Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 2,193 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 2,017,897
Pageviews Today: 2,849,809Threads Today: 764Posts Today: 15,298
11:33 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

The right to bear arms (2nd Amend) is specifically intended for DEFENSE AGAINST MODERN ARMY

 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 18625087
United States
12/18/2012 02:17 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The right to bear arms (2nd Amend) is specifically intended for DEFENSE AGAINST MODERN ARMY
If the country passes a law banning military type weapons then it is your duty as law abiding citizens to follow that law. If not, guess what, your a f'ing criminal.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 18625087
United States
12/18/2012 02:19 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The right to bear arms (2nd Amend) is specifically intended for DEFENSE AGAINST MODERN ARMY
The OP is putting his own twist on the 2nd amendment. The same is done with the bible.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 18625087


How has he done that? By quoting the people that wrote it?
 Quoting: Evil Cretin


Did you read that persons post? He said "What it means is"
Sledster
Get off my lawn....

User ID: 982167
Germany
12/18/2012 02:19 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The right to bear arms (2nd Amend) is specifically intended for DEFENSE AGAINST MODERN ARMY
It is sad, because the bills have already been drafted and have been waiting for this opportunity.
The Gun Control laws will be passed, there is no doubt. How will they enforce them is the next question.
 Quoting: Dr.Ricks



They had best tread lightly.

There are at least a million of us who will not accept their terms.
I'm tired of waiting, somebody push the damn button already!

Please ignore the German flag, I am an American.

Keep your 72 virgins, give me one old biker chick.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 29680603
United States
12/18/2012 02:20 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The right to bear arms (2nd Amend) is specifically intended for DEFENSE AGAINST MODERN ARMY
If the country passes a law banning military type weapons then it is your duty as law abiding citizens to follow that law. If not, guess what, your a f'ing criminal.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 18625087


Surprise! You are a f'ing SHEEP! Have fun in your FEMA camp abiding your laws...
maelstrom
User ID: 30235606
United States
12/18/2012 02:21 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The right to bear arms (2nd Amend) is specifically intended for DEFENSE AGAINST MODERN ARMY
If the country passes a law banning military type weapons then it is your duty as law abiding citizens to follow that law. If not, guess what, your a f'ing criminal.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 18625087


I'll be a criminal and you'll always be a coward hoping the government will protect you.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 18625087
United States
12/18/2012 02:21 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The right to bear arms (2nd Amend) is specifically intended for DEFENSE AGAINST MODERN ARMY
It is sad, because the bills have already been drafted and have been waiting for this opportunity.
The Gun Control laws will be passed, there is no doubt. How will they enforce them is the next question.
 Quoting: Dr.Ricks



They had best tread lightly.

There are at least a million of us who will not accept their terms.
 Quoting: Sledster


It is sad, because the bills have already been drafted and have been waiting for this opportunity.
The Gun Control laws will be passed, there is no doubt. How will they enforce them is the next question.
 Quoting: Dr.Ricks



They had best tread lightly.

There are at least a million of us who will not accept their terms.
 Quoting: Sledster


Then you will be just another criminal with a gun.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 18625087
United States
12/18/2012 02:23 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The right to bear arms (2nd Amend) is specifically intended for DEFENSE AGAINST MODERN ARMY
If the country passes a law banning military type weapons then it is your duty as law abiding citizens to follow that law. If not, guess what, your a f'ing criminal.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 18625087


I'll be a criminal and you'll always be a coward hoping the government will protect you.
 Quoting: maelstrom 30235606


Your a idiot. If you don't abide by the law then GTFO
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1144869
United States
12/18/2012 02:25 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The right to bear arms (2nd Amend) is specifically intended for DEFENSE AGAINST MODERN ARMY
If the country passes a law banning military type weapons then it is your duty as law abiding citizens to follow that law. If not, guess what, your a f'ing criminal.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 18625087


Remember, everything the Nazis did was LEGAL.

Think about that.
0311INFANTRYSIR

User ID: 6357336
United States
12/18/2012 02:25 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The right to bear arms (2nd Amend) is specifically intended for DEFENSE AGAINST MODERN ARMY
Here is the language of the Second Amdendment to the U.S. Constitution:

"Amendment II

A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed."



