Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 2,161 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 2,732,019
Pageviews Today: 3,511,718Threads Today: 710Posts Today: 15,262
11:42 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Another pair of actors in Sandy hoax exposed. 100% BUSTED!

 
Curly Howard

User ID: 3200255
United States
01/03/2013 02:46 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Another pair of actors in Sandy hoax exposed. 100% BUSTED!
This whole affair reminds me of the research of John Armstrong and his book 'Harvey and Lee: How the CIA framed Oswald" He pretty much establishes that there were two men, lookalikes sharing the same name and identity since boyhood. It was done as part of a CIA false defector operation. They even had mothers who looked nearly identical - one shorter around 5 foot 8 and the other taller around 6 foot 1. Google his name and book lots of great tid bits of his research is available. His book is widely respected amongst the best independent researchers in the JFK case. Many consider it a seminal work.
"Some people would rather curse the darkness than light a can do." Method Man
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 25254305
United States
01/03/2013 02:46 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Another pair of actors in Sandy hoax exposed. 100% BUSTED!
Yet another couple who just happened to move to the area recently! (2 years)
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 25459792
United States
01/03/2013 03:01 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Another pair of actors in Sandy hoax exposed. 100% BUSTED!
rant Going to be long - buckle in, I'm addressing so much of the entire thread I've been watching... You know what baffles me - is just how many people will apply circular or blind logic here. The very same details being used to compare people is the same thing being used to say they are different! I've followed GLP forever now, never saw fit to comment until this behemoth of a mess.

Example: Person A has the same jaw, hair, etc. etc. as Person B, therefore they are the same!

Counter-Example: Person C MUST be the same but they have altered their jaw, hair, etc. through makeup and surgery, see how their nose is the same!

Either looking the same is proof, or looking different is proof, which is it here? The "Phelps" DO look act like actors and look the same - but saying her hair is the same is NOT proof. You know how popular that hairstyle is? *I* have it right now. Longer side-swept bangs with layered hair. It's a copy-cat of KATE MIDDLETON - the one people are copying right now (though I must have been ahead of the times, because I've had this cut for a couple years). Seriously, it's the #1 style right now, pick up ANY magazine. Or just go here for a Google search of just "Hottest Hairstyles": [link to www.google.com (secure)]

I'm seeing far too many people pick a person from the shooting files and then scan the same album looking for the closest match (and even then might still be really far off - considering the distance between the eye corners and bridge of nose are WAY off, things you CANNOT change with makeup or surgery). That doesn't work - why? Because for one, A LOT of this is based off ONE album. Show the lack of info for prior history OR show the prior history - what about media photos? Has anyone done property records searches in PRIOR states for the victims families names? I don't see ANYTHING like that here - we need to get it and show it to prove these actors had no prior real life existence.

This thread started off loopy with the same commenter/OP spamming the same links over and over, got really good in the middle and now just looks like a bunch of people pasting up any photo they can find of anything and pointing and saying "See, see, see?" and waiting for someone to either say "I SEE IT!" or "I don't see it!" to respond back with "SHILL!!!!" You know what "they" say - if someone else tells you what they see, they'll see it too. Classic ink-blottage. Or for an audio example, the same "EVP" from a ghost hunt will sound completely different to two independent people, but when one person says "Hey, listen and see if you think it says "I'm coming for you" and tell me what you hear", that's what someone else will hear. Remove the power of suggestion.

You want some explanations, I'll give you the LOGICAL ones so we can get back on track to talking about the original couple and a FEW small others.

#1 Absurd thing: The "only" photo of the kids on a timeline. You know why? The rest are set to private. You can go to anyone's Facebook page that has it on lockdown and see only what they select to be seen - only one of my family photos is public and it doesn't have all my kids in it, does it mean the others don't exist? Absence of YOU being able to see something doesn't mean it doesn't exist or the whole point of GLP is moot. That said, also of COURSE someone would make something private/invite if they are being harassed one way or the other! Given the veracity in which people like 4chan exist, if someone is constantly harassing you AND you have lost a child, do you let it keep going on or do you just stop the madness? It *alone* is NOT indicative of whether someone is hiding something. Given how long this thread had gone on AND the outright post stating people had posted something like this on their blog comments - do you really think someone would let that stay? Imagine for a moment you are one of the real families who lost a child - and someone was making fun of you and your dead kid... you just stand by and give them free reign? If you removed it and it kept coming back and those posts were only meant for friends and family anyway, do you leave it open to ridicule? We don't know what was all posted on there and given the reach of this thread, even more vile things that "You are so and so" could have been said.

