WILL 2 FACED FEINSTEIN EXEMPT HERSELF FROM GIVING UP GUNS?

How do you know that Feinstein has a concealed carry permit? Is there a public record in California?...

Wow-- that would be the ultimate in hypocrisy.

LOL these "laws" are for the sheep, not them.

I think she had one when she was Mayor of SF. It was one of only 20 given in the city. When the press found out she gave it up. But she is a weasel and still might be packing.

On a similar note...I wonder if Bloomberg has ARMED guards with him?

links--

Second Amendment Hypocrites: Senators Schumer and Feinstein ..
www.federalobserver.com/archive.php?aid=10104

"And then we have Senator Diane Feinstein on the Left Coast who possesses something more rare than a conservative Republican in San Francisco - an unrestricted concealed weapons permit. Apparently without shame, she participated in a citywide gun turn-in program that was intended to create some kind of statue from the donated guns that were to be melted down. One of her police body guards let it slip that she contributed a cheap model for the meltdown, while retaining her .357 magnum revolver for her own personal self-defense."
----------------------------
No Guns For The Mindless Masses!
U.S. Senator Diane Feinstein (D-CA) Is a hypocrite of the worst kind!
According to U.S. Senator Diane Feinstein, only her and her elitist anti-gun cohorts should be allowed to carry guns, or hire armed (Gun-Toting) bodyguards!!!
[link to www.alphadogweb.com]

Feinstein Firearms Handling Technique-
Forth Worth Star-Telegram columnist Jill Labbe wrote, “Guns (are) nowhere as dangerous as liberals who can’t handle them. There stood Dianne Feinstein, the anti-gun senator from California, posing for all the nation’s media to capture on Kodachrome, holding an AK-47 with her finger firmly planted on the trigger. Here’s a woman so concerned about the supposed recklessness of gun manufacturers…who wouldn’t know firearm safety if it bit her in the end of her upturned San Franciscan nose.”(at an anti-gun conference several years ago)

The reporters, dignitaries and innocent bystanders packed into the room were too ignorant to be terrified as Feinstein swept the crowd with the muzzle of the automatic rife, bold closed, finger on the trigger, high-capacity magazine locked in place.
------------------------------

Even if they banned all guns (instant civil war 2) they would still let police and military have guns.

So the rich and famous will be able to hire police as private security, while the rest of us die.

This link is dated this year, but of course I don't know if they verified it. She is a slimeball weasel!

www.federalobserver.com/archive.php?aid=10104

Last Edited by Ralph--a house dog on 12/18/2012 09:21 AM

Whenever I see Feinstein speak... it seems like she's under some kind of mind control-- she speaks so slowly and deliberately that it appears that she's parroting something she's hearing in a tiny ear microphone...

She definitely gives the appearance of someone who's partially or fully possessed...

So she DOES have a concealed carry permit... now that's hypocrisy with a capital H!!

I hate when billionares tell the common people how to live. Mayor Mike is protected 24/7 be armed men. The poor mother up in Harlem is surounded by crime and violence and can't protect her self with a gun. She doesn't have the option of armed security like Bloomberg.

You are absolutely right Ralph. She and others like her will keep their guns and their hired armed body guards. This is another excellent example of why “gun control” laws have nothing to do with gun control or making the general public more safe. All they want is people control. If you don’t believe that, then just try telling them “no” by keeping your newly illegal gun after a new law is passed and they will have a federal cop stick his gun that he gets to keep in your face to take yours.

CHUCKY SCHUMER IS SPECIAL, TOO

[link to www.federalobserver.com]
Dec 18, 2012

(SNIP)
"The mainstream news media have been aware that several antigun proponents are carrying concealed firearms but have failed to expose this hypocrisy. This writer's efforts to discover how many other anti-gunners are also packing heat - a right they wish to deny other citizens - met with limited results.

Not only does Schumer carry a handgun, the New York City Police Department also provides armed escorts for the good senator. In fact, the Government Accounting Office -- the investigative arm of the US Congress -- slammed Schumer's use of police resources for personal protection. It's clear that Schumer believes he's special. He wishes to ban private citizens' ownership of firearms, while he enjoys layers of protection.

"No wonder Chuckie Schumer shoots his mouth off so much - he's able to protect himself," says a 25-year police veteran.

Also, a check of Pistol License records shows that Senator Schumer possesses an "unrestricted" pistol permit, a rarity in New York City. (SNIP) So it's evident that Senator Schumer has two sets of rules -- one for Americans and one for himself.

Keep in mind that the alphabet agencies are allowed to decide the details of implementation of new laws under their administration.

The BATF could (and likely would) expand on any vague 'exemption' in a law to include whatever groups of people they choose--or are ordered to favor. The out of control FDA and EPA do this kind of thing all the time.

This also means they can set cost prohibitive fees or any other rules to keep ordinary people from being able to protect themselves, even if the official legislative documents are silent on these issues.

haven't the rich been doing that forever allready?