Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 2,522 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,564,600
Pageviews Today: 2,522,433Threads Today: 962Posts Today: 17,202
08:45 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Top Democrat On Gun Control: “Confiscation Could Be an Option”

 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 30583851
United Kingdom
12/21/2012 07:19 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Top Democrat On Gun Control: “Confiscation Could Be an Option”
The Govt wont take away all guns
A reasonable law would be:
One gun per household
Everyone has a background check
Confiscate guns from ppl with a history of mental illness
Ban semi auto rifles
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 23651941
United States
12/21/2012 07:19 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Top Democrat On Gun Control: “Confiscation Could Be an Option”
But all respected historians know that is an error the second amendment actually says.

A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear armor shall not be infringed:in times of war







 Quoting: WAKEUPAMERICA01


You are an idiot and are trying to rewrite history. When the Bill of Rights was written,no western military used armor. Armor was useless against a muzzle loading weapon.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 30562031
Bahamas
12/21/2012 07:20 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Top Democrat On Gun Control: “Confiscation Could Be an Option”
Many of you americans are so stupid and ignorant.

You keep defending the right to bear arms, but what about the right of innocent people, and children, to live their lives?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 27972246
United States
12/21/2012 07:20 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Top Democrat On Gun Control: “Confiscation Could Be an Option”
...


Your wife would be a murderer if she shot a man for such trivial reasons when she could have easily called law enforcement or instead of lethal guns why not pepper spray.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30562031



Fuck off you scumbag... go die in a fire.. cocksucker, you are probably a god damned criminal. They like easy prey.

ESAD.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 24854023


If you can't take the truth its not my problem. Now I suggest if you have a gun in your possession you should donate it to law enforcement so they can have more resources
to protect you as a citizen.After all its their job to protect you.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30562031


Are you a PAID dumbass agitator or just that monumentally fucking stupid?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 24854023

Or a British Agent.
Manu-Koelbren

User ID: 1312616
Spain
12/21/2012 07:21 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Top Democrat On Gun Control: “Confiscation Could Be an Option”
They are insane if they try that....
 Quoting: ^TrInItY^


yep. every shell with every gun will be unloaded before anyone trys to step a foot in my door. dont give a shit who the fuck you are
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 3579236


They won't approach you at home. They'll get you when you away from home, probably during a traffic stop, when your in a vulnerable position.

They will take you to jail and search your home. If you don't go willingly they can always use your family to make you cooperate.

They know better then approaching people at home. If they pick you up away from your house or even better get your kids out of school or your wife at work, you'll be more cooperative.
 Quoting: Dinkytuff


You don't see the idiocy in this approach?
When people will have had enough it is the families of the goons that will die, it will be them being sniped, bombed by IEDs etc. They cannot possible protect themselves in this.

You can push people so much until there is backlash.
It's not hard to be a guerilla, especially not when you know the names and addresses of all that has declared you their enemy but they don't know you're the guerilla.

Not to talk about the number that will mutiny, those organizations will self destruct, the guerillas will have eyes and ears in all the organizations.

So there will be guerillas inside the ABC organizations that can blow up the organization HQs.

Someone hasn't been thinking through this confiscate guns idiocy.
 Quoting: -GLP-Christian-


You overestimate the power of an unorganized citizenry, history proves you wrong.
"White privilege" is the liberal religion's version of Original Sin: you are born guilty, and you carry that burden of guilt all your life, and the only way to escape eternal damnation is for white people confess their sin, to bow, kneel and believe the dogma of the Church of Liberalism, genuflect at its altars, honor its saints, fill the collection plate, and never, ever doubt.

-- Dixon Diaz
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 29643034
United States
12/21/2012 07:22 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Top Democrat On Gun Control: “Confiscation Could Be an Option”
What the second amendment really means and why guns should be banned for citizens because it was never legal.

The second amendment is a misinterpretation


Many people think the second amendment is

A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.

But all respected historians know that is an error the second amendment actually says.

A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear armor shall not be infringed:in times of war


Gun are for barbaric people who can't settle disputes peacefully.If you want true power write a letter ,sign a petition and peacefully demonstrate


Your wife would be a murderer if she shot a man for such trivial reasons when she could have easily called law enforcement or instead of lethal guns why not pepper spray.

Now using the correct version you can see that the second amendment actually is intended for the people to use offense weapons and protect themselves with body armor.Instead of defensive weapons such as guns.

