Another pair of actors in Sandy hoax exposed. 100% BUSTED!

Well,...Damn.





Z

Exactly, popularity. Meaning that enough people have been to Jennifer Greenberg's picture before tonight that she is the SECOND result in google.

Or did a million people just happen to find that picture tonight within the last hour or so?

Very well done :)

But what do you say to this hypothesis?

1) Robbie Parker is a devout Mormon who believes that CIA agents are "freedom fighters."

2) CIA agents come to Robbie Parker. They tell him, in grave tones, of Terrible Things about to happen in this country. They tell him that the government is saying nothing publicly because it can only save a few, and the public would only panic.

3) Robbie Parker begs the agents to save his daughter from the Terrible Things to come.

4) The agents reply that they are visiting him for exactly that reason: to save his daughter and her classmates. The agents explain that--again to avoid panicking the public big-time--the children will be whisked away during a danger drill that will be announced to the public as real.

5) The agents warn Robbie Parker that the security of the entire operation--and the safety of the children--depends on maintaining the fiction publicly. Robbie Parker gladly agrees to say or do whatever he has to in order to keep his daughter safe.

Are you denying that Robbie Parker would do what he could to save his daughter? Or are you claiming that Robbie Parker would doubt the good intentions of CIA agents?

Don't assume anything, just look at the evidence and follow it wherever it may lead.

Rationales and back-stories and motivations will almost DEFINITELY appear strange or even irrational to a person who is not privy to all the information. We don't have all the information, so it is best to simply look at the evidence.

No need to draw any conclusions until one is certain.

Wow, how weird is that? That is some rabbit hole stuff right there.

Born in Denver, Co...

She sure looks a lot like the principal too.

Yeah, considering the photos are all at least 8-12 years old!!!!

Men in New England do NOT tie their scarves like that! I grew up here. He must be from California.

If even one person in the MSM official story is found to be an actor...Then the whole story becomes fake and a false flag!

Here you have 2 actors...both greenburgs.

Then you have all the rest, and a bunch of them have already been outed as well. Like the smiling father of Emily who is Tony Hawk wearing a Veneer mouth piece that brings his upper lip out and looked DAMN uncomfortable as well. See how he had a very hard time pronouncing his words..... Words like Teeth become Teeff. Also he was reading a cue card.

Then you have the sheriff who Dallas outed. Big dumb idiot in my opinion. Who also wants to take away free speech.
Then you have the coroner who Dallas outed. Another big dumb idiot in my opinion. Who dropped the ball on the guns used.

(you can go to his site and decide for yourselves)

So why are you gonna believe anything that the MSM is telling you? Clear evidence of a false flag.

Therefor, No kids died, and probably no adults either.

you lost me at tony hawk lol

That just isn't reasonable. If there is in fact a group that is staging massive events then it is HIGHLY unlikely that they will use actors who are already very recognizable celebrities, such as Tony Hawk. That is obviously too much of a risk.

You may be asking...How could they pull this off?

EASY! This was a closed movie set. Everyone there is an actor and the public only sees what they want you to see.

You don't get to see the guns/bullets/bullet casings/clothing worn.

You don't get to see the killer. Other that 2 Photoshopped pictures and one looks like it was taken in 1935 before color was invented.

You don't get to see a huge group of parents crying. You only get to see one, or a couple at a time. Everyone else is set up...Like on a movie!

All the footage other than interviews (which are staged) are grainy, or from far distances in a helicopter. Nothing substantial.

Every cop/swat/ems/fbi agent is an actor. They all have handlers...Look behind every interview. You see the handlers every time with the stupid handheld microphones. That's garbage. Those guys would NEVER be standing behind for a major interview. This is shown to give it a look like they have let independent media into the area. I assure you that they are not.

Did you see any blood....anywhere on anyone? Nope. Not once. That's because no EMS worker had to put their hands on any bleeding child. No trying to revive kids that are not there.

Time will show you more things come to light. But this has just been a very poorly made movie with horrible writers.

funny. but well yahoo is the forefront of fast news that push agendas. the most gullible sheeple comment there and they are out in drones if you say anything against the yahoo content.

many look alikes out there and the guy from wellaware1.com does have many look alikes. it gets interesting when two "look a likes" have the same wife or kids.

Important for our stuff is the context and content at hand.
In which context do we see the people? can it be a coincidence?

Ask yourselves how a Skinny lowlife nerd could develop the EGO or confidence to do this. He must have been soiling himself at every step.

Then he supposedly had 3 guns on him. with ammo to go with it. I imagine he had all his ammo in ready to go clips as well. There is no way he was reloading clips as he went. That would take up way to much time. Time he didn't have with Tarded principles running towards gunfire rather than ducking and running for cover.

Lots of clips plus weight of ammo and guns. Hmm lets see. 3-11 bullets in each person there @ 26-28 people. (26-28 cause the numbers change all the time.) lets just go with 26

26 x 3 = 78 bullets
26 x 11 = 286 bullets
So minimum 286 bullets as there is no way he landed every single bullet into a person.

Supposedly none with the 9mm handguns as per the coroner.
286 bullets / 16 bullets per clip = 17-18 clips
(just approximate as I don't know for sure.

So he's got 18 clips that he is changing out this whole time and carting around 3 guns (2 that he doesn't use)

That's a lot of clips and weight to carry for a skinny lowlife loner.

