I've been reading the glp threads on Sandy Hook, as well as local mainstream media reports. The whole thing is mind boggling. It becomes very difficult to ascertain the truth when so many theories abound, including the "official" theory put forth by law enforcement and mainstream media.

Some threads are taking the "macro" approach. What's the agenda? Who did it? Why? I'm trying to take the "micro" approach. Instead of saying, "here's what I think happened," or "this is what it's all about," I'm trying to identify the specific discrepancies in the official story as pronounced by law enforcement and parroted by MSM.

Things like why did they first say Ryan Lanza? Why was Nancy Lanza reported to be a teacher? Why the confusion about the guns, where found and how many? Why couldn't venerable publications like the Hartford Courant get basic facts straight about what happened in Ms. Soto's room, days and even weeks after the event? Why did law enforcement say they found "very good" evidence at the Lanza home, then later reveal that little of value had been discovered, and that hard drives were smashed? Why no photos of shooter's point of entry, or of 600 students evacuating? Gene Rosen's far-fetched story. Who was the mysterious man Rosen referred to in his interviews, the one who seems to have corralled the kids and was "talking harshly?" What has become of Natalie Hammond, the wounded teacher? Did any of the witnesses actually see Adam Lanza's face, or did he wear a mask? Did they perform forensic test on Adam to see if he'd fired a weapon?

These are just some of the questions. I am certain I am leaving out many important ones. Nowhere in this post have I postulated what I think happened, who I think did it, or what I think it's all about. First things first. We need facts, which have been scarce thus far in this case. We who actually care should start by demanding answers from those that have them