End the life of Adam! Police scanner catches death sentence. Sandy hook drill. PIN!!!

Yes...and the unencrypted scanner line was accidentally left open.

IMO, It was either an order or it was just him audibly commenting to himself. Either way, the unencrypted scanner mic caught it.

What if accidentally turned off the encryption he was using at the end of his message. There is encryption right before that audio.

Encrypted walkies can be used regular or encrypted on a line. There are only so many channels. Plus, operatives would benefit from being encrypted on the line they also need to communicate on. That way they hear their opposition and are responding to each other on the same line, but encrypted.

It was probably cops who were using the encryption, but make no doubt about it....there was encrypted messages on that line.

He said "a little late for that".

It is the same voice as the responder who requests men to secure the roof at 5:49.

He is responding to the announcement at 5:02 that they are conducting an interior search at this time.

He is probably the type who would have went in right away, and hates the new candy ass protocols where the first responders gather outside and wait until everyone inside is dead, and then go in.

Well, maybe you should find the original police scanner recordings...

First I have been listening to it using a headset this whole time (which I have stated many times). I was just answering for the other guy that used 5.1 (which I feel only brought up 5.1 to including as much detail as he could to his post... it has nothing to do with him not being able to hear it without 5.1... you are almost suggesting he has all his 5.1 shit disconnected for some reason, listens to the clip, doesn't hear anything, for some reason plugs all his shit back in to make it 5.1 surround and then all of a sudden hears its... that's a total assumption on your part since he didn't say ANY of that, you just seemed to make it up for him.). Can't it just be he has a 5.1 system listened to the clip and heard the words clear as his actual words suggest (no audio enhancement programs involved, no having to increase quality to 5.1).

And no I don't hear it because I want to, I hear it cuz its clear as a bell what is said. I played the video for my sister which knows next to nothing about anything sandy hook related... without telling her context or any background info she clearly hear "End the life or Adam", after listening to it 1 more time she said the "or" actually sounded more like a "of". END THE LIFE OF ADAM.

My gosh, learn grammar, use it please.

"A little late for that" sounds not even close to "end the life of Adam".

Also, why would he say "in the life of Adam"? That makes even less sense then if he said "end the life of Adam"

Even if he was talking about "just another day in the life of Adam" as an officer named Adam. How often does "officer Adam" run into the most horrific school murder in US history. Yep, just another day in life of suburban Connecticut cop, Adam.

There very well is a logical explanation to this, but don't muddy the waters with even less logical interpretations.

Well, honestly, the sister bit, c'mon huh, I can say that kinda stuff too.

Look, there are those who think that's what is said, and there are those who think otherwise. I think the one thing it proves is that the audio is clearly inconclusive.

We'll just have to disagree that's all.

No hard feelings


Last Edited by Swearengen on 12/21/2012 03:30 PM

no, they pretended to kill 20 first graders just so they can push a gun policy.

you don't get it, and that's ok. it is a LOT to wrap your head around. not a comfy scenario.

Did you even listen to it?

At first, even when told it was "end the life of Adam", I did not hear it. Exactly that is. It was close to that. But I wasn't hearing it, and I have excellent hearing.

I got out my headphones, cranked it up, and heard "little late for that" Mumbled, but fairly distinct.

Definitely NOT "end the life of Adam".

Use your brain. If they were going to be so overt and stupid to use such an idiotic signal to end Adam's life, wouldn't he just have said it LOUD and CLEAR?

Please...

No, sadly they possibly had a hit squad murder 20 first graders, three teachers and two patsies as a mean to their wicked ends.

Your theory makes them sound just like liars, rather than homicidal liars.

You are thinking they have a conscious or valued those children's lives.

The minds of those without conscious nor empathy is a darkness hard to fathom for us normal folk.

I think I get the scenario. In fact yours is one of several scenarios floating around that suggests staged psy ops etc. I just don't go along with them in this case. At all.

well, i saw the photo with obama of the three parker children with another child that was listed as victims.

i don't think one child was harmed in the entire charade.

makes it easier to lie about it, doesn't it?

Classic shill attack methods. Attempt to make people feel stupid, because no one wants to be stupid. That programming trick was learned back when Murray was programming the Unabomber. Now it is used on the masses as well.

You must be the new guy. Your moves are so easy to see coming.

