Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 2,186 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 916,609
Pageviews Today: 1,145,808Threads Today: 204Posts Today: 3,153
08:16 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

The Sun Was Supposed To Set At 4:41 Central Time In Missouri, 12/18 , Still Hasn't Set At 5:01

 
Da fuq

User ID: 16258666
United States
12/19/2012 11:50 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Sun Was Supposed To Set At 4:41 Central Time In Missouri, 12/18 , Still Hasn't Set At 5:01
Can anyone in cali get a good view of the sun at the moment. Looks fucking redic right now.
DUCM900

User ID: 30323738
Italy
12/19/2012 11:50 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Sun Was Supposed To Set At 4:41 Central Time In Missouri, 12/18 , Still Hasn't Set At 5:01
So what you guys are saying is it may or may not matter if we check tomorrow things could go back to normal then be weird again the next day? It does seem the odd things are randomized.
 Quoting: _Obsidian_


Maybe they are setting up an artificial sun and it takes some time to do the stuff...


-
 Quoting: DUCM900


I don't know at this point everything seems "off" I saw your moon posts and I've noticed how the moon is indeed waxing/waning from the top down. People think I'm nuts for always watching the skies but they all have their noses in their phones it's a wonder people still pay attention to anything. The chemtrials have been particularly heavy in Cali this year btw.
 Quoting: _Obsidian_



The moon is doing no such thing. Look at it when it is rising in the east as opposed to setting in the west. It's called "field rotation".
 Quoting: Menow 18943200


siren2 shill siren2

Last Edited by IWASTHERE on 12/19/2012 11:52 AM
Menow
User ID: 18943200
United States
12/19/2012 11:51 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Sun Was Supposed To Set At 4:41 Central Time In Missouri, 12/18 , Still Hasn't Set At 5:01
the sun was supposed to rise at 7:12 this morning. It was light out and the sun was rising at 7 a.m.

It also did set late last night, I commented to my wife as we were driving toward the sunset that the sun sure is setting late tonight, odd.

Then I get home later in the evening and find this post.

somethings off somewhere.

The moon is waning and waxing incorrectly as well, any idiot can look up at the sky and see that.
 Quoting: NewsUpdater


It's good that you understand only idiots think that.
Waterbug

User ID: 1295673
United States
12/19/2012 11:53 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Sun Was Supposed To Set At 4:41 Central Time In Missouri, 12/18 , Still Hasn't Set At 5:01
This thread is getting too much attention.
DUCM900

User ID: 30323738
Italy
12/19/2012 11:53 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Sun Was Supposed To Set At 4:41 Central Time In Missouri, 12/18 , Still Hasn't Set At 5:01
the sun was supposed to rise at 7:12 this morning. It was light out and the sun was rising at 7 a.m.

It also did set late last night, I commented to my wife as we were driving toward the sunset that the sun sure is setting late tonight, odd.

Then I get home later in the evening and find this post.

somethings off somewhere.

The moon is waning and waxing incorrectly as well, any idiot can look up at the sky and see that.
 Quoting: NewsUpdater


It's good that you understand only idiots think that.
 Quoting: Menow 18943200


siren2siren2siren2siren2siren2

Last Edited by IWASTHERE on 12/19/2012 11:54 AM
Da fuq

User ID: 16258666
United States
12/19/2012 11:54 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Sun Was Supposed To Set At 4:41 Central Time In Missouri, 12/18 , Still Hasn't Set At 5:01
the sun was supposed to rise at 7:12 this morning. It was light out and the sun was rising at 7 a.m.

It also did set late last night, I commented to my wife as we were driving toward the sunset that the sun sure is setting late tonight, odd.

Then I get home later in the evening and find this post.

somethings off somewhere.

