Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 2,975 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,407,700
Pageviews Today: 2,134,447Threads Today: 705Posts Today: 13,711
05:38 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Is There A Argument For The Public Owning Assault Weapons?

 
No More Lies

User ID: 1707881
United States
12/17/2012 07:48 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Is There A Argument For The Public Owning Assault Weapons?
I am a gun owner, I hunt when I want. I really do not think an ak47 is a necessary for civilians.
 Quoting: GLP TARD


What he say is right ban them
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30182553


how you doing lady boy?
Thanks to whomever upgraded my account!
:nml:
smokahontas

User ID: 990753
United States
12/17/2012 07:52 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Is There A Argument For The Public Owning Assault Weapons?
The founding fathers meant for the "people" to bear arms to protect themselves from their government... They would agree today that if the Military were armed with Ar-15's so should the "people" be.
"I may not agree with what you say, but I would defend to the death your right to say it." Voltaire

"Facts do not cease to exist just because they are ignored." Aldous Huxley
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 30139965
Norway
12/17/2012 07:53 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Is There A Argument For The Public Owning Assault Weapons?
Death By Government!
smokahontas

User ID: 990753
United States
12/17/2012 07:55 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Is There A Argument For The Public Owning Assault Weapons?
More children die in backyard pools every year than by guns... Lets ban pools... It is a ridiculous argument.. intended to disarm this population. Wake UP!
"I may not agree with what you say, but I would defend to the death your right to say it." Voltaire

"Facts do not cease to exist just because they are ignored." Aldous Huxley
Squatch Hunter

User ID: 25765147
United States
12/17/2012 07:58 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Is There A Argument For The Public Owning Assault Weapons?
"No Free Man Should Ever be Barred the Use of Firearms. The Strongest Reason, For the People, To Maintain Their Right to Keep and Bear Arms, Is to Protect Themselves, As a Last Resort, Against Tyranny in Government". Thomas Jefferson.

Hunting has ZERO to do with the 2nd Amendment.

 Quoting: avanti.pensatore


Is it naive to believe we American's will never be attacked by foreign foot soldiers, or will need to defend ourselves and need assault weapons??


The Emperor of Japan considered a land invasion of the US instead of the attack on Pearl Harbor. Admiral Yamamotto turned to him and said "In America, there is a sniper behind every blade of grass". That was the end of that conversation.

During the Cold War, the Russians War Gamed various Scenarios. One of which included dropping two Airborne Divisions in the Southern Reaches of Canada to invade the US from the North. The plan was scrapped when they realized those two divisions would be wiped out within two weeks. Not from the US Army or Airforce. But by American gunowners.

Last Edited by Squatch Hunter on 12/17/2012 07:59 PM
2cents

User ID: 30059812
United States
12/17/2012 07:59 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Is There A Argument For The Public Owning Assault Weapons?
When all the governments of the world disarm...so will I
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 15680976
United States
12/17/2012 08:00 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Is There A Argument For The Public Owning Assault Weapons?
Yes, our second amendment says the right to bear arms should NOT be infringed.

It doesn't say there are limitations to it.


Assault Weapons are already illegal anyway, morans.
 Quoting: OutdoorsMan


I love when people say this.

Infringe: Act so as to limit or undermine (something); encroach on.

Same fucking thing genius.
Captaininyourface
User ID: 30181719
United States
12/17/2012 08:01 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Is There A Argument For The Public Owning Assault Weapons?
"Firearms stand next in importance to the constitution itself. They are the American people's liberty teeth and keystone under independence … from the hour the Pilgrims landed to the present day, events, occurences and tendencies prove that to ensure peace security and happiness, the rifle and pistol are equally indispensable … the very atmosphere of firearms anywhere restrains evil interference — they deserve a place of honor with all that's good."
George Washington
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 20240182


Seems like most people are FOR gun restrictions.
"GUN CONTROL, GUN CONTROL, GUN CONTROL!"
 Quoting: avanti.pensatore


