LIVE Search For NIBIRU - WEBCAST ON NOW!!!!! (Link) | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 27794780 United States 12/18/2012 08:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | And no you do not need a infrared telescope in space to see this stuff. Get Real! Only two days away and as large as it is suppose to be it would be seen. Quit spreading crap! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 27794780 United States 12/18/2012 08:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Dr. Astro Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 27749847 United States 12/18/2012 08:03 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The current telescope coordinates: Quoting: Dr. Astro Center (RA, hms): 01h 39m 06.733s Center (Dec, dms): -03° 50' 46.743" [link to nova.astrometry.net] Well, this is intriguing. There shouldn't be anything there were there is that "fuzzy splotch" on the right. On the left the little donut thing is clearly a dust mote on the CCD, but they seemed rather speculative themselves about what the thing on the right is. They suggested a faint face-on galaxy, but there's nothing there according to a SIMBAD search and cross-referencing with Palomar Sky Survey plates. |
Dapurps User ID: 30138682 Canada 12/18/2012 08:03 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The current telescope coordinates: Quoting: Dr. Astro Center (RA, hms): 01h 39m 06.733s Center (Dec, dms): -03° 50' 46.743" [link to nova.astrometry.net] Thanks for the info Astro "What you perceive to be becomes your reality." :ftwpanda: dapurps |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 27794780 United States 12/18/2012 08:05 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 14296678 New Zealand 12/18/2012 08:05 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The current telescope coordinates: Quoting: Dr. Astro Center (RA, hms): 01h 39m 06.733s Center (Dec, dms): -03° 50' 46.743" [link to nova.astrometry.net] Well, this is intriguing. There shouldn't be anything there were there is that "fuzzy splotch" on the right. On the left the little donut thing is clearly a dust mote on the CCD, but they seemed rather speculative themselves about what the thing on the right is. They suggested a faint face-on galaxy, but there's nothing there according to a SIMBAD search and cross-referencing with Palomar Sky Survey plates. they brushed it off... "well its certainly not a planet" any ideas what it might be? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 23094175 United States 12/18/2012 08:07 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The current telescope coordinates: Quoting: Dr. Astro Center (RA, hms): 01h 39m 06.733s Center (Dec, dms): -03° 50' 46.743" [link to nova.astrometry.net] Well, this is intriguing. There shouldn't be anything there were there is that "fuzzy splotch" on the right. On the left the little donut thing is clearly a dust mote on the CCD, but they seemed rather speculative themselves about what the thing on the right is. They suggested a faint face-on galaxy, but there's nothing there according to a SIMBAD search and cross-referencing with Palomar Sky Survey plates. So, anything to be concerned about, any speculation as to its direction of travel or possible future effects if any??? |
Ostria1 User ID: 29325791 Greece 12/18/2012 08:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Dr. Astro Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 27749847 United States 12/18/2012 08:15 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The current telescope coordinates: Quoting: Dr. Astro Center (RA, hms): 01h 39m 06.733s Center (Dec, dms): -03° 50' 46.743" [link to nova.astrometry.net] Well, this is intriguing. There shouldn't be anything there were there is that "fuzzy splotch" on the right. On the left the little donut thing is clearly a dust mote on the CCD, but they seemed rather speculative themselves about what the thing on the right is. They suggested a faint face-on galaxy, but there's nothing there according to a SIMBAD search and cross-referencing with Palomar Sky Survey plates. they brushed it off... "well its certainly not a planet" any ideas what it might be? No known galaxies that large there (there is a small group of very distant galaxies in the Palomar plates, but they're tiny and faintly visible through the glow of this fuzzy thing) and no known comets there. I'm thinking it might be quantum efficiency hysteresis (ghosting) from this Jupiter image: [link to nova.astrometry.net] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 22108680 New Zealand 12/18/2012 08:15 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 23094175 United States 12/18/2012 08:16 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Dapurps User ID: 30138682 Canada 12/18/2012 08:18 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 23094175 United States 12/18/2012 08:18 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Dr. Astro Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 27749847 United States 12/18/2012 08:23 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Well, at least they found one anomaly and CME...notice Dr Astro disappeared after noticing the anomaly...probably researching now. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 23094175 Yes, and luckily I hung onto my earlier screencaps of when they had Jupiter in the same scope immediately prior. I made a gif animation and you can see the glow is exactly where Jupiter had been in the image: [link to i319.photobucket.com] Furthermore, there's another faint spot right where one Jupiter's moons had been (just left of dead center in the Jupiter image). That is not a star, you can see that as well in the astrometrically solved version: [link to nova.astrometry.net] That proves that it's just quantum efficiency hysteresis, which produces a "ghosting" effect from bright objects in images that immediately follow it. Last Edited by Astromut on 12/18/2012 08:24 PM |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 22826717 United States 12/18/2012 08:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 19412151 United Kingdom 12/18/2012 08:36 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Tards if you want to search for Nibiru you need an orbiting infrared telescope. Anyone who has researched Nibiru will tell you this. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 19412151 Secondly Zacheria Stitchin said nibiru will NOT make an appearance in 2012 this has been repeated so many times lol. Learn to use google before waisting peoples time with this nonsense. As you have no concept of what is going please go back to your superbowl and 4by4`s. Enjoy the suasage fest. seriously, whats wrong with you? Apologies did not mean to be rude :) i think its great you guys n girls are looking for Nibiru at least your trying to make sense of all this shit floating round the internet and doing something constructive to find it. |