A little critical thinking here folks. Do you sit around on your own personal space just letting people call you a liar, a fraud, etc.? Just because something goes private doesn't 100% "prove" anything - it can be a point in the scenario but isn't standalone proof. I deleted a hateful comment on my blog that exposed the US's semi-traitor status of Gaddhafi - does that mean the comment was true? If that is the logic, then some of the hatefulness here to people who might not agree 100% with everything means the OP and those who agree are wrong. Circular logic and it doesn't work when trying to prove anything because it just means people will argue the point in circles and there is no definitive answer.

#2 Absurd thing: The age of the kids. I have FOUR kids under 10 years old. Those kids DO look to be about 4-5 years old. I've got one turning 2 this month and is nearly half their size and he is in the 50th percentile for heigh and 56th for weight so fairly average... not to mention the fact of my own children, I have worked in daycares most of my life. Anyone saying those are toddlers has never seen most kids. I do have a friend who's one child is 18 months younger but towers over my kid, she's the exception and in the 98th percentile for height and 96th for weight.

#3 Absurd thing: Location of the kids photo = padded room. With metal interlock walls? Really? That's an RV bed where the upper wall folds down usually the extra above the driver on an older RV. Note the slide bar on the far right of the photo.

#4 Absurd thing: The Soto photo comparison. Do you people not have kids or know a teacher? Regardless of the other photos, this one was laughable: [link to i24.photobucket.com]

Why? Because, for one the "summery dress" matches the other little girls in the photo, they are wearing light dresses/ short skirts (look at the girl in the very front row with the sleeveless summer dress on). Pics are normally taken in September, with retakes in October and the weather reports show it was a warm Sept. in New England - which also helped eventually fuel Sandy. Why is her "pro-photo" the same? Because it was taken the same day for the yearbook. Class photos are done usually in the gym or the front steps of a school. Individual shots (complete with the cheesy Lifetouch backdrop), are done somewhere else. Not to mention, it's not the same photo. The class photo would show both ears if they were exposed, the individual shot would not have shown her right ear (our left). Also, over her right shoulder in the class photo has more hair, while the individual shot shows less hair with it fanning out over to her arm.

#5 - not so absurd, just not really rational thing referenced: The little girl/Obama photo. The dress is the same, it's the sisters. A family friend lost their child to cancer and the younger son actually wore his older brothers suit to the funeral - I suppose it was to be "like" or "closer" to him. It's obviously ill-fitting. And yes, it's okay to smile after a loss - when my grandmother died of cancer, the Priest made a few jokes at her eulogy, because that's the type of woman she was. After the wake, we were laughing and smiling and she died in one of the worst possible ways I can imagine. Now, given if any parent loses a child and the fact they were in the middle of an international media shoot with Obama - I'd think at least for the sake of cameras, they'd put on a faux face, if nothing else for the other kids in the room who might been affected. They are supposed to be sisters... of COURSE they look alike. My brother is a stretched out carbon copy of me and he's a guy! If he put on 40lbs, and grew some boobs and lost a winkie, we'd be identical and if you put his photo next to my father's - they look like identical twins too. Saying a family member looks like a family member - not proof. And in applying that wrong circular logic, saying a family member looks nothing alike isn't proof either. We look like our dad, our mom - not ONE bit and she birthed us! (The same goes for a side snaggletooth in some of the photos being used as proof - it's a common thing to have and most people don't get it fixed - but it's one of the easiest things to change so either the teeth being the same is proof or being different is not - again, a PIECE of proof, not 100% if it's the only proof).

Get back to the start of this and work on the real comparisons that have been found and pick those apart FIRST instead of adding more questionable people on the pile with the same faulty methods. A quick side by side doesn't help. Use the side by side, use words/font underneath each photo and note WHERE that photo came from, via what news station/story, then the comparison photos. I think that's what some people in the middle were asking for - where did this come from? "The same album" doesn't help, which page? Which photo? Which album? Don't zoom in and pixelate everything, I've seen that too much which distorts features that cannot be changed and there is no way to make a judgment at all. One of the earlier comparisons shows a quite clear girl and the other a very, very grainy zoom in. If you think it helps, add it as a set of THREE side by sides. Calling people shills because they say "Nope, don't see that one" doesn't help either, completely derails the entire purpose. Foster meaningful thought and discussion, don't close your eyes and say "I'm right, you're wrong and since I'm right - YOU are the shill!". Frankly, the more you scream shill at even the slightest moment someone even ASKS a question (which I saw twice heavily) won't help and makes you look like the shill trying to derail us from getting to the very heart and a point of agreement - don't let the people talk, they won't put it altogether and figure out WHO is the actor. The only way to get to the bottom is to ask questions, get solid info THEN take it to the media and the internet. If you say "See, A and B are the same person" with nothing else, no way to find it, no idea WHY it matters, no one will listen.