The moon is waning and waxing incorrectly as well, any idiot can look up at the sky and see that.
 Quoting: NewsUpdater


It's good that you understand only idiots think that.
 Quoting: Menow 18943200


siren2siren2siren2siren2siren2siren2siren2
 Quoting: DUCM900


shilling1rof1

Last Edited by Da fuq on 12/19/2012 11:55 AM
Menow
User ID: 18943200
United States
12/19/2012 11:56 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Sun Was Supposed To Set At 4:41 Central Time In Missouri, 12/18 , Still Hasn't Set At 5:01
It was early here in Cali
 Quoting: _Obsidian_


Yeah looked twighlight around 6 a.m
 Quoting: Da fuq


Sunrise wasn't supposed to be till 6:50 O.O
 Quoting: _Obsidian_


yeah man but did you see the moon last night. Was all jacked up.
 Quoting: Da fuq


If by "jacked up", you mean the lighted side of the moon was facing the sun like it always does, you are right.
DUCM900

User ID: 30323738
Italy
12/19/2012 11:57 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Sun Was Supposed To Set At 4:41 Central Time In Missouri, 12/18 , Still Hasn't Set At 5:01
...


Yeah looked twighlight around 6 a.m
 Quoting: Da fuq


Sunrise wasn't supposed to be till 6:50 O.O
 Quoting: _Obsidian_


yeah man but did you see the moon last night. Was all jacked up.
 Quoting: Da fuq


If by "jacked up", you mean the lighted side of the moon was facing the sun like it always does, you are right.
 Quoting: Menow 18943200


alertalertalertalert

Last Edited by IWASTHERE on 12/19/2012 11:57 AM
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 23651021
12/19/2012 11:59 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Sun Was Supposed To Set At 4:41 Central Time In Missouri, 12/18 , Still Hasn't Set At 5:01
...


Maybe they are setting up an artificial sun and it takes some time to do the stuff...


-
 Quoting: DUCM900


I don't know at this point everything seems "off" I saw your moon posts and I've noticed how the moon is indeed waxing/waning from the top down. People think I'm nuts for always watching the skies but they all have their noses in their phones it's a wonder people still pay attention to anything. The chemtrials have been particularly heavy in Cali this year btw.
 Quoting: _Obsidian_



The moon is doing no such thing. Look at it when it is rising in the east as opposed to setting in the west. It's called "field rotation".
 Quoting: Menow 18943200


siren2 shill siren2
 Quoting: DUCM900


Moron Alert!

DUC9000 is back in the house!
Da fuq

User ID: 16258666
United States
12/19/2012 12:01 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Sun Was Supposed To Set At 4:41 Central Time In Missouri, 12/18 , Still Hasn't Set At 5:01
...


Sunrise wasn't supposed to be till 6:50 O.O
 Quoting: _Obsidian_


yeah man but did you see the moon last night. Was all jacked up.
 Quoting: Da fuq


If by "jacked up", you mean the lighted side of the moon was facing the sun like it always does, you are right.
 Quoting: Menow 18943200


alertalertalertalert
 Quoting: DUCM900


Dude this is fucking RED ALERT
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 4394822
United States
12/19/2012 12:01 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Sun Was Supposed To Set At 4:41 Central Time In Missouri, 12/18 , Still Hasn't Set At 5:01
the sun was supposed to rise at 7:12 this morning. It was light out and the sun was rising at 7 a.m.

It also did set late last night, I commented to my wife as we were driving toward the sunset that the sun sure is setting late tonight, odd.

Then I get home later in the evening and find this post.

somethings off somewhere.

The moon is waning and waxing incorrectly as well, any idiot can look up at the sky and see that.
 Quoting: NewsUpdater


It's good that you understand only idiots think that.
 Quoting: Menow 18943200


lol

Finally someone makes some sense in this thread!

Amazing how someone can make a poor observation and it generates 9 pages of people jumping onward. Would be laughable if it weren't so sad.
Menow
User ID: 18943200
United States
12/19/2012 12:02 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Sun Was Supposed To Set At 4:41 Central Time In Missouri, 12/18 , Still Hasn't Set At 5:01
...


Maybe they are setting up an artificial sun and it takes some time to do the stuff...