Buck Zander User ID: 26745463 Canada 12/18/2012 08:37 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | So, let's get this straight... Nibiru could have been a planet sized comet, which passes through our solar system eons ago, tore off a chunk of The Earth, established the present orbit of Venus and vaporized the atmosphere off Mars. Here we are, then, eons later, trying to predict the return passage of Nibiru, when all that may be left is sparse remnants, many of which we have been seeing in the form of asteroids and fireballs. I seriously believe that they have no clue, but are scared shitless, regardless. Sort of like the bunch of us, eh? There must be a law that people can't lie. |
Dr. Astro Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 27749847 United States 12/18/2012 08:37 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Well, at least they found one anomaly and CME...notice Dr Astro disappeared after noticing the anomaly...probably researching now. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 23094175 Yes, and luckily I hung onto my earlier screencaps of when they had Jupiter in the same scope immediately prior. I made a gif animation and you can see the glow is exactly where Jupiter had been in the image: [link to i319.photobucket.com] Furthermore, there's another faint spot right where one Jupiter's moons had been (just left of dead center in the Jupiter image). That is not a star, you can see that as well in the astrometrically solved version: [link to nova.astrometry.net] That proves that it's just quantum efficiency hysteresis, which produces a "ghosting" effect from bright objects in images that immediately follow it. Just for the sake of specifying, the bright moon of Jupiter that also left hysteresis is Ganymede. Io and Europa were much closer to Jupiter on the right side of the planet and their hysteresis spots are harder to distinguish from the overall glow, and they're much harder to see in the original Jupiter image (Europa looks a bit like a bulge on Jupiter's right side). Callisto was outside of the field of view, much farther to the right. Last Edited by Astromut on 12/18/2012 08:39 PM |
Ostria1 User ID: 29325791 Greece 12/18/2012 08:40 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Well, at least they found one anomaly and CME...notice Dr Astro disappeared after noticing the anomaly...probably researching now. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 23094175 Yes, and luckily I hung onto my earlier screencaps of when they had Jupiter in the same scope immediately prior. I made a gif animation and you can see the glow is exactly where Jupiter had been in the image: [link to i319.photobucket.com] Furthermore, there's another faint spot right where one Jupiter's moons had been (just left of dead center in the Jupiter image). That is not a star, you can see that as well in the astrometrically solved version: [link to nova.astrometry.net] That proves that it's just quantum efficiency hysteresis, which produces a "ghosting" effect from bright objects in images that immediately follow it. thanks astro! did you catch this one? also a jupiter signal they said (and the comet back) [link to img835.imageshack.us] Ostria |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 30277510 Mexico 12/18/2012 08:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
optimum judgment User ID: 24021617 United Kingdom 12/18/2012 08:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Well, at least they found one anomaly and CME...notice Dr Astro disappeared after noticing the anomaly...probably researching now. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 23094175 Yes, and luckily I hung onto my earlier screencaps of when they had Jupiter in the same scope immediately prior. I made a gif animation and you can see the glow is exactly where Jupiter had been in the image: [link to i319.photobucket.com] Furthermore, there's another faint spot right where one Jupiter's moons had been (just left of dead center in the Jupiter image). That is not a star, you can see that as well in the astrometrically solved version: [link to nova.astrometry.net] That proves that it's just quantum efficiency hysteresis, which produces a "ghosting" effect from bright objects in images that immediately follow it. Just for the sake of specifying, the bright moon of Jupiter that also left hysteresis is Ganymede. Io and Europa were much closer to Jupiter on the right side of the planet and their hysteresis spots are harder to distinguish from the overall glow, and they're much harder to see in the original Jupiter image (Europa looks a bit like a bulge on Jupiter's right side). Callisto was outside of the field of view, much farther to the right. isn't that the same effect seen during the venus crossing,when you could see the sun's corona through venus? |
Dr. Astro Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 27749847 United States 12/18/2012 08:49 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Well, at least they found one anomaly and CME...notice Dr Astro disappeared after noticing the anomaly...probably researching now. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 23094175 Yes, and luckily I hung onto my earlier screencaps of when they had Jupiter in the same scope immediately prior. I made a gif animation and you can see the glow is exactly where Jupiter had been in the image: [link to i319.photobucket.com] Furthermore, there's another faint spot right where one Jupiter's moons had been (just left of dead center in the Jupiter image). That is not a star, you can see that as well in the astrometrically solved version: [link to nova.astrometry.net] That proves that it's just quantum efficiency hysteresis, which produces a "ghosting" effect from bright objects in images that immediately follow it. Just for the sake of specifying, the bright moon of Jupiter that also left hysteresis is Ganymede. Io and Europa were much closer to Jupiter on the right side of the planet and their hysteresis spots are harder to distinguish from the overall glow, and they're much harder to see in the original Jupiter image (Europa looks a bit like a bulge on Jupiter's right side). Callisto was outside of the field of view, much farther to the right. isn't that the same effect seen during the venus crossing,when you could see the sun's corona through venus? Bingo. Yes, you're exactly right. |