EACH person in this needs their OWN reply with EACH photo and EACH document added to it. It's all over the place and about 3/4 of the way in, I lost who was supposed to be who and where they were found or seen before.

Example:
Person A is on TV as Mr. Smith as a parent of Little Guy Smith. Person A is actually Mr. Green. He was said to live in X city before, lived in Newtown for X months/years. He ACTUALLY was in X city and is shown as the Father of Person B, Cousin of Person C, and nephew of Person D.
On CNN:
Link to video
On Person C's album "Thanksgiving", page 6, third from the right, fourth down as Mr. Smith
Link to Photo
Also in Person A's album "Christmas", page 4, first from the right, second down as Mr. Green
Link to Album/Photo
Here is the side by side from Thanksgiving album and TV
Link to the photo
Here is a 3 set of photos, going from left - TV, Thanksgiving, Christmas

Now, that said, go ahead and proceed to call me a shill or whatever buzzwordy name for calling for people to use a little bit of logic here and stop with the overarching. There is too many things fishy with the whole thing and a few nuggets in here that are worth debating and getting into more depth. Those nuggets shouldn't be lost in circular logic or anyone that needs convincing, won't be.

As for adding to the discussion... The "Emilie Parker Fund" set up on Facebook was set up by a "friend" left back in Ogden. It was set up within 15-20 minutes of the first report of "a shooting" itself asking for cash to assist the Parkers - this was before the shooter was even confirmed dead, let alone if there were casualties or how many, or even where in the building it was. In fact, many people on the page with the first posts questioned how they could even know Emilie wasn't hiding somewhere and surmised it was a scam page. Given how many bullets went into each child as the story (IIRC, each new version said no victim had less than 11 shots into them), my guess is she wouldn't have been recognizable to give a positive ID in all the mayhem and mess. Not only this, but the parent's would have A) known all the above info, and B) got a hold of a friend in Utah FIRST and not other family or wait for confirmation? ...who then within seconds deemed it appropriate without knowing the family's finances to set up a donation fund and put up 5 or 6 photos? May not be 100% proof, but I certainly don't think friend in any other state has that type of photos... if they pulled them off say a personal page through the download function, it certainly would have taken longer than that to do. I have serious reservations about Robbie/Emilie Parker.

The shooting happened IMO. The question is, which families were in on it (perhaps most of those who spoke to the media) and which were truly hunted down. If you want to control the gun debate - it has to happen IRL to SOME extent - there has to be a trail. You can't pick a school and say "Gee golly, kids are dead now move along". There's multiple social media photos taken by neighbors of the scene, dozens of different news crews and dozens of photos from bystanders who came up to the area and took their own photos. It's far too much to risk to go wrong here for such a large issue like disarming people to be slaves, but the risk was mitigated by the fact that not so many kids died. In all these types of national events, they DO happen - to some extent, but likely planned and supplemented by actors, faux death counts, etc. They HAVE to have some real people for "memorials" later, they still exist while the ones in on it later say "No comment" and other media can walk up to the home later and say "It's been a year, do you miss so and so". If everyone disappears, it's too much to pass off. So some real people have to be casualties.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 31429683
Germany
01/03/2013 03:27 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Another pair of actors in Sandy hoax exposed. 100% BUSTED!
Rachel Davino:

[link to abclocal.go.com]

Here she is GB album, younger before teeth fixed:

[link to picasaweb.google.com (secure)]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 27493239


excellent match!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 25254305


BANG!!!

ANOTHER ONE!

BEST TREAD EVER! PIN THIS!!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 31429683
Germany
01/03/2013 03:29 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Another pair of actors in Sandy hoax exposed. 100% BUSTED!
Once you develop an eye for fakery, it's pretty easy to spot.


IMAGE ( [link to i24.photobucket.com] )

 Quoting: stjedi


lol. good stuff. just mirrored and pasted. It could have been the photograph who made the "School" pics but then again he would be the worst ever.

