## How can 'infinity' be a viable mathamatical concept when one must consider an alternative dimensional inflection point to even define infini | |

Anonymous Coward User ID: 26268975 Slovakia 12/20/2012 04:48 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |

Intergalactic Diplomat (OP)User ID: 30141746 United States 12/20/2012 04:55 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: How can 'infinity' be a viable mathamatical concept when one must consider an alternative dimensional inflection point to even define infini0=0 So 0 to infinity is used to define a ficticious paradigm for the sake of i wonder what So 0 as a fictional concept, can only be defined in mathamatics... can we define 0 or infinity outside of mathamatical parameters? Last Edited by Intergalactic Diplomat on 12/20/2012 04:58 PM |

Anonymous Coward User ID: 10098396 United States 12/20/2012 04:57 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |

Anonymous Coward User ID: 26268975 Slovakia 12/20/2012 04:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |

Abalone~User ID: 5417336 United States 12/20/2012 04:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: How can 'infinity' be a viable mathamatical concept when one must consider an alternative dimensional inflection point to even define infini |

OkieUser ID: 30449317 United States 12/20/2012 04:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: How can 'infinity' be a viable mathamatical concept when one must consider an alternative dimensional inflection point to even define infiniHow can 'infinity' be a viable Quoting: mathematical concept when one must consider the necessity of alternative dimensional 'inflection points' to even define infinity?If a particular mathematical conclusion is a simple line above a series of numbers that repeat indefinitely, how can we know there is not a divergance after, for example, the 1,0000,0000,000,000th repetition of said numbers? And this variance or divergence would be the anomaly, or 'alternative dimension' expressed in numbers that is necessary to preserve the integrity of the definition (or concept) of infinity?Wouldn't a variance in the very definition of infinity be required that would cross multiple dimensions? Intergalactic Diplomat Okay, that at least took care of your spelling errors, but I'm not even going to begin on the grammatical ones. It is however at least a beginning to helping you appear to be somewhat qualified to play pseudo-intellectual. By all means now, carry on. |

Jimb0User ID: 16834949 United States 12/20/2012 05:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Humans do not have the proper hardware to apprehend infinity. Symbolic representations and abstract operations are as close as most will get without special training. |

Intergalactic Diplomat (OP)User ID: 30141746 United States 12/20/2012 05:01 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | How can 'infinity' be a viable Quoting: mathematical concept when one must consider the necessity of alternative dimensional 'inflection points' to even define infinity?If a particular mathematical conclusion is a simple line above a series of numbers that repeat indefinitely, how can we know there is not a divergance after, for example, the 1,0000,0000,000,000th repetition of said numbers? And this variance or divergence would be the anomaly, or 'alternative dimension' expressed in numbers that is necessary to preserve the integrity of the definition (or concept) of infinity?Wouldn't a variance in the very definition of infinity be required that would cross multiple dimensions? Intergalactic Diplomat Okay, that at least took care of your spelling errors, but I'm not even going to begin on the grammatical ones. It is however at least a beginning to helping you appear to be somewhat qualified to play pseudo-intellectual. By all means now, carry on. Okie Order... hua Last Edited by Intergalactic Diplomat on 12/20/2012 05:05 PM |

Anonymous Coward User ID: 1018225 United States 12/20/2012 05:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Very close. Infinity is finite if observed from a dimension beyond its own bounds. A circle is infinite within one dimension. A sphere is infinite within two dimensions. To test this concept simply observe pi and how its accuracy for calculating spheres and circles can be adjusted from vague to infinity itself. Mathematical operations that work with infinity are quite possible and will be used extensively in the future to create new breakthroughs. The first step is accepting that when working with infinity accuracy is traded for speed the same as anything. Simple analog processing could be the first breakthrough on this road to better understanding. But the key is to start with fast inaccurate techniques and slowly improve the accuracy instead of the method we used for digital processing which started with accuracy and built speed. I always hope someone will understand what I write but they seldom do. |