Dr. Astro Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 27749847 United States 12/18/2012 08:54 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Well, at least they found one anomaly and CME...notice Dr Astro disappeared after noticing the anomaly...probably researching now. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 23094175 Yes, and luckily I hung onto my earlier screencaps of when they had Jupiter in the same scope immediately prior. I made a gif animation and you can see the glow is exactly where Jupiter had been in the image: [link to i319.photobucket.com] Furthermore, there's another faint spot right where one Jupiter's moons had been (just left of dead center in the Jupiter image). That is not a star, you can see that as well in the astrometrically solved version: [link to nova.astrometry.net] That proves that it's just quantum efficiency hysteresis, which produces a "ghosting" effect from bright objects in images that immediately follow it. thanks astro! did you catch this one? also a jupiter signal they said (and the comet back) [link to img835.imageshack.us] Yup. I saw that. That was with their high magnification view of Jupiter which was quite sharp, thus the outline of Jupiter was much better defined in the image. It appears to be slightly oblong, probably from imperfections in the tracking of the telescope over the time they were watching it. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 29128713 Australia 12/18/2012 08:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Correct my son! User ID: 30278317 Australia 12/18/2012 08:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Dr. Astro Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 27749847 United States 12/18/2012 08:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Nibiru/Planet X whatever you want to call it, will not hit Earth. It will however block the sun and possibly cause the earth to stop rotating for a few days. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 29128713 Nonsense. Such a thing would be perturbing the orbits of the planets. They just pointed a telescope at Jupiter and astrometry shows that Jupiter was right where it should have been in the image. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 18226170 United States 12/18/2012 09:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | And like unicorns they will realise it is a myth in just two little days! Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30277510 When the last eagle flies over the last crumbling mountain And the last lion roars at the last dusty fountain In the shadow of the forest though she may be old and worn They will stare unbelieving at the last unicorn When the first breath of winter through the flowers is icing And you look to the north and a pale moon is rising And it seems like all is dying and would leave the world to mourn In the distance hear the laughter of the last unicorn I'm alive, I'm alive When the last moon is cast over the last star of morning And the future has passed without even a last desperate warning Then look into the sky where through the clouds a path is torn Look and see her how she sparkles, its the last unicorn I'm alive, I'm alive [link to www.youtube.com] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 30279875 Australia 12/18/2012 09:18 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Nibiru/Planet X whatever you want to call it, will not hit Earth. It will however block the sun and possibly cause the earth to stop rotating for a few days. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 29128713 Yes. This is definitely correct. Believe not anyone who says otherwise. I am starting to think so too! Too many coincidences are just not adding up. They win't be able to keep up the constant lying when it is staring us in the face. Forgiveness will be calling big time. But it will be too late for that. Why would we bother anyhow. It's beyond me how some brains work. brainwashing, money and contracts come to mind. Not as far fetched as it seems. |
Dr. Astro Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 27749847 United States 12/18/2012 09:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Nibiru/Planet X whatever you want to call it, will not hit Earth. It will however block the sun and possibly cause the earth to stop rotating for a few days. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 29128713 Yes. This is definitely correct. Believe not anyone who says otherwise. I am starting to think so too! Too many coincidences are just not adding up. They win't be able to keep up the constant lying when it is staring us in the face. Forgiveness will be calling big time. But it will be too late for that. Why would we bother anyhow. It's beyond me how some brains work. brainwashing, money and contracts come to mind. Not as far fetched as it seems. Yeah, that's it, all the world's astronomers both amateur and professional are just lying. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 3828079 Australia 12/18/2012 09:27 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Nibiru/Planet X whatever you want to call it, will not hit Earth. It will however block the sun and possibly cause the earth to stop rotating for a few days. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 29128713 Yes. This is definitely correct. Believe not anyone who says otherwise. I am starting to think so too! Too many coincidences are just not adding up. They win't be able to keep up the constant lying when it is staring us in the face. Forgiveness will be calling big time. But it will be too late for that. Why would we bother anyhow. It's beyond me how some brains work. brainwashing, money and contracts come to mind. Not as far fetched as it seems. I have an uneasy feeling about all this. You know what I'm sayin? I can feel it in my bones and that constant ringing in my head at the mention of certain words and dates. I have been trying to analyze the triggers and effects for quite some time. |