Good catch, Bill!

That was dated Dec. 14, the DAY OF the shooting!

Not to me.

[link to outfront.blogs.cnn.com]

The principal was older looking and the facial shape was different.

Check out the woman interviewed at link above. The whole thing feels fake.... All she talks about is herself!!!

Im not sure with tony hawk. but yeah it all looks staged.
basicly a drill mixed in with some real people
the problem is they have not many takes to shoot their stuff and the actors are not the very best ones. thus they slip up.

No.blood at all is really remarkable. I mean it was a friggin massacre with hundreds of shots. no medics with blood. no reports from anyone about blood.

I think their base was in the often mentioned firehouse.



--- the examiner is obviously the cookiest actor of them all and I get he feeling he is.pressed into his role.and makes some stabs at the handlers. whenever he does.that he chuckles and acts all.weired.. for sure not like a guy who saw he most horrific wounds in his life a night ago.
just check this post for some detailed remarks:
Thread: Fake examiner (Page 2)

Also, I used to think Dallas was not right on most of his stuff! Then I started looking into his work. I use Photoshop as well. I started reading about Ear biometrics and that really opened my eyes. Before you question him, maybe look into what he is doing rather than just throw him under the bus because you can not be bothered to research.

Ear biometrics is not the only thing that he does. He looks for voice matches, lens distortions, writing analysis, even body movements as well as face recognition. He also releases his research and asks others if they too can see it! On the occasion that he is wrong, he admits it. I've been following his work for over a year.

The one thing that most do not know about him is that he has a treasure trove of video and pictures that he doesn't release to the public. It's his backup info. So for every pic you see, he probably has 1-200 backup pics analyzed on any person that he outs.

Why do you think he has not been sued yet? It's because he could destroy these people in a court of law if they did. I'm sure that he would love to do that too. I've seen him online tell people to do it. They never fallow through because they know they have been caught dead to rights.

So whenever he releases this info, you better not be caught sleeping. Dallas is one of the reasons that they want to shut down the internet and free speech. You can add many many others to that list. Dutchsense is another one.(wether manipulation) Danny Wilten is another one!(past history)

You don't have to believe everything that any of these guys say. But closing your mind to them just because you don't believe one thing is tarded. Everyone has something to offer if you listen.

No kiddin'.

VERY interesting.

Yah, even if it's not tony hawk, the guy was acting. Badly at that. His mouth looks deformed. Tony Hawk has also gained some weight lately as well in his skateboarding life.

I agree. It seems like everyone who was interviewed was laughing or smiling. All of them involved said weird stuff. And posing for pictures with Obama smiling away??? WTF The kids where smiling from ear to ear....they just lost their sister supposedly!

I appreciate his work because he's opened the door for many people to the idea of staged social events, which has been very helpful.

However, his speculations are pretty wild if you ask me. As I said before, it seems HIGHLY unlikely that a group staging events would use a universally recognizable celebrity - this is something that Dallas often suggests and it seems that this would be a VERY stupid move on their part.

Why use someone that everyone might possibly recognize when you can use an anonymous person that no one knows?

You can save the pro-Dallas rhetoric.

I have a medical background and have researched several Doppleganger cases and know about pinna (ear) biometrics. I also study craniofacial morphology and compare hand sizes (finger length, etc.), foot sizes, stride, dentition, voice, etc.

He makes glaring mistakes, not only in his "recognition" but also in his FACTS. Unlike you, I have never seen him issue a correction/retraction on anything. I did gently correct him on something in the comments section of his website, which he censored so it never was published.

The symbolism on his website suggests that he is a Freemason. I have outed him before on this site and others.

I will never, ever completely trust him. Like all disinfo agents, there are a few nuggets of truth in his bullshit (my trademark phrase that others here have copied and pasted).

He sucks. Once in a great while, he gets it right.

Facebook suspending accounts that question mainstream media story of the shooting..

[link to www.secretsofthefed.com]

You should ask Dallas that! I'm sure he'll tell you that they think they are untouchable. They have anyone who is in power working with them. That's why Obama flew out there.

These people work in sects. Little groups here there and everywhere. For big stuff like this they call the rest in for the foray. Looks like a bunch of them got a x-mas bonus. That's why there are all smiling away. X-mas bonus/attack on gun rights/attack on free speech/attack on people souls right before a happy time of year.

I really wonder how many of these supposed moms and dads commit suicide over the holidays because they are so distraught over losing their kids. (suicide is highest over x-mas, and it gets rid of their characters real quick like)

Just watch the news for that stuff any day now.

Jennifer Greenburg is Mrs. Phelps = YES.

ME is Iceman = NO.

Robbie Parker is Tony Hawk = NO.

mines still going strong and that's all I've posted for 2 days now!

Maybe I haven't hit it hard enough yet???

Even though I have 35 unanswered questions on it about this Psy-op. And links to every vid I could find.

What has he gotten wrong?

and I never said he was 100% right all the time. I only want people to have an open mind before dismissing him completely.

He has issued the corrections on his Facebook page. Really good reads from there. Way better than his You Tube channel will ever be!

yeah never saw im retract anything. he also doesnt respond Top any critique .

I dont understand how this thread isnt pined yet.

it.is as if glp is flooded with nonsense stuff to bury the valuable info