-
 Quoting: DUCM900


I don't know at this point everything seems "off" I saw your moon posts and I've noticed how the moon is indeed waxing/waning from the top down. People think I'm nuts for always watching the skies but they all have their noses in their phones it's a wonder people still pay attention to anything. The chemtrials have been particularly heavy in Cali this year btw.
 Quoting: _Obsidian_



The moon is doing no such thing. Look at it when it is rising in the east as opposed to setting in the west. It's called "field rotation".
 Quoting: Menow 18943200


siren2 shill siren2
 Quoting: DUCM900


[link to www.celestron.com]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 23651021
12/19/2012 12:02 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Sun Was Supposed To Set At 4:41 Central Time In Missouri, 12/18 , Still Hasn't Set At 5:01
...


yeah man but did you see the moon last night. Was all jacked up.
 Quoting: Da fuq


If by "jacked up", you mean the lighted side of the moon was facing the sun like it always does, you are right.
 Quoting: Menow 18943200


:alert::alert::alert::alert:
 Quoting: DUCM900


Dude this is fucking RED ALERT
 Quoting: Da fuq


The moon looked fine to me last night.

Quit being a fucking drama queen and lay off the pipe.
DUCM900

User ID: 30323738
Italy
12/19/2012 12:04 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Sun Was Supposed To Set At 4:41 Central Time In Missouri, 12/18 , Still Hasn't Set At 5:01
 Quoting: Menow 18943200


Go to sell your BS shill links away




-

Last Edited by IWASTHERE on 12/19/2012 12:04 PM
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 23651021
12/19/2012 12:08 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Sun Was Supposed To Set At 4:41 Central Time In Missouri, 12/18 , Still Hasn't Set At 5:01
 Quoting: Menow 18943200


Go to sell your BS shill links away




-
 Quoting: DUCM900


You yell "shill" everytime you get your ass-kicked by people using FACTS and LOGIC.

It's pathetic.
Da fuq

User ID: 16258666
United States
12/19/2012 12:09 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Sun Was Supposed To Set At 4:41 Central Time In Missouri, 12/18 , Still Hasn't Set At 5:01
[link to www.flickr.com]

Lowest exposure possible mind you.

Last Edited by Da fuq on 12/19/2012 12:11 PM
Menow
User ID: 18943200
United States
12/19/2012 12:09 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Sun Was Supposed To Set At 4:41 Central Time In Missouri, 12/18 , Still Hasn't Set At 5:01
 Quoting: Menow 18943200


Go to sell your BS shill links away




-
 Quoting: DUCM900


[link to www.celestron.com]

What is field rotation? How does it affect my scope’s viewing and imaging?

Field rotation can be visualized by thinking about what happens when a constellation or the moon rises, transits and sets. From northern latitudes, Orion will rise on his side with his left shoulder (the one north of Rigel) highest. As he crosses the sky he will reach and transit the meridian, when both shoulders will be the same height. When he sets, the right shoulder (Betelgeuse) will appear highest. It’s like he’s climbed the dome of the sky, reaching the top and then goes down the other side. The angle of his body changes during the course of the night, first tilting to the east, then tilting to the west. Similarly, the moon will rise with the Sea of Crises (Mare Crisium) edge leading upwards, the Ocean of Storms (Oceanus Procellarum) following and lower. Both of these dark areas will appear about the same altitude when it transits, then the Ocean of Storms will be higher than the Sea of Crises as the moon sets. Again the tilt changes as the moon moves across the sky. Both examples show field rotation with your head and body acting like an altazimuth mount.
Waterbug

User ID: 1295673
United States
12/19/2012 12:10 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Sun Was Supposed To Set At 4:41 Central Time In Missouri, 12/18 , Still Hasn't Set At 5:01
It's good that you understand only idiots think that.
 Quoting: Menow 18943200


lol

Finally someone makes some sense in this thread!

Amazing how someone can make a poor observation and it generates 9 pages of people jumping onward. Would be laughable if it weren't so sad.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 4394822


'someone'

Actually, a lot of people.

'poor observation'

Do you mean they have poor eyesight..?
An observation is merely an observation.
Can't qualify it like that.

'9 pages of people jumping onward'

Really..? Discussion is now jumping onward..?

'Would be laughable if it weren't so sad.'