Harder...

Your theory means all of the police officers and emts would have to have been in on it. Killing the kids and the witnesses (the three teachers) makes it easier to hide actually.

Maybe a spook or two had a kid in that class and is pretending they actually let them go to school that day, but kids were murdered.

Dark people we are dealing with. That or a kid gone of the rails. Either way, little kids were murdered.

You mean this photo?

[link to blog.ctnews.com]

Nobody would say "Take the life of Adam"

That's not how people talk.

Silly thread.

possibilities


claim the life provided


tame the life without it

aim for life regarded


for the life of god


her life without it.

This thread plays into the psy-op. leave the guns alone, but also make some slight rule changes to avoid this.

Otherwise, the answer is to better people to each other. To value family more.

You do that and you defeat any psy-op.

Conditioning is only successful if the desired response is obtained. Do not give these possible dark agents the desired response from this.

I know that sound like inaction and letting them get away, but if we stop giving the desired responses, the justice you seek will just sort of organically appear.

Thoughts become things, so don't think fear, hate and revenge. Otherwise you attract those things.

Our enemies fear, hate and feel they need to punish us. They do this by playing with our thoughts.

If we think things like empathy, pity, love and friendship. The dark ones will start to finally have their evil thoughts attract what they fear, hate and want to punish. A world that has regained it love and understanding for its fellow man.

HAHAHA, THIS! "Kill Adam" would also have sufficed.

+1

I also read that it was 20 year old Ryan, and that he had a child who went to the same school.

I even remember thinking to myself, "How old was this guy when he had a kid, 14?"

Q2: Granted, you did say "likely buzzed in", and you are right it would be easier if there was no buzzer before 9:30, but my point is you didn't even investigate and discover the security protocols in place before theorizing.

A2: The security protocols for the lookout/cleaner are irrelevant as he is never to be tied to the crime in any way. What is relevant is the protocols in place when the actual shooter (op 1) arrives to breech the entrance. The entrance door remember has security glass, designed to take the force of a standard bullet, which is why the shotgun is used. We can also assume the protocols were working, cuz if the door wasn't locked we can likely assume the assailant would of simply walked in (but that wouldn't explain the busted out glass door at the front of the school).

Q2: I didn't miss it. First, they would have to keep the rear door ajar, in order to enter at the signal. This would have kept the security panel light lit the entire time until OP 1 blew the front door.

A2: Again you are getting the order of events mixed up. First op 1 blows through the front door using the shotgun, then uses the 1 pistol he has on him to shoot the administrative staff, as this is happening the lookout/cleaner is already inside the building (he wasn't just standing there for hours before hand holding the back door open like a dumbass)... he waited till the shots were fired from the front of the school... shots being fired = no one giving 2 shits about some security panel light going off, you would be more concerned about the masked man in front of you shooting at you and your colleagues at that exact second... at this point the inside man (lookout/cleaner) opens the door for op 2 and the patsy.

Q2: Further more, it is just too dangerous to have 2 men decked out with camo and long guns over their shoulders to approach the rear doors of the building from ANY direction (parking lot or the woods) because if you look at the terrain, they would have been spotted easily from ANY angle of approach, through the windows by A teacher or student in SOME classroom OR OTHER)

A2: First off the 2 op's weren't together... one went to the front alone, the other went to the back with the patsy, meanwhile the lookout/cleaner is inside waiting. The clothing they are wearing doesn't scream IM GOING TO KILL YOU... its a black jacket and camo pants... go to a mall right now and you will likely see 100 ppl wearing that same outfit... my point being the outfit itself is not suspicious (they weren't wearing Scream 3 outfits or anything stupid obvious like that...). Second you act like they were in some rush for some reason... remember at this point NOTHING has happened yet, class is going on as scheduled, the kids are inside singing songs and reading books, not staring out the window looking for killers.

Each op took 2 guns total (1 small, 1 big). It is simple for both parties to conceal the pistols without much issue. The AR & shotgun are a bit more difficult to conceal but that is easy to get around with a bit of misdirection (good old Houdini). Op 1 and Op 2 would arrive separately. Op 1 arrives, mask and all, blatantly showing the shotgun, walks up to the entrance of the school (he doesn't have anything to hid... people are going to think hes Adam in 5 minutes anyways). Op 2 can't be as obvious as he entering an "unofficial" entry point (the back door) so op 2 wouldn't be wearing his mask yet, his pistol would be concealed in his pants, the AR would be as tucked into his jacket as he could get it. He would also have the added distraction of a kid next to him (the patsy), as well as anyone in the area who IS paying attention to their surrounding would probably be more focused on the guy on the front lawn wearing a mask, which an exposed shotgun in his hands... I don't think op 2 would have any issue getting into position.

Q2: Hard to believe more than one cop from a local force in an idyllic town would be that psychotic as to willingly slaughter little toddlers. More likely someone dressed as one as per your theory who was willing to take the chance to blend in knowing that the response would be multiple jurisdictions and he might not be noticed right away.

A2: 1 op (instead of 2) is in theory possible... except it doesn't match the evidence of the police recording... 2 police are inside the school... it's hard to believe 1 is killing kids, and the other is a good guy trying to find a killer. The evidence points to if 1 of these guys is in on it, the other is also in on it by just using pure logic. Also these men would in fact have to be on duty and in fact be police. They are inside the school directing the other police on which positions to take making sure reinforcements avoid the back entrance for as long as possible. Since they are on record announcing the gun's found on the scene from inside the school before any other cops at all had entered the building yet, it would be next to impossible for them not to be cops, and not get noticed.

Think of it this way, them being actual cops makes it a lot easier for them in the long run.

Hypothetical Scenario 1: They are not cops, just posing as cops. This scenario would cause to many unexplainable inconsistencies which other cops on the scene would immediately question (at least shortly after the fact worst case). Being the FIRST cops their would draw a lot of unwanted attention to them from other cops to begin with. They would be asking them questions trying to get updated on where things stand. Things like "you reported a shotgun inside the school earlier, where is in, does another perp have it"... basically the op's (first responding 2 cops) would have a lot of eyes on them and if they weren't legit it would be apparent right away (or as i said shortly after)... that leaves big holes in the report which cant be explained... this is a bad scenario.

Hypothetical Scenario 2: They are actual cops. They breech the front/shoot the classes, undress changing into their cop persona's, act like first responding police guiding the actions of the other early responders, delays things for as long as possible, and then eventually meets up with the other police in side giving them a seemingly honest account of what happened. See how much cleaner that is...

The problem is you act like being a cop is a super high honor that no scum can get into... it's like everything in this world there will always be a mix of good and evil... getting 2 willing participants (even cops) is probably a whole lot easier then you think, especially when you have a near unlimited bankroll to fund the near limitless bribes.

Q2: I think any op dressed as a cop would be very sure to keep moving until he found a way to get outside blend in and walk away. I doubt he would stick out after enough killing was done to make the point, by dithering on the scene. But it is possible. OP 1 would have had a shotgun and could have had an AR strapped to his back, and just dropped the shotgun he used near the office, then gone into the classroom Adam was in, Shot him, dropped his AR on the ground next to Adam's body along side the AR that Adam carried in, left a couple pistols there and kept one in his holster.

Viola. A responding officer sees a shotgun laying in front of the office, walks 30 feet into the first grade classroom and sees 2 AR's and 2 pistols.

Of course he would be one of the many officers who would know that something stinks about the official story.

A2: This is a multi part question so I am going to be kind of all over the map on this one... lol..

The first part of the question I answer in the answer above. For the op's it would be safer for them to be found standing over the body (acting like they just got there), then to be found sliding against the wall trying to escape... one of them is on record saying what weapons were seen inside the school... therefor that "cop" needs to be inside the school when reinforcements arrive to match the story... its all about consistency in the places it really matters. They can't have officer jim announcing the guns inside the school and then backup arrives and officer jim is nowhere to be found... that leads to questions... not very clean.

The shotgun was initially reported to be inside the school. That was retracted as an error, and changed to it was found in the trunk. There wasn't 2 shotguns. They just initially reported it in the wrong location and have since made that little "correction".

First all the guns used had to be found on the scene (he couldn't simply holster a gun that was just discharged... especially since the official story isn't that he shot Adam. How would he explain his gun being fired? Forensic's on scene needs to match the account... if 2 pistols were used (which is the case) then 2 pistols HAVE to be found.

