How sad is Piers Morgan? He has to bring up a constitutional right to protect himself? What a big hypocrite! | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 30624173 United States 12/22/2012 06:37 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
higher state of consciousness User ID: 11722476 United Kingdom 12/22/2012 06:38 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: How sad is Piers Morgan? He has to bring up a constitutional right to protect himself? What a big hypocrite! ... Quoting: higher state of consciousness yes but those pychos are in control of the armies of the world, civilians owning guns makes no difference does it Lol you obviously don't know what the 2nd amendment is for then. It's to stop those "psychos" that are in control of the army from tyranny. but look at iraq, they are the most armed civilian population in the world, they couldnt do shit against the american/uk military...if they decided to take over theres pretty much nothing you can do. we have no guns here and the army has never tried to take us over by tyranny...that argument doesnt wash, the world just isnt like that anymore, governments know they cant use force anymore so they do it using psychology, mind games manipulation etc... we havent had guns here ever and we have a far more peacful society than you guys and with far less murders. i have yet to hear a valid argument for legalising guns or the second amendment. i know you guys are free to do what you want i just speak from what i would want here... the less weapons available, the better imo. I'll try to keep this simple. A first world 3rd gen nation-state military (U.S/U.K) against a third world 2nd gen military (Iraq). Of course the result is foregone. Notice that this has nothing to do with whether civilians were armed. Believe it or not in the U.W. phase that followed the U.S. and allies were defeated. Just as the British were in the 1930s. None of the strategic objectives were met or will be met. This equals defeat. I understand that your country is heavily propagandized against private fire arms. That is fine. Just keep yourself and your opinions of the 2nd amendment on your side of the pond. lol...so you think armed civilians in america could take on the american military? the biggest most technologically advanced military in the history of the planet? lol... and anyway, i have no doubt in my mind whatsoever, the american military (on mass) would never carry out orders to attack and round up american citizens (ON MASS) to take them to death camps...totally stupid! it just would never happen, its paranoid bullshit. and now your telling me to keep my opinions to myself because you dont like them, well there goes the 'first'...lol do you want the constitution or not? |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 30624173 United States 12/22/2012 06:45 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: How sad is Piers Morgan? He has to bring up a constitutional right to protect himself? What a big hypocrite! ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30624173 Lol you obviously don't know what the 2nd amendment is for then. It's to stop those "psychos" that are in control of the army from tyranny. but look at iraq, they are the most armed civilian population in the world, they couldnt do shit against the american/uk military...if they decided to take over theres pretty much nothing you can do. we have no guns here and the army has never tried to take us over by tyranny...that argument doesnt wash, the world just isnt like that anymore, governments know they cant use force anymore so they do it using psychology, mind games manipulation etc... we havent had guns here ever and we have a far more peacful society than you guys and with far less murders. i have yet to hear a valid argument for legalising guns or the second amendment. i know you guys are free to do what you want i just speak from what i would want here... the less weapons available, the better imo. I'll try to keep this simple. A first world 3rd gen nation-state military (U.S/U.K) against a third world 2nd gen military (Iraq). Of course the result is foregone. Notice that this has nothing to do with whether civilians were armed. Believe it or not in the U.W. phase that followed the U.S. and allies were defeated. Just as the British were in the 1930s. None of the strategic objectives were met or will be met. This equals defeat. I understand that your country is heavily propagandized against private fire arms. That is fine. Just keep yourself and your opinions of the 2nd amendment on your side of the pond. lol...so you think armed civilians in america could take on the american military? the biggest most technologically advanced military in the history of the planet? lol... and anyway, i have no doubt in my mind whatsoever, the american military (on mass) would never carry out orders to attack and round up american citizens (ON MASS) to take them to death camps...totally stupid! it just would never happen, its paranoid bullshit. and now your telling me to keep my opinions to myself because you dont like them, well there goes the 'first'...lol do you want the constitution or not? You swear like we are the only country with military or something.. |
biscuits and gravy User ID: 1072087 United States 12/22/2012 06:46 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
