Something's Definitely "OFF" Here... Sandy Hook Victim's Father caught "ACTING". WTF!

Has anyone mentioned the kid on the far left? Look at her hand/fingers. More "horns"?

But it is MOST DEFINITELY PARANOIA to think that hundreds and hundreds of people are willing to participate in such a dangerously exposable conspiracy...with so many potential holes, and ways it can go wrong...where if it does go wrong, the entire relationship between government and the governed will be devastated (the sheeple realizing that they are being fooled, all control lost) ...and furthermore, that someone was able to flawlessly recruit so many mutually corrupt people, that not one of them tried to expose it, not one person secretely filmed them doing it and leaked it...

I mean, here's the scenario:

"Ok Bob, we're running a little operation here in this sleepy town. We're going stage a fake school shooting where we pretend a whole bunch of little kids get killed, flood the town with actors to pretend they are grieving, manipulate and make fools of the entire country, all so we can get some new gun bill put through. Are you on board?"

And not one of the hundreds of people given this scenario thought to themselves 'holy crap! this is crazy, is our government really doing this? I must expose this...'

Not one person had second thoughts or guilt after the fact, and came forward.
Not one person performed the perfectly safe act of filming the fraud and then anonymously posting it on the internet.


There is an inherent flaw when it comes to corrupt people sharing a secret. That being, the very moral corruption that renders them capable of committing the crime, also makes them generally untrustworthy bedfellows, willing to turn on each other at the drop of a hat for self preservation.

Any one of the participants of such a conspiracy, if they were able to prove it happened, could be an instantly rich anonymous informant. So you're not just gambling on so many people being willing to keep a secret, you're gambling that the mean people you hired to screw over other people *aren't* also going to screw over you.

I mean, this isn't just a little secret kept between confidants. This would involve PAYROLL. There are hundreds of people involved, being displaced for weeks, with varying levels of interest in the 'big picture' that would have to be getting paid to do this. The infrastructure involved in a production like this would be formidable.

I mean, these 'actors' would undoubtably have agents. And agencies. Or at the very least, fellow actors who may or may not like them. People who would look at the tv and go 'Hey! That's not Robbie Jackson! That's Phil MacDonald from my old theatre troupe! I'd recognize that asshole anywhere! FRAUD!!!!

I'm sorry. The resources involved would simply be too staggering. The holes and opportunities for exposure too numerous.

MAYBE the government decided to streamline the narrative of what happened to take advantage of an opportunity. But outright staging the entire thing, complete with grieving actors?

Nope.

Dude...you may be right. Her pinky, although partially hidden, looks like it may be extended over her white sleeve.

But it is MOST DEFINITELY PARANOIA to think that hundreds and hundreds of people are willing to participate in such a dangerously exposable conspiracy...with so many potential holes, and ways it can go wrong...where if it does go wrong, the entire relationship between government and the governed will be devastated (the sheeple realizing that they are being fooled, all control lost) ...and furthermore, that someone was able to flawlessly recruit so many mutually corrupt people, that not one of them tried to expose it, not one person secretely filmed them doing it and leaked it...

I mean, here's the scenario:

"Ok Bob, we're running a little operation here in this sleepy town. We're going stage a fake school shooting where we pretend a whole bunch of little kids get killed, flood the town with actors to pretend they are grieving, manipulate and make fools of the entire country, all so we can get some new gun bill put through. Are you on board?"

And not one of the hundreds of people given this scenario thought to themselves 'holy crap! this is crazy, is our government really doing this? I must expose this...'

Not one person had second thoughts or guilt after the fact, and came forward.
Not one person performed the perfectly safe act of filming the fraud and then anonymously posting it on the internet.


There is an inherent flaw when it comes to corrupt people sharing a secret. That being, the very moral corruption that renders them capable of committing the crime, also makes them generally untrustworthy bedfellows, willing to turn on each other at the drop of a hat for self preservation.

Any one of the participants of such a conspiracy, if they were able to prove it happened, could be an instantly rich anonymous informant. So you're not just gambling on so many people being willing to keep a secret, you're gambling that the mean people you hired to screw over other people *aren't* also going to screw over you.

I mean, this isn't just a little secret kept between confidants. This would involve PAYROLL. There are hundreds of people involved, being displaced for weeks, with varying levels of interest in the 'big picture' that would have to be getting paid to do this. The infrastructure involved in a production like this would be formidable.

