This is a set-up! They know gun confiscation is the ONLY WAY to a guaranteed Civil War | |
Devoted Follower User ID: 28055738 United States 12/21/2012 07:01 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 29412599 United States 12/21/2012 07:01 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Quote: Quoting: Riverman 1487773 Yeah what is happening in America should concern us all. The only thing that is stopping the NWO is Americas gun ownership. Once America topples, the rest of the western nations follow. So the whole agenda rests on America being de-weaponised for all the other dominoes to fall. Reaction: Total nonsense. People who keep defending the gun-fetish of american southerners, overrate america's position in the world: they want to be part of a lot of useless surface, while the world goes on. Australia, New Sealand, Canada or Western Europe has ultimately nothing to do with the culture of violence and ignorance in the states: ultimately it isnt the fault of the more liberal, western ones in that society, but you have the religious ones, the redneck ones trying to limit freedom of speech to the bible, the trailer parks, the ignorance. [link to www.thedailybeast.com] The Most Armed States in the US 1, Kentucky Population:4,314,113 NICS background checks per 100,000 residents (Dec. 2008 – May 2010): 134,028 2, Utah Population:2,784,572 NICS background checks per 100,000 residents: 30,315 3, Montana Population:974,989 NICS background checks per 100,000 residents: 25,745 4, Wyoming Population:544,270 NICS background checks per 100,000 residents: 22,827 5, Alaska Population:698,473 NICS background checks per 100,000 residents: 22,273 6, West Virginia Population:1,819,777 NICS background checks per 100,000 residents: 21,455 7, South Dakota Population:812,383 NICS background checks per 100,000 residents: 19,062 8, North Dakota Population:646,844 NICS background checks per 100,000 residents: 17,829 9, Arkansas Population:2,889,450 NICS background checks per 100,000 residents: 17,483 10, Alabama Population:4,708,708 NICS background checks per 100,000 residents: 16,860 11, Tennessee Population: 6,296,254 NICS background checks per 100,000 residents: 16,684 12, Oklahoma Population: 3,687,050 NICS background checks per 100,000 residents: 15,801 13, Idaho Population: 1,545,801 NICS background checks per 100,000 residents: 15,764 14, Colorado Population: 5,024,748 NICS background checks per 100,000 residents: 15,086 15, Missouri Population: 5,987,580 NICS background checks per 100,000 residents: 14,712 16, New Hampshire Population: 1,324,575 NICS background checks per 100,000 residents: 14,522 17, Mississippi Population: 2,951,996 NICS background checks per 100,000 residents: 14,165 18, Illinois Population: 12,910,409 NICS background checks per 100,000 residents: 13,879 19, Connecticut Population: 3,518,288 NICS background checks per 100,000 residents: 13,783 20, New Mexico Population: 2,009,671 NICS background checks per 100,000 residents: 13,408 21, Louisiana Population: 4,492,076 NICS background checks per 100,000 residents: 13,329 22, Minnesota Population: 5,266,214 NICS background checks per 100,000 residents: 13,285 23, Kansas Population: 2,818,747 NICS background checks per 100,000 residents: 12,516 24, Washington Population: 6,664,195 NICS background checks per 100,000 residents: 12,508 25, Pennsylvania Population: 12,604,767 NICS background checks per 100,000 residents: 12,449 26, Oregon Population: 3,825,657 NICS background checks per 100,000 residents: 12,059 27, Indiana Population: 6,423,113 NICS background checks per 100,000 residents: 11,614 28, South Carolina Population: 4,561,242 NICS background checks per 100,000 residents: 11,578 29, Maine Population: 1,318,301 NICS background checks per 100,000 residents: 11,528 30, Virginia Population: 7,882,590 NICS background checks per 100,000 residents: 10,134 31, Iowa Population: 3,007,856 NICS background checks per 100,000 residents: 10,127 32, Nevada Population: 2,643,085 NICS background checks per 100,000 residents: 10,115 33, Texas Population: 24,782,302 NICS background checks per 100,000 residents: 9,936 34, North Carolina Population: 9,380,884 NICS background checks per 100,000 residents: 9,411 35, Vermont Population: 621,760 NICS background checks per 100,000 residents: 9,366 36, Georgia Population: 9,829,211 NICS background checks per 100,000 residents: 9,200 37, Michigan Population: 9,969,727 NICS background checks per 100,000 residents: 9,030 38, Wisconsin Population: 5,654,774 NICS background checks per 100,000 residents: 8,534 39, Ohio Population: 11,542,645 NICS background checks per 100,000 residents: 8,491 40, Nebraska Population: 1,796,619 NICS background checks per 100,000 residents: 8,081 41, Arizona Population: 6,595,778 NICS background checks per 100,000 residents: 7,954 42, Florida Population: 18,537,969 NICS background checks per 100,000 residents: 7,510 43, Delaware Population: 885,122 NICS background checks per 100,000 residents: 5,636 44, California Population: 36,961,664 NICS background checks per 100,000 residents: 5,444 45, Maryland Population: 5,699,478 NICS background checks per 100,000 residents: 4,040 46, Massachusetts Population: 6,593,587 NICS background checks per 100,000 residents: 3,796 47, Rhode Island Population: 1,053,209 NICS background checks per 100,000 residents: 3,504 48, New York Population: 19,541,453 NICS background checks per 100,000 residents: 3,047 49, Hawaii Population: 1,295,178 NICS background checks per 100,000 residents: 2,031 50, New Jersey Population: 8,707,739 NICS background checks per 100,000 residents: 1,536 51, Washington, D.C. Population: 599,657 NICS background checks per 100,000 residents: 155 |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 30525185 United States 12/21/2012 07:03 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Americans will NEVER rise up and fight no matter what.. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 18133274 WHY??..cause MOST of em are so damn fat they could only fit about ten to a street at a time..and the effort of having to maybe RUN??..THATS whats really gonna stop em...just changing mags would get most of em out of breath. And they would stop the riot every two minutes for a beer and pizza break and to see whos winning dancing with the stars and to check the sports results. Go blow a kangaroo and shut the fuck up... He/she is right though. Most Americans could not give a crap any less and would never even consider opposing the govt because they're either weak, without moral, brainless, scared, intimidated, or obese etc. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 22017972 United States 12/21/2012 07:04 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Additoinally to the Aussie slaves in da house. Ummmmm......you already lost your enfields and bren guns long ago so this argument is not yours to engage in, you sold your country out already and the result is a desolate wasteland of half british wankers who have shit on the last remaining strength forged from Gallipoli's dead warriors. Simply STFU. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 29856998 United States 12/21/2012 07:04 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | THIS POLL SHOWS HOW CERTAIN A CIVIL WAR IS.... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 29412599 Does the Second Amendment give individuals the right to bear arms? [link to usatoday30.usatoday.com] Yes 97% No 2% Undecided 1% How many of them would actually USE their arms to kill? I doubt it would be 97% I'm not anti-guns whatsoever, I just find it hard to believe that A. The army, police would willingly kill American citizens. B. American citizens would willingly kill others if they are given a peaceful option. I would have no problem putting a bullet in a fucking totalitarian supporting libtard idiot if they came for my guns. I honestly mean that. I would feel proud. |
Saddletramp User ID: 739427 Puerto Rico 12/21/2012 07:04 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | What the second amendment really means and why guns should be banned for citizens because it was never legal. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30562031 The second amendment is a misinterpretation Many people think the second amendment is A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. But all respected historians know that is an error the second amendment actually says. A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear armor shall not be infringed:in times of war Now using the correct version you can see that the second amendment actually is intended for the people to use offense weapons and protect themselves with body armor.Instead of defensive weapons such as guns. On that merit alone,guns should be banned because they never were suppose to be legal for citizens anyway. The second amendment is a misinterpretation [link to en.wikipedia.org] Only in times of war should a citizen have armor. A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear armor shall not be infringed:in times of war It's always a foreigner interpreting OUR Constitution for us...thanks but, fuck off... "And how can a man die better than facing fearful odds, for the ashes of his fathers, and the temples of his Gods..." ~ Horatius "Because he told the truth, and once you've heard the truth, everything else is just cheap whiskey..." "We don't rent pigs!" |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1708283 United States 12/21/2012 07:05 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | What the second amendment really means and why guns should be banned for citizens because it was never legal. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30562031 The second amendment is a misinterpretation Many people think the second amendment is A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. But all respected historians know that is an error the second amendment actually says. A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear armor shall not be infringed:in times of war Now using the correct version you can see that the second amendment actually is intended for the people to use offense weapons and protect themselves with body armor.Instead of defensive weapons such as guns. On that merit alone,guns should be banned because they never were suppose to be legal for citizens anyway. The second amendment is a misinterpretation I think you may need to brush up on your English vocabulary. arms != armor, lmao. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 29856998 United States 12/21/2012 07:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Additoinally to the Aussie slaves in da house. Ummmmm......you already lost your enfields and bren guns long ago so this argument is not yours to engage in, you sold your country out already and the result is a desolate wasteland of half british wankers who have shit on the last remaining strength forged from Gallipoli's dead warriors. Simply STFU. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22017972 They hope we'll fold up like pussies, too. That way they don't have to feel like inferior men compared to us. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 22017972 United States 12/21/2012 07:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Americans will NEVER rise up and fight no matter what.. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 18133274 WHY??..cause MOST of em are so damn fat they could only fit about ten to a street at a time..and the effort of having to maybe RUN??..THATS whats really gonna stop em...just changing mags would get most of em out of breath. And they would stop the riot every two minutes for a beer and pizza break and to see whos winning dancing with the stars and to check the sports results. Go blow a kangaroo and shut the fuck up... He/she is right though. Most Americans could not give a crap any less and would never even consider opposing the govt because they're either weak, without moral, brainless, scared, intimidated, or obese etc. I agree most will fence post the battle because they are an enemy unto themselves, however talked openly to several of my patients today and plenty of them just bought 1000 round cases of 7.62 and flat out said I will die to end this corruption and oppression. I guess it depends on the state and region, my people in WV ready to go at the first smell of confiscation. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 30443180 Norway 12/21/2012 07:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
*HAARP Lady* User ID: 30590548 United States 12/21/2012 07:07 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Whatever happened to those petitions of the states that wanted to secede from the union? Did that ever go anywhere? Quoting: *HAARP Lady* I don't think the White House ever answered them...despite their own policies...go figure... Thank you for the reply. That's too bad - Texas has always wanted to be it's own country anyway! But I can just see what would happen - we'd all have to get passports to go visit family in these "former states". Makes me wonder if these states would be the first targeted for confiscation? Don't get mad - Get a Pepsi! |
Riverman User ID: 1487773 Netherlands 12/21/2012 07:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | a set up for what? What is wrong about discussing what can help schoolchildren from becoming gun-victims? Among rednecks that doesnt even seem to be a point.... the main point seems to be, i should be able to own any fire-arm, because the government is a danger. Why should there be a civi war in the first place? Simply because the government questions the current way how gun are possessed needs some adjunction? To be honest, i get fucking sick about people who talk about gun confiscation, when the governement and society is talking about gun control to protect the majoriry of society. The likes of you talking about civil war are ignorant, shortminded, fucked up types... you DON'T represent real americans. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 30562031 Bahamas 12/21/2012 07:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Quote: Quoting: Riverman 1487773 Yeah what is happening in America should concern us all. The only thing that is stopping the NWO is Americas gun ownership. Once America topples, the rest of the western nations follow. So the whole agenda rests on America being de-weaponised for all the other dominoes to fall. Reaction: Total nonsense. People who keep defending the gun-fetish of american southerners, overrate america's position in the world: they want to be part of a lot of useless surface, while the world goes on. Australia, New Sealand, Canada or Western Europe has ultimately nothing to do with the culture of violence and ignorance in the states: ultimately it isnt the fault of the more liberal, western ones in that society, but you have the religious ones, the redneck ones trying to limit freedom of speech to the bible, the trailer parks, the ignorance. [link to www.thedailybeast.com] The Most Armed States in the US 1, Kentucky Population:4,314,113 NICS background checks per 100,000 residents (Dec. 2008 – May 2010): 134,028 2, Utah Population:2,784,572 NICS background checks per 100,000 residents: 30,315 3, Montana Population:974,989 NICS background checks per 100,000 residents: 25,745 4, Wyoming Population:544,270 NICS background checks per 100,000 residents: 22,827 5, Alaska Population:698,473 NICS background checks per 100,000 residents: 22,273 6, West Virginia Population:1,819,777 NICS background checks per 100,000 residents: 21,455 7, South Dakota Population:812,383 NICS background checks per 100,000 residents: 19,062 8, North Dakota Population:646,844 NICS background checks per 100,000 residents: 17,829 9, Arkansas Population:2,889,450 NICS background checks per 100,000 residents: 17,483 10, Alabama Population:4,708,708 NICS background checks per 100,000 residents: 16,860 11, Tennessee Population: 6,296,254 NICS background checks per 100,000 residents: 16,684 12, Oklahoma Population: 3,687,050 NICS background checks per 100,000 residents: 15,801 13, Idaho Population: 1,545,801 NICS background checks per 100,000 residents: 15,764 