The Sun Was Supposed To Set At 4:41 Central Time In Missouri, 12/18 , Still Hasn't Set At 5:01 | |
Menow User ID: 18943200 United States 12/19/2012 08:53 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Menow 18943200 You "see beyond" what, reality? I'm sure you think you do. Do you have ANY solid evidence that it's lighter, later this year than last other that your memory? ANYTHING AT ALL? The fact that you didn't answer my question tells me that you aren't sure. I don't see beyond reality. But I surely pay attention to detail. The answer to this is get off the thread and go look morning and night. If you don't see anything off then quit coming here to prove you know the answer. If you see something off then join the club. But honestly rationality tells me we have nothing to gain here except a headache and wasted time with all this silly banter. Its like people who talk shit on songs they don't like on you tube. Gahhh don't like it it don't listen grow up and stop trying to poop on the party? So to speak. I consider it a duty, of sorts, to debunk the wild, hysterical, doomsday claims and predictions you seem to think of as a "party". The fact that you think random people can have discovered that the sun is setting late, or whatever you think this "off-ness" is speaks volumes and so does the fact that you didn't answer MY question. I didn't answer you because it makes no difference at all to the question at hand. Ummm I did answer your question for one thing. I believe you did not. Here is my question, which is quite relevant to the issue at hand: Do you have ANY solid evidence that it's lighter, later this year than last other that your memory? ANYTHING AT ALL? For two im not listening to random people I came here to discuss what I saw with my own two eyes and it just so happened to be the case that other people in various areas noticed it too. Quoting: _Obsidian_ I believe what what you are discussing is something you claim to REMEMBER, hmm? It may not be doom. There could be a rational explanation for it. Like what the OP posted recently. If that is your duty good luck also good luck with that round peg we all know how that turns out. In other words I don't think you'll get much accomplished. But I admire your conviction despite your outwardly condescending tone lol Quoting: _Obsidian_ Oh, I have been thanked many times for pointing out the flaws in the claims of people who insist there are things "wrong" in the sky. |
Da fuq User ID: 16258666 United States 12/19/2012 08:54 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Menow User ID: 18943200 United States 12/19/2012 08:55 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
DUCM900 User ID: 30357243 Italy 12/19/2012 08:55 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Da fuq User ID: 16258666 United States 12/19/2012 08:55 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: _Obsidian_ The fact that you didn't answer my question tells me that you aren't sure. I don't see beyond reality. But I surely pay attention to detail. The answer to this is get off the thread and go look morning and night. If you don't see anything off then quit coming here to prove you know the answer. If you see something off then join the club. But honestly rationality tells me we have nothing to gain here except a headache and wasted time with all this silly banter. Its like people who talk shit on songs they don't like on you tube. Gahhh don't like it it don't listen grow up and stop trying to poop on the party? So to speak. I consider it a duty, of sorts, to debunk the wild, hysterical, doomsday claims and predictions you seem to think of as a "party". The fact that you think random people can have discovered that the sun is setting late, or whatever you think this "off-ness" is speaks volumes and so does the fact that you didn't answer MY question. I didn't answer you because it makes no difference at all to the question at hand. Ummm I did answer your question for one thing. I believe you did not. Here is my question, which is quite relevant to the issue at hand: Do you have ANY solid evidence that it's lighter, later this year than last other that your memory? ANYTHING AT ALL? For two im not listening to random people I came here to discuss what I saw with my own two eyes and it just so happened to be the case that other people in various areas noticed it too. Quoting: _Obsidian_ I believe what what you are discussing is something you claim to REMEMBER, hmm? It may not be doom. There could be a rational explanation for it. Like what the OP posted recently. If that is your duty good luck also good luck with that round peg we all know how that turns out. In other words I don't think you'll get much accomplished. But I admire your conviction despite your outwardly condescending tone lol Quoting: _Obsidian_ Oh, I have been thanked many times for pointing out the flaws in the claims of people who insist there are things "wrong" in the sky. |