Maybe in your social group because their all probably just as retarded as you. You people crack me up you only attack the things you dont like. Why arent you pushing for a ban on automobiles, liquor, abortions, and cigarettes which kill way more people, ill tell you why because it doesnt fit into your agenda. Dipshit!
Spittin'Cesium

User ID: 14589973
United Kingdom
12/17/2012 08:02 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Is There A Argument For The Public Owning Assault Weapons?
See how well you do with a single shot rifle against a criminal with an assault weapon, who still has them, illegally of course
wink

The war on drugs worked so well, and don't we feel oh sooooo much safer because of it??? Let's spend billions of $$$ on guns too !!!!
 Quoting: TS66


Fuckin' aye 66!

rockon
The thing that hath been,
is That which shall be;
and that which is done is that which shall be done:and there is no new thing under the Sun.
Ecclesiastes 9:1
Spittin'Cesium

User ID: 14589973
United Kingdom
12/17/2012 08:03 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Is There A Argument For The Public Owning Assault Weapons?
When all the governments of the world disarm...so will I
 Quoting: 2cents


I'd go with that.
The thing that hath been,
is That which shall be;
and that which is done is that which shall be done:and there is no new thing under the Sun.
Ecclesiastes 9:1
Responsible owner
User ID: 28176415
United States
12/17/2012 08:05 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Is There A Argument For The Public Owning Assault Weapons?
I received an Ar-15 for graduation in 1984. I have harvested deer and hogs with it regularly. Mainly, I have used it as something to do on a Saturday to shoot targets.

I'm almost 50 years old, poor eyesight and arthritis and can still hit a pie pan at 100 yards with crappy old iron sights.

What this means to me is I can still harvest food, beat my nephews and nieces in shooting contests and have something to teach them about ecology, marksmanship and responsibility.

Eff Mitt Romney and all the asshole Dems. There are legitimate uses for these weapons in building character and relationships in addition to fun and feeding your family.sheep
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 4655644
United States
12/17/2012 08:10 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Is There A Argument For The Public Owning Assault Weapons?
You know what, this is a good question really. And take it one step further, do Americans need guns at all, of course not! And while we are asking, do they need good paying jobs or schools, do they need cars, clothes or houses, no of course not. They can live like the good people of India, or Shre Lanka, or Bangladesh, or Iraq, or Africa in mud huts, or plastic bags and pallets, and by the hundreds of million, no less!

Go ahead America, let your benevolent, all seeing, all knowing central government finish the job it started when it shipped all of the jobs to these destitute countries decades ago, let them enslave you, and then They, the government can show your children the love and care that they have in mind:



Yes, the little ones will be WELL cared for once we are all out of the way!
13th-Century

User ID: 28715327
Canada
12/17/2012 08:11 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Is There A Argument For The Public Owning Assault Weapons?
Teacher Prepper
Captaininyourface
User ID: 30181719
United States
12/17/2012 08:13 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Is There A Argument For The Public Owning Assault Weapons?
The media and government officials have been talking about banning assault weapons. I thought they were banned. But whether I am right or wrong a lot of the general public appear to own these weapons.

Is there a argument for allowing the general public to own assault weapons? Who will take this on?
 Quoting: avanti.pensatore


Hey avanti.penissore
I want to take your car, drugs, alchohol, and i dont think you need to have sex any more unless your married because we dont need any more fatherless children running around.
What do you think about that.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 30181719
United States
12/17/2012 08:14 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Is There A Argument For The Public Owning Assault Weapons?
The media and government officials have been talking about banning assault weapons. I thought they were banned. But whether I am right or wrong a lot of the general public appear to own these weapons.

Is there a argument for allowing the general public to own assault weapons? Who will take this on?
 Quoting: avanti.pensatore


Hey avanti.penissore
I want to take your car, drugs, alchohol, and i dont think you need to have sex any more unless your married because we dont need any more fatherless children running around.
What do you think about that.
 Quoting: Captaininyourface 30181719


That?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 19818372
12/17/2012 08:16 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Is There A Argument For The Public Owning Assault Weapons?
Well when you consider that anything used to harm someone is a weapon and when it is used thats an assault so anything can be an asssault weapon and the whole question is silly.

