Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 2,905 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 2,093,813
Pageviews Today: 3,053,328Threads Today: 706Posts Today: 15,839
10:14 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

The Sun Was Supposed To Set At 4:41 Central Time In Missouri, 12/18 , Still Hasn't Set At 5:01

 
DUCM900

User ID: 30827989
12/25/2012 10:42 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Sun Was Supposed To Set At 4:41 Central Time In Missouri, 12/18 , Still Hasn't Set At 5:01
Also, sun rose and set just as it was supposed to, hooray for things still being normal despite all the pot heads thinking otherwise.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 6476436


Now see, your insult is what betrays you, shilltard.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30218778


Really? I think it's accurate. THC leads to paranoia, leads to vast conspiracy theories.



 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 6476436


SO now the question for you is: WHY you are digging around in this conspiracy thread/site?


Anyway now, Explain Scientifically WHY the moon is in sidway mode even in the very northern hemisphere latitudes.


Otherwise, all you have to do is ----> cupofjoecupofjoe ---->and then go ahead.

-

Last Edited by IWASTHERE on 12/25/2012 11:00 AM
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 6476436
United States
12/25/2012 11:07 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Sun Was Supposed To Set At 4:41 Central Time In Missouri, 12/18 , Still Hasn't Set At 5:01
Also, sun rose and set just as it was supposed to, hooray for things still being normal despite all the pot heads thinking otherwise.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 6476436


Now see, your insult is what betrays you, shilltard.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30218778


Really? I think it's accurate. THC leads to paranoia, leads to vast conspiracy theories.



 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 6476436


SO now the question is: WHY you are digging around in this conspiracy thread/site?


Anyway now, Explain Scientifically WHY the moon is in sidway mode even in the very northern hemisphere latitudes.


Otherwise all you have to do is ----> cupofjoe ---->and go ahead.

-
 Quoting: DUCM900



Everything you needed was provided on page 32. Furthermore it's your claim, your burden of proof.

I can't help that you are arguing from a point of incredulity. Though that is basic SOP for these parts?

Why am I hear? Well, I tumbled down this rabbit hole originally to see how many end of the worlders were going to have their minds blown when it didn't end (repeatedly).

Sadly, it has become a realization that all it did was galvanize them to pick another date. There will always be DOOM on the horizon for some of these people I suppose. Not sure why, but it appears there is just a portion of individuals who would rather live in fear of every shadow, every dark corner, than shed light on the matter.

I stayed, because a lot of well intentioned people find their way here looking for answers. The answers they will often receive here are nothing more than uninformed conspiracy theories.

That's all well and good, except then they go just off of a random internet post and don't do any real independent research. Which makes them an easy convert for your side I suppose. Facts are stubborn things. There's a reason why no one on your side of the fence lasts long at a place like BAUT or other scientifically literate venues. No, it's not because everyone is a shill and suppressing evidence. It's because the "evidence" you claim to be true is not grounded in any sort of reality. When push comes to shove and challenged on extraordinary claims, or asked to simply compile data and look at it themselves and how it doesn't fit, the typical HB'er refuses or dismisses (their own) faulty data themselves.

As for motive? I can only guess why. Like I said apparently some people just want to watch the world burn. It doesn't mean they should take everyone down with them.

Now, are YOU going to start going through this thread and plot the supposed data points? Again, I'd even let you rule out anyone who is stating nothing is amiss. Let's allow for confirmation bias. Take all the "off" times, plug them in against almanac or weather station released times, and note, that the data itself doesn't fit. People are not taking into account a myriad list of reasons why the sun is rising/setting when it does, (field of view, elevation, weather, (ie they can't properly see when the sun rose/set and are assuming based on residual light) ecact lat/long coordinates etc).

What you'd get is a world that is both speeding up and slowing down at the same time, much akin to a 16 year old's first time at the wheel. The effects on weather patterns, tradewinds, biological cycles etc, would all be noticeable on a global scale. That isn't happening.
DUCM900

User ID: 30827989
12/25/2012 11:10 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Sun Was Supposed To Set At 4:41 Central Time In Missouri, 12/18 , Still Hasn't Set At 5:01
Everything you needed was provided on page 32. Furthermore it's your claim, your burden of proof.

 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 6476436


FAIL

Post data proof about sideway moon on the Northern Hemisphere and then explain why it should be normal to see it in these regions.


-

Last Edited by IWASTHERE on 12/25/2012 11:23 AM
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 6476436
United States
12/25/2012 11:25 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Sun Was Supposed To Set At 4:41 Central Time In Missouri, 12/18 , Still Hasn't Set At 5:01
Everything you needed was provided on page 32. Furthermore it's your claim, your burden of proof.

 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 6476436


FAIL

Post data proof about sideway moon on the Northern Hemisphere and then explain why it should be normal to see it in these regions.


-
 Quoting: DUCM900



Thanks for doing exactly what I predicted you would do.

I believe around these parts that means I'm some sort of psychic or alien, correct?
DUCM900

User ID: 30827989
12/25/2012 11:27 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Sun Was Supposed To Set At 4:41 Central Time In Missouri, 12/18 , Still Hasn't Set At 5:01
Thanks for doing exactly what I predicted you would do.

I believe around these parts that means I'm some sort of psychic or alien, correct?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 6476436


siren2 shill siren2
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 22022484
United States
12/25/2012 11:28 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Sun Was Supposed To Set At 4:41 Central Time In Missouri, 12/18 , Still Hasn't Set At 5:01
bumpdoor
Da fuq

User ID: 16258666
United States
12/25/2012 11:29 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Sun Was Supposed To Set At 4:41 Central Time In Missouri, 12/18 , Still Hasn't Set At 5:01
Thread: BREAKING: Moon is too bright here over europe
Data delivered by ESA’s Cluster quartet of satellites shows that it is easier for the solar wind to penetrate Earth’s magnetic environment, the magnetosphere, than had previously been thought.

Using Rumba, Salsa, Samba and Tango satellites as a space plasma microscope, scientists have zoomed in on the solar wind to reveal tiny turbulent swirls that could play a big role in heating it.

Also scientists from NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Md. have, for the first time, directly observed the presence of certain waves in the solar wind—called Kelvin-Helmholtz waves that can help transfer energy into near-Earth space—under circumstances when previous theories predicted they were not expected.

Turbulence is highly complex and all around us, evident in water flowing from a tap, around an aircraft wing, in experimental fusion reactors on Earth, and also in space.

In the stream of charged particles emitted by the Sun – the solar wind – turbulence is thought to play a key part in maintaining its heat as it streams away and races across the Solar System. As the solar wind expands, it cools down, but to a much smaller extent than would be expected if the flow were smooth.

Turbulence arises from irregularities in the flow of particles and magnetic field lines, but understanding how this energy is transferred from the large scales where it originates, to the small scales where it is dissipated, is like trying to trace energy as it is transferred from the smooth, laminar flow of a river down to the small turbulent eddies formed at the bottom of a waterfall.

Two of the four Cluster satellites have also made extremely detailed observations of plasma turbulence in the solar wind.

[link to www.messagetoeagle.com]














garybyekitty

Last Edited by Da fuq on 12/25/2012 11:34 AM
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 6476436
United States
12/25/2012 11:47 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Sun Was Supposed To Set At 4:41 Central Time In Missouri, 12/18 , Still Hasn't Set At 5:01
Thanks for doing exactly what I predicted you would do.

I believe around these parts that means I'm some sort of psychic or alien, correct?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 6476436


siren2 shill siren2
 Quoting: DUCM900


Facts are stubborn things. Closing your eyes shut and not applying critical thinking skills doesn't make the data suddenly fit with your hypothesis.
DUCM900

User ID: 30827989
12/25/2012 11:51 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Sun Was Supposed To Set At 4:41 Central Time In Missouri, 12/18 , Still Hasn't Set At 5:01
Facts are stubborn things. Closing your eyes shut and not applying critical thinking skills doesn't make the data suddenly fit with your hypothesis.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 6476436


You are unable to do nothing but stupid shilling. You are 'Menow' user now with AC number ass.

