Another pair of actors in Sandy hoax exposed. 100% BUSTED! | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 31668127 South Korea 01/07/2013 12:56 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
stjedi User ID: 31231376 United States 01/07/2013 01:12 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 25326483 United States 01/07/2013 01:59 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | We are certainly dealing with extremely sophisticate psy ops here. Quoting: Curly Howard Just when you think you have a match, up crops another person with the same name and identity that looks nothing like the person you just matched him/her with. The boy in the Leon Greenberg Facebook pics looks exactly like the soto brother...uh, no wait - here is another pic of that kid a few years older and he doesn't look like that at all. Oh, OK, but surely the obvious actors playing Nick and Laura Phelps are really Jennifer and Richard Sexton. Uhmm, maybe not, look at some of these other pics and it does not look exactly like them either. well, at least that horror movie chick, Debbie Rochon, looks exactly like the mother of Ella Seaver in that ABC interview, surely that is a match right?!? Uhh, no, Debbie Rochon has completely different facial features from the woman in the ABC interview... what I an alluding to here is the fact that there seems to be not only one woman actress going by the name Debbie Rochon, but two, both of whom look completely different from one another. Debbie Rochon # 1 - IMAGE ( [link to i612.photobucket.com] ) Debbie Rochon # 2 who coincidently looks uncannily like Mrs. Seaver from the ABC interview - IMAGE ( [link to i612.photobucket.com] ) Will the real Debbie Rochon please stand up. I think we are dealing with a massive mind screw here. They have two or more people with same name and indentity, some who look similar but not exactly alike, some who look nothing alike, and some images of them that have been tampered with to create even more confusion. We are dealing with something carefully planned and executed by very high level IQ managers within the intelligence apperatus. There are so many factors that can affect a person's appearance--age, weight, illness, sleep deprivation, mood, makeup, suntanning, lighting, camera angle--it's actually totally normal for person to look different in various photos, even photos taken a few days apart. At least I know this is certainly true of my own photos. I think the more likely problem is simply that people are proclaiming matches without doing enough research. Noticing similar features between two people in a couple of photographs is not proof of anything; it's a starting point. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1461405 United States 01/07/2013 07:02 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 27493239 United States 01/07/2013 08:29 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | To the person questioning the Debbie Rochon match - where did you get that video still? When I search for images of Debbie Rochon, I see close to 100 matches that look just like the Seaver mother. Why do pick out the one picture where she looks a little different of these 100 matches that are definitely the same person? And what is the video still from? I think this is an undeniable match. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 27493239 United States 01/07/2013 09:18 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 31269315 Australia 01/07/2013 09:23 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 27493239 United States 01/07/2013 09:49 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This looks like an informative video. Pity they got Mr Mackey from South Park to narrate it. Mkay. So, someone's accent has any bearing on their credibility as a truth seeker - and an excellent researcher? No wonder we are so divided as humans. |
Geronimo User ID: 19037703 United States 01/07/2013 09:50 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ------>Superintendent Janet Robinson seems to be another Greenberg.<------ She was the first in (New)town 2008(with a nice salary of course) to bring the hoaxers into position. How convient that the sandy school kids are now transfered out of her district.. Work done... [link to img15.imageshack.us] ...2008 is the year they all started positioning. In 2008 Tony and Anne bought their house in Westport. Have you noticed a lack of Tony and Anne in these investigations? I have. Where could they be lurking? They are the best actors of the bunch. ...and just one general observation about the photos made available to the press. These are by far some of the poorest quality class and family photos I have ever seen. This is a very affluent community where people would be likely to spend money on photo family sessions with their kids. It down's add up. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 27493239 United States 01/07/2013 09:51 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This looks like an informative video. Pity they got Mr Mackey from South Park to narrate it. Mkay. I see this is your first post here. Someone finds out that United Way set up their Sandy Hook memorial money grabbing page on DECEMBER 11, and you try to dismiss it by making fun of the man's voice? Shill much? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 27493239 United States 01/07/2013 09:55 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ------>Superintendent Janet Robinson seems to be another Greenberg.<------ Quoting: Anonymous Coward 31630023 She was the first in (New)town 2008(with a nice salary of course) to bring the hoaxers into position. How convient that the sandy school kids are now transfered out of her district.. Work done... [link to img15.imageshack.us] ...2008 is the year they all started positioning. In 2008 Tony and Anne bought their house in Westport. Have you noticed a lack of Tony and Anne in these investigations? I have. Where could they be lurking? They are the best actors of the bunch. ...and just one general observation about the photos made available to the press. These are by far some of the poorest quality class and family photos I have ever seen. This is a very affluent community where people would be likely to spend money on photo family sessions with their kids. It down's add up. Welcome to the thread. No one here agrees that this is the same woman. The OP posted it once and we disagreed. Good observation about the class photos being poor quality/photoshopped. We already covered that . |