Note the language that this militia is "necessary to the security of a free state". This means that this militia is ABLE TO DEFEND AGAINST FOREIGN AND DOMESTIC ENEMIES IN WARFARE...ie, be able to defend against a modern army of the day.

The original meaning of the language "well regulated" here basically means "properly trained and equipped." Also, the original meaning of the term "militia" is basically "every able bodied male who could serve in the army."

Thus, putting this Amendment into "modern" language, it is saying:

"A properly equipped and trained population of able-bodied men, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 20078449


Sorry, you don't get to add words to the constitution to reflect your own beliefs or desires OBAMA.
"Democracy is two
wolves and a lamb
voting on what to
have for lunch.
Liberty is a
well-armed lamb
contesting the vote"
~ Benjamin Franklin.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 18625087
United States
12/18/2012 02:28 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The right to bear arms (2nd Amend) is specifically intended for DEFENSE AGAINST MODERN ARMY
If the country passes a law banning military type weapons then it is your duty as law abiding citizens to follow that law. If not, guess what, your a f'ing criminal.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 18625087


Remember, everything the Nazis did was LEGAL.

Think about that.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1144869


Wow, now you are really grasping at straws.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1144869
United States
12/18/2012 02:29 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The right to bear arms (2nd Amend) is specifically intended for DEFENSE AGAINST MODERN ARMY
If the country passes a law banning military type weapons then it is your duty as law abiding citizens to follow that law. If not, guess what, your a f'ing criminal.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 18625087


Remember, everything the Nazis did was LEGAL.

Think about that.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1144869


Wow, now you are really grasping at straws.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 18625087


Referencing historical fact is grasping at straws?

What do they pay you to post?
0311INFANTRYSIR

User ID: 6357336
United States
12/18/2012 02:30 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The right to bear arms (2nd Amend) is specifically intended for DEFENSE AGAINST MODERN ARMY
If the country passes a law banning military type weapons then it is your duty as law abiding citizens to follow that law. If not, guess what, your a f'ing criminal.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 18625087


Remember, everything the Nazis did was LEGAL.

Think about that.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1144869


If the country passes a law banning military type weapons then it is your duty as law abiding citizens to follow that law. If not, guess what, your a f'ing criminal.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 18625087


Remember, everything the Nazis did was LEGAL.

Think about that.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1144869


How is it that people seem to think it is OK to take away more constitutional rights? First off, the MSM reported that he used two pistols, then, once the president decided he was going to wage war on the Constitution it became "he used an assault riffle".

If, by the way, you allow our guns to be taken away, you are the Fuckin' criminal. Time and Time again throughout history, once guns are taken from the people, their governments have ran them over.
"Democracy is two
wolves and a lamb
voting on what to
have for lunch.
Liberty is a
well-armed lamb
contesting the vote"
~ Benjamin Franklin.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 18625087
United States
12/18/2012 02:31 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The right to bear arms (2nd Amend) is specifically intended for DEFENSE AGAINST MODERN ARMY
Here is the language of the Second Amdendment to the U.S. Constitution:

"Amendment II

A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed."



Note the language that this militia is "necessary to the security of a free state". This means that this militia is ABLE TO DEFEND AGAINST FOREIGN AND DOMESTIC ENEMIES IN WARFARE...ie, be able to defend against a modern army of the day.

The original meaning of the language "well regulated" here basically means "properly trained and equipped." Also, the original meaning of the term "militia" is basically "every able bodied male who could serve in the army."

Thus, putting this Amendment into "modern" language, it is saying:

"A properly equipped and trained population of able-bodied men, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 20078449


Sorry, you don't get to add words to the constitution to reflect your own beliefs or desires OBAMA.
 Quoting: 0311INFANTRYSIR


This!!! Maybe you guys should quit spending money on guns and more on learning to read.
maelstrom
User ID: 30235606
United States
12/18/2012 02:32 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The right to bear arms (2nd Amend) is specifically intended for DEFENSE AGAINST MODERN ARMY
If the country passes a law banning military type weapons then it is your duty as law abiding citizens to follow that law. If not, guess what, your a f'ing criminal.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 18625087


I'll be a criminal and you'll always be a coward hoping the government will protect you.
 Quoting: maelstrom 30235606


Your a idiot. If you don't abide by the law then GTFO
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 18625087


Come to my neighborhood and you'll see what a criminal with a gun is really like. A real criminal that wont blink at eye at hurting either of us. You will poop your pants.