Already noticed she looks always the same.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 31429683
Germany
01/03/2013 03:34 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Another pair of actors in Sandy hoax exposed. 100% BUSTED!
I'm still trying to tie this family to the Arizona (Loughner) shooting and I found another possible match?

This photo is of Christina Green's mother on the right and an unidentified woman on the left holding her hand:

[link to www.commercialappeal.com]

This photo is from the Greenburg family album (wow, they sure do get around don't they?) The woman in the back? No name for her here either that I can find.

What do you think?
[link to picasaweb.google.com (secure)]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 10783814


Yes--- close examination of the blonde on the top in the photo album reveals that she has the identical nose, and narrow eye-to-nose ratio as the woman holding Christina Taylor Green's mother's hand. The two women also have similar wide jaw lines-- and almost nonexistent upper lips--- very thin!!... Both seem to have a facial hair problem above their upper lips... lol.

The only thing that looks different are the Mr. Spock eyebrows on the mourning woman, which seem penciled in over shaven eyebrows. The hair color/style is of course different, but that's easy to change.

Wow-- I think another remarkable hit.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 2924495


BANG![/color

ANOTHER HIT and CONNECTION


DOWN WITH THE NWO. DOWN WITH THE FASCISTS. DOWN WITH THE ZIONISTS. DOWN WITH THE NAZIS


COMMON SHILLS COMMON
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 31429683
Germany
01/03/2013 03:38 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Another pair of actors in Sandy hoax exposed. 100% BUSTED!
Okay, I found a way around this. Just use the arrow in that last link on the right of the picture to move ahead one pic. There are the two daughters on the outside. These girls, older, are in the pic with "Mary" in the red dress.

Here is the woman impersonating school psychologist Mary Sherlach:

[link to picasaweb.google.com (secure)]

Now look at the alleged Mary Sherlach. Same EXACT expression.
And get a good look at her two daughters because I think I found them in the Greenberg album as well!

[link to haddon.patch.com]

Now look at the Greenberg photo. Tallest Sherlach daughter is on far left in the Stones shirt. Shorter daughter is on the far right. They are just younger, but I think it's them!

Remember, Mary Sherlach's maiden name is Greene.
[link to picasaweb.google.com (secure)]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 27493239

 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 27493239

 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 27493239

Here it is(right click: copy image adress):

[link to lh3.googleusercontent.com (secure)]


AND.... BANGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG another hit!

MARY SHERLACH FAKE VICTIM!

FAKE!!!
SANDY HOOOAX
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 25254305
United States
01/03/2013 03:43 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Another pair of actors in Sandy hoax exposed. 100% BUSTED!
Soto's class
[link to www.theblaze.com]

Substitute teacher Rousseau's class:
[link to www.zimbio.com]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 25254305
United States
01/03/2013 03:44 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Another pair of actors in Sandy hoax exposed. 100% BUSTED!
Soto's family:
[link to nbclatino.com]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 31429683
Germany
01/03/2013 03:49 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Another pair of actors in Sandy hoax exposed. 100% BUSTED!
rant Going to be long - buckle in,
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 25459792


Just look at the last posts ..all matches!

Concentrate on the ones who are clearly identified.

Easy no nead to write a book.
Say what is match and say what is not a match and explain why. Quote the post with the pictures in.


Some pics were off but quickly debunked. This is also now a research thread which means there will be wrong allegations and wrong comparisons.


Oh and Im the OP(yeah got about 10 times banned lol) and I spammed the same links over and over cause some shills(yeah they exists) and cointel pro(yeah they exist) love to derail a thread with questions and false allegations and hope it comes to a personal level.
They also derail with long or repeated posts without info to clutter up pages so lazy conspiracy tards see nothing and click next thread.
This is why I repeat matches over and over and we wont stop doing that.

Nothing will get lost. I encourage everyone to download the web albums. The news pages. make screenshots. save everything. repost it and push it until the whole world knows what scam artists ruling the world.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 25254305
United States
01/03/2013 03:50 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Another pair of actors in Sandy hoax exposed. 100% BUSTED!
Soto's family:
[link to nbclatino.com]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 25254305


I'm not convinced or anything but throwing it out there as a maybe?
The Greenberg, Soto family?
[link to picasaweb.google.com (secure)]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 31429683
Germany
01/03/2013 03:58 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Another pair of actors in Sandy hoax exposed. 100% BUSTED!
I was a very firm believer that Nick and Laura Phelps were actors. I am still a firm believer that something stinks with this entire event. But then I did some extra digging and came across someone's personal blog page which shows photos of the Phelps couple on a mini vacation with friends and looking at the photos-they are 100% the people in the news brief.