Karlos User ID: 30322593 United Kingdom 12/19/2012 08:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I got the info from memory - I recognised it as soon as I saw it. Quoting: Karlos And you don't need a NASA link FFS - they don't own a monopoly on space study y'know. Google the name - there should be tons of pics and info. Oh, and here's the 'Lunar 100' Observing challenge list for Moon-viewers. Note the 'Straight wall' at number 15 [link to the-moon.wikispaces.com] Come on DUCM - admit it - you got PWNT and you don't like it. |
Da fuq User ID: 16258666 United States 12/19/2012 08:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | *****PROOF Quoting: Da fuq The following information is provided for San Diego, San Diego County, California (longitude W117.1, latitude N32.8): Wednesday 19 December 2012 Pacific Standard Time SUN Begin civil twilight 6:19 a.m. Sunrise 6:46 a.m. Sun transit 11:46 a.m. Sunset 4:46 p.m. End civil twilight 5:13 p.m. [link to www.flickr.com] ****************************** That pic was at 5:30 p.m Twighlight didn't completely fade till about 5:38 btw. Come on shill. Start shilling. |
Menow User ID: 18943200 United States 12/19/2012 08:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | *****PROOF Quoting: Da fuq The following information is provided for San Diego, San Diego County, California (longitude W117.1, latitude N32.8): Wednesday 19 December 2012 Pacific Standard Time SUN Begin civil twilight 6:19 a.m. Sunrise 6:46 a.m. Sun transit 11:46 a.m. Sunset 4:46 p.m. End civil twilight 5:13 p.m. [link to www.flickr.com] ****************************** That pic was at 5:30 p.m Twighlight didn't completely fade till about 5:38 btw. Come on shill. Start shilling. Is that your idea of a picture of the sun setting? |
DUCM900 User ID: 30357243 Italy 12/19/2012 08:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Karlos User ID: 30322593 United Kingdom 12/19/2012 08:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | LMFAO Quoting: Karlos I'm a 'shill' because I knew something about astronomy. You are fuckin' priceless. Wrong, you are shilling just because you are unable to proof your ***** claims. Its a "bit" different story. - Unable to prove......??? FFS Here: [link to lmgtfy.com] |
Da fuq User ID: 16258666 United States 12/19/2012 09:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | *****PROOF Quoting: Da fuq The following information is provided for San Diego, San Diego County, California (longitude W117.1, latitude N32.8): Wednesday 19 December 2012 Pacific Standard Time SUN Begin civil twilight 6:19 a.m. Sunrise 6:46 a.m. Sun transit 11:46 a.m. Sunset 4:46 p.m. End civil twilight 5:13 p.m. [link to www.flickr.com] ****************************** That pic was at 5:30 p.m Twighlight didn't completely fade till about 5:38 btw. Come on shill. Start shilling. Is that your idea of a picture of the sun setting? Ha, now your just trolling. Move along child. |
DUCM900 User ID: 30357243 Italy 12/19/2012 09:03 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | LMFAO Quoting: Karlos I'm a 'shill' because I knew something about astronomy. You are fuckin' priceless. Wrong, you are shilling just because you are unable to proof your ***** claims. Its a "bit" different story. - Unable to prove......??? FFS Here: [link to lmgtfy.com] I told you, link NASA site, not f*** wiki stuf where everyone can post garbage. - |
Menow User ID: 18943200 United States 12/19/2012 09:07 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | *****PROOF Quoting: Da fuq The following information is provided for San Diego, San Diego County, California (longitude W117.1, latitude N32.8): Wednesday 19 December 2012 Pacific Standard Time SUN Begin civil twilight 6:19 a.m. Sunrise 6:46 a.m. Sun transit 11:46 a.m. Sunset 4:46 p.m. End civil twilight 5:13 p.m. [link to www.flickr.com] ****************************** That pic was at 5:30 p.m Twighlight didn't completely fade till about 5:38 btw. Come on shill. Start shilling. Is that your idea of a picture of the sun setting? Ha, now your just trolling. Move along child. Not at all. You're claiming that the sun is setting at a different time than it should, but you show a pic which is clearly taken well after the sun has set. What, exactly, do you think that is supposed to demonstrate about the time the sun set? |