I am a law abiding owner. The government can make me a criminal if it wants to. You'll be a criminal eventually, too.

Come to the city. At night. In the land of the free.

I'll even teach you some grammar, and self defense.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 27972246
United States
12/18/2012 02:32 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The right to bear arms (2nd Amend) is specifically intended for DEFENSE AGAINST MODERN ARMY
Where do I get my tank from?

Tank
 Quoting: novamom


Since I am efficient with missiles, where do I get my personal shoulder launched Stinger Missiles. These also are Arms. A Tyrant will not hesitate to use Reaper Drones and its sort against whomever it wishes, even on a whim.

Where do I get my RGPs, also hand carried Arms.

Are IEDs to be included in Arms?

Oh, and are cyanide grenades hand held, hand tossed chemical weapons, are not these also, arms?

Is a Flamethrower an Arms?

Where do I get my chemical weapons, and for that matter my biological arms? Molotov cocktails also are arms... and even Napalm cocktails, these too are chemical weapons, chemical arms, as is gun powder.

Arms means Weapons.. period.

The NLP has been afoot for every since the end of the U.S. Civil War, that the 2nd Amendments "arms" only means Guns... and the Neural Linguistics Programming has brought the term to an even more narrower meaning to be that of only a single individual carried single weapon, and that it takes two people to carry is is in the modern NLP application is not to be understood as a 'gun'. Hence in the modern mind-bender redefinition of words and terms, a 55mm Gun is not to be considered one of the 2nd's 'arms'.

The expression and term 'arms' has been almost completely redefined to mean only hand guns, rifles, and shot-guns. The Media of propaganda have worked for nearly 100 years to get this redefinition applied and accepted by those very same "the People".

Tyranny will have no ban against itself in the use of its own forces using chemical, biological, and even nuclear, or electromagnetic (LASERs and MASERs, and EMPs) against those who are fighting with weapons to oppose its tyranny.

The operative qualification of the subordinate clause, i.e., the Reason that the right of the people to bear arms shall not be infringed is for the security of a free State.

I ask you was is in this case the 'state' part of the 'free State'?

Another is the well regulated.. the great example is that of the people of the Swiss.

Make no mistake, this is not about killing Bambi to eat deer meat and to make buckskin cloths with, this is about the potential to kill other Human Beings in the quickest way possible... yes, if needed to Kill other human beings. In this application of power the 2nd Amendment is the power of 'gods'. The People of the Unites States are these gods, these 'mighty ones', these Elohiym... and these are gods to rule over their servants, their governments, City, County, State, and even Federal.

The People have a terrible responsibility, in a world of possible Global Thermal-nuclear War and its Tens of Thousands of nuclear weapons, the People are a terrible force, the power of a Destroyer of Worlds... and so is the Servant of the People of the Unites States of America.

A power the Founders could not possibly even have imagined.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 18625087
United States
12/18/2012 02:38 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The right to bear arms (2nd Amend) is specifically intended for DEFENSE AGAINST MODERN ARMY
If the country passes a law banning military type weapons then it is your duty as law abiding citizens to follow that law. If not, guess what, your a f'ing criminal.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 18625087


Remember, everything the Nazis did was LEGAL.

Think about that.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1144869


If the country passes a law banning military type weapons then it is your duty as law abiding citizens to follow that law. If not, guess what, your a f'ing criminal.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 18625087


Remember, everything the Nazis did was LEGAL.

Think about that.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1144869


How is it that people seem to think it is OK to take away more constitutional rights? First off, the MSM reported that he used two pistols, then, once the president decided he was going to wage war on the Constitution it became "he used an assault riffle".