On that merit alone,guns should be banned because they never were suppose to be legal for citizens anyway.

The second amendment is a misinterpretation


Guns are barbaric and a vice in today's modern society and thus the provision for guns should only be made for law enforcement and government.



There are many alternative means to take down a larger opponent without using something as barbaric as gun .What about stun guns,lasers,mace,pepper spray that are just as effective in stopping someone as a gun

If you can't take the truth its not my problem. Now I suggest if you have a gun in your possession you should donate it to law enforcement so they can have more resources
to protect you as a citizen.After all its their job to protect you.

Your barbaric mind is so fixated on slaying someone with a gun that you can't even think critically

are you working the night shift trying to get in all those posts before you get off? Guess they had to switch it up from OZ, UK now the bahamas. get the fuck out of here you troll.
skull_fingtoolsbuscupofjoesuicide
 Quoting: WAKEUPAMERICA01


Don't you recognize that guns are destroying America. And will continue to spread the correct interpretation of the second amendment.You gun holding redneck hillbilly.

A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear armor shall not be infringed:in times of war

 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30562031


guns are not destroying america, having the government systematically take away our rights and freedoms is what will destroy america, our founding fathers knew this and took every step to try and prevent what seems inevitable, thomas jefferson himself said the most important reason a citizen has the right to bear arms is to protect oneself from the tyranny of government.
Chef.

User ID: 29889809
United States
12/21/2012 07:22 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Top Democrat On Gun Control: “Confiscation Could Be an Option”
Many of you americans are so stupid and ignorant.

You keep defending the right to bear arms, but what about the right of innocent people, and children, to live their lives?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30562031


stir Get a clue.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 23651941
United States
12/21/2012 07:23 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Top Democrat On Gun Control: “Confiscation Could Be an Option”
Just think how many people were saved because the average German soldier during WW2 used a bolt action rifle.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1431110
United States
12/21/2012 07:29 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Top Democrat On Gun Control: “Confiscation Could Be an Option”
...


Lasers? What about a Jedi Sword?

yoda
 Quoting: Manu-Koelbren

Your barbaric mind is so fixated on slaying someone with a gun that you can't even think critically
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30562031


My barbaric mind is fixated on my individual right for self defense judging by the fact that the police is not likely to be around when I need them the most. When seconds count, the police are only minutes away. There's also the need for the citizenry to have some means to counter government tyranny were it to arise. There's countless logical points to dispel your utter BS, you're a poor deluded imbecile.
 Quoting: Manu-Koelbren


What you gun holding redneck hill-billies don't understand is the second amendment(and the 4th) isn't even relevant and there are other ways to defend yourself than using a gun ,like using mace and pepper spray. Obama needs to quickly change the constitution to detract citizens from using guns and make the provision for only law enforcement to have guns.You don't want another Newtown event right
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30562031


You miss the point completely.
The reason the founding fathers included the seconded amendment was NOT so the people could defend themselves agains rapists and criminals (although they are handy for that) It is to protect ourselves against TYRANNICAL GOVERNMENT. Are you even aware that the number one killer of humans is their own government???
You need to research that before you start calling for citizens to be dis armed...ASSHAT!!!

bsflag stfu I call
On your 2nd amendment claim so if you don't have a link then
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 30075865
United States
12/21/2012 07:30 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Top Democrat On Gun Control: “Confiscation Could Be an Option”
IMO It's about time guns need to ban for citizens in order for modern society to advance barbaric weapons such as weapons have no use. Only law enforcement,military and government should have guns to protect us.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30562031


Let me pose a "what if" situation to you. Suppose, that gun control/confiscation is instituted at a cost of untold lives. Once the dust settled and for the sake of argument the Govt was victorious in instituting said ban and then that very Govt decided that there would be no more elections and began to impose taxes and restrictive policies at will, just how will the people be able to overcome such tyranny????

That is why our (American) forefathers made the 2nd Amendment! It was that important to them to make it number two on the U.S. constitution, so that the PEOPLE could fend off tyranny!

Enough said.............
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 30562031
Bahamas
12/21/2012 07:30 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Top Democrat On Gun Control: “Confiscation Could Be an Option”
What the second amendment really means and why guns should be banned for citizens because it was never legal.

The second amendment is a misinterpretation


Many people think the second amendment is

A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.

But all respected historians know that is an error the second amendment actually says.