higher state of consciousness User ID: 11722476 United Kingdom 12/22/2012 06:49 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: How sad is Piers Morgan? He has to bring up a constitutional right to protect himself? What a big hypocrite! ... Quoting: higher state of consciousness but look at iraq, they are the most armed civilian population in the world, they couldnt do shit against the american/uk military...if they decided to take over theres pretty much nothing you can do. we have no guns here and the army has never tried to take us over by tyranny...that argument doesnt wash, the world just isnt like that anymore, governments know they cant use force anymore so they do it using psychology, mind games manipulation etc... we havent had guns here ever and we have a far more peacful society than you guys and with far less murders. i have yet to hear a valid argument for legalising guns or the second amendment. i know you guys are free to do what you want i just speak from what i would want here... the less weapons available, the better imo. I'll try to keep this simple. A first world 3rd gen nation-state military (U.S/U.K) against a third world 2nd gen military (Iraq). Of course the result is foregone. Notice that this has nothing to do with whether civilians were armed. Believe it or not in the U.W. phase that followed the U.S. and allies were defeated. Just as the British were in the 1930s. None of the strategic objectives were met or will be met. This equals defeat. I understand that your country is heavily propagandized against private fire arms. That is fine. Just keep yourself and your opinions of the 2nd amendment on your side of the pond. lol...so you think armed civilians in america could take on the american military? the biggest most technologically advanced military in the history of the planet? lol... and anyway, i have no doubt in my mind whatsoever, the american military (on mass) would never carry out orders to attack and round up american citizens (ON MASS) to take them to death camps...totally stupid! it just would never happen, its paranoid bullshit. and now your telling me to keep my opinions to myself because you dont like them, well there goes the 'first'...lol do you want the constitution or not? You swear like we are the only country with military or something.. my point is, that is not a valid argument for having guns, simple. we have an army, many demonic prime ministers probably would of loved to take over the nation with force but they know the army would never do it, even though we dont have guns. they know they are there to protect us not round us up for death camps, its just a totally daft argument. |
s. d. butler User ID: 974819 United States 12/22/2012 06:53 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: How sad is Piers Morgan? He has to bring up a constitutional right to protect himself? What a big hypocrite! ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30624173 Lol you obviously don't know what the 2nd amendment is for then. It's to stop those "psychos" that are in control of the army from tyranny. but look at iraq, they are the most armed civilian population in the world, they couldnt do shit against the american/uk military...if they decided to take over theres pretty much nothing you can do. we have no guns here and the army has never tried to take us over by tyranny...that argument doesnt wash, the world just isnt like that anymore, governments know they cant use force anymore so they do it using psychology, mind games manipulation etc... we havent had guns here ever and we have a far more peacful society than you guys and with far less murders. i have yet to hear a valid argument for legalising guns or the second amendment. i know you guys are free to do what you want i just speak from what i would want here... the less weapons available, the better imo. I'll try to keep this simple. A first world 3rd gen nation-state military (U.S/U.K) against a third world 2nd gen military (Iraq). Of course the result is foregone. Notice that this has nothing to do with whether civilians were armed. Believe it or not in the U.W. phase that followed the U.S. and allies were defeated. Just as the British were in the 1930s. None of the strategic objectives were met or will be met. This equals defeat. I understand that your country is heavily propagandized against private fire arms. That is fine. Just keep yourself and your opinions of the 2nd amendment on your side of the pond. lol...so you think armed civilians in america could take on the american military? the biggest most technologically advanced military in the history of the planet? lol... and anyway, i have no doubt in my mind whatsoever, the american military (on mass) would never carry out orders to attack and round up american citizens (ON MASS) to take them to death camps...totally stupid! it just would never happen, its paranoid bullshit. and now your telling me to keep my opinions to myself because you dont like them, well there goes the 'first'...lol do you want the constitution or not? Again try to research 4th and 5th gen warfare before showing such a high degree of ignorance. Your second paragraph is an example of the strategic problem facing a would be tyrant. So so you are able to understand something of 4th and 5th gen conflict. Amusing that you can say with certainty ,"it just would never happen". That is what the British army thought about Singapore in WW2. Have you ever heard of a Black Swan event? I told you to keep your heavily brainwashed opinion to your side of the pond. And I'll tell you the same thing now. |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 30624173 United States 12/22/2012 06:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: How sad is Piers Morgan? He has to bring up a constitutional right to protect himself? What a big hypocrite! ... Quoting: s. d. butler I'll try to keep this simple. A first world 3rd gen nation-state military (U.S/U.K) against a third world 2nd gen military (Iraq). Of course the result is foregone. Notice that this has nothing to do with whether civilians were armed. Believe it or not in the U.W. phase that followed the U.S. and allies were defeated. Just as the British were in the 1930s. None of the strategic objectives were met or will be met. This equals defeat. I understand that your country is heavily propagandized against private fire arms. That is fine. Just keep yourself and your opinions of the 2nd amendment on your side of the pond. lol...so you think armed civilians in america could take on the american military? the biggest most technologically advanced military in the history of the planet? lol... and anyway, i have no doubt in my mind whatsoever, the american military (on mass) would never carry out orders to attack and round up american citizens (ON MASS) to take them to death camps...totally stupid! it just would never happen, its paranoid bullshit. and now your telling me to keep my opinions to myself because you dont like them, well there goes the 'first'...lol do you want the constitution or not? You swear like we are the only country with military or something.. my point is, that is not a valid argument for having guns, simple. we have an army, many demonic prime ministers probably would of loved to take over the nation with force but they know the army would never do it, even though we dont have guns. they know they are there to protect us not round us up for death camps, its just a totally daft argument. Did you even see the video I posted ontop of page 5? Or are you as blind with your words? |