14, Colorado Population: 5,024,748 NICS background checks per 100,000 residents: 15,086 15, Missouri Population: 5,987,580 NICS background checks per 100,000 residents: 14,712 16, New Hampshire Population: 1,324,575 NICS background checks per 100,000 residents: 14,522 17, Mississippi Population: 2,951,996 NICS background checks per 100,000 residents: 14,165 18, Illinois Population: 12,910,409 NICS background checks per 100,000 residents: 13,879 19, Connecticut Population: 3,518,288 NICS background checks per 100,000 residents: 13,783 20, New Mexico Population: 2,009,671 NICS background checks per 100,000 residents: 13,408 21, Louisiana Population: 4,492,076 NICS background checks per 100,000 residents: 13,329 22, Minnesota Population: 5,266,214 NICS background checks per 100,000 residents: 13,285 23, Kansas Population: 2,818,747 NICS background checks per 100,000 residents: 12,516 24, Washington Population: 6,664,195 NICS background checks per 100,000 residents: 12,508 25, Pennsylvania Population: 12,604,767 NICS background checks per 100,000 residents: 12,449 26, Oregon Population: 3,825,657 NICS background checks per 100,000 residents: 12,059 27, Indiana Population: 6,423,113 NICS background checks per 100,000 residents: 11,614 28, South Carolina Population: 4,561,242 NICS background checks per 100,000 residents: 11,578 29, Maine Population: 1,318,301 NICS background checks per 100,000 residents: 11,528 30, Virginia Population: 7,882,590 NICS background checks per 100,000 residents: 10,134 31, Iowa Population: 3,007,856 NICS background checks per 100,000 residents: 10,127 32, Nevada Population: 2,643,085 NICS background checks per 100,000 residents: 10,115 33, Texas Population: 24,782,302 NICS background checks per 100,000 residents: 9,936 34, North Carolina Population: 9,380,884 NICS background checks per 100,000 residents: 9,411 35, Vermont Population: 621,760 NICS background checks per 100,000 residents: 9,366 36, Georgia Population: 9,829,211 NICS background checks per 100,000 residents: 9,200 37, Michigan Population: 9,969,727 NICS background checks per 100,000 residents: 9,030 38, Wisconsin Population: 5,654,774 NICS background checks per 100,000 residents: 8,534 39, Ohio Population: 11,542,645 NICS background checks per 100,000 residents: 8,491 40, Nebraska Population: 1,796,619 NICS background checks per 100,000 residents: 8,081 41, Arizona Population: 6,595,778 NICS background checks per 100,000 residents: 7,954 42, Florida Population: 18,537,969 NICS background checks per 100,000 residents: 7,510 43, Delaware Population: 885,122 NICS background checks per 100,000 residents: 5,636 44, California Population: 36,961,664 NICS background checks per 100,000 residents: 5,444 45, Maryland Population: 5,699,478 NICS background checks per 100,000 residents: 4,040 46, Massachusetts Population: 6,593,587 NICS background checks per 100,000 residents: 3,796 47, Rhode Island Population: 1,053,209 NICS background checks per 100,000 residents: 3,504 48, New York Population: 19,541,453 NICS background checks per 100,000 residents: 3,047 49, Hawaii Population: 1,295,178 NICS background checks per 100,000 residents: 2,031 50, New Jersey Population: 8,707,739 NICS background checks per 100,000 residents: 1,536 51, Washington, D.C. Population: 599,657 NICS background checks per 100,000 residents: 155 Skewed statistics learn the real second amendment hillbilly A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear armor shall not be infringed:in times of war |
Copperhead User ID: 24964643 United States 12/21/2012 07:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | What the second amendment really means and why guns should be banned for citizens because it was never legal. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30562031 The second amendment is a misinterpretation Many people think the second amendment is A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. But all respected historians know that is an error the second amendment actually says. A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear armor shall not be infringed:in times of war Now using the correct version you can see that the second amendment actually is intended for the people to use offense weapons and protect themselves with body armor.Instead of defensive weapons such as guns. On that merit alone,guns should be banned because they never were suppose to be legal for citizens anyway. The second amendment is a misinterpretation Have you always had an extra 23rd? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 26490972 United States 12/21/2012 07:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You could be on to something OP. The surge in propagandized crime on the TV and media could be used by design to ramp up gun sells and ad more people to the data base of own registered weapons. in return getting more people willingly putting their house on the map of those to search. Quoting: Talkinghands The effort is to create the illusion that the majority want our guns gone. FBI stats show a 50%+ reduction in violent cimes nationwide over the last 25-30 years. The media, under orders without question, seeks to maximize the impact to the public of every shooting mass or otherwise to create the illusion that these crimes are at epidemic proportions, when the FBI's own stats suggest the opposite. These people are lying and they are lying big, but the average idiot will believe whatever the talking head tells him. You can access the violent crime data on the FBI website. So, if you are part of the elite and crime is declining with gun ownership on the rise, the last thing you want to do is publicize that fact if what you want to disarm the population. There is real danger right now. These people are not benevolent in any way and the American and Western population will suffer greatly if we are disarmed. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 30562031 Bahamas 12/21/2012 07:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | What the second amendment really means and why guns should be banned for citizens because it was never legal. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30562031 The second amendment is a misinterpretation Many people think the second amendment is A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. But all respected historians know that is an error the second amendment actually says. A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear armor shall not be infringed:in times of war Now using the correct version you can see that the second amendment actually is intended for the people to use offense weapons and protect themselves with body armor.Instead of defensive weapons such as guns. On that merit alone,guns should be banned because they never were suppose to be legal for citizens anyway. The second amendment is a misinterpretation I think you may need to brush up on your English vocabulary. arms != armor, lmao. I think need to talk to any respected historian and they will tell you the second amendment was changed and the original was. A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear armor shall not be infringed:in times of war You can research it yourself |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 30554565 Brazil 12/21/2012 07:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | OK Aussie. What happens to the world if the US goes into civil war, OR loses all weapons and becomes a totalitarian police state, huh? You think it won't affect you? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 29412599 Nobody seems to understand that if the US goes down the whole world goes down with it ! Wake up people, stop wishing America's demise ! If you don't care about the American people at least do it for your own selfish reasons cos make no mistake about it, IF the US falls your life will be turned upside down no matter where you live on the planet ! No, man here we dont need the US to fkng nothing, maybe Israel need as a country body guard. But in any case here we acept EVERYONE... |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 30562031 Bahamas 12/21/2012 07:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | What the second amendment really means and why guns should be banned for citizens because it was never legal. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30562031 The second amendment is a misinterpretation Many people think the second amendment is A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. But all respected historians know that is an error the second amendment actually says. A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear armor shall not be infringed:in times of war Now using the correct version you can see that the second amendment actually is intended for the people to use offense weapons and protect themselves with body armor.Instead of defensive weapons such as guns. On that merit alone,guns should be banned because they never were suppose to be legal for citizens anyway. The second amendment is a misinterpretation Have you always had an extra 23rd? \What |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1044117 United States 12/21/2012 07:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Don't worry. This administration will soon make every person who supports the 2nd Amendment look like enemies of the state. They'll twist shit around and pit gun owners against non gun owners if they have to. This admin is shithouse corrupt, and doesn't really care how many lies and "events" need to be carried out before they get their way. |
Riverman User ID: 1487773 Netherlands 12/21/2012 07:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 22017972 United States 12/21/2012 07:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | a set up for what? Quoting: Riverman 1487773 What is wrong about discussing what can help schoolchildren from becoming gun-victims? Among rednecks that doesnt even seem to be a point.... the main point seems to be, i should be able to own any fire-arm, because the government is a danger. Why should there be a civi war in the first place? Simply because the government questions the current way how gun are possessed needs some adjunction? To be honest, i get fucking sick about people who talk about gun confiscation, when the governement and society is talking about gun control to protect the majoriry of society. The likes of you talking about civil war are ignorant, shortminded, fucked up types... you DON'T represent real americans. All that sentence structure and no meaning wow you wasted at least several minutes slamming that drivel together. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 20056488 United States 12/21/2012 07:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | follow the string op...nice catch, now heres a question will civil war actually be allowed or will it be forced to a breaking point and then pulled back with some minor consolations from the power...ie. a few arrests of "crooked" politicians, and a finacial re-eval that will even the books a bit in america's caste system |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 29412599 United States 12/21/2012 07:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Americans will NEVER rise up and fight no matter what.. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 18133274 WHY??..cause MOST of em are so damn fat they could only fit about ten to a street at a time..and the effort of having to maybe RUN??..THATS whats really gonna stop em...just changing mags would get most of em out of breath. And they would stop the riot every two minutes for a beer and pizza break and to see whos winning dancing with the stars and to check the sports results. Go blow a kangaroo and shut the fuck up... He/she is right though. Most Americans could not give a crap any less and would never even consider opposing the govt because they're either weak, without moral, brainless, scared, intimidated, or obese etc. I think we know who you're talking about. They can all keep their government paychecks and Obama phones. The rest can flee back over the boarder. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 15256858 United States 12/21/2012 07:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Americans will NEVER rise up and fight no matter what.. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 18133274 WHY??..cause MOST of em are so damn fat they could only fit about ten to a street at a time..and the effort of having to maybe RUN??..THATS whats really gonna stop em...just changing mags would get most of em out of breath. And they would stop the riot every two minutes for a beer and pizza break and to see whos winning dancing with the stars and to check the sports results. You sure have a lot of room to talk, dontcha? And all you fat slobs down there in Austrailia feeling no pain on your larger did exactly that, didn't ya? YES you did!!! None of you lazy ass bastards stood up and did a dam thing and now your country is "gun free". Don't you just love it? Sure you do!! So........stupid Austrailian........SHUT THE FUCK UP...LOSER...YOU FAIL!!!!! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 22017972 United States 12/21/2012 07:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 22017972 United States 12/21/2012 07:15 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 30525185 United States 12/21/2012 07:16 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I'm not gonna lie though, African Americans and other minority groups would be idiotic if they were to oppose the govt. Because if this ever leads to a civil war, and the govt loses, the winning Bill of Rights upholding people will most likely treat you like complete shit. After all, the original Bill of Rights were written only for white American men. You may be enslaved again. |
ar-15 nut User ID: 1281306 United States 12/21/2012 07:17 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | What the second amendment really means and why guns should be banned for citizens because it was never legal. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30562031 The second amendment is a misinterpretation Many people think the second amendment is A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. But all respected historians know that is an error the second amendment actually says. A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear armor shall not be infringed:in times of war Now using the correct version you can see that the second amendment actually is intended for the people to use offense weapons and protect themselves with body armor.Instead of defensive weapons such as guns. On that merit alone,guns should be banned because they never were suppose to be legal for citizens anyway. The second amendment is a misinterpretation [link to en.wikipedia.org] Only in times of war should a citizen have armor. A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear armor shall not be infringed:in times of war Well regulated We are a REPUBLIC.If we can keep it MORAN! A pissed off American Veteran! |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 29412599 United States 12/21/2012 07:17 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 16559138 Australia 12/21/2012 07:17 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Americans will NEVER rise up and fight no matter what.. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 18133274 WHY??..cause MOST of em are so damn fat they could only fit about ten to a street at a time..and the effort of having to maybe RUN??..THATS whats really gonna stop em...just changing mags would get most of em out of breath. And they would stop the riot every two minutes for a beer and pizza break and to see whos winning dancing with the stars and to check the sports results. You need to come hunting with me in West Virginia. The real estate is mostly vertical. And damn near everyone has better arms than the US Army, and arsenals of it. IF you survive you will have a totally different stereotype of the American male. I said "MOST"...not all. And the ones that CAN fight and are NOT blubber gutted sheep easily entertained by MSM BULLSHIT...dont stand a real chance because there are NOT ENOUGH of them. |