If, by the way, you allow our guns to be taken away, you are the Fuckin' criminal. Time and Time again throughout history, once guns are taken from the people, their governments have ran them over.
 Quoting: 0311INFANTRYSIR

Your paranoid and have no idea what your talking about. Go back to your single wide in the woods, trim your mullet, and then crack open a Schlitz
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 27972246
United States
12/18/2012 02:45 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The right to bear arms (2nd Amend) is specifically intended for DEFENSE AGAINST MODERN ARMY
our "voted in servants" are to sever the people and up hold the constitution. no if ands or buts... if they don't they should be impeached or fired . they are not to pass laws because they think they should
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30238234


Under the US Constitution, I am but one of around 650,000 people that my U.S. House Representative serves. My voice is but 1/650,000th of a 'vote' as it were. This is the pure democracy part of the system. And yet, my U.S. Representative is to represent all 650,000 of us.

And yet under the Law of the Land, the U.S. Constitution, my U.S. Representative is under no obligation to follow the democratic simple majority vote (should one even be voted upon by those 650,000 people) to be made to ORDER said U.S. Representative to be mandated to cast his vote in the U.S. House, according and strictly to the majority will of his/her 650,000 constituents. No, under the U.S. Constitution, the U.S. House Representative is free to use his own 'wisdom' and good understanding. This is something very many are completely ill informed about. They are in fact free to pass laws just because they think they should, as guided by the will of their 650,000 people's voice as well as his own knowledge, wisdom, and understanding.

So, your assertion is a fallacy and a misrepresentation of the Law of the Land -- and yet you assert that which is contrary to the U.S. Constitution itself while pretending to be a defender of it. Yea, you, a Wolf in Sheep's clothing.

I remind you as well, oh Wolf, that the People themselves are also under the U.S. Constitution. How many of the People are just now working to overthrow that self-same U.S. Constitution? More than many realize.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 27921992
United States
12/18/2012 02:47 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The right to bear arms (2nd Amend) is specifically intended for DEFENSE AGAINST MODERN ARMY
Thank you. Keep educating the masses.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1144869
United States
12/18/2012 02:49 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The right to bear arms (2nd Amend) is specifically intended for DEFENSE AGAINST MODERN ARMY
If the country passes a law banning military type weapons then it is your duty as law abiding citizens to follow that law. If not, guess what, your a f'ing criminal.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 18625087


Remember, everything the Nazis did was LEGAL.

Think about that.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1144869


If the country passes a law banning military type weapons then it is your duty as law abiding citizens to follow that law. If not, guess what, your a f'ing criminal.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 18625087


Remember, everything the Nazis did was LEGAL.

Think about that.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1144869


How is it that people seem to think it is OK to take away more constitutional rights? First off, the MSM reported that he used two pistols, then, once the president decided he was going to wage war on the Constitution it became "he used an assault riffle".

If, by the way, you allow our guns to be taken away, you are the Fuckin' criminal. Time and Time again throughout history, once guns are taken from the people, their governments have ran them over.
 Quoting: 0311INFANTRYSIR


Whoa! Easy there fella chuckle

I'm in agreement with you.

My point was that the Nazis went on a genocidal rampage after forbidding the Jews to own firearms. I was trying to make that bozo (the guy I quoted) stop and think about what he'd said.

We on the same side bro cheers
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 27972246
United States
12/18/2012 02:53 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The right to bear arms (2nd Amend) is specifically intended for DEFENSE AGAINST MODERN ARMY
Stop being daft. A government body possessing nukes is no argument for complete disarmament of it's people.

I don't believe governments should have ever possessed nukes in the first place. But your argument is not one we are talking about. We are talking about arms a person carries (hint, hint, guns).
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 19701857


You, are way behind the times... and the knowledge of technologies of nuclear weapons. Indeed you are dangerously short-sighted.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1379065
United States
12/18/2012 02:55 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The right to bear arms (2nd Amend) is specifically intended for DEFENSE AGAINST MODERN ARMY
If the country passes a law banning military type weapons then it is your duty as law abiding citizens to follow that law. If not, guess what, your a f'ing criminal.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 18625087


If the country passes a law banning freedom of movement and freedom of speech then it is your duty as law abiding citizens to follow that law. If not, guess what, you're a fucking criminal.
CharlieMurphy

User ID: 21085501
United States
12/18/2012 02:57 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The right to bear arms (2nd Amend) is specifically intended for DEFENSE AGAINST MODERN ARMY
And what modern army do you think semi-automatic rifles and handguns will be much use against?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 25007705


Modern Armies used mostly crew served weapons. Kill the crew and you can make it your weapon. So they are very useful in my opinion.

This is one of the reasons for the push for more drones.
Fuck Yea!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1379065
United States
12/18/2012 02:58 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The right to bear arms (2nd Amend) is specifically intended for DEFENSE AGAINST MODERN ARMY
If the country passes a law banning military type weapons then it is your duty as law abiding citizens to follow that law. If not, guess what, your a f'ing criminal.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 18625087


If the country passes a law banning freedom of movement and freedom of speech then it is your duty as law abiding citizens to follow that law. If not, guess what, you're a fucking criminal.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1379065


If a country passes a law conscripting all children from their parentsa at the age of 5 to enroll in boarding camp indoctrination centers, then it is your duty as law abiding citizens to follow that law. If not, guess what, you're a fucking criminal.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1379065
United States
12/18/2012 02:59 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The right to bear arms (2nd Amend) is specifically intended for DEFENSE AGAINST MODERN ARMY
And what modern army do you think semi-automatic rifles and handguns will be much use against?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 25007705


Modern Armies used mostly crew served weapons. Kill the crew and you can make it your weapon. So they are very useful in my opinion.

This is one of the reasons for the push for more drones.
 Quoting: CharlieMurphy


bingo.
IssueX

User ID: 14348632
United States
12/18/2012 02:59 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The right to bear arms (2nd Amend) is specifically intended for DEFENSE AGAINST MODERN ARMY
If the country passes a law banning military type weapons then it is your duty as law abiding citizens to follow that law. If not, guess what, your a f'ing criminal.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 18625087


Remember, everything the Nazis did was LEGAL.

Think about that.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1144869


If the country passes a law banning military type weapons then it is your duty as law abiding citizens to follow that law. If not, guess what, your a f'ing criminal.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 18625087


Remember, everything the Nazis did was LEGAL.

Think about that.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1144869


How is it that people seem to think it is OK to take away more constitutional rights? First off, the MSM reported that he used two pistols, then, once the president decided he was going to wage war on the Constitution it became "he used an assault riffle".

If, by the way, you allow our guns to be taken away, you are the Fuckin' criminal. Time and Time again throughout history, once guns are taken from the people, their governments have ran them over.
 Quoting: 0311INFANTRYSIR

Your paranoid and have no idea what your talking about. Go back to your single wide in the woods, trim your mullet, and then crack open a Schlitz
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 18625087


why do shillls lke AC 18625087 always attack the poor whites (who live in trailer parks or in the country) but don't have a word to say about the millions of violent gun toting poor urban dwellers and minorities who live there who?

Why are liberals on the side of the poor, if they are in the city, but hate them if they live in a trailer? Just curious

I know that if my car has to break down in a poor neighborhood, I'd rather it break down in one filled with mullet wearing double-wide dwelling schlitz drinkers than the ones shooting each other up in the hood

but 18625087 has an agenda, so there is no point in arguing with him
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1018225
United States
12/18/2012 03:02 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The right to bear arms (2nd Amend) is specifically intended for DEFENSE AGAINST MODERN ARMY
The ability to own freely without license any fire arm we see fit was taken away around the time of prohibition. Soldiers used to bring home browning automatics compliments of uncle Sam. These were fully automatic and given to the people(soldiers). Depression and hard times led these people to either turn to crime or sell their weapons to law breakers. This was the last time in the history of the united states when a free American citizen could legally be equally or better equipped than law enforcement or the military. The gangsters had v8 fords bored out with two speed rear ends and automatic weapons, while the law enforcement was equipped with inline six stock dodges revolvers and shotguns. It is far too late to cry about the second amendment, it was scraped years ago.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 17952489
United States
12/18/2012 03:04 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The right to bear arms (2nd Amend) is specifically intended for DEFENSE AGAINST MODERN ARMY
If the country passes a law banning military type weapons then it is your duty as law abiding citizens to follow that law. If not, guess what, your a f'ing criminal.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 18625087