higher state of consciousness User ID: 11722476 United Kingdom 12/22/2012 07:05 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: How sad is Piers Morgan? He has to bring up a constitutional right to protect himself? What a big hypocrite! ... Quoting: higher state of consciousness lol...so you think armed civilians in america could take on the american military? the biggest most technologically advanced military in the history of the planet? lol... and anyway, i have no doubt in my mind whatsoever, the american military (on mass) would never carry out orders to attack and round up american citizens (ON MASS) to take them to death camps...totally stupid! it just would never happen, its paranoid bullshit. and now your telling me to keep my opinions to myself because you dont like them, well there goes the 'first'...lol do you want the constitution or not? You swear like we are the only country with military or something.. my point is, that is not a valid argument for having guns, simple. we have an army, many demonic prime ministers probably would of loved to take over the nation with force but they know the army would never do it, even though we dont have guns. they know they are there to protect us not round us up for death camps, its just a totally daft argument. Did you even see the video I posted ontop of page 5? Or are you as blind with your words? LOL... thats my whole point FFS! take away all guns and you 'dont' get mad men driving cars through windows shooting everyone in the first place! the woman would never of been in that position in the first place. if the pyscho had a knife a couple or guys could over power him. again my whole point is legalising guns makes it easy for psychopths to carry out their fantasies, that without said guns would never be able to... and it makes it easier for a normal person in a rage to kill someone, that would never do that with another kind of weapon such as a knife etc... guns just make killing easy... |
higher state of consciousness User ID: 11722476 United Kingdom 12/22/2012 07:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: How sad is Piers Morgan? He has to bring up a constitutional right to protect himself? What a big hypocrite! ... Quoting: higher state of consciousness but look at iraq, they are the most armed civilian population in the world, they couldnt do shit against the american/uk military...if they decided to take over theres pretty much nothing you can do. we have no guns here and the army has never tried to take us over by tyranny...that argument doesnt wash, the world just isnt like that anymore, governments know they cant use force anymore so they do it using psychology, mind games manipulation etc... we havent had guns here ever and we have a far more peacful society than you guys and with far less murders. i have yet to hear a valid argument for legalising guns or the second amendment. i know you guys are free to do what you want i just speak from what i would want here... the less weapons available, the better imo. I'll try to keep this simple. A first world 3rd gen nation-state military (U.S/U.K) against a third world 2nd gen military (Iraq). Of course the result is foregone. Notice that this has nothing to do with whether civilians were armed. Believe it or not in the U.W. phase that followed the U.S. and allies were defeated. Just as the British were in the 1930s. None of the strategic objectives were met or will be met. This equals defeat. I understand that your country is heavily propagandized against private fire arms. That is fine. Just keep yourself and your opinions of the 2nd amendment on your side of the pond. lol...so you think armed civilians in america could take on the american military? the biggest most technologically advanced military in the history of the planet? lol... and anyway, i have no doubt in my mind whatsoever, the american military (on mass) would never carry out orders to attack and round up american citizens (ON MASS) to take them to death camps...totally stupid! it just would never happen, its paranoid bullshit. and now your telling me to keep my opinions to myself because you dont like them, well there goes the 'first'...lol do you want the constitution or not? Again try to research 4th and 5th gen warfare before showing such a high degree of ignorance. Your second paragraph is an example of the strategic problem facing a would be tyrant. So so you are able to understand something of 4th and 5th gen conflict. Amusing that you can say with certainty ,"it just would never happen". That is what the British army thought about Singapore in WW2. Have you ever heard of a Black Swan event? I told you to keep your heavily brainwashed opinion to your side of the pond. And I'll tell you the same thing now. man i dont have time to research all that nonsense you speak of. i dont live in a paranoid fantasy like you. our army would never round us up to kill us all its just proposterous to say such a thing. and im pretty sure your even more patriotic army would never do such a thing also. so you can call me brainwashed lol i call me realistic. and why the hell are you comparing singapore in ww2? lol...with what we are talking about? me ignorant? pot and kettle anyone... and im free to voice my opinions thanks! dont get all butthurt now just because you lost the debate lol... |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 28635817 United States 12/22/2012 07:25 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: How sad is Piers Morgan? He has to bring up a constitutional right to protect himself? What a big hypocrite! ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30624173 You swear like we are the only country with military or something.. my point is, that is not a valid argument for having guns, simple. we have an army, many demonic prime ministers probably would of loved to take over the nation with force but they know the army would never do it, even though we dont have guns. they know they are there to protect us not round us up for death camps, its just a totally daft argument. Did you even see the video I posted ontop of page 5? Or are you as blind with your words? LOL... thats my whole point FFS! take away all guns and you 'dont' get mad men driving cars through windows shooting everyone in the first place! the woman would never of been in that position in the first place. if the pyscho had a knife a couple or guys could over power him. again my whole point is legalising guns makes it easy for psychopths to carry out their fantasies, that without said guns would never be able to... and it makes it easier for a normal person in a rage to kill someone, that would never do that with another kind of weapon such as a knife etc... guns just make killing easy... I rest my case. You are totally blind. It was because it was a law that she can't keep a gun in her purse what caused the tradegy to continue on. Her parents might have been spared if it wasn't for a law restricting a gun. What you want to have gun control so guns can be more profitable in the black market? Just what they want. Maybe if every person on the world was disarmed then I would be totally for banning guns. But I would love to see you try. You think the people that commit these crimes wouldn't get guns illegally? I mean illegal things tend to be a little easier to get, especially when they know no one else would be able to protect themselves. What the fuck are you going to do? Throw the guns to the bottom of the ocean |
s. d. butler User ID: 974819 United States 12/22/2012 07:27 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: How sad is Piers Morgan? He has to bring up a constitutional right to protect himself? What a big hypocrite! ... Quoting: s. d. butler I'll try to keep this simple. A first world 3rd gen nation-state military (U.S/U.K) against a third world 2nd gen military (Iraq). Of course the result is foregone. Notice that this has nothing to do with whether civilians were armed. Believe it or not in the U.W. phase that followed the U.S. and allies were defeated. Just as the British were in the 1930s. None of the strategic objectives were met or will be met. This equals defeat. I understand that your country is heavily propagandized against private fire arms. That is fine. Just keep yourself and your opinions of the 2nd amendment on your side of the pond. lol...so you think armed civilians in america could take on the american military? the biggest most technologically advanced military in the history of the planet? lol... and anyway, i have no doubt in my mind whatsoever, the american military (on mass) would never carry out orders to attack and round up american citizens (ON MASS) to take them to death camps...totally stupid! it just would never happen, its paranoid bullshit. and now your telling me to keep my opinions to myself because you dont like them, well there goes the 'first'...lol do you want the constitution or not? Again try to research 4th and 5th gen warfare before showing such a high degree of ignorance. Your second paragraph is an example of the strategic problem facing a would be tyrant. So so you are able to understand something of 4th and 5th gen conflict. Amusing that you can say with certainty ,"it just would never happen". That is what the British army thought about Singapore in WW2. Have you ever heard of a Black Swan event? I told you to keep your heavily brainwashed opinion to your side of the pond. And I'll tell you the same thing now. man i dont have time to research all that nonsense you speak of. i dont live in a paranoid fantasy like you. our army would never round us up to kill us all its just proposterous to say such a thing. and im pretty sure your even more patriotic army would never do such a thing also. so you can call me brainwashed lol i call me realistic. and why the hell are you comparing singapore in ww2? lol...with what we are talking about? me ignorant? pot and kettle anyone... and im free to voice my opinions thanks! dont get all butthurt now just because you lost the debate lol... |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 30668847 Australia 12/22/2012 07:30 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: How sad is Piers Morgan? He has to bring up a constitutional right to protect himself? What a big hypocrite! Twitter- Ironic U.S. gun rights campaign to deport me for 'attacking 2nd Amendment rights' - is my opinion not protected under 1st Amendment rights? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30624173 [link to mobile.twitter.com (secure)] Last time I checked he doesn't have any rights! He ain't American! Well then...it is MY opinion that we should confiscate your freedom of speech since it incites anger amongst the US citizens Lol he's not an American citizen. Get with the program he's in America where the ist amendment exists. you people are fucking stupid and hypocrits. |
higher state of consciousness User ID: 11722476 United Kingdom 12/22/2012 07:33 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: How sad is Piers Morgan? He has to bring up a constitutional right to protect himself? What a big hypocrite! ... Quoting: higher state of consciousness my point is, that is not a valid argument for having guns, simple. we have an army, many demonic prime ministers probably would of loved to take over the nation with force but they know the army would never do it, even though we dont have guns. they know they are there to protect us not round us up for death camps, its just a totally daft argument. Did you even see the video I posted ontop of page 5? Or are you as blind with your words? LOL... thats my whole point FFS! take away all guns and you 'dont' get mad men driving cars through windows shooting everyone in the first place! the woman would never of been in that position in the first place. if the pyscho had a knife a couple or guys could over power him. again my whole point is legalising guns makes it easy for psychopths to carry out their fantasies, that without said