no sense of Self, because they simply parrot the lies of the propagandists they love.

A very large knife will accomplish the same thing, especially in a room full of kids. They'd be too scared to move.

Thank you.

Shouldn't they be calling it "save the choices"? Since children are just "choices" to them?

If the UN globalist faggots have it their way humans will be either nearly eradicated or 80% ghey.

To be honest, a gun is a great substitute for a lack of balls.

Not so much badass as situationaly aware.You live in a different world.In every world there are certain reality's that one must face.Some being, Bad guys don't follow laws (part of being a bad guy]. Bad guys have guns.(Inasmuch as some don't believe this it's true} and Police are not always close by.You do for your family and I will do for mine.

If they wanted complete accuracy they probably would. Instead they opted to use a 5.56 rounds which can be deadly at great distances. The politically correct asshats (that think like you) thought it more humane to merely maim the enemy...not kill him.

The 'gun ban' in Australia was a ban primarily on semi-auto weapons. Plenty of people still have bolt action rifles, shotguns, and if you care to join a gun club, semi-automatic pistols and revolvers. If these stats are true, they may be part of a rise in crime in general or perhaps other reasons (gun crime has become quite common in specific areas due to lebanese immigrants). I should also point out there hasn't been a gun massacre in Australia in the 17 years since the assault style rifles were banend.