I'll be a criminal and you'll always be a coward hoping the government will protect you.
 Quoting: maelstrom 30235606


Your a idiot. If you don't abide by the law then GTFO
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 18625087


"your a idiot". Wow, you managed two errors in a three-word sentence...a sentence about someone's lack of intelligence. The irony never gets old. Thanks for coming out, but no one will take you seriously until you present yourself as an adult.
mrmuffins69

User ID: 28433365
United States
12/18/2012 03:04 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The right to bear arms (2nd Amend) is specifically intended for DEFENSE AGAINST MODERN ARMY
To fight against a corrupt/tyrannic government/army there is something probably more important than weapon that most people seem to have forgotten : the people are to be united.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1011606


^THIS^ but good luck trying to get that, you would need an eye opening event for this to happen, just like how massacre called for tougher laws or even just a ban on guns
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 27972246
United States
12/18/2012 03:13 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The right to bear arms (2nd Amend) is specifically intended for DEFENSE AGAINST MODERN ARMY
Here is the language of the Second Amdendment to the U.S. Constitution:

"Amendment II

A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed."



Note the language that this militia is "necessary to the security of a free state". This means that this militia is ABLE TO DEFEND AGAINST FOREIGN AND DOMESTIC ENEMIES IN WARFARE...ie, be able to defend against a modern army of the day.

The original meaning of the language "well regulated" here basically means "properly trained and equipped." Also, the original meaning of the term "militia" is basically "every able bodied male who could serve in the army."

Thus, putting this Amendment into "modern" language, it is saying:

"A properly equipped and trained population of able-bodied men, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 20078449


This is the start of the civil war in America. MSM and your Government are flat out calling for your guns. Whatever side you stand on this, know one thing, this will get bloody. Before you say that there has already been blood shed, that will pale in comparison to what is to come. Check your fucking Government now. Tell them who the boss is. We the people. We the people are.


Power is not a means, it is an end. One does not establish a dictatorship in order to safeguard a revolution; one makes the revolution in order to establish the dictatorship.

George Orwell
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 27205820


Remember in the 1st U.S. Civil War, both the Federal Government, and the Peoples of the States in rebellion against that Federal Government, both sides used every weapon that was known to man at that time. All of them, and even invented new ones.

The State Legislatures of the States in "Rebellion" against the standing U.S. Government asserted that they had the 'order' by the People of their State to fight against what those People understand in their own opinions that the then standing U.S. Goverment was a Tyrant and in a state of Tyranny... and those people chose to take up arms against said U.S. Government, Those People used every known weapon available in their own perceived fight against tyranny. They used their understanding of the 2nd Amendment of the U.S. Constitution as it was intended to be used.

That self same U.S. Constitution also provided Article One, Section Eight -- Congress shall have the power to.... :

"To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;

To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress;" -- Article One, Section Eight.

And under Section 10 - Powers prohibited of States:
"No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation..."

One must come to understand the ENTIRE U.S. Constitution, all its Amendments, and in fact all Treaties that the U.S. Congress over time have Approved of. Doing any thing else is to work against the U.S. Constitution, either ignorantly or willingly.

Remember, both the North, and the South their States, and their peoples were both of the opinion that they had correctly Interpreted and understood the U.S. Constitution. This disagreement brought on the U.S. Civil War, that killed a half a million American troops, and countless civilians.

Both sides used every known weapon and invented new ones.

So, yes, in the next US Civil War we can well imagine that nuclear weapons will be used by both sides of the battle, as well as chemical weapons and biological weapons.

Civil Wars are essentially a Fight to the Death.

Get your heads out of the pot-smoke, alcohol confused, drug dumbed down mental case and become very very sober about all of this.

There are in fact External forces working overtime within the USA to bring to past as Second U.S. Civil War. These will call it a "Revolution", it will be the end of the USA as we now and have ever known the USA, and the People.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 27972246
United States
12/18/2012 03:15 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The right to bear arms (2nd Amend) is specifically intended for DEFENSE AGAINST MODERN ARMY
"Power is not a means, it is an end. One does not establish a dictatorship in order to safeguard a revolution; one makes the revolution in order to establish the dictatorship." --George Orwell

News