A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear armor shall not be infringed:in times of war


Gun are for barbaric people who can't settle disputes peacefully.If you want true power write a letter ,sign a petition and peacefully demonstrate


Your wife would be a murderer if she shot a man for such trivial reasons when she could have easily called law enforcement or instead of lethal guns why not pepper spray.

Now using the correct version you can see that the second amendment actually is intended for the people to use offense weapons and protect themselves with body armor.Instead of defensive weapons such as guns.

On that merit alone,guns should be banned because they never were suppose to be legal for citizens anyway.

The second amendment is a misinterpretation


Guns are barbaric and a vice in today's modern society and thus the provision for guns should only be made for law enforcement and government.



There are many alternative means to take down a larger opponent without using something as barbaric as gun .What about stun guns,lasers,mace,pepper spray that are just as effective in stopping someone as a gun

If you can't take the truth its not my problem. Now I suggest if you have a gun in your possession you should donate it to law enforcement so they can have more resources
to protect you as a citizen.After all its their job to protect you.

Your barbaric mind is so fixated on slaying someone with a gun that you can't even think critically

are you working the night shift trying to get in all those posts before you get off? Guess they had to switch it up from OZ, UK now the bahamas. get the fuck out of here you troll.
skull_fingtoolsbuscupofjoesuicide
 Quoting: WAKEUPAMERICA01


Don't you recognize that guns are destroying America. And will continue to spread the correct interpretation of the second amendment.You gun holding redneck hillbilly.

A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear armor shall not be infringed:in times of war

 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30562031


guns are not destroying america, having the government systematically take away our rights and freedoms is what will destroy america, our founding fathers knew this and took every step to try and prevent what seems inevitable, thomas jefferson himself said the most important reason a citizen has the right to bear arms is to protect oneself from the tyranny of government.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 29643034


If the government is systematically taking away your rights nad freedoms the original second amendment makes provision for that:


A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear armor shall not be infringed:in times of war


If the government becomes a tyranny then the second amendment gives you the right to keep and bear armor so if the government decides to open fire on you it wont effect you.Also the original second amendment only makes provision for the keeping and bearing of guns in times of war.Hope you understand
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 30270133
United States
12/21/2012 07:31 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Top Democrat On Gun Control: “Confiscation Could Be an Option”
The Govt wont take away all guns
A reasonable law would be:
One gun per household
Everyone has a background check
Confiscate guns from ppl with a history of mental illness
Ban semi auto rifles
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30583851





I'm umm.....you're ass, I don't think so asscap
WAKEUPAMERICA01

User ID: 30489425
United States
12/21/2012 07:33 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Top Democrat On Gun Control: “Confiscation Could Be an Option”
What the second amendment really means and why guns should be banned for citizens because it was never legal.

The second amendment is a misinterpretation


Many people think the second amendment is

A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.

But all respected historians know that is an error the second amendment actually says.

A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear armor shall not be infringed:in times of war


Gun are for barbaric people who can't settle disputes peacefully.If you want true power write a letter ,sign a petition and peacefully demonstrate


Your wife would be a murderer if she shot a man for such trivial reasons when she could have easily called law enforcement or instead of lethal guns why not pepper spray.

Now using the correct version you can see that the second amendment actually is intended for the people to use offense weapons and protect themselves with body armor.Instead of defensive weapons such as guns.

On that merit alone,guns should be banned because they never were suppose to be legal for citizens anyway.

The second amendment is a misinterpretation


Guns are barbaric and a vice in today's modern society and thus the provision for guns should only be made for law enforcement and government.



There are many alternative means to take down a larger opponent without using something as barbaric as gun .What about stun guns,lasers,mace,pepper spray that are just as effective in stopping someone as a gun

If you can't take the truth its not my problem. Now I suggest if you have a gun in your possession you should donate it to law enforcement so they can have more resources
to protect you as a citizen.After all its their job to protect you.

Your barbaric mind is so fixated on slaying someone with a gun that you can't even think critically

are you working the night shift trying to get in all those posts before you get off? Guess they had to switch it up from OZ, UK now the bahamas. get the fuck out of here you troll.
skull_fingtoolsbuscupofjoesuicide
 Quoting: WAKEUPAMERICA01


Don't you recognize that guns are destroying America. And will continue to spread the correct interpretation of the second amendment.You gun holding redneck hillbilly.