I found this photo when I dug to search for the Phelps family, relatives, etc to find images on facebook or other media sites. It took a while, but when I got hold of Laura's maiden name I was able to search easier since that last name (Calio) is much less common than Phelps.

Here is the link-judge for yourselves. Let me know your thoughts!!

[link to cc.bingj.com]
 Quoting: jennyo 17312651


Yeah we had that midway. That blog got deleted(your link is a cache) when One(!) commented: "You are the greenbergs"

The kids in the pictures are also in the greenberg photoalbum.

They often also mix kids and couples etc.

-----
As the blog was created a year ago(or more)this shows they had forknowledge.
Infact most of the famillies came the last two years into the area.
Tony greenberg has property nearby.
-----
Blog is cached, screenshoted and saved. Greenbergs got busted and should go lifelong to jail + all their green agenda/scheme exposed.( maurice green, AIG, green taxes all over the world)
Needs only an american with courage and a judge who is not corrupted..
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 31429683
Germany
01/03/2013 04:01 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Another pair of actors in Sandy hoax exposed. 100% BUSTED!
Soto's family:
[link to nbclatino.com]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 25254305


I'm not convinced or anything but throwing it out there as a maybe?
The Greenberg, Soto family?
[link to picasaweb.google.com (secure)]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 25254305


yes yes yes ;)
we had it already ;)
But good picture..didnt see that till now..
Uncle also already exposed.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 25254305
United States
01/03/2013 04:03 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Another pair of actors in Sandy hoax exposed. 100% BUSTED!
Soto's family:
[link to nbclatino.com]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 25254305


I'm not convinced or anything but throwing it out there as a maybe?
The Greenberg, Soto family?
[link to picasaweb.google.com (secure)]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 25254305


yes yes yes ;)
we had it already ;)
But good picture..didnt see that till now..
Uncle also already exposed.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 31429683


A more recent picture (taken 2.5 years ago)
[link to picasaweb.google.com (secure)]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 10783814
United States
01/03/2013 04:08 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Another pair of actors in Sandy hoax exposed. 100% BUSTED!
Okay, I found a way around this. Just use the arrow in that last link on the right of the picture to move ahead one pic. There are the two daughters on the outside. These girls, older, are in the pic with "Mary" in the red dress.

Here is the woman impersonating school psychologist Mary Sherlach:

[link to picasaweb.google.com (secure)]

Now look at the alleged Mary Sherlach. Same EXACT expression.
And get a good look at her two daughters because I think I found them in the Greenberg album as well!

[link to haddon.patch.com]

Now look at the Greenberg photo. Tallest Sherlach daughter is on far left in the Stones shirt. Shorter daughter is on the far right. They are just younger, but I think it's them!

Remember, Mary Sherlach's maiden name is Greene.
[link to picasaweb.google.com (secure)]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 27493239

 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 27493239

 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 27493239

Here it is(right click: copy image adress):

[link to lh3.googleusercontent.com (secure)]


AND.... BANGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG another hit!

MARY SHERLACH FAKE VICTIM!

FAKE!!!
SANDY HOOOAX
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 31429683


I'm sorry, AC 27493239 is going to think I'm picking on her, but I just don't see the match here.

If you guys do, OK...I just don't.

No offense. I'm just calling em as I see em.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 27493239
United States
01/03/2013 04:08 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Another pair of actors in Sandy hoax exposed. 100% BUSTED!
To the person with the very long first post above: This is an ORGANIC discussion. It has evolved from real minds working on real POSSIBILITIES. You said that you had a hard time following it. Well, I haven't had a hard time with it. It takes attention to detail. It's not in publishable form yet. How do you think a book is written? Do you think it just hops onto the page fully complete? This is a process.

And many of us seem to be able to weed out the spot on matches from the maybe ones. This goes way beyond a hairstyle comparison, that you tried to minimize our work with. You criticized the fact that people on this thread are looking for people in the Greenberg albums beyond Nick and Laura Phelps.

