Even Sean Hannity Was Calling For Gun Restrictions Today !

He is the definition of a Chicken-hawk.

I never was a fan of Hannity and I care even less about his stance on anything. As for the media assault on the 2A, they smell blood and are going for it. I really can't blame them, as they have the guts those on the right only wish they had.

The right is too busy being the "gentleman" and "proper".

Screw off OP. Its Debbie downers like you that co create this reality. Stop.

You know what? I live in NJ and it sux balls to get a gun. I had to get finger printed FBI check mental health check and 2 references. After that you get a firearms ID card.Yeah it sucks but it does weed out the nut jobs. I don't mind doing it once, but every time I want a new hand gun I have to go through the same B.S. aside from fingerprints. I don't mind doing it once and maybe it should be done, but after that, you should be allowed to buy what you want.

No surprise to me, never have trusted him.

It's a fine line. New Jersey is WAY TOO DAMN restrictive but I don't have a problem with a basic background check to weed out (VIOLENT) Felons or registered nut jobs BUT ONLY if the check were performed and then anonymized.

THE PROBLEM is that this could never happen and the last thing we need is a great list of who has been "naughty or nice" when it comes to gun ownership YET you know the government does archive this stuff just because it can.

If they could make a list with disappearing ink then no problem but till then...



Last Edited by IRQ_1 on 12/18/2012 12:47 AM

It means that he is stupid, or a traitor. Which is it?

Like I said it's a fine line.

EVERYONE has a God given right to defend themselves and I think even Felons who have served their time should have their rights restored if they won't recommit a violent crime but if we have the ability to stop someone who is still out in public but has a known psycho issue then maybe we should do it.

Of course the problem with this and your right about it in that the intrusion of the personal relationship with the doctor and patient being brought up into the entire argument is more or less a violation of the 4th. People with ISSUES PROBABLY shouldn't own a gun YET the very problem I have with that argument is that it seems that arguing that people with mental disorders should be restricted is that "THEY" can always change the definition of a "mental disorder" which they do annually.

Like I said It's a fine line and for damn sure a slippery slope.

Last Edited by IRQ_1 on 12/18/2012 01:25 AM

Was it just what they were looking for, almost like they planned it.

fast and furious.

Criminals shouldnt be allowed depending on the severity of their record. Anyone being denied because of what website they visit is foolish.

It was a unique but overrated movie.

Or are you referring to the ILLEGAL gun trading hypocritical arguments coming from this administration?

The butthurt in this thread is EPIC!!!!

WTF! Weird black hate group claims whites deserved what happened in Newtown and more to come. These guys are nuts! never heard of them before.

oops wrong vid

[link to sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net]

That's the shit!

Are you the beast, are you sleeping with the beast? ARE YOU THE FUTURE ANTICHRIST or the big 666, or are you just a normal boring teenager.


COME SEE IF YOUR NAME CALCULATES 666

The keywords for google are: "ANTICHRIST CALCULATOR"

This is the best way to help you remember how to find it without a link.



[link to www.google.com]

Guns kill people. Yes they do. Wouldn't you want an even playing field to protect your family and friends? How come mass shootings are popping up now all of a sudden? There's more to the story. Below is what you should be worried about.

Here’s a history of what happens after governments have disarmed their citizens:

1911 – Turkey disarmed it’s citizens, and between 1915 – 1917 they murdered 1.5 million Armenians.

1929 – Russia disarmed it’s citizens, and between 1929 – 1953 they murdered 20 million Russians.

1935 – China disarmed it’s citizens, and between 1948 – 1952 they murdered 20 million Chinese.

1938 – Germany disarmed it’s citizens, and between 1939 – 1945 they murdered 16 million Jews.

1956 – Cambodia disarmed it’s citizens, and between 1975 – 1977 they murdered 1 million Educated people.

1964 – Guatamala disarmed it’s citizens, and between 1964 – 1981 they murdered 100,000 Mayan Indians.

1970 – Uganda disarmed it’s citizens, and between 1971 – 1979 they murdered 300,000 Christians.

[link to warriortimes.com]

Attn: stupid fucks of the internet

Show me the law that will stop a lunatic walking into any room and just start blasting away with the calmness of one who has all the time in the world.

You could ban ALL guns tomorrow, and horrible events like this WILL STILL HAPPEN.

However, I can show you the gun that can stop a lunatic walking into any room and just start blasting away. ANY gun could've done this. The gun just needs to be there. Simple as that. It doesn't even need to be ON someone. It could be in a staff room locked in a gun safe.

Are you really this stupid?

bullshit.....fuck off!!

tell me one gun that can shoot off 100 rounds in 4 minutes.

No, because it HASN'T gotten "so bad." Mass shootings are flat. Violent crime is down. The worst school massacre in US history happened in 1927 due to a bomb. It is NOT "so bad" compared to any other time. The only change we need is to make it easier to get carry-conceal permits. Mandatory training and background checks are fine for carry-conceal permits, but they need to be made available for the PURPOSE OF SELF DEFENSE in all the libtarded areas where it's currently nearly impossible to get them. That'll stop a lot of the cowardly punks from terrorizing people.

I am the mother of one of the kids killed and I say if one of the teachers was armed this would have been stoped before so many whould have been killed. Thats all

ohh boy