Ah, yes... your true motive to post here. Ridicule.
DUCM900

User ID: 30323738
Italy
12/19/2012 12:11 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Sun Was Supposed To Set At 4:41 Central Time In Missouri, 12/18 , Still Hasn't Set At 5:01
You yell "shill" everytime you get your ass-kicked by people using FACTS and LOGIC.

It's pathetic.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 23651021



Go back to school instead and open just one book. You and your shill friend F.O.S. here.

-

Last Edited by IWASTHERE on 12/19/2012 12:15 PM
Da fuq

User ID: 16258666
United States
12/19/2012 12:14 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Sun Was Supposed To Set At 4:41 Central Time In Missouri, 12/18 , Still Hasn't Set At 5:01
[link to www.flickr.com]

Lowest exposure possible mind you.
 Quoting: Da fuq


Ignore da shillies and look at mah pic!5a

Lowest exposure and brightness that I could do.
Menow
User ID: 18943200
United States
12/19/2012 12:18 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Sun Was Supposed To Set At 4:41 Central Time In Missouri, 12/18 , Still Hasn't Set At 5:01
You yell "shill" everytime you get your ass-kicked by people using FACTS and LOGIC.

It's pathetic.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 23651021



Go back to school instead and open just one book. You and your shill friend F.O.S. here.

-
 Quoting: DUCM900


Which book would that be?
DUCM900

User ID: 30323738
Italy
12/19/2012 12:23 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Sun Was Supposed To Set At 4:41 Central Time In Missouri, 12/18 , Still Hasn't Set At 5:01
[link to www.flickr.com]

Lowest exposure possible mind you.
 Quoting: Da fuq


Ignore da shillies and look at mah pic!5a

Lowest exposure and brightness that I could do.
 Quoting: Da fuq



How about exposure settings in that shot?


-
Da fuq

User ID: 16258666
United States
12/19/2012 12:24 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Sun Was Supposed To Set At 4:41 Central Time In Missouri, 12/18 , Still Hasn't Set At 5:01
[link to www.flickr.com]

Lowest exposure possible mind you.
 Quoting: Da fuq


Ignore da shillies and look at mah pic!5a

Lowest exposure and brightness that I could do.
 Quoting: Da fuq



How about exposure settings in that shot?


-
 Quoting: DUCM900


It has to be that low. Otherwise the entire screen is just white.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 29416166
12/19/2012 12:33 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Sun Was Supposed To Set At 4:41 Central Time In Missouri, 12/18 , Still Hasn't Set At 5:01
I'm pretty sure we can all agree that the Cheshire moon has been happening forever.

But why cant some people understand that it has seemed to happen at times that it shouldn't.

For example during winter a Cheshire moon is apparently normal yet in the summer it is not. I'm speaking from southern California and that perspective.

And from that point, Personally it was a Cheshire moon last spring/summer that caught my attention as odd.

So consider for a moment that maybe a change in the consistency of what we are accustomed to seeing and during the appropriate seasons is causing all of the confusion.

A wobble in the rotation of the earth would explain The moon anomalies, the weather, the rising and setting of the sun.

And if it hasn't happened yet. The very aspect of forums like these are waking people up to the idea of it. But some will never believe.
DUCM900

User ID: 30323738
Italy
12/19/2012 12:36 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Sun Was Supposed To Set At 4:41 Central Time In Missouri, 12/18 , Still Hasn't Set At 5:01
I'm pretty sure we can all agree that the Cheshire moon has been happening forever.

 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 29416166


Where forever, you mean the boat moon in the equator regions almost near 15 degrees from the middle equator line right?

If not, you should go back to school as well.

whatever


-

Last Edited by IWASTHERE on 12/19/2012 12:41 PM
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 29416166
12/19/2012 12:43 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Sun Was Supposed To Set At 4:41 Central Time In Missouri, 12/18 , Still Hasn't Set At 5:01
I'm pretty sure we can all agree that the Cheshire moon has been happening forever.

 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 29416166


Where forever, you mean the boat moon in the equator regions right? if not, you should go back to school as well.

whatever


-
 Quoting: DUCM900


What in the @#&**^%?@ world you IDIOT!!!! OF COURSE!!!!! IT DOESN'T MATTER IF YOU LIVE IN THE SOUTH POLE OR ON MARS!!!! THE CHESHIRE MOON HAS BEEN HAPPENING SINCE THE BEGINNING FOR THOSE THAT ARE IN @%$&*? REGION TO SEE IT HAPPEN!!!!