Did you ever think that the REASON we are looking at the prominent people in this event and searching for them in the Greenberg albums... is because we keep finding them there!? When not just there is reason to search for more faces. If you do not see that several matches have been made in are largely agreed upon, then there's nothing anyone can do to change your perception.

Here is your advice to us, after saying nothing for 27 pages:

"Get back to the start of this and work on the real comparisons that have been found and pick those apart FIRST instead of adding more questionable people on the pile with the same faulty methods. A quick side by side doesn't help. Use the side by side, use words/font underneath each photo and note WHERE that photo came from, via what news station/story, then the comparison photos."

Well, there ya go. That is a job that does INDEED need to be done. Will you get right on it?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 27493239
United States
01/03/2013 04:16 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Another pair of actors in Sandy hoax exposed. 100% BUSTED!
Typo... I meant to say:

Did you ever think that the REASON we are looking at the prominent people in this event and searching for them in the Greenberg albums... is because we keep finding them there!?

When we are not just finding witnesses in the albums, but people who are supposedly DEAD.... there is urgent reason to search for more faces. If you do not see that several matches have been made that are largely AGREED UPON, then there's nothing anyone can do to change your perception.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 31429683
Germany
01/03/2013 04:24 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Another pair of actors in Sandy hoax exposed. 100% BUSTED!
Okay, I found a way around this. Just use the arrow in that last link on the right of the picture to move ahead one pic. There are the two daughters on the outside. These girls, older, are in the pic with "Mary" in the red dress.

...

 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 27493239

 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 27493239

Here it is(right click: copy image adress):

[link to lh3.googleusercontent.com (secure)]


AND.... BANGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG another hit!

MARY SHERLACH FAKE VICTIM!

FAKE!!!
SANDY HOOOAX
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 31429683


I'm sorry, AC 27493239 is going to think I'm picking on her, but I just don't see the match here.

If you guys do, OK...I just don't.

No offense. I'm just calling em as I see em.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 10783814


The kid on the far right is the kid on the far right in the other pic.
---
same husband years older:
[link to fbcdn-sphotos-e-a.akamaihd.net]

Obviously they use different make up and no beard or colored hair. Its not as easy as the Soto family but the odds are very high to have so many similar looking people ;)

But then again some people dont have the vision to see that(no offense, you might hear better ;) ).
Luckily for us its not just one match but many from the same family in the same event,with different names, which makes it easy for everyone to see/know.

Apart from all the other inconsistencys sourounding these "victims".
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 31409037
United Kingdom
01/03/2013 04:26 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Another pair of actors in Sandy hoax exposed. 100% BUSTED!
hiding
insomnimom

User ID: 20373817
United States
01/03/2013 04:34 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Another pair of actors in Sandy hoax exposed. 100% BUSTED!
Soto's family:
[link to nbclatino.com]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 25254305


I'm not convinced or anything but throwing it out there as a maybe?
The Greenberg, Soto family?
[link to picasaweb.google.com (secure)]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 25254305


yes yes yes ;)
we had it already ;)
But good picture..didnt see that till now..
Uncle also already exposed.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 31429683


A more recent picture (taken 2.5 years ago)
[link to picasaweb.google.com (secure)]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 25254305


I posted a few pages ago that I think Victoria Soto looks so much like the girl on the far left, Samantha Sexton. Someone commented that she is too young to be Victoria. But, I would bet that a family this wealthy and capable of fooling the majority of the world could manipulate photographs. Where are the pictures of the adult Sandy Hook victims as children? There are no videos of the victims either. Usually the media likes to bombard us with these things to appeal to our emotions.
"The government is like a baby's alimentary canal, with a happy appetite at one end, and no responsibility at the other." ~Ronald Reagan
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 17058124
United States
01/03/2013 04:46 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Another pair of actors in Sandy hoax exposed. 100% BUSTED!
OMG! They have to be actors, look at the pictures! They both have TWO eyes, and ONE nose and ONE Mouth, and OMG they both have TWO ears. They have to be the same person, OMG!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 27493239
United States
01/03/2013 04:47 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Another pair of actors in Sandy hoax exposed. 100% BUSTED!
Is it possible to delete your own post if you mess up on it (a link doesn't work etc.)? And how does one pin and bump? I still don't know what this means!

Anyone, please help!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 10783814
United States
01/03/2013 04:50 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Another pair of actors in Sandy hoax exposed. 100% BUSTED!
Is it possible to delete your own post if you mess up on it (a link doesn't work etc.)? And how does one pin and bump? I still don't know what this means!

