Why gun control is bigger than the Second Amendment

Grown ups are smart enough to realize that not everyone is going to use their fists. Moron!

What is the true issue here? The children or gun control?

Yeah we know. Us non-American are moronic enough to not be afraid and always thinking about people who could shoot us.

Newsflash: you will die.

My country people are quite safe thanks.

I'll come to the US as a tourist in March. Should I bring a gun with me to protect myself?

What do you want to bet that the author of this piece to ban guns to "Save the Children" also believes in free taxpayer funded unfettered abortion in every hospital district as well...

Just sayin...

This is not about those children anymore, they are being exploited for a political agenda...

Last Edited by Saddletramp on 12/16/2012 11:13 AM

Apparently you don't have hunting there, that is why I own most of my guns, but the 12 gauge can send someone back out the door if need be. You sound like someone in their 20s that hasn't faced the realities of life yet,and probably have never seen death up close, you just keep living in your little dream world.

WRONG ! Take your own advise and go read a book... a law book...

THE COPS HAVE NO DUTY TO PROTECT YOU

PUBLIC DUTY DOCTRINE
[link to definitions.uslegal.com]

Public duty doctrine is a principle of personal injury law that government owes duties to the public at large rather than individuals. In general, this doctrine provides that a governmental entity can be held liable only when the duty breached was owed to the injured person as an individual and was not merely the breach of an obligation owed to the public at large. Governmental duty to protect its citizens is a general duty to the public as a whole. When there is only a general duty to protect the public, there is no duty of care to an individual citizen which may result in liability. In short a duty to all is a duty to no one.


[link to www.duhaime.org]

In Eklund, the Montana Supreme Court held:

"The public duty doctrine provides that a governmental entity cannot be held liable for an individual plaintiff's injury resulting from a governmental officer's breach of a duty owed to the general public rather than to the individual plaintiff."

So your country isn't safe? They lied to us at the travel agency! Damn bastards.

Nothing will ever disarm Americans, twat brains.

We do have hunting. But we don't use semi-automatic weapons ;)

And I've seen death closer than you'd believe. Are you afraid of it?

It took police 10 minutes to get to Sandy Hook.


10 long minutes.

1 Armed person inside the school could have been at the classroom in 2 minutes unless he happened to be patrolling that hallway that instant.



Criminals don't obey laws. They will steal weapons and commit crimes regardless of the laws.

You can ban every gun on the planet and it won't stop a criminal hell bent on this type of crime.

You have to take the son of a bitch out once he begins to act.


Taking away my guns isn't going to stop a criminal. It's just going to unarm me and make me wait 10 minutes for a cop that may or may not come. I'm not waiting nor am I going to become a victim.

Good, come look me up. Ill go fist to fist with you, sounds like you need some sense beat into you. Better yet, don't even come we don't need people like you coming here.

Are all Americans as aggressive as you are? That would explain the feeling of safety a gun would provide to someone.

You my friend are free to put your right to life in the hands of another.I choose to keep that right within my own hands.I do however find your choice pathetic,weak and lazy.

LOL..shaddup, dick. What are you hoping to accomplish here? You think people that own guns are going to suddenly agree with your pussy ass?

People like you are ignorant children.

Discussing guns with a paranoid is like discussing drugs with an hypochondriac.

They never have enough.

I'm not trying to accomplish anything. It's an open forum. I voice my opinion politely.

Deal with it.

lick balls SLAVE

Like the founders of the nation, huh.

Your the one that started the fist to fist thing, i just wanted to oblige you. Yes we are aggressive, and thats what made and makes us the biggest baddest and strongest. By the way how big is your country?

lol! Your leaders haven't been under your control for years.

Hit a nerve?

I never started a fight. I just said that guns are for people who are afraid of everything. It gives them a false feeling of security. If you have no fear, a gun is not something mandatory.

I could crack a home intruder skulls open with a baseball bat. Home intruders don't even have guns here.

It's like the cold war. If citizen have more guns, criminals will equip accordingly.

Idiot! over

When you are out of arguments, resort to personal attacks. Works everytime and makes you look strong (not)

Hey everybody a "tough guy"

How is this pinned?!? Shameful!

People need to understand and take heed: As goes the Second Amendment, so goes all other Constitutional Rights.

Any restriction, limitation or outright nullification of the Second Amendment will serve as precedent, and pretense, for restricting, limiting and nullifying all other rights.

There is nothing in the Constitution that makes one right greater or lesser than the other. Thus, the same "argument" used to restrict one right can be employed for the restriction of all others.

People need to realize that precedent set involving any one right in the bill of Rights can and will be used by those in power with respect to all other rights.

People don't need guns, so let's restrict their ownership. Well, people don't "need" the internet either. I mean, you have phones (some of them free), can get your news from television, etc. And really, if people have nothing to hide, they should have no problem with a routine health and welfare search of their homes. For the public good of course.

We are witnessing the debate to open Pandora's box. And we are being conditioned to accept more and more government control of and intrusion into our lives. Twenty years ago, did anyone dream they would have to submit to a "strip search" before being allowed to fly on an airplane?

Funny how that works, ain't it?
Hypocrits, Psychopaths, and Communists disguised as Liberals are destroying what used to be The Greatest Country on Earth.

All it takes to make a semi automatic assault rifle shoot almost on par with an automatic is a slide stock and knowing how to bump fire.



I'm pretty sure you cant do that with a revolver. And I'm pretty sure a semi automatic rifle clip can carry 30 bullets as opposed to 6 in a revolver. So, it's reasonable to say a semi automatic assault style rifle is more dangerous than a revolver (in terms of being able to kill multiple people quickly)