Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,500 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 354,894
Pageviews Today: 568,354Threads Today: 175Posts Today: 3,342
07:17 AM


Back to Forum
Back to Forum 		Back to Thread
Back to Thread
REPORT ABUSIVE REPLY
Message Subject ADAM WAS FRAMED: Mossad death squads slaughtered children at Sandy Hook
Poster Handle Monk Meat
Post Content
...


What makes you think there isn't a shred of evidence?

Sorry but, when someone says "lets see those videos"...what exactly did that mean? How do you know what he was requesting? You people talk out of your asses. And do you think that if they mentioned that they DO have video but it is not being released, then that would be good enough for "AC"?

You fucking freaks who think EVERYTHING is a big fake are seriously disturbed.
 Quoting: Monk Meat


Dullard,

The onus is on "paid shill" to provide at least some evidence to back up his assertions. I know you are new to this forum, but that is the way it works.

That poster made 2 assertions. I have not seen any evidence, and as I said, (to my knowledge), the mainstream media hasn't even backed up those 2 claims made by paid shill! And the OP (original poster for you newbies) just corroborated that as well, saying,

I agree. The only eye-witnesses to the actual killings all appear to be dead (other than the actual killers).
 Quoting: OP


So, I challenged "paid shill", and so did the person who said "let's see those videos".

Occam's razor says the simplest answer is the best. In the context of this discussion, "let's see those videos" means prove it. Because OBVIOUSLY (simply) "paid shill" doesn't have access to the videos.

That is how I know "what he meant". Because I employ common sense. Meanwhile you are the one assuming the worst about someone simply asking "paid shill" to prove his assertions.

You asked,
Do I think that if they mentioned that they DO have video but it is not being released, then that would be good enough for "AC"?
 Quoting: monk meat


I don't speculate. I just go with the facts, and the facts are they haven't mentioned video ONCE, and I have been following this story since its inception at 10:40 am when the first reports came out. So your hypothetical question is a useless waste of my time, not to mention a trap.

So maybe you and your shill friends should regroup, and realize that your intellects are not actually as sharp as you think they are, and come up with a better plan. Like perhaps read a book on logic, reason, and persuasion, and take a class in debate.

And as far as your assertion that I am a freak who thinks that everything is a fake, thanks for another example of your amateur desperation with that irrational attempt to smear me with a broad brush.

By the way, I just stuck a fork in you, and you are done, and mighty tasty by the way.

Thanks for breakfast.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30642382


Listen, you pompous piece of slug shit, anytime one of these dimwits comes up (or goes along with) some half-assed theory such as "psy ops, munchurian drone, mind control, luciferian, mossad" bullshit, the burden of proof lies solely on their shoulders. Not those of us who wish to think that perhaps... just perhaps...a kid who was fucked up in the head who had easy access to guns went on a murderous rampage. But wait..THAT'S the crazy story..right?

The only thing you stuck a fork in was yourself, by posting and confirming your idiocy.
 Quoting: Monk Meat


MMM,time for desert.

I agree with you that anyone who presents a theory, half-assed or not, is required to go on to prove it.

In this case, you jumped on to this thread and instead of politely pointing out that the OP did not provide enough evidence to prove his theory, you just went with the sarcastic "santa claus" routine. That's ok, I didn't have a problem with that. You can waste your time as you like.

Soon after, a different poster said "probably not mossad behind this" and then gave a link with some REAL evidence as to who may have been behind this tragedy as opposed to the mainstream media's unproven "lone 125 pound weakling with 4 long-guns" theory.

And, in the end, after reading that link and discussing with a few truly interested parties, the OP just posted and ate as much crow as he could, saying

It's enough for me, but then again my opinion is only that it was a professional hit. Whether it was done by Mossad or some other hired thug death squad in the end is irrelevant. A 20-year-old computer geek with Grover arms didn't kill his mom, the children, or the teachers. The official story is BS.
 Quoting: OP


The OP's conversion certainly wasn't a result of your sarcastic "santa clause" ROUTINE, nor a result of "paid shill" who just repeated the unproven media line, with NO evidence.

So back to the point of me talking to you.

You just wrote:[monk meat: (burden of proof is on them) Not those of us who wish to think that perhaps... just perhaps...a kid who was fucked up in the head who had easy access to guns went on a murderous rampage. But wait..THAT'S the crazy story..right?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30642382


You can think what you want. As a matter of fact, go ahead and start a thread about "what you think". No one is stopping you.

But this thread was started with a different theory. "paid shill" tried to rebut the OP's theory giving no evidence, but repeating the media party line that is frankly unverifiable.

This is the same media who reported so many inconsistencies and ridiculous falsehoods that there is a 25 page thread documenting them all.

So, you may be right. But PROVE it or just get off this thread and stop being such a prick. Because that is exactly how you began your presence here, and you have stuck with it all the way to the bitter end.

This is the beauty of GLP. You get to make your own thread, and go with it. If you don't like that but are only here to piss on other people's threads and rain on their parade, then trust me, I won't be the last to take you out to the woodshed for a good whoopin. It will be a regular occurrence until you grow the fuck up and be nice to people.

Run along now before there is no meat left on your monkey bones.


-----------------------------------------------------
My response..the quoting system is glitching..

The burden of proof is with the person who makes the claim ...as the OP did by starting this thread.

Another beauty of GLP is that you can continue on being as delusional as you wish. In your case, part of your delusion is thinking you proved me wrong on anything. I think I've quite soundly handed your ass to you on a platter.

I have no problem whatsoever being sarcastic to someone who starts a thread, INVITING people like me to come in and post opinions of them and their theory. This place is not for the faint of heart. So while you're crying like a baby about me being rude to someone who started a thread to let everyone know that he concurs with the douchebag from Arizona and Iranian run PressTV that Israel is somehow behind Sandy Hook. Yes, I have no problem with calling him out and treating him like the imbecile he is. Or you for that matter.
 
Please verify you're human:




Reason for reporting:





GLP