Menow User ID: 18943200 United States 12/19/2012 09:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | LMFAO Quoting: Karlos I'm a 'shill' because I knew something about astronomy. You are fuckin' priceless. Wrong, you are shilling just because you are unable to proof your ***** claims. Its a "bit" different story. - Unable to prove......??? FFS Here: [link to lmgtfy.com] I told you, link NASA site, not f*** wiki stuf where everyone can post garbage. - I told you to say what book it is which proves there is no such thing as field rotation, but you didn't even pretend to have one. |
Da fuq User ID: 16258666 United States 12/19/2012 09:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | *****PROOF Quoting: Da fuq The following information is provided for San Diego, San Diego County, California (longitude W117.1, latitude N32.8): Wednesday 19 December 2012 Pacific Standard Time SUN Begin civil twilight 6:19 a.m. Sunrise 6:46 a.m. Sun transit 11:46 a.m. Sunset 4:46 p.m. End civil twilight 5:13 p.m. [link to www.flickr.com] ****************************** That pic was at 5:30 p.m Twighlight didn't completely fade till about 5:38 btw. Come on shill. Start shilling. Is that your idea of a picture of the sun setting? Ha, now your just trolling. Move along child. Not at all. You're claiming that the sun is setting at a different time than it should, but you show a pic which is clearly taken well after the sun has set. What, exactly, do you think that is supposed to demonstrate about the time the sun set? I'm claiming the sun is burning at an intensity we have never seen before. Thank you for clarifying you are a shill and indeed an idiot now as well. |
Menow User ID: 18943200 United States 12/19/2012 09:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Da fuq User ID: 16258666 United States 12/19/2012 09:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I don't care what the man in the building said. I have pictures, you have a mental block of a religioustard. Keep on shillin' though. Last Edited by Da fuq on 12/19/2012 09:13 PM |
Menow User ID: 18943200 United States 12/19/2012 09:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Not at all. You're claiming that the sun is setting at a different time than it should, but you show a pic which is clearly taken well after the sun has set. What, exactly, do you think that is supposed to demonstrate about the time the sun set? I'm claiming the sun is burning at an intensity we have never seen before. Thank you for clarifying you are a shill and indeed an idiot now as well. And your photo demonstrates that, how? May I remind you of the subject of this thread?: The Sun Was Supposed To Set At 4:41 Central Time In Missouri, 12/18 , Still Hasn't Set At 5:01 |
Karlos User ID: 30322593 United Kingdom 12/19/2012 09:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Quoting: DUCM900 That link is Google - not wiki - It searches everything, including NASA sites. NASA is down at 8th position. Why don't you just admit that the Rupes Recta is a well documented Lunar feature, instead of perpetuating this 'dumb' act. Admit it - You highlighted that video, thinking it was something abnormal - and don't want to accept that you were wrong. |
Hydra User ID: 30368654 Germany 12/19/2012 09:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I got the info from memory - I recognised it as soon as I saw it. Quoting: Karlos And you don't need a NASA link FFS - they don't own a monopoly on space study y'know. Google the name - there should be tons of pics and info. confirmed confirmed I think it's the first time you are right: [link to www.google.de] . :ase26122019: Annular Solar Eclipse - December 26, 2019 - Kannur, Kerala, India |
Da fuq User ID: 16258666 United States 12/19/2012 09:15 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Not at all. You're claiming that the sun is setting at a different time than it should, but you show a pic which is clearly taken well after the sun has set. What, exactly, do you think that is supposed to demonstrate about the time the sun set? I'm claiming the sun is burning at an intensity we have never seen before. Thank you for clarifying you are a shill and indeed an idiot now as well. And your photo demonstrates that, how? May I remind you of the subject of this thread?: The Sun Was Supposed To Set At 4:41 Central Time In Missouri, 12/18 , Still Hasn't Set At 5:01 Oh ok shill. We can't elaborate as to why the topic is occurring. We have to stay exactly on topic? right hitler? You're not on my level. Last Edited by Da fuq on 12/19/2012 09:15 PM |