A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear armor shall not be infringed:in times of war

 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30562031


guns are not destroying anything. Sure they are used in crimes all over the world by criminals and by criminals in govt. What is destroying this country is the culture of what is played on TV. the Radio, in Hollywood, the Pharmacueticals forced upon every citizen of this country. As for the Constitution you don't get to interpret it the way you want to fit your agenda. That is too bad that you believe guns are bad and as someone who believes opposite what you think, I still believe you have that ability to think freely. The Govt. in its current form and the leaders of this country both demons and rebloods are the problem as well as folks like yourself who want to force your opinions on others using events like last week as a political stepping stone. That in itself is sickening, using a tragedy to propagate your agenda. I think you might be looking at the Bahama Constitution in your analysis. Because no where in my education did one teacher or professor ever have the idea that you have and I had some real Liberal Pro. BTW I am looking at my Constitution that hangs on my wall and I tried to look at it your way and still couldn't come up with what your saying. Keep the Redneck Hill billy shit to yourself or do you just like playing the race card.
WAKE UP AMERICA
"I love the man that can smile in trouble, that can gather strength from distress, and grow brave by reflection. 'Tis the business of little minds to shrink; but he whose heart is firm, and whose conscience approves his conduct, will pursue his principles unto death."
Thomas Paine, The American Crisis, No. 1, December 19, 1776
"Those who expect to reap the blessings of freedom, must, like men, undergo the fatigues of supporting it."

Thomas Paine, The American Crisis, No. 4, September 11, 1777
"I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. Already they have raised up a monied aristocracy that has set the government at defiance. The issuing power (of money) should be taken away from the banks and restored to the people to whom it properly belongs." -- Thomas Jefferson, U.S. President.
"A majority of the people of the United States have lived all of their lives under emergency rule. For 40 years, [79 years now in 2012] freedoms and governmental procedures guaranteed by the Constitution have in varying degrees been abridged by laws brought into force by statutes of national emergency."
Manu-Koelbren

User ID: 1312616
Spain
12/21/2012 07:33 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Top Democrat On Gun Control: “Confiscation Could Be an Option”
What the founding fathers said was to keep a citizen MILITIA not that a divided individualistic society of people should keep personal weapons in their homes. The latter case won't stop a tyrannical government. Do you think your fractured multicultural society can withstand a civil war right now? The Mexicans will revolt and try to take the lands they deem theirs back, the most blacks hate America with a passion and most won't join any resistance but will try to use the chance to spread havoc. Most liberal whites and educated Asians will be caught up in the chaos and succumb. I foresee that only certain southern communities and groups of militia men with military training will be able to resist what's coming.

Get ready folks the NWO is almost here, godspeed to all the good people out there who will fight for the principle of freedom, family and civilization, those who think I am against these values, well unfortunately you're too ignorant to understand me.
"White privilege" is the liberal religion's version of Original Sin: you are born guilty, and you carry that burden of guilt all your life, and the only way to escape eternal damnation is for white people confess their sin, to bow, kneel and believe the dogma of the Church of Liberalism, genuflect at its altars, honor its saints, fill the collection plate, and never, ever doubt.

-- Dixon Diaz
Manu-Koelbren

User ID: 1312616
Spain
12/21/2012 07:34 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Top Democrat On Gun Control: “Confiscation Could Be an Option”
IMO It's about time guns need to ban for citizens in order for modern society to advance barbaric weapons such as weapons have no use. Only law enforcement,military and government should have guns to protect us.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30562031


Let me pose a "what if" situation to you. Suppose, that gun control/confiscation is instituted at a cost of untold lives. Once the dust settled and for the sake of argument the Govt was victorious in instituting said ban and then that very Govt decided that there would be no more elections and began to impose taxes and restrictive policies at will, just how will the people be able to overcome such tyranny????

That is why our (American) forefathers made the 2nd Amendment! It was that important to them to make it number two on the U.S. constitution, so that the PEOPLE could fend off tyranny!

Enough said.............
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30075865


THISS
"White privilege" is the liberal religion's version of Original Sin: you are born guilty, and you carry that burden of guilt all your life, and the only way to escape eternal damnation is for white people confess their sin, to bow, kneel and believe the dogma of the Church of Liberalism, genuflect at its altars, honor its saints, fill the collection plate, and never, ever doubt.

-- Dixon Diaz
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 23651941
United States
12/21/2012 07:34 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Top Democrat On Gun Control: “Confiscation Could Be an Option”
User ID: 30562031

You are such a shill. ARMOR DOES NOT STOP A BULLET. That is why the Red Coats didn't wear it. You POS.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 24854023
United States
12/21/2012 07:34 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Top Democrat On Gun Control: “Confiscation Could Be an Option”
...


Don't play the ad hominem and THINK, think what you're average accountant with a wife and two kids would do if a swat team would show up home and DEMAND his weapons at gun point. Not everything is a hollywood movie fuckhead, wake up from the spell and smell the fragrance of REALITY.
 Quoting: Manu-Koelbren


rockon Exactly. These dumb fucks think they would have a chance against swat or the military. Cunts wouldnt last a minute defending themselves
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30583851


Speaking of "cunts".. have a hissy over a .22 round lately?

There is a reason we celebrate the 4th.. oh and that thing round about 1812 as well.

We are cunts?.. ya.. but you are a nation of pussies.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 24854023


1812? why does canada still exist? lmfao. Another yank that dont know history.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30583851


"The War of 1812 was a 32 month military conflict between the United States and the British Empire and their allies which resulted in no territorial change, but a resolution of many issues remaining from the American War of Independence."
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 30270133
United States
12/21/2012 07:34 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Top Democrat On Gun Control: “Confiscation Could Be an Option”
Many of you americans are so stupid and ignorant.

You keep defending the right to bear arms, but what about the right of innocent people, and children, to live their lives?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30562031




We gun owners are the only reason those lives are worth living...
Saddletramp
We Don't Rent Pigs...

User ID: 739427
United States
12/21/2012 07:34 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Top Democrat On Gun Control: “Confiscation Could Be an Option”
"Confiscation Could Be An Option..."

Surprised a man with presidential aspirations would say that...

Last Edited by Saddletramp on 12/21/2012 07:35 PM
"And how can a man die better than facing fearful odds, for the ashes of his fathers, and the temples of his Gods..." ~ Horatius

"Because he told the truth, and once you've heard the truth, everything else is just cheap whiskey..."
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 24854023
United States
12/21/2012 07:35 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Top Democrat On Gun Control: “Confiscation Could Be an Option”
your cuntry ran.. tail between their legs once again.. suck it limey.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 23651941
United States
12/21/2012 07:35 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Top Democrat On Gun Control: “Confiscation Could Be an Option”
Why are there so many foreign fucks telling Americans what we need?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 24854023
United States
12/21/2012 07:36 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Top Democrat On Gun Control: “Confiscation Could Be an Option”

What the second amendment really means and why guns should be banned for citizens because it was never legal.

The second amendment is a misinterpretation


Many people think the second amendment is

A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.


But all respected historians know that is an error the second amendment actually says.

A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear armor shall not be infringed:in times of war


Now using the correct version you can see that the second amendment actually is intended for the people to use offense weapons and protect themselves with body armor.Instead of defensive weapons such as guns.

On that merit alone,guns should be banned because they never were suppose to be legal for citizens anyway.

The second amendment is a misinterpretation


Guns are barbaric and a vice in today's modern society and thus the provision for guns should only be made for law enforcement and government.

Obama should pass laws for constitutional reform so that only the government and law enforcement can only have gun.

It's the only safe choice
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30562031

Another fucking British Agent.. remember they burned the absolute proof of the ratification of the original 13th Amendment, the Titles Of Nobility Amendment.

Fucking British Agents, are the same ones that have everyone all pissed about 'the jews' and the 'muslims', and the 'fascists' and the 'commmunists', the last two the British Agents themselves installed in Germany and Russia and China, and many other places.

Fucking British Agents.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 27972246


Ad hominem attack won't work.Why are you getting emotional when I expose the real original second amendment which says:

A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear armor shall not be infringed:in times of war



liar.. commie.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 7820311
United States
12/21/2012 07:36 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Top Democrat On Gun Control: “Confiscation Could Be an Option”
I strongly doubt it will ever come to that.

Like most Italian-Americans, Cuomo runs off at the mouth before thinking.
 Quoting: Guns n' God (redux)


cruise
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 29643034
United States
12/21/2012 07:37 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Top Democrat On Gun Control: “Confiscation Could Be an Option”
If the government becomes a tyranny then the second amendment gives you the right to keep and bear armor so if the government decides to open fire on you it wont effect you.Also the original second amendment only makes provision for the keeping and bearing of guns in times of war.Hope you understand


okay i have tried my best to be respectful and logical in explaining my stance on this, that being said you are a FUCKIN IDIOT.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 30562031
Bahamas
12/21/2012 07:37 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Top Democrat On Gun Control: “Confiscation Could Be an Option”
What the second amendment really means and why guns should be banned for citizens because it was never legal.

The second amendment is a misinterpretation


Many people think the second amendment is

A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.

But all respected historians know that is an error the second amendment actually says.

A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear armor shall not be infringed:in times of war


Gun are for barbaric people who can't settle disputes peacefully.If you want true power write a letter ,sign a petition and peacefully demonstrate


Your wife would be a murderer if she shot a man for such trivial reasons when she could have easily called law enforcement or instead of lethal guns why not pepper spray.

Now using the correct version you can see that the second amendment actually is intended for the people to use offense weapons and protect themselves with body armor.Instead of defensive weapons such as guns.

On that merit alone,guns should be banned because they never were suppose to be legal for citizens anyway.

The second amendment is a misinterpretation


Guns are barbaric and a vice in today's modern society and thus the provision for guns should only be made for law enforcement and government.



There are many alternative means to take down a larger opponent without using something as barbaric as gun .What about stun guns,lasers,mace,pepper spray that are just as effective in stopping someone as a gun

If you can't take the truth its not my problem. Now I suggest if you have a gun in your possession you should donate it to law enforcement so they can have more resources
to protect you as a citizen.After all its their job to protect you.

Your barbaric mind is so fixated on slaying someone with a gun that you can't even think critically

are you working the night shift trying to get in all those posts before you get off? Guess they had to switch it up from OZ, UK now the bahamas. get the fuck out of here you troll.
skull_fingtoolsbuscupofjoesuicide
 Quoting: WAKEUPAMERICA01


Don't you recognize that guns are destroying America. And will continue to spread the correct interpretation of the second amendment.You gun holding redneck hillbilly.

A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear armor shall not be infringed:in times of war

 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30562031


guns are not destroying anything. Sure they are used in crimes all over the world by criminals and and destroys peoples lives and are all bad . What is destroying this country is the culture of what is played on TV. the Radio, in Hollywood, the Pharmacueticals forced upon every citizen of this country. As for the Constitution you don't get to interpret it the way you want to fit your agenda. That is too bad that you believe guns are bad and as someone who believes opposite what you think, I still believe you have that ability to think freely. The Govt. in its current form and the leaders of this country both demons and rebloods are the problem as well as folks like yourself who want to force your opinions on others using events like last week as a political stepping stone. That in itself is sickening, using a tragedy to propagate your agenda. I think you might be looking at the Bahama Constitution in your analysis. Because no where in my education did one teacher or professor ever have the idea that you have and I had some real Liberal Pro. BTW I am looking at my Constitution that hangs on my wall and I tried to look at it your way and still couldn't come up with what your saying. Keep the Redneck Hill billy shit to yourself or do you just like playing the race card.
 Quoting: WAKEUPAMERICA01
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 24854023
United States
12/21/2012 07:37 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Top Democrat On Gun Control: “Confiscation Could Be an Option”
The Govt wont take away all guns
A reasonable law would be:
One gun per household
Everyone has a background check
Confiscate guns from ppl with a history of mental illness
Ban semi auto rifles
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30583851

A classic case of rectal crainial inversion.
Manu-Koelbren

User ID: 1312616
Spain
12/21/2012 07:37 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Top Democrat On Gun Control: “Confiscation Could Be an Option”
Why are there so many foreign fucks telling Americans what we need?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 23651941


In my case at least because you're the last bastion of freedom against the NWO and you're way too complacent and confident for your actual situation. Unfortunately that's the way great empires and civilizations fall.

"The price of freedom is eternal vigilance"

Thomas Jefferson.

Last Edited by Manu-K on 12/21/2012 07:38 PM
"White privilege" is the liberal religion's version of Original Sin: you are born guilty, and you carry that burden of guilt all your life, and the only way to escape eternal damnation is for white people confess their sin, to bow, kneel and believe the dogma of the Church of Liberalism, genuflect at its altars, honor its saints, fill the collection plate, and never, ever doubt.

-- Dixon Diaz
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 27972246
United States
12/21/2012 07:37 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Top Democrat On Gun Control: “Confiscation Could Be an Option”
...


