Dead Principal Who Gave Statement -- Screen Capture

You are all missing the fact that the first report made was that, the Principal recognized him as the son of a teacher so she buzzed him in..

Then comes the Newtown Bee story that the principal said a "masked man".. was shooting.

The first part was later changed to .. "He shot a window out and forced his way in"

So obviously, if the lone gunman wore a mask, the previous statement could not have happened.. as the principal would not have recognized him.

The other hole, I find is that, if he planned on killing himself when going in there, then why wear a mask??

good find, everyday its just getting dumber and dumber ..the amount of things going on. seems like this whole last week has all been a setup

It's just like the bin Laden story, like when Hillary was watching the video with that look on her face.

The retraction doesn't really change anything. Someone who identified herself as the school principal, Dawn Hochsprung, gave a statement as a firsthand eyewitness to the local paper just after the shooting.

It would be nice to know if the paper called her or if she called them.

None of that is lost on me. This thread is just focused on one of many facts.

But, to add to what you are saying, the alleged gunman couldn't have given any pause to killing himself if he took care of all those murders and his own suicide in two minutes flat.

I must have missed that. I only read that the shooting started at 9:30 a.m. and ended at 9:32 a.m.

My point was that always in these psyop shootings, the government workers are made to look saintly.

It isn't saintly for someone working at the school to impersonate the principal, so there is no "need" to pursue that part of the "story".

Only things that move the story "FORWARD" will be published.

With the Sandy Hook Fire and Rescue Company right on the corner of the only entrance into the school, one would think those calls for help would have gone out a lot sooner and help would be there in about one minute.

[link to goo.gl]

I hear you.

That's why I said it would be nice to know. But, I know we will never know because the answer will not fit the narrative.

AND his own suicide without any time to spare for contemplation.

Ed C. would have a field day with that 'typo'...


Last Edited by sleepypoochy on 12/17/2012 04:29 PM

guys I remember the morning well. That story
was released prior to the 12-1pm, which is
when it was announced over 20 were dead.
People need to focus on the 3 hours taking place
between 930 and 1230. That is a long long time.
Dawn could have been killed anytime up to then,
she could have talked to the Bee at 10am then
was herself killed at 11am. Remember, the timeline
allows for others entering the premises and
"cleaning up", so to speak.

Wow... and Hochsprung means "tall jump" in German, or could also be translated as blow-up?...

Or Highjump.

While dailymail has never been the beacon of journalistic excellence, this is a new level of sloppiness. Even for a potentially make-belief rampage massacre that possibly never took place.

ANOTHER FAKE


It wasnt a fault or what. NO someone spoke as if she was the Principal!!!

This means. That someone faked himself to be the Principal.

[link to imageshack.us]

The FAKE Principal said it was a masked man entering!

Who was the fake Principal? The perosn who killed the real Principal? Or is the Newtown bee just covering their asses?

btw. here is the original thread:
Thread: (sandy hook) Newton bee inconsistency? Dead Principal told them..
great screen capture op!!!

--------------

Two other Fake actors already exposed.(please help me with the shills over there..they will be here soon lol)

Thread: Another pair of actors in Sandy hoax exposed. 100% BUSTED!

This is what I am inclined to believe. She gave a statement to the local news as to what had happened. The local news reported on the even and parents were told there would be staging areas to report to and not to call the school district at that time with questions.

Then she was killed but 'they' did not realize that she had already spoken with the local news.

I don't believe any grown woman would impersonate the principal to have some fun at a time like that. It's just more ridiculous than the truth.

It's simple people.

They were "disappeared". Why? I don't know. But I highly doubt it was a "sacrifice". Probably on their way underground (DIA), as we speak, to be part of the chosen (Knowing?).

AND, if the "cover up" is as sloppy as it appears, it's a message to anyone with a consciousness that it's time to GYST.

HERSELF.

The principal was a woman and anyone identifying herself as "Dawn Hochsprung" had to be a woman. I cannot see a grown woman simply having some fun like the paper is suggesting.

The case is already solved, though, so no need to investigate.

Yep. And the only thing left to do now is to repeal the Second Amendment and let the criminals start purchasing their weapons from the CIA like they do their drugs. The NWO has some fundraising to do.

I was listening to the breaking news on a local radio
station, I remember the time very well. The situation
was said to be under control. Only ONE PERSON was confirmed
dead and there was ONE DEAD perp and ONE CAPTURED perp.
That is what local news reported. LIVE. All of a sudden,
around 11 am they stopped covering the story live because
they said it was up to the authorities to confirm everything, then it wasn't until well after 12 noon
that they dropped the bomb of over 20 being dead.
This is in inexcusable amount of time. Since the story
broke around 9:45 or so. There is only one explanation.
Two separate events took place.

Yes. Clearly there was plenty of time to stage and get the real job done.

Two minutes of shooting does not explain all the events that took place.

why can't I open any external links on GLP, no matter what browser????

for the same reason

Don't forget they found the rifle in the trunk of a car with a dead perp in the school with 2 handguns. Report that most kids were shot point blank with a rifle.

So the perp shot them with the rifle, walked outside, put the gun in his car, went back in and shot himself.

Yeah that makes perfect sense!

What I don't like about the way the retraction is written is that it sounds like it is placing blame on the person who provided the information....

An early online report from the scene at the December 14 shootings at Sandy Hook Elementary School quoted a woman who identified herself to our reporter as the principal of the school. The woman was not the school's principal, Dawn Hochsprung, who was killed in the Friday morning attack.


OR THE VICE PRINCIPAL IDENTIFIED HERSELF AS THE PRINCIPAL BECAUSE THE PRINCIPAL WAS DEAD ... AND THE REPORTER DIDN'T GET THE NAME, ASSUMING HE/SHE COULD LOOK IT UP ...

It would have been best for the newspaper not to have written a cryptic retraction. The retraction written this way makes things worse.