Menow User ID: 18943200 United States 12/19/2012 09:16 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Menow 18943200 Not at all. You're claiming that the sun is setting at a different time than it should, but you show a pic which is clearly taken well after the sun has set. What, exactly, do you think that is supposed to demonstrate about the time the sun set? I'm claiming the sun is burning at an intensity we have never seen before. Thank you for clarifying you are a shill and indeed an idiot now as well. And your photo demonstrates that, how? May I remind you of the subject of this thread?: The Sun Was Supposed To Set At 4:41 Central Time In Missouri, 12/18 , Still Hasn't Set At 5:01 Oh ok shill. We can't elaborate as to why the topic is occurring. We have to stay exactly on topic? right hitler? You're not on my level. I thank my lucky stars for that! Now... your photo supports your assertion, how? |
DUCM900 User ID: 30357243 Italy 12/19/2012 09:16 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I feel like they are lying in wait, gonna strike as a team again soon. Lot of money wasted for trying to covering the uncovering. - Last Edited by IWASTHERE on 12/19/2012 09:17 PM |
Da fuq User ID: 16258666 United States 12/19/2012 09:18 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Da fuq I'm claiming the sun is burning at an intensity we have never seen before. Thank you for clarifying you are a shill and indeed an idiot now as well. And your photo demonstrates that, how? May I remind you of the subject of this thread?: The Sun Was Supposed To Set At 4:41 Central Time In Missouri, 12/18 , Still Hasn't Set At 5:01 Oh ok shill. We can't elaborate as to why the topic is occurring. We have to stay exactly on topic? right hitler? You're not on my level. I thank my lucky stars for that! Now... your photo supports your assertion, how? Look man you're just not getting it, read what it says then try again. I don't know whether to chalk it up with being a shill which inherently makes you stupid or what? Last Edited by Da fuq on 12/19/2012 09:20 PM |
Menow User ID: 18943200 United States 12/19/2012 09:24 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Menow 18943200 And your photo demonstrates that, how? May I remind you of the subject of this thread?: The Sun Was Supposed To Set At 4:41 Central Time In Missouri, 12/18 , Still Hasn't Set At 5:01 Oh ok shill. We can't elaborate as to why the topic is occurring. We have to stay exactly on topic? right hitler? You're not on my level. I thank my lucky stars for that! Now... your photo supports your assertion, how? Look man you're just not getting it, read what it says then try again. I don't know whether to chalk it up with being a shill which inherently makes you stupid or what? Read what "it" says? What is "it". It's a simple question. Repeat: Your photo supports your assertion, how? |
Da fuq User ID: 16258666 United States 12/19/2012 09:25 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 3888116 United States 12/19/2012 09:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Ok so yesterday the sky was light linger than usual..it didnt start getting darker until after 5:10. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 3888116 Today was normal...by 5:10-15 it was already dark. These was a definite difference between yesterday and today. And no difference in cloud cover? Hmmm...it was pretty cloudy earlier. I cant remember how it was yesterday...I'll pay attention to that tomorrow. |
Da fuq User ID: 16258666 United States 12/19/2012 09:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | *****PROOF Quoting: Da fuq The following information is provided for San Diego, San Diego County, California (longitude W117.1, latitude N32.8): Wednesday 19 December 2012 Pacific Standard Time SUN Begin civil twilight 6:19 a.m. Sunrise 6:46 a.m. Sun transit 11:46 a.m. Sunset 4:46 p.m. End civil twilight 5:13 p.m. [link to www.flickr.com] ****************************** That pic was at 5:30 p.m Twighlight didn't completely fade till about 5:38 btw. Come on shill. Start shilling. Is that your idea of a picture of the sun setting? Ha, now your just trolling. Move along child. |
Menow User ID: 18943200 United States 12/19/2012 09:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Menow 18943200 And your photo demonstrates that, how? May I remind you of the subject of this thread?: The Sun Was Supposed To Set At 4:41 Central Time In Missouri, 12/18 , Still Hasn't Set At 5:01 Oh ok shill. We can't elaborate as to why the topic is occurring. We have to stay exactly on topic? right hitler? You're not on my level. I thank my lucky stars for that! Now... c Look man you're just not getting it, read what it says then try again. I don't know whether to chalk it up with being a shill which inherently makes you stupid or what? Below your photo, it says: "5:30". Now...your photo supports your assertion, how? |
Menow User ID: 18943200 United States 12/19/2012 09:27 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |