Who identified Adam Lanza as the shooter?

this is a GREAT, FUNDAMENTAL question

did he have drivers license on him?

it was just a wild-ass guess, just like everything
else they do in Sandy Hook Connecticut.

CCTV?

but only after their first 2 wild-ass guesses were wrong.

Driver's licenses in CT use a pretty high tech management system as of 2003 ...

[link to www.me-mag.com]

I suspect there is probably a lot of data available if Adam had a license.

(The divorce documents state that father Peter Lanza was required to provide a car and insurance for Adam.)

Nobody.

This is so interesting. WHY would Adam bring the only form of ID as that of his brother? Seriously, you would just drive with your weapons. Where the hell did he get his ID if he hadn't seen him for 2 years? An old ID hanging around the house? Was he trying to punish his brother (Who didn't speak to him?) Which, I don't care who you are, for Ryan to NOT speak to his ONLY brother who is autistic for two years smells rotten.

Who searched the body and found "ryan's id"? and then strangely announced him to be 20, not 24. (Ryan is 24, ADAM is 20)

Doesn't make any sense at all.

Yes it is very interesting I can't fathom why he would even bother to have an ID on him that day. Oh ya let me shoot my mom then put my brothers id in my pocket. Unless he wanted his brother to get some blame as payback for not speaking to him for two years. Also they never said what type of ID this was left me wondering was it some school id maybe a license?

Brothers not speaking aren't uncommon my husband has not spoke to his only brother since 08. His mom says they never got along some families are strange that way.

yes. this story just gets curiouser and curiouser.

we certainly have no respect whatsoever for the police
or any of the authorities in this matter.

It makes about as much sense as the original story, that; 1) he had a child in the kindergarten, 2) he shot his mother, the kindergarten teacher, in front of her class, 3) his brother immediately went on facebook to say it wasn't him.

in fact. the whole problem with this whole country
is that NOBODY has any respect for any of the authorities in this country, anywhere! (because none of them are deserving
of anyones respect!)

Yes. It is really fucking strange that Adam Lanza is being described as a 'recluse' who had no social circle and hardly ever came out of his house.

Yet, there was that story about the principle recognizing him and buzzing him in, which I'm sure has changed by now.

The 'plotline' of this shooting has been all over the map. It was his brother who's girlfriend was missing, then it was him. His mother was a 'prepper' who took him to the gun range all the time, no wait she didn't, he is a recluse who has rarely been seen for 3 years.

Nothing is consistent about this 'official story'.

respectfully yours,

AC

one thing is for certain, though:

they certainly did show "the ballon boy" who's boss. didn't they.

Nothing is ever "consistent" with eary "facts" from this kind of incident.
All of the conspriacytards are out in force, but this is really straightfoward.
The shooter was id'ed when they picked up his brother, who's liscense he was using.
He broke into the school, breaking a window in the door.
Nobodies ever explained the logic of putting a window in a friggin door to me.

This is all pretty straightfoward, a videogame addic t that looks like a space alien and has a demonic website, destroyed his computer(crazy, nort a dumbass) decided to kill himself and play a real life shooter game first,
not to mention satanists just love to slaughter innocents.
And this might change, as facts emerge.
People watch too much TV in this country, a case is never
clear cut, always fluid as facts emerge.
Nothing "uspicious" about

I think you pegged it.
His brother has been driving around all these years without an id. Meltdown of sanity...what happens next, Santa with Jesus on board?

Sure...he was just a devil worshiping reclusive video game junkie with a possible mental illness.

He may or may not have been to a psychiatrist. He may or may not have been on meds. He may or may not have had an 'altercation' at the school the day before. He may or may not been obsessed with guns. He may or may not have been fearful of being involuntarily committed. He may or may not have been to a shooting range with his mother. His mother may or may not be a 'prepper' or a 'gun enthusiast'.

Nothing "uspicious" about the information. Although, I'm not sure what the word "uspicious" means so I could be way off here.

(at 2:37)

"You'd think after the thousands of people I have seen shot I could answer that question."

The county coroner from a sleepy town in Connecticut has examined thousands of shooting victims?

Was he in Nam?

If he has examined thousands of shooting victims...why doesn't he appear to know the caliber of the ammo used in the crime scene at the school?

Why does he refer to the assault rifle as the 'long gun'?

Why does he not appear to know that the assault rifle was supposedly left in the car...according to earlier reports?

They saw his picture on the internet, it said he was the killer, and he looked crazy enough, so, you know...

That must be one rough neighborhood.

I have to disagree with you!

A good reporter reports FACTS!

There's no way that someone can gain entrance by being buzzed in AND breaking in. It's either one or the other! He was either let in or he broke in.

There's no way his mother was killed in front of her kindergarten classroom AND in her home. Last I heard, people only die once.

The fact of the matter is that this information is coming from the news media. Why are they still employed? People are getting paid to deliberately lie and mislead the public?

Why should anyone bother to listen to anything the media has to say after seeing how this matter has unfolded.

As to what you mentioned about FACTS being fluid, that's not so. Reporters could easily use words such as 'alleged,' 'think,' 'unverified information,' etc.

The ones responsible for spreading rumors and presenting them as facts should be terminated in my opinion. Very, very poor and irresponsible journalism.

And surely he must have known this:

[link to www.examiner.com]

The assault rifle was in the trunk...why did the story change?

I suspect Lanza had nothing to do with the shootings and was a convenient scape goat found dead at the scene. This shooting was a blackop and it's quite obvious there were several actors involved who were the real trigger men.. but they will never be known because that's how the story supposed to go down.

It's always the lone nut theory pushed by the media because if it's more than two people that means there was planning involved and that scenario doesn't play along as well with anti-gun agenda.

Critical thinking is a great thing. Do you see what the OP did here? He just asked a simple but fundamental question that has yet to be answered.

Maybe the police ran the license plate on the car which they say was driven by Adam.

Dead body with his brothers ID...Mothers car...mothers 27 registered guns...all of which are high powered, large capacity