Last conceivable possibility remaining for a Nibiru’s arrival in December 2012: Nibiru is not a brown dwarf, but is constituted of DARK MATTER!!

First thing: NASA, Astromut and T-Bar are perfectly right. There’s nothing out there like a planet or a brown dwarf near or in our solar system, because it would have reflected light since years and would have been in any case as bright as Venus or Jupiter and growing. And its gravitational effects would have been noticeable on the orbits of the other planets of the solar system.

So if there’s something out there, which could still arrive in December 2012, it must be something else, something very different, and something absolutely unknown and hardly conceivable.

From my point of view, there’s only one possibility remaining: one of the great unsolved mysteries of our universe: THE DARK MATTER.

You probably already know that the visible part of our universe accounts for only 17% of its total mass. It means that 83% of our universe mass is constituted of dark matter that we can’t observe and that we totally don’t know of. And we don’t have any proof that it’s actually exist, just like Nibiru! [link to en.wikipedia.org]

Why is it unobservable? Most probably because it doesn’t emit light and also absorbs incoming light rather than reflecting it like the normal matter does. I will say white matter for normal matter, from now on, in order to easily differentiate it from dark matter.

We absolutely know nothing of the proprieties and specificities of dark matter. So everything (and also its contrary!?) is possible to imagine and to speculate. It’s only pseudo-science and I don’t claim it has something in common with strong reality, but it could possess an internal logic from my (doomtard’s) point of view and that’s why I wanted to share it with you, dear nibirutards sisters and brothers…

I think that it must be oppositions and complementarities between the properties of white and dark matters, somewhat like for the yin and the yang principles. [link to en.wikipedia.org]

But dark matter isn’t anti-matter. The anti-matter atom is constituted of negative protons and of positive electrons. When it’s confronted with a normal atom, it comes instantaneously to a reaction of annihilation of the particle and of the anti-particle. So a universe constituted of matter and of anti-matter couldn’t exist durably.

I think then that an atom of dark matter would be rather similar to a classical atom of white matter as we know it: a nucleus of positive protons and negative electrons around it. The only difference would be that specific dark protons would take the place of the usual white protons, with a clockwise spin instead of the usual anti-clockwise spin of the normal white protons.

In the interstellar vacuum, the astronomers have observed that clouds of atoms of (white matter) hydrogen tend, much time passing, to undergo a spin-flip and to produce light and energy. They emit then a hydrogen line, aka 21 centimeter line or HI line, an electro-magnetic radiation. The spin-flip could constitute a kind of ageing of the matter. But if such a spin-flip would occur with an atom of dark matter hydrogen, that means when an electron transits to a lower state of energy (closer to the nucleus), it would come from an anti-parallel spin to a parallel spin (instead of from a parallel to an anti-parallel spin like for the white matter) and it would cost energy and light to the atom, instead of producing or ejecting energy and light outwards as for a normal spin-flip. So the ageing dark matter in the interstellar vacuum would tend to become darker and darker, cooler and cooler, very near of the absolute zero (O Kelvin). As more and more electrons tend to adopt the parallel flip, it should also reinforce continuously its energetic potential, its general clock-wise rotation and its powerful magnetism. [link to en.wikipedia.org] or [link to fr.wikipedia.org] , (in French!), but look at the first explanative diagram.

I think then plausible to extrapolate, on the model of its simplest particle, the hydrogen atom, that there’s a global trend of the ageing white matter to expand in space and to produce (that means to lose also) light, energy and mass. That what permits life on Earth and our existence. Dark matter, by opposition would tend to retract in space and to re-absorb (and gain) light, energy and mass, expelled by the white matter. A kind of equilibrium would be maintained in this way in the universe and it would also account for the time passing.

At a cosmological level, it means that just after the moment of the “initial” big-bang, the mass and energy of the expelled matter would have been of near 100% of white matter and the mass of dark matter near 0%. Then the white matter would have expanded more and more, producing light and energy that is absorbed more and more by the dark matter, which becomes more and more massive, denser, energetic and acquires more and more magnetic power. After 14 billion years, the proportion is now of 16% white matter and 84% dark matter. In several billion years, the proportion of white matter would be respectively too small for a wider expansion and the universe would begin to retract on itself under the preponderant influence of the mass of dark matter and would begin to retract gently, and then faster and faster.

Finally the universe would reduce itself to an almost (spatially) nothing immensely dense and when it comes to an impossible point zero (spatially), it would explode again to a new big-bang and a new universe. So the big-bang would consist in the instantaneous transformation from a state of a maximal spatial retraction state in the infinite small with 100% of the matter having become dark, no light and no space at all remaining, the concentration of all energy, mass and matter of the universe standing in this point, into a state of maximal spatial expansion with 100% of white matter, maximal production of energy and light for another round of (let’s say) 26 billion years.

But just after the explosion at such a speed, the proportion would probably have been relatively rapidly of near 50% to 50%, the expansion of white matter being already slowed down by the now relatively important proportion of dark matter. It would then form here and there separate cluster of white and dark matter, each cluster absorbing then remaining atoms of its own “species” thanks to its respective reactivity to gravity or to magnetism. And finally the clusters of dark and white matters would combine together to form galaxies of different sorts, depending the different proportion of white and dark matters cluster at proximity. In a classic spiral galaxy like our Milky Way, most of the dark matter would be concentrate in the central black hole and maintain the cohesion of the Galaxy, but a part could also be associated with white matter system as a binary dark matter entity or system.

That universal cycle would be the ultimate time cycle and would be perfectly coherent with the cyclical conception of time of the Mayans, of the Indians and of many other cultures around the world. The smaller cycle of the Mayan would the Tzolkin year was 260 days long. The intermediate precession of the equinoxes cycle is about 26’000 years long. Why not an ultimate universal cycle of 26’000’000’000 years?

It would seem logical to extrapolate further that such a dark matter doesn’t emit light from itself outwards. And its powerful magnetism would absorb all diffuse incoming light on account of its specific strongest electro-magnetic nature. So we wouldn’t see anything of it, unless it directly interferes magnetically with concentrate luminous sources coming to us in an occultation or indirectly from the Sun to it and back to us. It seems that the polarization of photons by the magnetic flux of dark matter would produce light (and probably energy), but that the photons would be then rapidly absorbed at direct contact by the dark matter.

So if a massive coronal solar ejection would have been directed by chance just in the direction of a binary dark solar/entity constituted of black matter and in approach, the luminous flux would have been at first polarized by the enormous electromagnetic flux of this entity in a gigantic magnetic maelstrom in a clockwise spiral and in a second time, would have been rapidly absorbed, to let place finally to an rapidly expanding big round dark space of impressive void, just as it happens for the Norwegian spiral on the 9th of December 2009.
[link to www.youtube.com]

The Russian rocket convenient explanation, revolving on itself because of only one reactor active seems rather implausible to me, especially for the ending stage with the expansion of the final dark bowl. It was also too much circular and regular; the racket wouldn’t have stopped before turning on itself and the trace wouldn’t have been circular! The trajectory from the blue stream was seemingly coming from the East (Russia), but that’s also where the Sun was located, just before its raising, on 8 am in the winter morning!!!