Proof of chemtrails finally

The Sheeple don't care its about 20 some dead kids now.

OP you see chemtrails once a month well consider yourself lucy we in wales uk see it 3 or 4 times a week

How does this proof chemtrails? THey are talking about solar radiation management, nowhere do they talk about spraying the sky with clouds or anything. They write scientific papers on solar radiation management, thats what they do. Just because it has the words geoengineering in it doesn't automatically mean it has anything to do with chemtrails.

how do you think they manage "solar radiation management"?

do you think they're using large sun-shades to make shaded areas on hot days?

i'd like to see your suggestion of how to go about doing that without doing something IN THE SKY.

Chemtrails are a myth beleived by retards.

Seriously!! That is incredible....and scary. I thought once a month was alarming sometimes twice for a few days at a time but every week that's insane. In the video they talk about creating a dialogue yet nothing in the msm, not that it's surprising that something so significant is omitted. I wanted to make this thread only because there are so many non believers in the reality of chemtrails. It's happening, it's here, and now our reality.

Lunatic Fringe's proof: some crappy blog says it = it must be true.

Thank You for explaining to this person. It makes NO sense to try to be that naive.

from the paper

"Stratospheric aerosols
Large volcanic eruptions release millions of tons of sulphur dioxide into the
Earth’s upper atmosphere (the stratosphere), which react to form tiny particles –
aerosols – in the form of sulphates. These aerosols then circulate the planet on
the stratospheric winds and block out a small amount of inbound sunlight. This
phenomenon temporarily cools the Earth, sometimes detectably for a year or
two depending on the size of the eruption. The artificial injection of aerosols to
mimic this natural phenomenon could also produce a cooling effect. It has been
suggested that releasing a sufficient quantity of aerosols (such as sulphate
particles) could reduce some of the effects of climate change at relatively low
cost. Furthermore, the cooling effects of stratospheric aerosols are expected to
be relatively evenly distributed around the world.
However, this technique also carries the risk of modifying large-scale weather
patterns and precipitation (tropical monsoon systems in particular). The hazy
skies resulting from aerosol introduction could also negatively affect solar
power generation, astronomy, remote sensing, and (depending on the choice of
aerosol) stratospheric ozone levels. In addition, there would also be effects on
plant productivity due to reduced direct sunlight and increased diffuse sunlight,
but it is thought that not all changes would necessarily be adverse.
Finally, on a practical level, the full costs and feasibility of delivering suitable
aerosols into the stratosphere are currently unknown since the technology
required to do so has not been developed. It has been suggested that it would
be very difficult to produce sulphate droplets of a small enough size to scatter
sunlight effectively, and that massive amounts of sulphate injections would be
required. "

Long story short, in theory aerosol in the athmosphere could work but the risks are potentially greater then we can anticipate and we have no means to do it.
But I guess we can ignore that part of the paper and conclude that chemtrails are real.

These are big idea that require big solutions. Groundbreaking, precedent thinking.

That is not a blog.. Did you even look at my link?! That is an authentic international tri-lateral group of scientists saying that we need to protect our selfs from solar radiation and lists the ways in which we can deflect and cool the planet with aerosols being the quickest and cheapest way but with what consequences? The point is that we need to move past wether or not chemtrails excist and into a discussion about its ethicacy. Is this our best option, how serious is the situation, it's time for us all to get honor and find solutions that are sustainable and appropriate.

I DO get your point, OP, and I am right with you. The evidence points to a sudden, abrupt need to address protection from solar radiation. One should ask themselves, what happened to the natural protection, and why the sudden interest in deep space radioactive particles, gamma rays and such?

They also note that they have developed this group in an attempt to bring about guidelines to follow because they don't want governments experimenting...the fact that they are concerned speaks volumes. An operation like this would of course be top secret no one is gonna want to be the ones experimented in but if we are in an emergency the government would and is taking action. This must be a dire situation is my only conclusion.

I just want answers. If this is in our best interest then I think we should be briefed on the topic. Has it been affective thus far, why are only certain parts of the world sprayed? Then there are health concerns and of course what is happening to our protective shield, is this permanent or just temporary? The list goes on but it is clear that our environment is in a state of emergency.

Don't try using logic with these people. They don't understand it.

Yet, no evidence that the trails in the sky have anything to do with that. You people just assume that if "spray, planes and chemicals" are mentioned...then that must be what you are seeing in the sky.


Fucking stupid

Watch the vid I posted towards the top of the page if you want some statistics backed by research.

This guy who posted this ^^^^ is the real sheep

So? What does your paranoid mind tell you that is?!?

No, that's backed by bullshit you accept as "research".

It tells me the sky looks very different these days than it did in the 1960's-1980's.

Yeah, so?

There are more planes, flights, airports, and air routes....of course there are more contrails.

The conversation always gets derailed by the nay Sayers instead of leading to an actual intelligent discussion about a serious matter. If you are in denial don't respond. What actions do we take now?

There is no such thing as "intelligent conversation" about "chemtrails".


All you people do is speculate and assume. And you're too stupid to understand THAT much...

It's you people who are in denial about your lack of education in the subjects which explain the trails in the sky...without involving any kind of plot.

There are no actions necessary...other than the need for you people to actually take the time to learn these subjects through reputable and qualified sources. Which, of course, you will never do....because you enjoy being paranoid and ignorant losers.

Go ahead...just keep accepting the words from other uneducated chemtards as truth...ignore the facts. Its what you losers do best.

Your anger toward this topic is strange and unnessary if you think it's bs then move along. No need to get nasty.

Why don't you tell us what it is you seem to know so much about chemtrails. Searching your history shows that you shilled 11 chemtrail threads over 50 times. You have no info debating the subject just insults. People should just keep reporting you as an abusive poster and maybe they will get rid of you.