HOLY CRaP: SHE's ALIVE???

Yes, I have gleaned your point behind this thread.



Do you not understand the passage of time and growth in children?

There is at least a year between these photos.

That red dress is on her younger sister, the middle child.


I can't believe how far some will go to convince themselves of something.


The sad thing is, when you find out you were incorrect, you will just forgive yourself immediately for the ripple you put out there.


I know you want her to be alive.

So do I.


So do her parents, siblings, and relatives.

When a little girl is horrifically murdered, do the parents really say to her sister, "We can dress you like your dead sister and part your hair like your dead sister. You can be your dead sister!"

Are you claiming that such a reaction is common?

The 5 stages of Grief included shock.


These people are in SHOCK.

You can not judge someones affect when under such duress.

Give these people some peace.



For the love of common decency.

Their entire worlds have been shattered in the most ineffable way imaginable.


Yet it remains...UNimaginable.

Hence...what we have here.

When a little girl is horrifically murdered, do the parents really say to her sister, "We can dress you like your dead sister and part your hair like your dead sister. You can be your dead sister!"

Are you claiming that such a reaction is common?

Perhaps she asked to wear her sisters dress. As a tribute to her memory.

Young children do not grieve the same way as adults.

You're not answering my question, Seer777...

... Are you suggesting that the DailyMail caption is innaccurate?

This is about a caption?

On the family photo?





The caption is accurate being THE FAMILY photo was taken most likely LAST Christmas.

Please observe the passage of time...

Look up hair growth charts over a one year period of time.

I'll try one more time.

Question: Is the caption in the DailyMail a lie.

Yes or no.

It's a very simple question that you keep refusing to answer.

Look at the photo of the family with the parents and 3 girls, the one where the little one has her fingers in her mouth. It's on your first link to the Daily Mail.

That picture is also on his Facebook, and the 2 girls sitting on their dad's lap their legs are missing, especially the one in the red dress. The little one has one leg missing, on one side it looks like there is a leg, but on the other you see the newspaper on his lap.

In the Obama photo where he is with the parents, it looks like the oldest daughter is suspended in the air.

It's all very strange.

I meant the youngest daughter looks like she's in the air in the Obama photo where they are all wearing big smiles.

The photos are 2 years apart.

I looked at the pictures to try to figure out who the girl is and I now think it is the middle sister, not Emily. The face looks like the other girl, and her hair could have grown that much in 2 years. That still doesn't explain why she is wearing Emily's dress or why they all are smiling so big.

What does one do normally when posing for a photograph?

They smile.



These people are running on 'autopilot'.



To know Grief, is to know it's tortures...

You make an EXCELLENT point about this pic:
[link to i.dailymail.co.uk]

We see what we can imagine are the dad's legs, but no legs for the daughter.

The fakery never ends, does it?

Does everyone else see this?

HOLY CRAP!

OMG! I didn't even notice until you mentioned it but yeah! She's missing legs and the other little one is missing one leg! (Illuminati sign of the pirate!)

Not the same girl, is the other sister, and maybe she wanted to wear her sisters dress.

Take a look at these website pics:

[link to www.dailymail.co.uk]

Let me break it down - here's family pic of the "dead" girl (before the shooting):
[link to i.dailymail.co.uk]

(Look at the girl in the red/black dress.)

And here's the pic shown after the shooting (all smiles) with Obama:
[link to i.dailymail.co.uk]

See how the same girl in the same black/red dress is in the Obama pic.

Can someone explain this to me?

None of the victims were seen by thier families after the incident.

They were shown photo's.

The medical examiner said he has very good photographers.
he said "you can sort of...you can control the situation."

No bodies. only photos.

Is this where they get thier bohemian grove sacrifices?

Thanks for explaining about the pigtails. (I'm being sarcastic). There's no way letting out those pigtails doubles the length of her hair so it reaches all of the way down to the small of her back.

Again, if it's indeed the other sister, than the DailyMail's caption is a lie. The media is ALWAYS lying because they're in on the scam.

Remember, it says (and I quote):

"Loving family: Robbie Parker, pictured with his wife and three daughters with Emilie on the far right"

It doesn't say the far left.

And if the DailyMail makes a correction, then there are other problems (which I'll reveal at the right time to not give the liars of the media and military a chance to fix).

No matter who Emily is in this case, it's a WHOPPER of a lie.

Don't mention it (sarcasm intended).

It would reach half the length of her back.

Next fucking quesstion.

HELL YEAH!!!!


WTF?!?!?!?!?!

When a little girl is horrifically murdered, do the parents really say to her sister, "We can dress you like your dead sister and part your hair like your dead sister. You can be your dead sister!"

Are you claiming that such a reaction is common?

Perhaps she asked to wear her sisters dress. As a tribute to her memory.

Young children do not grieve the same way as adults.

Here's a thought for ya.

BOTH girls had the same dress, there were two dresses.

I sometimes used to dress my two daughters the same, not all the time, just occasionally.

Perhaps the sister wanted to wear that dress (which was her own) in rememberance of the fact that they were sometimes dressed alike.

Perhaps she misses her sister and wants to feel close.

Good grief!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I'm not sure you're paying attention here, Lotus Flower.

Look up a few posts.

The liars got caught in a whopper of a lie.

They forgot to give the girl legs in this picture (the one sitting on daddy):
[link to i.dailymail.co.uk]

This means none of your theories hold water... because you're analyzing a faked family photo.