Geronimo User ID: 19037703 United States 01/07/2013 09:57 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 27493239 United States 01/07/2013 10:00 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 27493239 United States 01/07/2013 10:02 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I mean the sister who is the middle one in age, not the middle baby in the above photo. The one on the far left and far right are the same girl. And look at the size of Emilie's head in this pic! Much smaller than it should be compared to the younger girls. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 8879837 United States 01/07/2013 10:12 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Discussion going on on the Facebook page of Emilie Parker Fund [link to www.facebook.com (secure)] I thought it was interesting when someone brought up the issue of Emilie being alive and posing with Obama 2 days afterward wearing big smiles, etc.. the response from the FB page owner states that the pictures we have seen were photoshopped? What...? So, that's what we are going with here? Here was the exchange: Otto Wells NEW TOWN conneticut is the second CHURCH OF SATAN OUTPOST! Conneticut is jammed packed full of Baal&molech worshippers. AND EMILE IS ALIVE! SHE'S POSEING WITH OBAMA 2 DAYS AFTERWARDS. WEARING BIG SMILES!!! U SICK TURDS. Friday at 9:23pm · Edited · Like · 5 Emilie parker fund i am emilie's cousin, i was there at her wake! and Paul Allen Skudra we are not asking for money!!! we want you guys to send warrminfg letters or what ever you want to them! and Otto Wells SHE IS NOT ALIVE! HAVE YOU EVER HEARD OF PHOTO SHOP!!?? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 8879837 United States 01/07/2013 10:41 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 27493239 United States 01/07/2013 10:42 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | That Emilie Parker page is another rip-off site someone made to collect money. Here's the real one. Scroll down and see that a whole school dressed in green to honor the Sandy hook school. School color was GREEN - Greenbergs even had their fingers in that. Hence, the green ribbons on all the trees outside the school. [link to www.facebook.com] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 31680350 United States 01/07/2013 10:48 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | That Emilie Parker page is another rip-off site someone made to collect money. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 27493239 Here's the real one. Scroll down and see that a whole school dressed in green to honor the Sandy hook school. School color was GREEN - Greenbergs even had their fingers in that. Hence, the green ribbons on all the trees outside the school. [link to www.facebook.com] Um, how could they still set it up on the 11th? Even if it is fake? |
Reckless Driver User ID: 24817147 United States 01/07/2013 11:01 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Quoting: Geronimo 19037703 What is the kicker and seals this as a fake form me is why would any family have their 3rd child pose behind and to the side like that?!? Lets cuddle these too and have the "Meg" of the family positioned here! Look at any family of 3 that pose for professional pics. you'll not see anything like this. Aren't there some image guys/gals on here that can start dissecting this pic apart? It looks like it should be able to do with the right software. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 8879837 United States 01/07/2013 11:34 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Quoting: Geronimo 19037703 What is the kicker and seals this as a fake form me is why would any family have their 3rd child pose behind and to the side like that?!? Lets cuddle these too and have the "Meg" of the family positioned here! Look at any family of 3 that pose for professional pics. you'll not see anything like this. Aren't there some image guys/gals on here that can start dissecting this pic apart? It looks like it should be able to do with the right software. There is a pretty good video discussion this particular picture. It is here: [link to www.youtube.com] The part that got me was the part about the hair / hairline. When he showed the comparisons between the mom's hair and the other two sisters hair with the lighting, etc... It definitely looked different than Emilie's hair / hairline. Emilie's looks photoshopped. I'm no expert, but this video made me really think... |
Geronimo User ID: 19037703 United States 01/07/2013 11:36 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Hi all, Quoting: capth Been lurking on this thread since joining GLP just after the shooting as I don't believe the official story. This is my first post, and its with regards to the photo of Vicki Soto's class. I'm no expert on photography but can someone tell help me with a few bits that I found quite strange? The chair shadow behind Avielle Richman surely doesn't match the chair, so whats causing the thin, vertical shadow? The girl bang in the middle of the photo with the boy in the navy and green rugby top behind her, there's no way his left arm can go behind her at that angle and then his hand appear on the side of the chair below her left shoulder, is there? Then that same girl, to the left of her is a small but black shadow between her and the boy on the left in the blue and white striped shirt. Is that from his shirt and how is the shadow so dark just for that little bit? Like I said, I'm no expert on photography or lighting or anything, I just wondered if someone could help my curiousity. Thanks. PS. That Vicki Soto photo of her on the rock, did anyone else notice what appears to be a fingerprint in the middle of the picture on her right arm? Wow, those are some really good observations regarding the class photo. And look how they made Ms. Soto's dress cut off the side of the girl's arm next to her: [link to www.nypost.com] And why is this other class picture (the class that all "died") so fuzzy??? [link to www.lebanontimes.com] No photographer worth his salt would get away with charging the school for a class picture this blurry! This is not the 1950's. This is not how class pictures look these days! And this was a very WEALTHY school. That's the best class photo they could afford? And why doesn't Soto's class look blurry this? They would have had the same photography company. Only the other teacher seems to be all out of focus in Soto's picture. Both class photos are total fakes. Here is a visual to help clarify one the problems with Vicki's class photo [link to www.facebook.com (secure)] |
