NRA Preparing To "Push Back" Against The Gun Control Idiots

NRA has released their first statement. Thread: The NRA has Spoken! First Statement on Shootings in Newtown Released.

This

So what? Your point is invalidated by the fact that at the time EVERYONE had the same armaments. What that means to me is that we should still ALL have the same armaments. To include fully automatic machine guns if that is your fancy and you dont mind the tax stamp or knowing that the ATF can come to your home at any time and inspect said weapons without a warrant.

Leave the law-abiding citizen out of your "conversation", you may find that there are unintended consequences.

Last Edited by Sledster on 12/19/2012 03:22 PM

Its time to start a conversation about the side effects of these prescription drugs...

[link to www.businessinsider.com]

During the Revolutionary War, only THREE percent of the people actually fought against Great Britain.

Only TEN percent of the citizens actively supported that three percent.

Approximately TWENTY percent considered themselves to be on the side of the Revolution, but they did not actively participate.

Towards the climatic end of the war, approximately THIRTY percent actually fought on the side of the British.

The rest of the citizens had no disposition either way. They didn’t care. They didn’t want anything to do with what they deemed to simply be a political issue.


Where do you stand?

[link to freedomintelligence.wordpress.com]

My wife is a high school principal of a very large county school. We want school control not gun control. Allow my wife to have more SRO officers, security mechanisms and access to non lethal OR lethal weaponry while at school.

This is about school control instead of gun control.

Doesn't matter one bit. At the time it was written, the intent was for citizens to have the same firearms the military had. State of the art technology at the time. Why would you think their intent would change with changing technology?

.

Supreme Court Strike down the Banning of Violent Video Games.

Reinstating a law or creating new ones like it that did not stop a similar tragedy then will have the same non-existent affect on public safety now. The reason is simple. You can't stop crazy people from doing crazy things and there is no law that will stop criminals from stealing what they want or improvising to get what they want done another way.

Doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result is a definition of insanity ...which makes sense when you consider that progressive liberalism (where the anti-gun crowd comes from) is a mental disorder.

i know its scary isnt it that these insane people have there fingers on the button that could kill every life on this planet 2000 times over

It wouldn't even make it to the supreme court. Most first person shooter video games are already labeled as either NC17 or M for mature adult-only product.

Push back meaning agreeing with the gun control tards?

Get real every time congress has passed anti gun legislation, the NRA has backed them. They are traitors.

Yes, human behaviour and corporate greed such as big pharma to push dangerous drugs whose side effects include "aggressive behaviours", "suicide", etc.

Even though there is no proof yet other than what the shooter's uncle supposedly said that this shooter was on one there have been many other shooter's on these drugs.

I would say that the chances that the Sandy Hook shooter was either on one currently or had just come off one are pretty high.

I hope NRA adds this to their "push back" along with the violent video games and other issues.

I only disagree on certain points:

First of all, the SROs would be a primary target. Any lunatic knows the SRO is carrying and would take them out first.

On the other hand, if you have teachers who want to carry and have been trained, conceal permit, etc. carrying concealed weapons, a shooter has no idea who is armed and who isn't.

No way they'll pick that school. And if they did, they wouldn't get too far.

By the way, my wife is a public school teacher and I have three kids in public schools.

On the whole, we're on the same page. But I say let the Teachers, Staff, and SROs carry. Teachers and Staff only after proper training of course.

I'm of the opinion that this is an issue for Americans to resolve. I have an opinion, but it matters not one jot. I can not and never will understand the gun culture of the US. That's why non-Americans should just butt out and leave them to it. Let them continue killing each other. The situation is beyond reproach. There are simply too many guns in general circulation. If I was an American living in America, I would want a gun to defend myself too.

Thats right because that was state of the art in that day and the people were armed with the same type of weapons available to any army. The same should hold true today. The second ammendment was designed to uphold our God given right to defend ourselves, our states, and our nation against any threat including our own tyrannical government that is showing its ugly ass. It makes nomention of any limit as to number, type, or limited use of these arms the people have their God given right to buy, possess and use. What you anti gun asswipes seem to overlook is the fact that the government never gave us this right, its an uninalienable right, a God given right, and as such the government has no recourse. They didnt grant the right, the constitution upholds the right, and the government has no legal or constitutional authority to resind that right. Make no mistake the pro gun public is very well aware of our constitutional right and the constitutional authority of government which is limited only to that authority SPECIFICALLY granted to by the constitution. In reallity the government is going to end up on the losing end of the stick. The supreme court has already upheld and set case presedence that the right to keep and bear arms applies to individules and as such set precedence that the 2nd ammendment is valid. If the current administration and I use that term loosely, sees fit to circumvent the constitution and congress, he is asking for a civil war in this country and by God he'll get it. This is clearely the line in the sand, we have taken nothing but shiut from the guy and always bent but this is the straw. As to all you anti gun fucknuts, you can all be dumbasses but at least try to educate yourselves on what it is you are trying to fight about

fucking right!

If people would just study the Constitution, they would understand that We the people demand that the Federal goverment immediately turn in all weapons to the local sheriff. Now! Disarm this illegal group of corporate puppets !,

False argunment. Does that mean that, since modern media technology (television, radio, the internet, zerox printers, etc) did not exist during the 1700's, that freedom of speech only applies to the spoken word and vintage printing presses from the 1700's using hand made paper?

Wait... I better not give "liberals" like yourself any ideas.

We do need strict gun control in cities, where the intelligent people live. If all the dumbfuck knuckle-dragging redneck conservitard country apes want to shoot each other, that's just fine with me.

It is quite obvious that you have no idea why the American founding fathers included the language that they did as it pertains to the Second Amendment!

Don't preach shit unless you know what the fuck your talking about!!!!!!!

Question for ya 506. Are YOU an American? Why are trolling this thread ?

The government can't even organize a hurricane clean-up with success, let alone a full war on the soil. I think most would agree with you on your point.

Actually we still have our rights. You on the other hand gave up most of yours. Who pushed for your restrictions? Your government you say...who's brainwashed again?

You really should just worry about your own lil country.

Sorry shill, this is an American problem. Your advice and opinions are not wanted.

I mean they all ready did.

[link to www.foxnews.com]

I second that. Sour grapes from the Aussie

As an American I completely disagree. America has much to learn from other countries, especially since we have the highest murder rate in the western world.

Better be careful who you talk to assclown havent seen much food grown in your precious cities. All us knuckle dragging apes might just decide your little grocery store doesnt need any more food supplied and starve your inelligent ass to death then when you get hungry enough to grow a set of balls and go into the dreaded dangerous land of apes and guns, we can feed your pathetic bag of starved bones to our hogs, they have to eat too and are used to eating shit.