The Technocratic Hivemind, Noosphere, RMN, Synthetic Telepathy etc

great questions you ask, and I would argue based on my experiences that this tech does in fact exist. It's manifestation is quite spurious.

thanks for sharing. I have plenty of good material and I will save the better stuff for later.

"Introducing Cervello™ Elite: the next step in EEG monitoring
systems technology"

[link to blackrockneuromed.com]

Berkeley scientists crack brain wave code, hinting at mind reading device
Published on Wed, Feb 1, 2012 by Mihai Andrei
Post filled in: Mind & Brain, Research
In the not so distant future, scientists could be able to eavesdrop on a patient’s inner monologues or communicate with those who cannot speak, thanks to a breakthrough made by researchers from the University of California, Berkeley.
They have astonishingly managed to crack the ‘code’ of a brain wave by decoding electrical activity in a region of the human auditory system called the superior temporal gyrus (STG). Basically, by analyzing the STG activity they were able to reconstruct words that subjects listened in conversation by attaching electrodes to their bare brains.

During surgery, patients were played recordings of people speaking average conversations; even though they were ‘asleep’, their brains still processed the data, and as they did, the electrodes transferred the information to a computer which then calculated how the brains responded according to the speech frequencies they heard. It could therefore reproduce a sound close enough to the original word for the researchers to guess the word quite accurately. Of course, the first use they thought of was in a new type of prosthetic.
“This is huge for patients who have damage to their speech mechanisms because of a stroke or Lou Gehrig’s disease and can’t speak,” said Robert Knight, Professor of Psychology and Neuroscience at UC Berkeley. “If you could eventually reconstruct imagined conversations from brain activity, thousands of people could benefit. “
For example, people like Stephen Hawking could make themselves heard using this technology which processes their own thoughts. However, this research is focused only on people who hear actual sounds and interpret them.
“But to use this for a prosthetic device, these principles would have to apply to someone who is imagining speech,” cautioned Brian N. Pasley, leading author. “There is some evidence that perception and imagery may be pretty similar in the brain. If you can understand the relationship well enough between the brain recordings and sound, you could either synthesize the actual sound a person is thinking, or just write out the words with a type of interface device.”
However, the research was based only on 15 people and the technique is far from being viable, and there will be some serious obstacles to be crossed, not only for the researchers, but for subjects as well – it works only on patients who are undergoing neurosurgery and willing to have 256 electrodes attached to their exposed brains. Still, the benefits are huge, and just stop a moment and think about it: researchers are close to intercept people’s very thoughts – something which seemed sci-fi even 10 years ago, even for other scientists.
“I didn’t think it could possibly work, but Brian did it,” Knight said.


[link to www.zmescience.com]

"CORTICAL DYNAMICS OF AUDITORY-
VISUAL SPEECH: A FORWARD MODEL
OF MULTISENSORY INTEGRATION"


[link to ling.umd.edu]

"Dynamic causal modelling for EEG and MEG"
Stefan J. Kiebel Æ Marta I. Garrido Æ
Rosalyn J. Moran Æ Karl J. Friston

[link to www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov]

"Mind-reading program translates brain activity into words"

guardian.**.uk/science/2012/jan/31/mind-reading-program-brain​-words

"The Biosphere and Noosphere Reader Global Environment Society and Change"

there is a pdf online floating around somewhere

if you would like a copy e-mail me: mrphilosophias@gmail.com

"Psychophysics of the Noosphere:
Teilhard de Chardin
and the EMF Field Theory of Consciousness"

[link to www.shellijoye.com]

again I ask is this related to the Mark of the Beast, or is it what will proceed it?

who wants to talk about the bee?

I regret to inform those who were following this thread that I am now banned. I doubt I will receive a response as to why. Lord willing I will return at a time of my choosing to disclose every last bit of investigative research, writing, etc which I have in my possession. This will include neuromarketting (&tvstck), neurotrophic electrodes, infrared spectrometry, neural imaging, covert neural surveillance, and other topics. If there are those here who prefer this information does not go out far and wide then please humor me, I only seek answers to honest questions, with sincere intention and concern. I wish I didn't have to resort to such tactics, but if you have any other ideas how I can arrive at the answers which I seek, then e-mail me.

If you have any information related to the hive mind phenomenon, dream inception, remote neural imaging, or any other critical research you would like to pass on please do. I will give credit where it is due. If this technology is so benign, then why the secrecy? How come nobody really knows what it is that they are protecting?

signing out:
mrphilosophias@gmail.com

Wtf

:bummp:

bumping this

OP, how aboud a quick explination as to what exactly you think this is.

I havnt researched it much but I dont think a mark of the beast is needed. I think the nano tech in food will serve that purpose.

odd how few comments this topic gets. are people scared of it?

it seems TPTB are hijacking earths natural resonance. this can not be good in any way shape or form.

correction:

mark of the beast is NOT needed.

dont know how/why I skipped that word in my previous post. wierd.

Great thread, What do you believe aliens have to do with all of this?