Reckless Driver User ID: 24817147 United States 01/07/2013 12:31 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Quoting: Geronimo 19037703 What is the kicker and seals this as a fake form me is why would any family have their 3rd child pose behind and to the side like that?!? Lets cuddle these too and have the "Meg" of the family positioned here! Look at any family of 3 that pose for professional pics. you'll not see anything like this. Aren't there some image guys/gals on here that can start dissecting this pic apart? It looks like it should be able to do with the right software. There is a pretty good video discussion this particular picture. It is here: [link to www.youtube.com] The part that got me was the part about the hair / hairline. When he showed the comparisons between the mom's hair and the other two sisters hair with the lighting, etc... It definitely looked different than Emilie's hair / hairline. Emilie's looks photoshopped. I'm no expert, but this video made me really think... Good video, thanks for bringing it to my attention. The Hair thing is something that I didn't notice until he pointed it out. Everyone else has fly-a-ways in their hair but her! |
stjedi User ID: 31231376 United States 01/07/2013 01:07 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Geronimo User ID: 19037703 United States 01/07/2013 01:18 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Want proof? I got your proof right here! Quoting: stjedi Note the following FAKE photo composite. [link to i1079.photobucket.com] source: [link to www.mirror.co.uk] It shows the father, brother and 2 sisters of Vicki Soto coming out of the church of her supposed funeral. Note the following problems with this photo. 1) The father and brother should be much lower, as they are at least 1 or 2 steps further down than the girls above them. 2) The girls have been pasted in. The Dad and brother have as well. 3) The trooper behind the girls is the size of Andre the Giant or bigger. He is hulk-size. 4) Finally, watch this video and you'll see the ACTUAL footage of the sister in yellow as she exits the Church at about :23 seconds. Trooper, other sister and dad/brother nowhere to be seen. As you can see, the steps begin going down immediately which means Dad and Bro in the photo would have to be much lower being 1 or 2 steps ahead (if the photo was real). Have a look as she comes out of the church (pauses for her closeup, knowing full well they'll need a shot for the fake photo) and then almost even looks right at the camera. This video proves that the photo above is FRAUDULENT. GAME OVER StJedi....your powers of observation are simply incredible. I admire your work |
Geronimo User ID: 19037703 United States 01/07/2013 02:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
stjedi User ID: 31231376 United States 01/07/2013 03:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to i24.photobucket.com] This photo screams of fakery. I took this screengrab from the video. If there is a hi-res or even low-res version of the photo somewhere, it would go a long way in pointing out inconsistencies. Cheers |
stjedi User ID: 31231376 United States 01/07/2013 03:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Thanks for the kind words, Geronimo. I can't take full credit though, have found stuff on other sites and in youtube videos. Some of the observations are my own, such as this one: Thread: 100% Proof that Actors were used in Aurora |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 27493239 United States 01/07/2013 05:55 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ALERT!!!!! I just tried to post a picture of the Sherlach couple from a news article and got this RED message! They are threatening us for sharing pictures: *guardian.co.uk content is banned from this website due to copyright infringement threats. YOU are liable for what you post on the internet and YOU could be PERSONALLY sued by guardian.co.uk for copyright infringement for posting their content. We recommend you find an alternative news source for your posts who appreciates the free exposure they receive from discussion of their articles on GLP. |
Geronimo User ID: 19037703 United States 01/07/2013 06:03 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | First, I think we are at a point where it must be assumed that all official press release from Sandy Hook may have been tampered with in some way. Second,I would like to say that a person should not be kicked off this thread for being creative. What if? [link to www.facebook.com (secure)] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 27493239 United States 01/07/2013 06:51 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | First, I think we are at a point where it must be assumed that all official press release from Sandy Hook may have been tampered with in some way. Second,I would like to say that a person should not be kicked off this thread for being creative. What if? Quoting: Geronimo 19037703 [link to www.facebook.com (secure)] You know, I think you could be right about the kids. Thanks for your leap of mind. I have been looking intently at all these kids for a week now and finding the same matches you have here (except Avielle). I just couldn't justify my ideas because at that point I saw that their ages didn't match up with the ages of the class. BUT, now that we are seeing that the class pictures are likely fabricated... well, now it DOES make sense that many of these kids are in those albums. They are just at different ages. They don't all have to appear the same age in the albums because they did as you said and used photos from their kids at age 6 and 7, even if they are older now. I am beyond disgusted right now. The only thing that is making me feel the slightest bit relieved is that it seems more likely that no children were murdered or abducted into a diabolical world. I have been very worried that some real Newtown children were harmed. But if those class pictures are fake, well, hopefully it's ALL fake. Now this would mean the whole town had to be in on this, would it not? Two fake classes? How could they pull this off? |