Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 1,380 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 399,819
Pageviews Today: 513,009Threads Today: 100Posts Today: 1,583
03:37 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

The Sun Was Supposed To Set At 4:41 Central Time In Missouri, 12/18 , Still Hasn't Set At 5:01

 
Karlos

User ID: 30322593
United Kingdom
12/19/2012 08:53 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Sun Was Supposed To Set At 4:41 Central Time In Missouri, 12/18 , Still Hasn't Set At 5:01
I got the info from memory - I recognised it as soon as I saw it.
And you don't need a NASA link FFS - they don't own a monopoly on space study y'know.

Google the name - there should be tons of pics and info.
 Quoting: Karlos



confirmed shill confirmed


-
 Quoting: DUCM900

LMFAO
I'm a 'shill' because I knew something about astronomy.

You are fuckin' priceless.
Menow
User ID: 18943200
United States
12/19/2012 08:53 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Sun Was Supposed To Set At 4:41 Central Time In Missouri, 12/18 , Still Hasn't Set At 5:01
...


You "see beyond" what, reality? I'm sure you think you do.
Do you have ANY solid evidence that it's lighter, later this year than last other that your memory? ANYTHING AT ALL?
 Quoting: Menow 18943200


The fact that you didn't answer my question tells me that you aren't sure. I don't see beyond reality. But I surely pay attention to detail. The answer to this is get off the thread and go look morning and night. If you don't see anything off then quit coming here to prove you know the answer. If you see something off then join the club. But honestly rationality tells me we have nothing to gain here except a headache and wasted time with all this silly banter. Its like people who talk shit on songs they don't like on you tube. Gahhh don't like it it don't listen grow up and stop trying to poop on the party? So to speak.
 Quoting: _Obsidian_


I consider it a duty, of sorts, to debunk the wild, hysterical, doomsday claims and predictions you seem to think of as a "party". The fact that you think random people can have discovered that the sun is setting late, or whatever you think this "off-ness" is speaks volumes and so does the fact that you didn't answer MY question.

I didn't answer you because it makes no difference at all to the question at hand.
 Quoting: Menow 18943200



Ummm I did answer your question for one thing.
 Quoting: _Obsidian_


I believe you did not. Here is my question, which is quite relevant to the issue at hand: Do you have ANY solid evidence that it's lighter, later this year than last other that your memory? ANYTHING AT ALL?

For two im not listening to random people I came here to discuss what I saw with my own two eyes and it just so happened to be the case that other people in various areas noticed it too.
 Quoting: _Obsidian_


I believe what what you are discussing is something you claim to REMEMBER, hmm?

It may not be doom. There could be a rational explanation for it. Like what the OP posted recently. If that is your duty good luck also good luck with that round peg we all know how that turns out. In other words I don't think you'll get much accomplished. But I admire your conviction despite your outwardly condescending tone lol
 Quoting: _Obsidian_


Oh, I have been thanked many times for pointing out the flaws in the claims of people who insist there are things "wrong" in the sky.
Da fuq

User ID: 16258666
United States
12/19/2012 08:54 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Sun Was Supposed To Set At 4:41 Central Time In Missouri, 12/18 , Still Hasn't Set At 5:01
Come on I put up pics with the watch and everything. Where the shill zerg go?
 Quoting: Da fuq


Its incredible, now we got all the shills of GLP in one thread

rockon


-
 Quoting: DUCM900


I feel like they are lying in wait, gonna strike as a team again soon.hf
Menow
User ID: 18943200
United States
12/19/2012 08:55 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Sun Was Supposed To Set At 4:41 Central Time In Missouri, 12/18 , Still Hasn't Set At 5:01
Ok so yesterday the sky was light linger than usual..it didnt start getting darker until after 5:10.
Today was normal...by 5:10-15 it was already dark. These was a definite difference between yesterday and today.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 3888116


And no difference in cloud cover?
DUCM900

User ID: 30357243
Italy
12/19/2012 08:55 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Sun Was Supposed To Set At 4:41 Central Time In Missouri, 12/18 , Still Hasn't Set At 5:01
LMFAO
I'm a 'shill' because I knew something about astronomy.

