Morgan is a prick and an ignorant one at that. If you look at the statistics, every one points to more gun ownership equals less crime when it's lawful citizens that own them. It's sickening and quite telling that the administration is pushing this issue since they are pushing the talking points and it seems everyone is on board with the agenda. We quite conveniently miss the point of the drugs these kids are on, the tv they watch, the games they play, and the complete lack of God in our lives.
I will say that the need for any normal citizen to own a assault rifle is really not necessary. But my main argument is, why do lawful citizens have to lose their civil liberties every time a crisis happens in this country? This is simply the politics playing their role in this and want to overlook the obvious other things that are going on in our culture and jump right to the guns completely knowing that the statistics speak for themselves.
If you stare long enough into the abyss, the abyss eventually stares back.
Quoting: Question EVERYTHING You just contradicted yourself. In fact, you answered your OWN question.
You said: "I will say that the need for any normal citizen to own a assault rifle is really not necessary."
You THEN said: "But my main argument is, why do lawful citizens have to lose their civil liberties every time a crisis happens in this country?"
NOW do you see the need for a citizen to own a so-called "assault rifle"?
To PROTECT their rights from a "government" that TAKES their rights when criminals commit crimes! Can't you SEE that?
And the reason that I said "so-called assault rifle" is because the rifles being used in these shootings are NOT "assault rifles", which, by definition, are FULLY AUTOMATIC.
Your police and military, THEY have "assault rifles". Yet these libtard idiots don't even want us having semi-auto rifles. They want us to be at the mercy of body armor, fully automatic machine guns, and directed energy microwave weapons, with us have daisy Red Ryder BB guns to defend ourselves with.