AND I STATED MY REGION!!

and here is something special for you..

[link to www.readingsoft.com]


Its a reading comprehension test! please copy and paste your scores..
Thanks!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 4394822
United States
12/19/2012 12:43 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Sun Was Supposed To Set At 4:41 Central Time In Missouri, 12/18 , Still Hasn't Set At 5:01
It's good that you understand only idiots think that.
 Quoting: Menow 18943200


lol

Finally someone makes some sense in this thread!

Amazing how someone can make a poor observation and it generates 9 pages of people jumping onward. Would be laughable if it weren't so sad.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 4394822


'someone'

Actually, a lot of people.

'poor observation'

Do you mean they have poor eyesight..?
An observation is merely an observation.
Can't qualify it like that.

'9 pages of people jumping onward'

Really..? Discussion is now jumping onward..?

'Would be laughable if it weren't so sad.'

Ah, yes... your true motive to post here. Ridicule.
 Quoting: Waterbug


You deserve more ridicule frankly. This thread is pure bunk.
DUCM900

User ID: 30323738
Italy
12/19/2012 12:44 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Sun Was Supposed To Set At 4:41 Central Time In Missouri, 12/18 , Still Hasn't Set At 5:01
I'm pretty sure we can all agree that the Cheshire moon has been happening forever.

 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 29416166


Where forever, you mean the boat moon in the equator regions right? if not, you should go back to school as well.

whatever


-
 Quoting: DUCM900


What in the @#&**^%?@ world you IDIOT!!!! OF COURSE!!!!! IT DOESN'T MATTER IF YOU LIVE IN THE SOUTH POLE OR ON MARS!!!! THE CHESHIRE MOON HAS BEEN HAPPENING SINCE THE BEGINNING FOR THOSE THAT ARE IN @%$&*? REGION TO SEE IT HAPPEN!!!!

AND I STATED MY REGION!!

and here is something special for you..

[link to www.readingsoft.com]


Its a reading comprehension test! please copy and paste your scores..
Thanks!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 29416166


moran
Da fuq

User ID: 16258666
United States
12/19/2012 12:45 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Sun Was Supposed To Set At 4:41 Central Time In Missouri, 12/18 , Still Hasn't Set At 5:01
It's good that you understand only idiots think that.
 Quoting: Menow 18943200


lol

Finally someone makes some sense in this thread!

Amazing how someone can make a poor observation and it generates 9 pages of people jumping onward. Would be laughable if it weren't so sad.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 4394822


'someone'

Actually, a lot of people.

'poor observation'

Do you mean they have poor eyesight..?
An observation is merely an observation.
Can't qualify it like that.

'9 pages of people jumping onward'

Really..? Discussion is now jumping onward..?

'Would be laughable if it weren't so sad.'

Ah, yes... your true motive to post here. Ridicule.
 Quoting: Waterbug


You deserve more ridicule frankly. This thread is pure bunk.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 4394822


Lol why won't you leave scrub? Piss off.
Waterbug

User ID: 1295673
United States
12/19/2012 12:46 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Sun Was Supposed To Set At 4:41 Central Time In Missouri, 12/18 , Still Hasn't Set At 5:01
It's good that you understand only idiots think that.
 Quoting: Menow 18943200


lol

Finally someone makes some sense in this thread!

Amazing how someone can make a poor observation and it generates 9 pages of people jumping onward. Would be laughable if it weren't so sad.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 4394822


'someone'

Actually, a lot of people.

'poor observation'

Do you mean they have poor eyesight..?
An observation is merely an observation.
Can't qualify it like that.

'9 pages of people jumping onward'

Really..? Discussion is now jumping onward..?

'Would be laughable if it weren't so sad.'

Ah, yes... your true motive to post here. Ridicule.
 Quoting: Waterbug


You deserve more ridicule frankly. This thread is pure bunk.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 4394822


Thanks for verifying.... Not real smart, are ya..?

News