Anyone, please help!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 27493239


i think only paid members can edit their posts.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 27493239
United States
01/03/2013 05:01 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Another pair of actors in Sandy hoax exposed. 100% BUSTED!
Here is Mary Sherlach with her two sisters. Look at the caption under the picture! I find that quite strange. What would "the family" be worried about people doing with the picture?

[link to www.thedenverchannel.com]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 7133050
United Kingdom
01/03/2013 05:04 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Another pair of actors in Sandy hoax exposed. 100% BUSTED!
Jillian Soto tweeted that "CNN rocked" after her sister's death. She also tweets about her boyfriend and the like, while she is supposedly mourning:

[link to www.youtube.com]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 27493239


That video, which has generated over a dozen comments, only records 62 views.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 31429683
Germany
01/03/2013 05:07 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Another pair of actors in Sandy hoax exposed. 100% BUSTED!
...


I'm not convinced or anything but throwing it out there as a maybe?
The Greenberg, Soto family?
[link to picasaweb.google.com (secure)]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 25254305


yes yes yes ;)
we had it already ;)
But good picture..didnt see that till now..
Uncle also already exposed.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 31429683


A more recent picture (taken 2.5 years ago)
[link to picasaweb.google.com (secure)]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 25254305


I posted a few pages ago that I think Victoria Soto looks so much like the girl on the far left, Samantha Sexton. Someone commented that she is too young to be Victoria. But, I would bet that a family this wealthy and capable of fooling the majority of the world could manipulate photographs. Where are the pictures of the adult Sandy Hook victims as children? There are no videos of the victims either. Usually the media likes to bombard us with these things to appeal to our emotions.
 Quoting: insomnimom


Yeah but usually they make their life much easier. But then again vicky soto has always the same face like it is pasted.
could be.. but hard to prove..


The tree kids are playing the soto family kids. The brother is a 100% match.
[link to i612.photobucket.com]
[link to i612.photobucket.com]

This makes clear vicky soto is fake as is her B.S hero story.
[link to i612.photobucket.com]

But yeah probably Samantha sexton is carlee soto
[link to i612.photobucket.com]
[link to i612.photobucket.com]
and she is also Christina Taylor Green from the Tuscon shooting:
[link to media.npr.org]
Same teeth again.

Probably thinks she is a very good actor. They are that careless cause they are as much arrogant.
____________

I think Victoria Soto is here on the right side:
[link to wellaware1.com]

But yeah not sure.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 31429683
Germany
01/03/2013 05:09 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Another pair of actors in Sandy hoax exposed. 100% BUSTED!
Jillian Soto tweeted that "CNN rocked" after her sister's death. She also tweets about her boyfriend and the like, while she is supposedly mourning:

[link to www.youtube.com]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 27493239


That video, which has generated over a dozen comments, only records 62 views.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 7133050


They are arrogant over the top rich cunts raised to be actors by arrogant dumb rich criminals.
I feel a bit sorry for them but then they have a choice at that age...

Just look at above post..they are clearly busted for Tuscon shooting and sandy hook shooting which are probably both totally fake.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 27493239
United States
01/03/2013 05:19 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Another pair of actors in Sandy hoax exposed. 100% BUSTED!
Here's old Nick Phelps. I think he lost that black hair a few years back:

[link to picasaweb.google.com (secure)]
insomnimom

User ID: 20373817
United States
01/03/2013 05:32 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Another pair of actors in Sandy hoax exposed. 100% BUSTED!
Here is Mary Sherlach with her two sisters. Look at the caption under the picture! I find that quite strange. What would "the family" be worried about people doing with the picture?

[link to www.thedenverchannel.com]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 27493239


The thing I thought was the most odd about Mary Sherlach is her loving husband's facebook which says he is in a relationship with Denise Labunski. I guess there could be a reasonable explanation for that, but they are made out to be this amazing couple that has been married for 30+ years. It's all just weird.

[link to www.facebook.com (secure)]
"The government is like a baby's alimentary canal, with a happy appetite at one end, and no responsibility at the other." ~Ronald Reagan
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 27493239
United States
01/03/2013 05:44 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Another pair of actors in Sandy hoax exposed. 100% BUSTED!
I should have said - Here's old Nick Phelps, aka Jennifer Greenberg's husband Richard Sexton - in the Greenberg album. I think he lost that black hair a few years back:

[link to picasaweb.google.com (secure)]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 27493239

News