I mean, these 'actors' would undoubtably have agents. And agencies. Or at the very least, fellow actors who may or may not like them. People who would look at the tv and go 'Hey! That's not Robbie Jackson! That's Phil MacDonald from my old theatre troupe! I'd recognize that asshole anywhere! FRAUD!!!!

I'm sorry. The resources involved would simply be too staggering. The holes and opportunities for exposure too numerous.

MAYBE the government decided to streamline the narrative of what happened to take advantage of an opportunity. But outright staging the entire thing, complete with grieving actors?

Nope.

it might be impossible for an adult or an older child, but not for a toddler. they are more flexible at that age.

but, how did she establish the sucking of the two middle fingers? who knows because that is not the norm...

Salt, I looked at this pic and noticed that the masks definitely look placed rather than the them wearing them. What do you think?
[link to www.facebook.com]

I agree with some of the other posting that it is odd. HOWEVER, I agree more with the above person I quoted - the man is in shock. Your moods can change from one second to the next. The entire incident is not real to you. I don't think he was faking or acting - I think he is simply trying to cope and try to come to grips with what has occurred -- one minute it is real and the next your mind cannot conceive that it could be real and you act normal for a minute or two. In fact, his mind might have tricked him to saying if you act normal, then this horrific thing will disappear - it was only a nightmare - nor real.

I really think it is shock.

Salt, I looked at this pic and noticed that the masks definitely look placed rather than the them wearing them. What do you think?
[link to www.facebook.com]

I'd like to nominate this interview as the
worst acting I've seen in this entire psyop - do you agree:

[link to www.cbsnews.com]

No tears.
No dripping mascara.
Carly smiles when interviewed. What the hell.

Then she says she had a bad relationship with her sister.

If I had to prove fakery and acting and could only show one video, this would be it.

Agree?

I'd like to nominate this interview as the
worst acting I've seen in this entire psyop - do you agree:

[link to www.cbsnews.com]

I did laugh when someone died when someone brought up the happy times.

But then again, no one offered proof of what was said.

You guys would be untrustworthy in a school of higher education or a court of law. Condemning someone without further evidence.

I guarantee no one on this post, other than myself went to college.

The two older blonde girls are almost identical, can't tell them apart. The one in the obama photo is the one that didn't die.

The father is having nervous laughter.
YOU KNOW THIS, HOW!

I can't believe you guys are tearing this family apart like this, it's sick and cruel.

Get lost shill...

If your daughter is brutally shot dead the day before, you will have been crying almost NON-STOP, as long as you are awake, and your face will show this - your eyes will be red and your nose will be raw from blowing your nose, your eyes will be puffy.

This guy had none of these signs. What sort of parent would even WANT to talk to the press immediately after their child has been killed? It's one thing if your child has been abducted, and you make a public plea to find the abductor, but in this case there is absolutely NOTHING to be gained by appearing before the press, and no reason to do it. What possible reason could there be?

Good to see people awakening.

This stuff has been done for decades... every shooting has the same nonsense. Every one (including Columbine).

With that said, I'm willing to invest my time creating an infographic that will blow away people...

... But I'd like your help.

Can you reply to this and link to all of the smiling face shots - what I'll do is make a big ass collage that will be VERY smoking gun.

When people see everyone in the act smiling, they'll begin to wake up out of their slumber.

Anyone up for helping me with this?

I am more convinced THAT ever that this whole event is a Gov run Psy-Op. WTF

(at 2:37)

"You'd think after the thousands of people I have seen shot I could answer that question."

The county coroner from a sleepy town in Connecticut has examined thousands of shooting victims?

Was he in Nam?

The only thing "off" here is you guys tearing apart a father in mourning who came out of his mourning for a few moments to attempt to make a statement on the news. Even during normal circumstances this is difficult to do. I can remember laughing uncontrollably one time at an inappropriate time out of the anxiety of being in front of the public. No matter the reason, this feeding frenzy is shameful to say the least. What does this reveal about the ones feeding on this injured victim?

Yep, you nailed it mate!! The girl's shoulder angle relative to the angle of the mask are not congruent. She is looking at the man in the image, yet the mask is straight anterior relative to the POV.