Intergalactic Diplomat (OP)User ID: 30141746 United States 12/20/2012 05:04 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Very close. Infinity is finite if observed from a dimension beyond its own bounds. A circle is infinite within one dimension. A sphere is infinite within two dimensions. To test this concept simply observe pi and how its accuracy for calculating spheres and circles can be adjusted from vague to infinity itself. Mathematical operations that work with infinity are quite possible and will be used extensively in the future to create new breakthroughs. The first step is accepting that when working with infinity accuracy is traded for speed the same as anything. Simple analog processing could be the first breakthrough on this road to better understanding. But the key is to start with fast inaccurate techniques and slowly improve the accuracy instead of the method we used for digital processing which started with accuracy and built speed. I always hope someone will understand what I write but they seldom do. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1018225 thanks for input |

Anonymous Coward User ID: 1540685 United States 12/20/2012 05:04 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |

|DEAD|SERIOUSUser ID: 25094718 United States 12/20/2012 05:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |

|DEAD|SERIOUSUser ID: 25094718 United States 12/20/2012 05:07 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |

Intergalactic Diplomat (OP)User ID: 30141746 United States 12/20/2012 05:07 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |

Anonymous Coward User ID: 10098396 United States 12/20/2012 05:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |

|DEAD|SERIOUSUser ID: 25094718 United States 12/20/2012 05:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |

Anonymous Coward User ID: 21761661 United States 12/20/2012 05:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | How can 'infinity' be a viable mathamatical concept when one must consider the necessity of alternative dimensional 'inflection points' to even define infinity? Quoting: If a particular mathamatical conclusion is a simple line above a series of numbers that repeat indefinately, how can we know there is not a divergance after, for example, the 1,0000,0000,000,000th repettition of said numbers? And this variance or divergence would be the anamoly, or 'alternative dimension' expressed in numbers that is necessary to preserve the integrity of the definition (or concept) of infinity? Wouldn't a variance in the very definition of infinity be required that would cross multiple dimensions? Intergalactic Diplomat pi goes on forever. pi is the eye dollar dollar bill ya |

Anonymous Coward User ID: 30422424 United Kingdom 12/20/2012 05:35 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Theoretical mathematicians think nothing of dividing by zero. That's how they came up with the ridiculous concept (while masquerading as "physicists") of "Black Holes". |

God User ID: 22982908 United States 12/20/2012 05:35 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |

Anonymous Coward User ID: 30443981 United Kingdom 12/20/2012 05:36 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | How can 'infinity' be a viable mathamatical concept when one must consider the necessity of alternative dimensional 'inflection points' to even define infinity? Quoting: If a particular mathamatical conclusion is a simple line above a series of numbers that repeat indefinately, how can we know there is not a divergance after, for example, the 1,0000,0000,000,000th repettition of said numbers? And this variance or divergence would be the anamoly, or 'alternative dimension' expressed in numbers that is necessary to preserve the integrity of the definition (or concept) of infinity? Wouldn't a variance in the very definition of infinity be required that would cross multiple dimensions? Intergalactic Diplomat The answer to this is endless |

Intergalactic Diplomat (OP)User ID: 30141746 United States 12/20/2012 05:39 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | How can 'infinity' be a viable mathamatical concept when one must consider the necessity of alternative dimensional 'inflection points' to even define infinity? Quoting: If a particular mathamatical conclusion is a simple line above a series of numbers that repeat indefinately, how can we know there is not a divergance after, for example, the 1,0000,0000,000,000th repettition of said numbers? And this variance or divergence would be the anamoly, or 'alternative dimension' expressed in numbers that is necessary to preserve the integrity of the definition (or concept) of infinity? Wouldn't a variance in the very definition of infinity be required that would cross multiple dimensions? Intergalactic Diplomat pi goes on forever. pi is the eye dollar dollar bill ya Anonymous Coward 21761661 but does pi go on forever after the 3rd dimension collapses? and how is it 'represented' numerically? wouldnt it become a variant or rogue entity in the 3rd dimensional quantification ...and suddenly change or be 'interrupted' if it were a sound definition of a "infinate" subset of quantity? i would imagine things of 'fictions' would be the only things destined for "destruction".... like the paradigm of the eye... not the eye itself Last Edited by Intergalactic Diplomat on 12/20/2012 05:45 PM |

Anonymous Coward User ID: 30426509 United States 12/20/2012 05:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |

Intergalactic Diplomat (OP)User ID: 30141746 United States 12/20/2012 05:43 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | @ Irony "The Fixx" "Saved by zero" Great pull. Making more sense now im in a state of nonsense Last Edited by Intergalactic Diplomat on 12/20/2012 05:47 PM |

Anonymous Coward User ID: 30426509 United States 12/20/2012 05:45 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | If a particular mathamatical conclusion is a simple line above a series of numbers that repeat indefinately, how can we know there is not a divergance after, for example, the 1,0000,0000,000,000th repettition of said numbers? And this variance or divergence would be the anamoly, or 'alternative dimension' expressed in numbers that is necessary to preserve the integrity of the definition (or concept) of infinity? Wouldn't a variance in the very definition of infinity be required that would cross multiple dimensions? Intergalactic Diplomat pi goes on forever. pi is the eye dollar dollar bill ya Anonymous Coward 21761661 but doe pi go on forever after the 3rd dimension collapses? and how is it 'represented' numerically? wouldnt it become a variant or rogue entity in the 3rd dimensional quantification ...and suddenly change or be 'interrupted' if it were a sound definition of a "infinate" subset of quantity? i would imagine things of 'fictions' would be the only things destined for "destruction".... like the paradigm of the eye... not the eye itself Intergalactic Diplomat |

Anonymous Coward User ID: 20063747 Canada 12/20/2012 05:48 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Ever tried to divide by zero on a calculator? It cannot display the answer. Now tell me, what is the only value in the universe, That cannot be displayed by an electronic screen? |

Anonymous Coward User ID: 30443981 United Kingdom 12/20/2012 05:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |

Anonymous Coward User ID: 20063747 Canada 12/20/2012 05:54 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |

- A Complete Guide to Being a Thought Criminal
- Violent TV May Make Children More Susceptible to Advertising Messages: Study
- Even McDonald’s Rejects New GMO Potato in French Fries
- How the IRS and Department of Homeland Security are Expanding Undercover Work (IRS Agents Can Even Pose as Clergy)
- Crime-Fighting Robots Go On Patrol In Silicon Valley
- CONGRESSMAN PROPOSES "MOAT" AROUND WHITEHOUSE, SECRET SERVICE DIRECTOR CONFIRMS "MAY BE GOOD IDEA"
- Obama’s Plan for a Backdoor Internet Tax
- Oregon public school sex-ed conference promotes sex toys, sexting, and using meth to 11 year olds
- Utah Considers Cutting Off Water to the NSA’s Monster Data Center
- Cops have a new scanner that decodes DNA in 90 minutes they can't wait to use on you
- Indiana to Start Requiring Food Stamp Recipients to Work
- Leonids Meteor Shower Will Dance Across the Sky Sunday Night
- Scientists rappel into Siberia’s mystery craters
- The Real Reason For America’s Collapsing Labor Force
- More Federal Agencies Are Using Undercover Operations
- IBM's Watson Wants to Examine Your DNA
- Extreme Weather Warning: As Polar Vortex Descends on U.S. "All Hell to Break Loose"
- The Red Cross' Own Employees Doubt The Charity's Ethics
- Hump Back Whale Music
- Glowing Predatory Insect Graboids
- Eight Appalling Facts about Bovine Growth Hormone
- World's First Glow-in-the-Dark Bike Path Opens
- US Internet speeds vary wildly state-by-state, US Census Bureau says
- 3 things White House doesn't want you to know about ObamaCare, plus ....
- UN Official Accuses US States of Violating International Law By Legalizing Pot