Something's Definitely "OFF" Here... Sandy Hook Victim's Mocked by GLPers

How does one debate "I was given special revelation" which we can't know? We either trust you or do not. I don't put belief in your argument from special revelation, so there is not much to debate. Especially because I have no idea of the source of your claim, how they would have got it, and even if your claim about what happened were true, it doesn't mean that this is all staged. All it means is someone knows of what happened in the 90s, believes it happened as typical reports claimed, and think this is similar. It doesn't prove "and therefore, this was orchestrated." You leap into accusations without logic. There, dumbass.

The lamestream media (eg the Daily Fail) only published the version with the 'getting into character' bit cut out.

You did quite well till the end.. You forget to mention howver, the use of the helgellian method.. the problem, reaction , solution system they have been using forver..
dont look at what they say but at what they do...
If you go backwards from what they do to how they got to it with the helgellian in mind.. it opens up the way they got the reaction back to the problem they created in the first place.
Dunblane and sandy hook both fit this system perfectly..
I trust the intel i got back then wholeheartedly.. i dont give 2 shits about anyones opinion on that.. do i expect anyone to take it as tuth? no.. does that mean that this is a non conspiracy event? absolutely not.
I have absolutely nothing invested in this being a conspiracy.. but as soon as i picked up that newspaper , i knew in a fraction of a second.. It is exactly how they work..
and rubbing it in the fucking faces too.

That's why.... we see this video, right?

Oh please, if "they" wanted to cover up a story "they" would make no mistakes and no one would be questioning it for a minute.

These are real people, human expression and emotion varies in situations like this. This man may have cried his eyes out, talked to family and friends, still be in shock, be called in to speak on behalf of the other parents and he accepted. He may have smiled because of the nervousness or awkwardness of giving an interview. To jump to the conclusion that this is all fake before gathering enough factual evidence is dangerous.

Imagine a glper or conspiracy theorist going up to one of these distraught parents saying, "Your child's not dead. Who is paying you to do this?" Or committing a worse kind of deviant act towards them. This is not what you would want for yourself if your child was murdered violently, would it?

Anyway good call op, you really nailed it when you started this thread. Not only are they insulting the lives of the innocent dead but they're insulting the grieving parents.

see for yourself which version they published. video is at bottom of page
[link to www.dailymail.co.uk]

i dont believe the parents are actors or that they are not genuine.. the kids are dead , the parents are in shock ... end of..
to go that far , the conspiracy have too many dangerous angles to keep clean... this sounds harsh , but its much easier to just kill the kids and have everyone as genuine grief. the only people that know are the handlers and their bosses... compartmentalised up to the men behind the curtain.

So one link means ALL the media? Typical dumbass response. Again, if it were fake, as the person above said, it would have been all set up, no getting in character on any camera. The fact is, they edited things LATER, sure, just like every other story in history.

You believe whatever BS you want.

And you can disbelieve whatever facts you want. But don't be upset if people think something is wrong with you.

I like the argument that THEY are so AMAZiNG that THEY never make mistakes, thus if they make a mistake it should be ignored or it somehow proves it is not THEM.
Jesus, quit worshiping TPTB. They use the same lame dumbed down employees as the rest of us. If they weren't dumbed down, they wouldn't be spending their lives in hollywood and government.

I love the argument "They are weird, therefore it's fake." Sorry, you are projecting things on TPTB. No one else is.

I agree with you OP. Some people are so obsessed with conspiracies that they think there is a conspiracy in everything that goes on. It's extreme paranoia and takes away credibility from the real conspiracies out there.

I used to be involved in the pre-planning of spontaneous media events. Wanna guess how much is scripted? :)

Last Edited by The Loophole on 12/20/2012 07:42 AM

What kind of "media events" are you talking about? Seriously, you are acting line.. "because this was scripted over here, everything is scripted." Logic. It's not your specialty. Apples and oranges, so they say.

Most is scripted. Look, you're obviously bright enough to get into media. Go get a job in it and find out for yourself. Don;t just blindly believe or disbelieve things you have no experience in.

Last Edited by The Loophole on 12/20/2012 07:49 AM

I'm a doctoral candidate -- sorry, moron, media is not about "being smart." I know about the media. Seriously, what you are showing is no logical argument. You have none. Typical asshole who thinks you know something when you know nothing.

Yes, the media is "scripted." People read reports. Doesn't mean the EVENTS are scripted, moron. Real events happen.

"I'm a doctoral candidate"
"sorry moron"


WOW. They really taught you wonderful debate skills. I'm impressed. Where did you go to university?

AMAZING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!



And yes, I've been to scripted events, and participated, and hated it because I suck at memorizing lines. Did you really think professionals just go in blind and unprepared in front of a camera for the world to see? Even you would recite your lines first my dear doctoral candidate.

Last Edited by The Loophole on 12/20/2012 08:01 AM

Fyi....actors get into character BEFORE they're on stage, not while they're on stage.

If this was fake, why would he wait to "noticeably get into character" while standing AT the mic in front of video cameras during a live national news broadcast. Kinda doesn't make sense does it?

You have no debating skills. It's funny. Your debate is "you don't know, you don't know, you don't know." Secondly, who said this is a debate? You have not even given primary evidence to debate, moron

Exactly.

You're thinking in terms of a play. Television is a bit different. An actor can be standing on the set when they get into character before a scene, they don't have to leave the set first, they just have to be in character when they are told the film is about to go live.

Last Edited by The Loophole on 12/20/2012 08:04 AM

They WERE LIVE when you say he is not in "character." This is the nonsense you and people like you are at. Self-contradictory nonsense.

Yes, they were told they were going live and to get into place. Have you seriously never done any time on television or in acting? No one here?

Again, they were not "going live." THEY WERE LIVE

yeah I worked in television, they have annual goof tapes of what goes on before the red light (live) comes on.

Something of this magnitude would call for the highest amount of preparation. We're not talking about an episode of "It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia" here. We're talking about someone is supposed to be "acting" convincingly, in front of live television cameras, as someone whose child was just murdered. Sorry but..you don't get into character after the director yells "action." Which is essentially what you're saying happened in this case.

It doesn't add up, and is downright ridiculous.

Last Edited by Swearengen on 12/20/2012 08:17 AM

cameras are rolling for light and sound checks, position, angles etc. actors know inappropriate stuff will be edited out for transmission.

Who would think inappropriate stuff would be edited out of a LIVE broadcast?

Again, what people are talking about was transmitted: YOU SAW IT.