GO away


-

Last Edited by IWASTHERE on 12/25/2012 11:54 AM
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 6476436
United States
12/25/2012 11:56 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Sun Was Supposed To Set At 4:41 Central Time In Missouri, 12/18 , Still Hasn't Set At 5:01
Facts are stubborn things. Closing your eyes shut and not applying critical thinking skills doesn't make the data suddenly fit with your hypothesis.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 6476436


You are unable to do nothing but stupid shilling. You are 'Menow' user now with AC number ass.

GO away


-
 Quoting: DUCM900


What am I shilling? I certainly have nothing for sale here.

Do you think the basic laws of the universe are shills too?

Don't believe me! It's fine! Prove it for yourself, plot the data contained in this thread.

You won't, because as soon as you do you'll realize the data doesn't match up.
DUCM900

User ID: 30904298
Italy
12/26/2012 08:03 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Sun Was Supposed To Set At 4:41 Central Time In Missouri, 12/18 , Still Hasn't Set At 5:01
I-ve just started a new thread about the sideway moon here

Thread: The Moon Contiunues To Be Seen Often In Sideway Mode Even in the Northern Latitude Regions


Ignore the same shills as well.


/
DUCM900

User ID: 30957746
Italy
12/27/2012 02:40 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Sun Was Supposed To Set At 4:41 Central Time In Missouri, 12/18 , Still Hasn't Set At 5:01
This one is interesting as well:

<>>> Thread: Bright Skies at Night


/
Waterbug

User ID: 1295673
United States
01/09/2013 11:29 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Sun Was Supposed To Set At 4:41 Central Time In Missouri, 12/18 , Still Hasn't Set At 5:01
Also, sun rose and set just as it was supposed to, hooray for things still being normal despite all the pot heads thinking otherwise.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 6476436


Guilt by association..?
Is it 1970 again..?

That statement is so transparent.. ludicrous..
Man.. come up with something that is at least
halfway intelligent.
Maybe you should burn a bowl.. enjoy some introspective..
You don't have to be an asshole forever.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 24581329
United States
01/14/2013 08:28 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Sun Was Supposed To Set At 4:41 Central Time In Missouri, 12/18 , Still Hasn't Set At 5:01
OP here. I just got unbanned.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 32050596
United Kingdom
01/14/2013 09:12 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Sun Was Supposed To Set At 4:41 Central Time In Missouri, 12/18 , Still Hasn't Set At 5:01
OP here. I just got unbanned.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 24581329

Why did you get banned?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 6476436
United States
02/05/2013 09:51 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Sun Was Supposed To Set At 4:41 Central Time In Missouri, 12/18 , Still Hasn't Set At 5:01
Also, sun rose and set just as it was supposed to, hooray for things still being normal despite all the pot heads thinking otherwise.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 6476436


Guilt by association..?
Is it 1970 again..?

That statement is so transparent.. ludicrous..
Man.. come up with something that is at least
halfway intelligent.
Maybe you should burn a bowl.. enjoy some introspective..
You don't have to be an asshole forever.
 Quoting: Waterbug


Nope. I've never touched the stuff, though for the record, I think it should be legal.

However, yes that post was not my finest moment.

There have been several other posts in this thread by me, why just single that one out instead of the others?

Anyone bother to use this thread yet and plot the data points?

You'll be shocked at what it reveals.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 34643383
United States
02/19/2013 10:51 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Sun Was Supposed To Set At 4:41 Central Time In Missouri, 12/18 , Still Hasn't Set At 5:01
Thread: Sun Supposed To Set At 5:41; Sets At 6:15
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 34643383
United States
02/19/2013 10:52 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Sun Was Supposed To Set At 4:41 Central Time In Missouri, 12/18 , Still Hasn't Set At 5:01
OP here. I just got unbanned.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 24581329

Why did you get banned?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 32050596


No clue. They never say.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 34643383
United States
02/19/2013 10:57 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Sun Was Supposed To Set At 4:41 Central Time In Missouri, 12/18 , Still Hasn't Set At 5:01
Thread: Is The Sun Setting Earlier Than Usual On The West Coast?

News