Now when I can buy a car that can do nearly 3 times the highest legal speed limit in the country you sould be asking if anyone needs one of those too.

The truth of the matter is that the 2nd was never about hunting so using that as the standard as to what a private citizen should or should not own is just a distraction and calling quazimiliterized semiautomatic rifles and pistols assault weapons to make them sound scary is juvenile and silly too.

Sawed off shotguns were banned because the defendant could not prove that there was a military application for such a weapon. If the military had no use for them then they didn't fall under the blanket of the 2nd amendment protection for civilian ownership.
If you think about this, they just keep changing the target and now the standard seeems to be hunting. personally I'm ok with this as a can get a hell of a lot higher powered rifle as a hunting weapon than as what they are calling an assault weapon. YMMV
betterlivings

User ID: 28647627
United States
12/17/2012 08:16 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Is There A Argument For The Public Owning Assault Weapons?
I don't think the average citizen needs assault weapons. If you need something for protection, I figure there is something more suitable. I think both your gov't and ours
need to do a better job of keeping the weaponry out of the
hands of criminals. Then people would not have as much need to own guns.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30178076


so what happens when your government is the criminals and they have fully autos and you're stuck with a single shot????
Captaininyourface
User ID: 30181719
United States
12/17/2012 08:18 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Is There A Argument For The Public Owning Assault Weapons?
I don't think the average citizen needs assault weapons. If you need something for protection, I figure there is something more suitable. I think both your gov't and ours
need to do a better job of keeping the weaponry out of the
hands of criminals. Then people would not have as much need to own guns.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30178076


so what happens when your government is the criminals and they have fully autos and you're stuck with a single shot????
 Quoting: betterlivings


They plan to go full retard on them!
avanti.pensatore (OP)

User ID: 29678569
United States
12/17/2012 08:22 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Is There A Argument For The Public Owning Assault Weapons?
There is no law or ban that would have stopped or prevented Adam Lanza from killing 26 people.

Do we really want to take away peoples ability to defend themselves in the event of riots, civil wars, attacks on our nation by foreign powers?

Again, 99.9% of the general population doesn't go out and commit mass murders. Why should we allow the Second Amendment to be infringed upon based on what happened in Newtown, CT?
smokahontas

User ID: 990753
United States
12/17/2012 08:23 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Is There A Argument For The Public Owning Assault Weapons?
Is it not clear that we are headed into a dictatorship, all democracies end in one. I think they will outlaw the sale of ammunition rather than try to take 300,000,000 guns. It is a clear lesson of history that an unarmed populus is much easier to control. Just ask: Hitler, Stalin, PolPot, Mao, ect.ect. I pray we wake up before it' too late. Where is Samuel Adams when you need him...

"If Yee love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating conquest of freedom, Go from us in peace. We ask not your consels or ARMS. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that yee were our countrymen."
 Quoting: smokahontas

"I may not agree with what you say, but I would defend to the death your right to say it." Voltaire

"Facts do not cease to exist just because they are ignored." Aldous Huxley
avanti.pensatore (OP)

User ID: 29678569
United States
12/17/2012 08:25 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Is There A Argument For The Public Owning Assault Weapons?
There is no law or ban that would have stopped or prevented Adam Lanza from killing 26 people.

Do we really want to take away peoples ability to defend themselves in the event of riots, civil wars, attacks on our nation by foreign powers?

Again, 99.9% of the general population doesn't go out and commit mass murders. Why should we allow the Second Amendment to be infringed upon based on what happened in Newtown, CT?
 Quoting: avanti.pensatore


STOP BLAMING THE GUNS THEMSELVES. ABSURD!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 4655644
United States
12/17/2012 08:30 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Is There A Argument For The Public Owning Assault Weapons?
You have to keep in mind that the average poor dumb-fuck American idiot has NO idea what weapons are good or bad or dangerous or not. Ak's and Ar's are "bad" because they look bad, they look dangerous. Johnny Dumbfuck has no clue that an automatic 12 gauge with 8 rounds in the tube will fuck up a room full of victims a lot easier than an automatic rifle, and reloading is a breeze.