Q2: NO, there is NO "OFFICIAL" story on the guns. You won't find any official statement as to the TOTAL AND TYPE of guns made by the State police LT at a press conference.
At different times, he acknowledged "pistols" and a Bushmaster .223.

All other gun reports are the dozens of different accounts that made it into news stories over 2 days.

The best actual evidence we have is

1. what the officer on the scanner relates, (long rifles and shotgun)
2. the helicopter showing the semi-auto shotgun in the trunk.

The 2 pistols are "likely" since their mention was repeated often and early on in news reports. As is the Bushmaster AR-15

And there were a few reports a .45 Henry repeating rifle, a .30 Enfield rifle, and a .22 Marlin rifle, which is why I chose to use the enfield as an example of one of the long rifles mentioned in the scanner report.

A2: it will eventually pan out officially to 4 weapons total, 2 pistols, a AR, and a shotgun (3 found inside the school with Adam, the other found in his moms car trunk in the parking lot). We know there is at least 1 AR since it was used for most of the killing according to the official story. We also know a shotgun was at least present as they found it in the trunk (and mishandled it to the highest degree... using no gloves...). And we also know at least 1 pistol was used as not all the deaths were caused by the AR, and the shotgun couldn't of been used since it was in the trunk. As I said eventually it will pan out officially it was 4 weapons. The others are just distractions to cause confusion... I mean seriously you really think Adam Lanza that is like 100lbs on a good day carried a .45 Henry, .30 Enfield, .22 Marlin rifle, and at least 1 pistol, along with additional ammo, while wearing a bullet proof vest under his clothing, and a mask that restricts his breathing... I bet if you handed all that to that kid he wouldn't be able to walk a foot, let alone go on a killing spree... This is why they will limit the gun count to the 4 I mentioned as otherwise it opens up additional weird questions (like which vitamin supplements was he taking to look so weak yet be to buff?... lol)

Look at how patheticaly small and skinny adam lanza was. Now, how can a kid this small carry all those guns, ammo and magazines while shooting and killing.

They said he was wearing a vest, face mask besides.

Really, how can a kid this small and skinny do all that.

Here's how.

He didn't do it.

He was the patsy. They gained entry by his being there and shot him as the first victim.

Two gunman fired on anyone walking into the kill zone and each took a class before before throwing down all there weapons and ammo next to the murdered kid adam as they ran out from another entrance via the gymnasium where they were spotted running by windows.

OMG it does ay end the life of Adam!....thats just creepy,,

its clear Adam was a patsy that was to be murdered after he was in the school,,either the cops did him in or his two handlers that groomed him into the situation...

this case screams false flag and the media is covering it all up just like 9/11

the media is absolutely WORTHLESS & USELESS..they provide false disinformation and knowingly cover up crimes

I remember reading that Nancy Lanza was shot while in bed in her pyjamas....I'm sure someone knows what I'm talking about and which report it was tied with so they can provide a link to that info.....

the voice comes from a DEMOM that interfered in the transmission

the voice comes from a DEMON that interfered in the transmission

The source is not a youtube video edited. Its clearly heard on the unedited radiorefence recording of the police scanners for that day.
[/quote


sounds like "anger for wife and daugthers" to me...but my speakers suck.

What is really puzzling is the extreme security system placed at this school. I live in a big city full of gang members and drug dealers the schools around here have no security system at all, now isn't this school in a small safe town? When was this security system installed or put in place? Anyone know?

From what I understand up to this point that is correct.

Try to picture it like this, they arrive early while she's still sleep and wake her. Tell her the bs story I mentioned in my other post, 1 cop consoles her, the other "looks around the house". The 2nd cop finds the needed guns, preps them, and then calls down to his other cop buddy to come upstairs and take a look at this (the mother follows). She comes into the room to the 2nd cop with 1 of the "patsy" guns in hand (I don't remember hearing exactly which of the 4 guns was used on the mother). They tell her to position herself a specific way on the bed (again what option do you have when a person has a gun pointed at you). She does it, and they shoot her when she is in a convincing enough position. They then take her car with the 4 stolen weapons and head to go pickup Adam the patsy. Official it would appears that she was killed by Adam in bed (still in pajama's, no signs of forced entry, patsy guns missing, bullet type in mom & at school match)... no loose ends, nice and clean.