You are fuckin' priceless.
 Quoting: Karlos


Wrong, you are shilling just because you are unable to proof your ***** claims. Its a "bit" different story.

-
Da fuq

User ID: 16258666
United States
12/19/2012 08:55 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Sun Was Supposed To Set At 4:41 Central Time In Missouri, 12/18 , Still Hasn't Set At 5:01
...


The fact that you didn't answer my question tells me that you aren't sure. I don't see beyond reality. But I surely pay attention to detail. The answer to this is get off the thread and go look morning and night. If you don't see anything off then quit coming here to prove you know the answer. If you see something off then join the club. But honestly rationality tells me we have nothing to gain here except a headache and wasted time with all this silly banter. Its like people who talk shit on songs they don't like on you tube. Gahhh don't like it it don't listen grow up and stop trying to poop on the party? So to speak.
 Quoting: _Obsidian_


I consider it a duty, of sorts, to debunk the wild, hysterical, doomsday claims and predictions you seem to think of as a "party". The fact that you think random people can have discovered that the sun is setting late, or whatever you think this "off-ness" is speaks volumes and so does the fact that you didn't answer MY question.

I didn't answer you because it makes no difference at all to the question at hand.
 Quoting: Menow 18943200



Ummm I did answer your question for one thing.
 Quoting: _Obsidian_


I believe you did not. Here is my question, which is quite relevant to the issue at hand: Do you have ANY solid evidence that it's lighter, later this year than last other that your memory? ANYTHING AT ALL?

For two im not listening to random people I came here to discuss what I saw with my own two eyes and it just so happened to be the case that other people in various areas noticed it too.
 Quoting: _Obsidian_


I believe what what you are discussing is something you claim to REMEMBER, hmm?

It may not be doom. There could be a rational explanation for it. Like what the OP posted recently. If that is your duty good luck also good luck with that round peg we all know how that turns out. In other words I don't think you'll get much accomplished. But I admire your conviction despite your outwardly condescending tone lol
 Quoting: _Obsidian_


Oh, I have been thanked many times for pointing out the flaws in the claims of people who insist there are things "wrong" in the sky.
 Quoting: Menow 18943200


siren2shillsiren2shillsiren2
Karlos

User ID: 30322593
United Kingdom
12/19/2012 08:56 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Sun Was Supposed To Set At 4:41 Central Time In Missouri, 12/18 , Still Hasn't Set At 5:01
I got the info from memory - I recognised it as soon as I saw it.
And you don't need a NASA link FFS - they don't own a monopoly on space study y'know.

Google the name - there should be tons of pics and info.
 Quoting: Karlos


Oh, and here's the 'Lunar 100'
Observing challenge list for Moon-viewers.
Note the 'Straight wall' at number 15
[link to the-moon.wikispaces.com]


Come on DUCM - admit it - you got PWNT and you don't like it.
Da fuq

User ID: 16258666
United States
12/19/2012 08:56 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Sun Was Supposed To Set At 4:41 Central Time In Missouri, 12/18 , Still Hasn't Set At 5:01
*****PROOFbyekitty



The following information is provided for San Diego, San Diego County, California (longitude W117.1, latitude N32.8):

Wednesday
19 December 2012 Pacific Standard Time

SUN
Begin civil twilight 6:19 a.m.
Sunrise 6:46 a.m.
Sun transit 11:46 a.m.
Sunset 4:46 p.m.
End civil twilight 5:13 p.m.

[link to www.flickr.com] ******************************

That pic was at 5:30 p.m
Twighlight didn't completely fade till about 5:38 btw.
Come on shill. Start shilling.

 Quoting: Da fuq

 Quoting: Da fuq
Menow
User ID: 18943200
United States
12/19/2012 08:56 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Sun Was Supposed To Set At 4:41 Central Time In Missouri, 12/18 , Still Hasn't Set At 5:01
*****PROOFbyekitty



The following information is provided for San Diego, San Diego County, California (longitude W117.1, latitude N32.8):

Wednesday
19 December 2012 Pacific Standard Time

SUN
Begin civil twilight 6:19 a.m.
Sunrise 6:46 a.m.
Sun transit 11:46 a.m.
Sunset 4:46 p.m.
End civil twilight 5:13 p.m.

[link to www.flickr.com] ******************************

That pic was at 5:30 p.m
Twighlight didn't completely fade till about 5:38 btw.
Come on shill. Start shilling.

 Quoting: Da fuq


Is that your idea of a picture of the sun setting?
DUCM900

User ID: 30357243
Italy
12/19/2012 08:58 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Sun Was Supposed To Set At 4:41 Central Time In Missouri, 12/18 , Still Hasn't Set At 5:01
who is missed? ohh WeaselTurboooo i guess hf


-
Karlos

User ID: 30322593
United Kingdom
12/19/2012 08:58 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Sun Was Supposed To Set At 4:41 Central Time In Missouri, 12/18 , Still Hasn't Set At 5:01
LMFAO
I'm a 'shill' because I knew something about astronomy.

You are fuckin' priceless.
 Quoting: Karlos


Wrong, you are shilling just because you are unable to proof your ***** claims. Its a "bit" different story.

-
 Quoting: DUCM900


Unable to prove......???
FFS

Here:
[link to lmgtfy.com]
Da fuq

User ID: 16258666
United States
12/19/2012 09:00 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Sun Was Supposed To Set At 4:41 Central Time In Missouri, 12/18 , Still Hasn't Set At 5:01
*****PROOFbyekitty



The following information is provided for San Diego, San Diego County, California (longitude W117.1, latitude N32.8):

Wednesday
19 December 2012 Pacific Standard Time

SUN
Begin civil twilight 6:19 a.m.
Sunrise 6:46 a.m.
Sun transit 11:46 a.m.
Sunset 4:46 p.m.
End civil twilight 5:13 p.m.

[link to www.flickr.com] ******************************

That pic was at 5:30 p.m
Twighlight didn't completely fade till about 5:38 btw.
Come on shill. Start shilling.

 Quoting: Da fuq


Is that your idea of a picture of the sun setting?
 Quoting: Menow 18943200


Ha, now your just trolling. Move along child.
DUCM900

User ID: 30357243
Italy
12/19/2012 09:03 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Sun Was Supposed To Set At 4:41 Central Time In Missouri, 12/18 , Still Hasn't Set At 5:01
LMFAO
I'm a 'shill' because I knew something about astronomy.

You are fuckin' priceless.
 Quoting: Karlos


Wrong, you are shilling just because you are unable to proof your ***** claims. Its a "bit" different story.

-
 Quoting: DUCM900


Unable to prove......???
FFS

Here:
[link to lmgtfy.com]
 Quoting: Karlos


I told you, link NASA site, not f*** wiki stuf where everyone can post garbage.


-
Menow
User ID: 18943200
United States
12/19/2012 09:07 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Sun Was Supposed To Set At 4:41 Central Time In Missouri, 12/18 , Still Hasn't Set At 5:01
*****PROOFbyekitty



The following information is provided for San Diego, San Diego County, California (longitude W117.1, latitude N32.8):

Wednesday
19 December 2012 Pacific Standard Time

SUN
Begin civil twilight 6:19 a.m.
Sunrise 6:46 a.m.
Sun transit 11:46 a.m.
Sunset 4:46 p.m.
End civil twilight 5:13 p.m.

[link to www.flickr.com] ******************************

That pic was at 5:30 p.m
Twighlight didn't completely fade till about 5:38 btw.
Come on shill. Start shilling.

 Quoting: Da fuq


Is that your idea of a picture of the sun setting?
 Quoting: Menow 18943200


Ha, now your just trolling. Move along child.
 Quoting: Da fuq


Not at all. You're claiming that the sun is setting at a different time than it should, but you show a pic which is clearly taken well after the sun has set. What, exactly, do you think that is supposed to demonstrate about the time the sun set?
Menow
User ID: 18943200
United States
12/19/2012 09:09 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Sun Was Supposed To Set At 4:41 Central Time In Missouri, 12/18 , Still Hasn't Set At 5:01
LMFAO
I'm a 'shill' because I knew something about astronomy.

You are fuckin' priceless.
 Quoting: Karlos


Wrong, you are shilling just because you are unable to proof your ***** claims. Its a "bit" different story.

-
 Quoting: DUCM900


Unable to prove......???
FFS

Here:
[link to lmgtfy.com]
 Quoting: Karlos


I told you, link NASA site, not f*** wiki stuf where everyone can post garbage.


-
 Quoting: DUCM900


I told you to say what book it is which proves there is no such thing as field rotation, but you didn't even pretend to have one.
Da fuq

User ID: 16258666
United States
12/19/2012 09:09 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Sun Was Supposed To Set At 4:41 Central Time In Missouri, 12/18 , Still Hasn't Set At 5:01
*****PROOFbyekitty



The following information is provided for San Diego, San Diego County, California (longitude W117.1, latitude N32.8):

Wednesday
19 December 2012 Pacific Standard Time

SUN
Begin civil twilight 6:19 a.m.
Sunrise 6:46 a.m.
Sun transit 11:46 a.m.
Sunset 4:46 p.m.
End civil twilight 5:13 p.m.

[link to www.flickr.com] ******************************

That pic was at 5:30 p.m
Twighlight didn't completely fade till about 5:38 btw.
Come on shill. Start shilling.

 Quoting: Da fuq


Is that your idea of a picture of the sun setting?
 Quoting: Menow 18943200


Ha, now your just trolling. Move along child.
 Quoting: Da fuq


Not at all. You're claiming that the sun is setting at a different time than it should, but you show a pic which is clearly taken well after the sun has set. What, exactly, do you think that is supposed to demonstrate about the time the sun set?
 Quoting: Menow 18943200


I'm claiming the sun is burning at an intensity we have never seen before. Thank you for clarifying you are a shill and indeed an idiot now as well. hf
Menow
User ID: 18943200
United States
12/19/2012 09:11 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Sun Was Supposed To Set At 4:41 Central Time In Missouri, 12/18 , Still Hasn't Set At 5:01
Are you all ignoring the post from the person in the tall building who said the sun set 2 minutes after the predicted time? Why yes... yes, you are.
Da fuq

User ID: 16258666
United States
12/19/2012 09:12 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Sun Was Supposed To Set At 4:41 Central Time In Missouri, 12/18 , Still Hasn't Set At 5:01
I don't care what the man in the building said. I have pictures, you have a mental block of a religioustard.

Keep on shillin' though.

Last Edited by Da fuq on 12/19/2012 09:13 PM
Menow
User ID: 18943200
United States
12/19/2012 09:13 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Sun Was Supposed To Set At 4:41 Central Time In Missouri, 12/18 , Still Hasn't Set At 5:01
...


Is that your idea of a picture of the sun setting?
 Quoting: Menow 18943200


Ha, now your just trolling. Move along child.
 Quoting: Da fuq


Not at all. You're claiming that the sun is setting at a different time than it should, but you show a pic which is clearly taken well after the sun has set. What, exactly, do you think that is supposed to demonstrate about the time the sun set?
 Quoting: Menow 18943200


I'm claiming the sun is burning at an intensity we have never seen before. Thank you for clarifying you are a shill and indeed an idiot now as well. hf
 Quoting: Da fuq


And your photo demonstrates that, how?

May I remind you of the subject of this thread?:

The Sun Was Supposed To Set At 4:41 Central Time In Missouri, 12/18 , Still Hasn't Set At 5:01
Karlos

User ID: 30322593
United Kingdom
12/19/2012 09:14 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Sun Was Supposed To Set At 4:41 Central Time In Missouri, 12/18 , Still Hasn't Set At 5:01
 Quoting: Karlos


I told you, link NASA site, not f*** wiki stuf where everyone can post garbage.

 Quoting: DUCM900

That link is Google - not wiki - It searches everything, including NASA sites.
NASA is down at 8th position.

Why don't you just admit that the Rupes Recta is a well documented Lunar feature, instead of perpetuating this 'dumb' act.

Admit it - You highlighted that video, thinking it was something abnormal - and don't want to accept that you were wrong.
Hydra

User ID: 30368654
Germany
12/19/2012 09:14 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Sun Was Supposed To Set At 4:41 Central Time In Missouri, 12/18 , Still Hasn't Set At 5:01
I got the info from memory - I recognised it as soon as I saw it.
And you don't need a NASA link FFS - they don't own a monopoly on space study y'know.

Google the name - there should be tons of pics and info.
 Quoting: Karlos


confirmed confirmed

 Quoting: DUCM900

I think it's the first time you are right: [link to www.google.de]


.
If the Moon is off, if Earth wobbles or if there is a pole shift
how can things like this, predicted decades ago, happen?

aseindia
Annular Solar Eclipse - January 15, 2010 - Rameshwaram, India
Da fuq

User ID: 16258666
United States
12/19/2012 09:15 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Sun Was Supposed To Set At 4:41 Central Time In Missouri, 12/18 , Still Hasn't Set At 5:01
...


Ha, now your just trolling. Move along child.
 Quoting: Da fuq


Not at all. You're claiming that the sun is setting at a different time than it should, but you show a pic which is clearly taken well after the sun has set. What, exactly, do you think that is supposed to demonstrate about the time the sun set?
 Quoting: Menow 18943200


I'm claiming the sun is burning at an intensity we have never seen before. Thank you for clarifying you are a shill and indeed an idiot now as well. hf
 Quoting: Da fuq


And your photo demonstrates that, how?

May I remind you of the subject of this thread?:

The Sun Was Supposed To Set At 4:41 Central Time In Missouri, 12/18 , Still Hasn't Set At 5:01
 Quoting: Menow 18943200


Oh ok shill. We can't elaborate as to why the topic is occurring. We have to stay exactly on topic? right hitler?

You're not on my level.

Last Edited by Da fuq on 12/19/2012 09:15 PM
Menow
User ID: 18943200
United States
12/19/2012 09:16 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Sun Was Supposed To Set At 4:41 Central Time In Missouri, 12/18 , Still Hasn't Set At 5:01
...


Not at all. You're claiming that the sun is setting at a different time than it should, but you show a pic which is clearly taken well after the sun has set. What, exactly, do you think that is supposed to demonstrate about the time the sun set?
 Quoting: Menow 18943200


I'm claiming the sun is burning at an intensity we have never seen before. Thank you for clarifying you are a shill and indeed an idiot now as well. hf
 Quoting: Da fuq


And your photo demonstrates that, how?

May I remind you of the subject of this thread?:

The Sun Was Supposed To Set At 4:41 Central Time In Missouri, 12/18 , Still Hasn't Set At 5:01
 Quoting: Menow 18943200


Oh ok shill. We can't elaborate as to why the topic is occurring. We have to stay exactly on topic? right hitler?

You're not on my level.
 Quoting: Da fuq


I thank my lucky stars for that!

Now... your photo supports your assertion, how?
DUCM900

User ID: 30357243
Italy
12/19/2012 09:16 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Sun Was Supposed To Set At 4:41 Central Time In Missouri, 12/18 , Still Hasn't Set At 5:01
Come on I put up pics with the watch and everything. Where the shill zerg go?
 Quoting: Da fuq


Its incredible, now we got all the shills of GLP in one thread

rockon


-
 Quoting: DUCM900


I feel like they are lying in wait, gonna strike as a team again soon.hf
 Quoting: Da fuq



Lot of money wasted for trying to covering the uncovering.


whatever


-

Last Edited by IWASTHERE on 12/19/2012 09:17 PM
Da fuq

User ID: 16258666
United States
12/19/2012 09:18 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Sun Was Supposed To Set At 4:41 Central Time In Missouri, 12/18 , Still Hasn't Set At 5:01
...


I'm claiming the sun is burning at an intensity we have never seen before. Thank you for clarifying you are a shill and indeed an idiot now as well. hf
 Quoting: Da fuq


And your photo demonstrates that, how?

May I remind you of the subject of this thread?:

The Sun Was Supposed To Set At 4:41 Central Time In Missouri, 12/18 , Still Hasn't Set At 5:01
 Quoting: Menow 18943200


Oh ok shill. We can't elaborate as to why the topic is occurring. We have to stay exactly on topic? right hitler?