The real point is that the vast majority of Americans have always been too gullible, too simple, and frankly too STUPID to do any real, common sense thinking. They have allowed their children to be used against them in the school systems and by the government for fun and profit for a good 30 years now and it is only going to get worse. America WILL collapse and America WILL deserve it, it is inevitable, embrace it.
smokahontas

User ID: 990753
United States
12/17/2012 08:31 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Is There A Argument For The Public Owning Assault Weapons?
For 100 years we have been taught what to think not how to think,,, It was inevitable,
"I may not agree with what you say, but I would defend to the death your right to say it." Voltaire

"Facts do not cease to exist just because they are ignored." Aldous Huxley
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 23818020
United States
12/17/2012 08:43 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Is There A Argument For The Public Owning Assault Weapons?
I am a gun owner, I hunt when I want. I really do not think an ak47 is a necessary for civilians.
 Quoting: GLP TARD


you're full of shit...

if you were a hunter then you would know that an AK47 is no different than a browning bar.

It's the same fucking thing as your hunting rifle, neither are automatic.


lying ass shill
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 28368227
United States
12/17/2012 08:45 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Is There A Argument For The Public Owning Assault Weapons?
my ar15 is perfect for hunting...
Hawgzilla

User ID: 1138565
United States
12/17/2012 08:45 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Is There A Argument For The Public Owning Assault Weapons?
Yes, the second amendment.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 29951262


I concur.
Ban guns to "save the children" but killing them in the womb is totally cool......I see; it makes perfect sense now.
Kirk

User ID: 25384388
United States
12/17/2012 08:48 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Is There A Argument For The Public Owning Assault Weapons?
The media and government officials have been talking about banning assault weapons. I thought they were banned. But whether I am right or wrong a lot of the general public appear to own these weapons.

Is there a argument for allowing the general public to own assault weapons? Who will take this on?
 Quoting: avanti.pensatore


typical media bullshit. Civilians do not possess assault weapons. The AK-47 you hear about is INCAPABLE of automatic fire. Same with the AR
Worry is a misuse of the imagination.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 28336413
United States
12/17/2012 08:49 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Is There A Argument For The Public Owning Assault Weapons?
You have to keep in mind that the average poor dumb-fuck American idiot has NO idea what weapons are good or bad or dangerous or not. Ak's and Ar's are "bad" because they look bad, they look dangerous. Johnny Dumbfuck has no clue that an automatic 12 gauge with 8 rounds in the tube will fuck up a room full of victims a lot easier than an automatic rifle, and reloading is a breeze.

The real point is that the vast majority of Americans have always been too gullible, too simple, and frankly too STUPID to do any real, common sense thinking. They have allowed their children to be used against them in the school systems and by the government for fun and profit for a good 30 years now and it is only going to get worse. America WILL collapse and America WILL deserve it, it is inevitable, embrace it.
 Quoting: Black Knight


Sadly, I agree. We (collectively)regurgitate what they tell us, and believe it with all our hearts.
Kybeam
User ID: 27604421
United States
12/17/2012 09:04 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Is There A Argument For The Public Owning Assault Weapons?
I own a pipe wrench, don't use it much, don't want to use it. I own it because when you need one there is no substitute.

I own a gun...

ohyeah
smokahontas

User ID: 990753
United States
12/17/2012 09:07 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Is There A Argument For The Public Owning Assault Weapons?
Ted Kennedy has killed More people with his car than I have my Gun... Bumper Sticker
"I may not agree with what you say, but I would defend to the death your right to say it." Voltaire

"Facts do not cease to exist just because they are ignored." Aldous Huxley