My barbaric mind is fixated on my individual right for self defense judging by the fact that the police is not likely to be around when I need them the most. When seconds count, the police are only minutes away. There's also the need for the citizenry to have some means to counter government tyranny were it to arise. There's countless logical points to dispel your utter BS, you're a poor deluded imbecile.
 Quoting: Manu-Koelbren


What you gun holding redneck hill-billies don't understand is the second amendment(and the 4th) isn't even relevant and there are other ways to defend yourself than using a gun ,like using mace and pepper spray. Obama needs to quickly change the constitution to detract citizens from using guns and make the provision for only law enforcement to have guns.You don't want another Newtown event right
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30562031


Please explain to me how someone can defend themselves with pepper spray against a criminal with a gun...just because you make a law doesn't mean it will be followed this is basic comprehension, criminals will always have guns and nothing an ignorant politician signs will change that.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 29643034



A criminal won't have a gun because there would be no guns in circulation. Do you see my logic in this? And that would equal the playing field so to speak.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30562031

Do you have any idea how incredibly it is to make a gun and the explosive to fire it really is? Apparently those in Britain are completely dumbed down now... I wonder know if they even now how to make a knife from a piece of flint.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1292637
United States
12/21/2012 07:38 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Top Democrat On Gun Control: “Confiscation Could Be an Option”
What the second amendment really means and why guns should be banned for citizens because it was never legal.

The second amendment is a misinterpretation


Many people think the second amendment is

A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.

But all respected historians know that is an error the second amendment actually says.

A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear armor shall not be infringed:in times of war


Gun are for barbaric people who can't settle disputes peacefully.If you want true power write a letter ,sign a petition and peacefully demonstrate


Your wife would be a murderer if she shot a man for such trivial reasons when she could have easily called law enforcement or instead of lethal guns why not pepper spray.

Now using the correct version you can see that the second amendment actually is intended for the people to use offense weapons and protect themselves with body armor.Instead of defensive weapons such as guns.

On that merit alone,guns should be banned because they never were suppose to be legal for citizens anyway.

The second amendment is a misinterpretation


Guns are barbaric and a vice in today's modern society and thus the provision for guns should only be made for law enforcement and government.



There are many alternative means to take down a larger opponent without using something as barbaric as gun .What about stun guns,lasers,mace,pepper spray that are just as effective in stopping someone as a gun

If you can't take the truth its not my problem. Now I suggest if you have a gun in your possession you should donate it to law enforcement so they can have more resources
to protect you as a citizen.After all its their job to protect you.

Your barbaric mind is so fixated on slaying someone with a gun that you can't even think critically

are you working the night shift trying to get in all those posts before you get off? Guess they had to switch it up from OZ, UK now the bahamas. get the fuck out of here you troll.
skull_fingtoolsbuscupofjoesuicide
 Quoting: WAKEUPAMERICA01


Don't you recognize that guns are destroying America. And will continue to spread the correct interpretation of the second amendment.You gun holding redneck hillbilly.

A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear armor shall not be infringed:in times of war

 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30562031


guns are not destroying anything. Sure they are used in crimes all over the world by criminals and and destroys peoples lives and are all bad . What is destroying this country is the culture of what is played on TV. the Radio, in Hollywood, the Pharmacueticals forced upon every citizen of this country. As for the Constitution you don't get to interpret it the way you want to fit your agenda. That is too bad that you believe guns are bad and as someone who believes opposite what you think, I still believe you have that ability to think freely. The Govt. in its current form and the leaders of this country both demons and rebloods are the problem as well as folks like yourself who want to force your opinions on others using events like last week as a political stepping stone. That in itself is sickening, using a tragedy to propagate your agenda. I think you might be looking at the Bahama Constitution in your analysis. Because no where in my education did one teacher or professor ever have the idea that you have and I had some real Liberal Pro. BTW I am looking at my Constitution that hangs on my wall and I tried to look at it your way and still couldn't come up with what your saying. Keep the Redneck Hill billy shit to yourself or do you just like playing the race card.
 Quoting: WAKEUPAMERICA01

 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30562031


Provocateur.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 30270133
United States
12/21/2012 07:38 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Top Democrat On Gun Control: “Confiscation Could Be an Option”
Why are there so many foreign fucks telling Americans what we need?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 23651941




Because those fuckers have already been de-nutted and expect the same for us, which is why granny says.....


granny