You're not on my level.
 Quoting: Da fuq


I thank my lucky stars for that!

Now... your photo supports your assertion, how?
 Quoting: Menow 18943200


Look man you're just not getting it, read what it says then try again.


I don't know whether to chalk it up with being a shill which inherently makes you stupid or what?

Last Edited by Da fuq on 12/19/2012 09:20 PM
Menow
User ID: 18943200
United States
12/19/2012 09:24 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Sun Was Supposed To Set At 4:41 Central Time In Missouri, 12/18 , Still Hasn't Set At 5:01
...


And your photo demonstrates that, how?

May I remind you of the subject of this thread?:

The Sun Was Supposed To Set At 4:41 Central Time In Missouri, 12/18 , Still Hasn't Set At 5:01
 Quoting: Menow 18943200


Oh ok shill. We can't elaborate as to why the topic is occurring. We have to stay exactly on topic? right hitler?

You're not on my level.
 Quoting: Da fuq


I thank my lucky stars for that!

Now... your photo supports your assertion, how?
 Quoting: Menow 18943200


Look man you're just not getting it, read what it says then try again.


I don't know whether to chalk it up with being a shill which inherently makes you stupid or what?
 Quoting: Da fuq


Read what "it" says? What is "it". It's a simple question. Repeat: Your photo supports your assertion, how?
Da fuq

User ID: 16258666
United States
12/19/2012 09:25 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Sun Was Supposed To Set At 4:41 Central Time In Missouri, 12/18 , Still Hasn't Set At 5:01
Ah i'll hold your hand through this process shill.

Lets begin!

What time Did the NAVY say Civil twighlight would end?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 3888116
United States
12/19/2012 09:26 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Sun Was Supposed To Set At 4:41 Central Time In Missouri, 12/18 , Still Hasn't Set At 5:01
Ok so yesterday the sky was light linger than usual..it didnt start getting darker until after 5:10.
Today was normal...by 5:10-15 it was already dark. These was a definite difference between yesterday and today.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 3888116


And no difference in cloud cover?
 Quoting: Menow 18943200


Hmmm...it was pretty cloudy earlier. I cant remember how it was yesterday...I'll pay attention to that tomorrow.
Da fuq

User ID: 16258666
United States
12/19/2012 09:26 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Sun Was Supposed To Set At 4:41 Central Time In Missouri, 12/18 , Still Hasn't Set At 5:01
*****PROOFbyekitty



The following information is provided for San Diego, San Diego County, California (longitude W117.1, latitude N32.8):

Wednesday
19 December 2012 Pacific Standard Time

SUN
Begin civil twilight 6:19 a.m.
Sunrise 6:46 a.m.
Sun transit 11:46 a.m.
Sunset 4:46 p.m.
End civil twilight 5:13 p.m.

[link to www.flickr.com] ******************************

That pic was at 5:30 p.m
Twighlight didn't completely fade till about 5:38 btw.
Come on shill. Start shilling.

 Quoting: Da fuq


Is that your idea of a picture of the sun setting?
 Quoting: Menow 18943200


Ha, now your just trolling. Move along child.
 Quoting: Da fuq
Menow
User ID: 18943200
United States
12/19/2012 09:26 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Sun Was Supposed To Set At 4:41 Central Time In Missouri, 12/18 , Still Hasn't Set At 5:01
...


And your photo demonstrates that, how?

May I remind you of the subject of this thread?:

The Sun Was Supposed To Set At 4:41 Central Time In Missouri, 12/18 , Still Hasn't Set At 5:01
 Quoting: Menow 18943200


Oh ok shill. We can't elaborate as to why the topic is occurring. We have to stay exactly on topic? right hitler?

You're not on my level.
 Quoting: Da fuq


I thank my lucky stars for that!

Now... c
 Quoting: Menow 18943200


Look man you're just not getting it, read what it says then try again.


I don't know whether to chalk it up with being a shill which inherently makes you stupid or what?
 Quoting: Da fuq


Below your photo, it says: "5:30". Now...your photo supports your assertion, how?

News