guns would never be able to... and it makes it easier for a normal person in a rage to kill someone, that would never do that with another kind of weapon such as a knife etc... guns just make killing easy... I rest my case. You are totally blind. It was because it was a law that she can't keep a gun in her purse what caused the tradegy to continue on. Her parents might have been spared if it wasn't for a law restricting a gun. What you want to have gun control so guns can be more profitable in the black market? Just what they want. Maybe if every person on the world was disarmed then I would be totally for banning guns. But I would love to see you try. You think the people that commit these crimes wouldn't get guns illegally? I mean illegal things tend to be a little easier to get, especially when they know no one else would be able to protect themselves. What the fuck are you going to do? Throw the guns to the bottom of the ocean oh my god me blind? it was because the pscho had a gun in the first place FFS...take his gun away the woman isnt in that same danger. here in the uk practically nobody has a gun and if you get caught with a gun you go to jail for atleast a few years, so even criminals 99% of the time wont carry them, it just isnt worth it for them. now do you see anyone in the uk walking into a school and killing 20 6 year old kids? answer no! why because the nutters cant get guns!!! SIMPLE! |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 30624173 United States 12/22/2012 07:33 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: How sad is Piers Morgan? He has to bring up a constitutional right to protect himself? What a big hypocrite! Twitter- Ironic U.S. gun rights campaign to deport me for 'attacking 2nd Amendment rights' - is my opinion not protected under 1st Amendment rights? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30624173 [link to mobile.twitter.com (secure)] Last time I checked he doesn't have any rights! He ain't American! Well then...it is MY opinion that we should confiscate your freedom of speech since it incites anger amongst the US citizens Lol he's not an American citizen. Get with the program he's in America where the ist amendment exists. you people are fucking stupid and hypocrits. If we don't have rights, then he doesn't have rights is the message here. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 30668847 Australia 12/22/2012 07:34 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: How sad is Piers Morgan? He has to bring up a constitutional right to protect himself? What a big hypocrite! ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30603464 Well then...it is MY opinion that we should confiscate your freedom of speech since it incites anger amongst the US citizens Lol he's not an American citizen. Get with the program he's in America where the ist amendment exists. you people are fucking stupid and hypocrits. If we don't have rights, then he doesn't have rights is the message here. but he does...in your country..so STFU. |
higher state of consciousness User ID: 11722476 United Kingdom 12/22/2012 07:37 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: How sad is Piers Morgan? He has to bring up a constitutional right to protect himself? What a big hypocrite! ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30603464 Well then...it is MY opinion that we should confiscate your freedom of speech since it incites anger amongst the US citizens Lol he's not an American citizen. Get with the program he's in America where the ist amendment exists. you people are fucking stupid and hypocrits. If we don't have rights, then he doesn't have rights is the message here. surely the first ammendment gives anyone in the usa the right to voice an opinion on the second ammendment. he isnt forcibly trying to make you change it is he, its just an opinion ffs... |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 24180550 United States 12/22/2012 07:40 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: How sad is Piers Morgan? He has to bring up a constitutional right to protect himself? What a big hypocrite! ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30624173 Lol you obviously don't know what the 2nd amendment is for then. It's to stop those "psychos" that are in control of the army from tyranny. but look at iraq, they are the most armed civilian population in the world, they couldnt do shit against the american/uk military...if they decided to take over theres pretty much nothing you can do. we have no guns here and the army has never tried to take us over by tyranny...that argument doesnt wash, the world just isnt like that anymore, governments know they cant use force anymore so they do it using psychology, mind games manipulation etc... we havent had guns here ever and we have a far more peacful society than you guys and with far less murders. i have yet to hear a valid argument for legalising guns or the second amendment. i know you guys are free to do what you want i just speak from what i would want here... the less weapons available, the better imo. I'll try to keep this simple. A first world 3rd gen nation-state military (U.S/U.K) against a third world 2nd gen military (Iraq). Of course the result is foregone. Notice that this has nothing to do with whether civilians were armed. Believe it or not in the U.W. phase that followed the U.S. and allies were defeated. Just as the British were in the 1930s. None of the strategic objectives were met or will be met. This equals defeat. I understand that your country is heavily propagandized against private fire arms. That is fine. Just keep yourself and your opinions of the 2nd amendment on your side of the pond. lol...so you think armed civilians in america could take on the american military? the biggest most technologically advanced military in the history of the planet? lol... and anyway, i have no doubt in my mind whatsoever, the american military (on mass) would never carry out orders to attack and round up american citizens (ON MASS) to take them to death camps...totally stupid! it just would never happen, its paranoid bullshit. and now your telling me to keep my opinions to myself because you dont like them, well there goes the 'first'...lol do you want the constitution or not? You should learn more about American history before you spout such utter bullshit. I am a veteran, and yes a well formed mitlitia can defeat a US military unit. Check our afghanistan. They have primitve explosives and cheap ass AK-47s, doing a pretty good job holding back the US Army. The have thrown out Russia and soon the US will lose as well. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 24180550 United States 12/22/2012 07:43 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: How sad is Piers Morgan? He has to bring up a constitutional right to protect himself? What a big hypocrite! Twitter- Ironic U.S. gun rights campaign to deport me for 'attacking 2nd Amendment rights' - is my opinion not protected under 1st Amendment rights? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30624173 [link to mobile.twitter.com (secure)] Last time I checked he doesn't have any rights! He ain't American! Well then...it is MY opinion that we should confiscate your freedom of speech since it incites anger amongst the US citizens Lol he's not an American citizen. Get with the program he's in America where the ist amendment exists. you people are fucking stupid and hypocrits. Then he should becoma a CITIZEN of the US you cunt. Other people from other countries need to mind their own goddamn business. You have no right to have an opinion on how we CHOOSE to govern ourselves. Go fuck youself nosy cunt. |
higher state of consciousness User ID: 11722476 United Kingdom 12/22/2012 07:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: How sad is Piers Morgan? He has to bring up a constitutional right to protect himself? What a big hypocrite! ... Quoting: higher state of consciousness but look at iraq, they are the most armed civilian population in the world, they couldnt do shit against the american/uk military...if they decided to take over theres pretty much nothing you can do. we have no guns here and the army has never tried to take us over by tyranny...that argument doesnt wash, the world just isnt like that anymore, governments know they cant use force anymore so they do it using psychology, mind games manipulation etc... we havent had guns here ever and we have a far more peacful society than you guys and with far less murders. i have yet to hear a valid argument for legalising guns or the second amendment. i know you guys are free to do what you want i just speak from what i would want here... the less weapons available, the better imo. I'll try to keep this simple. A first world 3rd gen nation-state military (U.S/U.K) against a third world 2nd gen military (Iraq). Of course the result is foregone. Notice that this has nothing to do with whether civilians were armed. Believe it or not in the U.W. phase that followed the U.S. and allies were defeated. Just as the British were in the 1930s. None of the strategic objectives were met or will be met. This equals defeat. I understand that your country is heavily propagandized against private fire arms. That is fine. Just keep yourself and your opinions of the 2nd amendment on your side of the pond. lol...so you think armed civilians in america could take on the american military? the biggest most technologically advanced military in the history of the planet? lol... and anyway, i have no doubt in my mind whatsoever, the american military (on mass) would never carry out orders to attack and round up american citizens (ON MASS) to take them to death camps...totally stupid! it just would never happen, its paranoid bullshit. and now your telling me to keep my opinions to myself because you dont like them, well there goes the 'first'...lol do you want the constitution or not? You should learn more about American history before you spout such utter bullshit. I am a veteran, and yes a well formed mitlitia can defeat a US military unit. Check our afghanistan. They have primitve explosives and cheap ass AK-47s, doing a pretty good job holding back the US Army. The have thrown out Russia and soon the US will lose as well. but even lets say i agree with you, IT DOESNT MEAN SHIT! because the us army WOULD NEVER...EVER round up its citizens to exterminate them ffs... you people live in some very vivid paranoid fantasies... |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 24180550 United States 12/22/2012 07:45 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: How sad is Piers Morgan? He has to bring up a constitutional right to protect himself? What a big hypocrite! ... Quoting: s. d. butler I'll try to keep this simple. A first world 3rd gen nation-state military (U.S/U.K) against a third world 2nd gen military (Iraq). Of course the result is foregone. Notice that this has nothing to do with whether civilians were armed. Believe it or not in the U.W. phase that followed the U.S. and allies were defeated. Just as the British were in the 1930s. None of the strategic objectives were met or will be met. This equals defeat. I understand that your country is heavily propagandized against private fire arms. That is fine. Just keep yourself and your opinions of the 2nd amendment on your side of the pond. lol...so you think armed civilians in america could take on the american military? the biggest most technologically advanced military in the history of the planet? lol... and anyway, i have no doubt in my mind whatsoever, the american military (on mass) would never carry out orders to attack and round up american citizens (ON MASS) to take them to death camps...totally stupid! it just would never happen, its paranoid bullshit. and now your telling me to keep my opinions to myself because you dont like them, well there goes the 'first'...lol do you want the constitution or not? You should learn more about American history before you spout such utter bullshit. I am a veteran, and yes a well formed mitlitia can defeat a US military unit. Check our afghanistan. They have primitve explosives and cheap ass AK-47s, doing a pretty good job holding back the US Army. The have thrown out Russia and soon the US will lose as well. but even lets say i agree with you, IT DOESNT MEAN SHIT! because the us army WOULD NEVER...EVER round up its citizens to exterminate them ffs... you people live in some very vivid paranoid fantasies... Yes you are absolutely correct. Signed, Adolf Hitler You are one uneducated dipshit. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 30668847 Australia 12/22/2012 07:46 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: How sad is Piers Morgan? He has to bring up a constitutional right to protect himself? What a big hypocrite! ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30603464 Well then...it is MY opinion that we should confiscate your freedom of speech since it incites anger amongst the US citizens Lol he's not an American citizen. Get with the program he's in America where the ist amendment exists. you people are fucking stupid and hypocrits. Then he should becoma a CITIZEN of the US you cunt. Other people from other countries need to mind their own goddamn business. You have no right to have an opinion on how we CHOOSE to govern ourselves. Go fuck youself nosy cunt. you fucking moron....when Americunt GTFO of my country, stops being the self appointed police of the world, then I will STFU...until then, i'll say whateveve the fuck I want about Americunt, when I want....fuck you. America...Making the world safe for hypocricy. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 30668847 Australia 12/22/2012 07:47 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: How sad is Piers Morgan? He has to bring up a constitutional right to protect himself? What a big hypocrite! ... Quoting: s. d. butler I'll try to keep this simple. A first world 3rd gen nation-state military (U.S/U.K) against a third world 2nd gen military (Iraq). Of course the result is foregone. Notice that this has nothing to do with whether civilians were armed. Believe it or not in the U.W. phase that followed the U.S. and allies were defeated. Just as the British were in the 1930s. None of the strategic objectives were met or will be met. This equals defeat. I understand that your country is heavily propagandized against private fire arms. That is fine. Just keep yourself and your opinions of the 2nd amendment on your side of the pond. lol...so you think armed civilians in america could take on the american military? the biggest most technologically advanced military in the history of the planet? lol... and anyway, i have no doubt in my mind whatsoever, the american military (on mass) would never carry out orders to attack and round up american citizens (ON MASS) to take them to death camps...totally stupid! it just would never happen, its paranoid bullshit. and now your telling me to keep my opinions to myself because you dont like them, well there goes the 'first'...lol do you want the constitution or not? You should learn more about American history before you spout such utter bullshit. I am a veteran, and yes a well formed mitlitia can defeat a US military unit. Check our afghanistan. They have primitve explosives and cheap ass AK-47s, doing a pretty good job holding back the US Army. The have thrown out Russia and soon the US will lose as well. but even lets say i agree with you, IT DOESNT MEAN SHIT! because the us army WOULD NEVER...EVER round up its citizens to exterminate them ffs... you people live in some very vivid paranoid fantasies... THIS^^^^^^^^ |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 18622835 United States 12/22/2012 07:47 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
higher state of consciousness User ID: 11722476 United Kingdom 12/22/2012 07:49 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: How sad is Piers Morgan? He has to bring up a constitutional right to protect himself? What a big hypocrite! ... Quoting: higher state of consciousness lol...so you think armed civilians in america could take on the american military? the biggest most technologically advanced military in the history of the planet? lol... and anyway, i have no doubt in my mind whatsoever, the american military (on mass) would never carry out orders to attack and round up american citizens (ON MASS) to take them to death camps...totally stupid! it just would never happen, its paranoid bullshit. and now your telling me to keep my opinions to myself because you dont like them, well there goes the 'first'...lol do you want the constitution or not? You should learn more about American history before you spout such utter bullshit. I am a veteran, and yes a well formed mitlitia can defeat a US military unit. Check our afghanistan. They have primitve explosives and cheap ass AK-47s, doing a pretty good job holding back the US Army. The have thrown out Russia and soon the US will lose as well. but even lets say i agree with you, IT DOESNT MEAN SHIT! because the us army WOULD NEVER...EVER round up its citizens to exterminate them ffs... you people live in some very vivid paranoid fantasies... Yes you are absolutely correct. Signed, Adolf Hitler You are one uneducated dipshit. lol...hitler's army didnt round up his own people you moron, it was the jews because they were tryin to do to germany what they have just done to america now ... YOU uneducated dipshit... |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 18622835 United States 12/22/2012 07:50 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: How sad is Piers Morgan? He has to bring up a constitutional right to protect himself? What a big hypocrite! he's in America where the ist amendment exists. you people are fucking stupid and hypocrits. Then he should becoma a CITIZEN of the US you cunt. Other people from other countries need to mind their own goddamn business. You have no right to have an opinion on how we CHOOSE to govern ourselves. Go fuck youself nosy cunt. you fucking moron....when Americunt GTFO of my country, stops being the self appointed police of the world, then I will STFU...until then, i'll say whateveve the fuck I want about Americunt, when I want....fuck you. America...Making the world safe for hypocricy. What are ya saying......we occupy your country???????? WTF? Fine.....you don't want us to "police" anything, then we won't........enjoy bending over for the UN and their MUslim pals......since they know SO much better............and don't want you to have guns, either........ |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 30624173 United States 12/22/2012 07:50 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: How sad is Piers Morgan? He has to bring up a constitutional right to protect himself? What a big hypocrite! he's in America where the ist amendment exists. you people are fucking stupid and hypocrits. Then he should becoma a CITIZEN of the US you cunt. Other people from other countries need to mind their own goddamn business. You have no right to have an opinion on how we CHOOSE to govern ourselves. Go fuck youself nosy cunt. you fucking moron....when Americunt GTFO of my country, stops being the self appointed police of the world, then I will STFU...until then, i'll say whateveve the fuck I want about Americunt, when I want....fuck you. America...Making the world safe for hypocricy. Most counties have sanctions around the world just saying. It's called the U.N. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 24180550 United States 12/22/2012 07:54 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: How sad is Piers Morgan? He has to bring up a constitutional right to protect himself? What a big hypocrite! he's in America where the ist amendment exists. you people are fucking stupid and hypocrits. Then he should becoma a CITIZEN of the US you cunt. Other people from other countries need to mind their own goddamn business. You have no right to have an opinion on how we CHOOSE to govern ourselves. Go fuck youself nosy cunt. you fucking moron....when Americunt GTFO of my country, stops being the self appointed police of the world, then I will STFU...until then, i'll say whateveve the fuck I want about Americunt, when I want....fuck you. America...Making the world safe for hypocricy. Glad to see you can stay on topic. You are showing a very high intellect and GREAT debate skills. I am impressed by your deep understanding of how you have zero say so in anything that concerns American law. You can SAY whatever you want. Just do not expect to have any bearing on how WE AMAERICANS choose to govern ourselves, uness you become a tax paying club member. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 24180550 United States 12/22/2012 07:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: How sad is Piers Morgan? He has to bring up a constitutional right to protect himself? What a big hypocrite! ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 24180550 You should learn more about American history before you spout such utter bullshit. I am a veteran, and yes a well formed mitlitia can defeat a US military unit. Check our afghanistan. They have primitve explosives and cheap ass AK-47s, doing a pretty good job holding back the US Army. The have thrown out Russia and soon the US will lose as well. but even lets say i agree with you, IT DOESNT MEAN SHIT! because the us army WOULD NEVER...EVER round up its citizens to exterminate them ffs... you people live in some very vivid paranoid fantasies... Yes you are absolutely correct. Signed, Adolf Hitler You are one uneducated dipshit. lol...hitler's army didnt round up his own people you moron, it was the jews because they were tryin to do to germany what they have just done to america now ... YOU uneducated dipshit... So it was OK because they were JEWS? Do you actually say this out loud before you type it? Where did they live and what country were they a citizen of? There are SEVERAL examples. The 2nd ammendment was THE REASON Japan did not invade our soil. "There would be a rifle behind every blade of grass" The slaves were freed by the gun, and the 2nd amendment. (Civil War) I could go on, but I do not think you could retain the amout of knowledge I can lay on you. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 30668847 Australia 12/22/2012 08:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: How sad is Piers Morgan? He has to bring up a constitutional right to protect himself? What a big hypocrite! ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30668847 he's in America where the ist amendment exists. you people are fucking stupid and hypocrits. Then he should becoma a CITIZEN of the US you cunt. Other people from other countries need to mind their own goddamn business. You have no right to have an opinion on how we CHOOSE to govern ourselves. Go fuck youself nosy cunt. you fucking moron....when Americunt GTFO of my country, stops being the self appointed police of the world, then I will STFU...until then, i'll say whateveve the fuck I want about Americunt, when I want....fuck you. America...Making the world safe for hypocricy. What are ya saying......we occupy your country???????? WTF? Fine.....you don't want us to "police" anything, then we won't........enjoy bending over for the UN and their MUslim pals......since they know SO much better............and don't want you to have guns, either........ have you been living under a rock lately?? YES, YOU DO OCCUPY MY COUNTRY. GTFO |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 30668847 Australia 12/22/2012 08:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: How sad is Piers Morgan? He has to bring up a constitutional right to protect himself? What a big hypocrite! ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30668847 he's in America where the ist amendment exists. you people are fucking stupid and hypocrits. Then he should becoma a CITIZEN of the US you cunt. Other people from other countries need to mind their own goddamn business. You have no right to have an opinion on how we CHOOSE to govern ourselves. Go fuck youself nosy cunt. you fucking moron....when Americunt GTFO of my country, stops being the self appointed police of the world, then I will STFU...until then, i'll say whateveve the fuck I want about Americunt, when I want....fuck you. America...Making the world safe for hypocricy. Glad to see you can stay on topic. You are showing a very high intellect and GREAT debate skills. I am impressed by your deep understanding of how you have zero say so in anything that concerns American law. You can SAY whatever you want. Just do not expect to have any bearing on how WE AMAERICANS choose to govern ourselves, uness you become a tax paying club member. just like Piers Morgan...so what's the fucking problem then, dipshit....it's only an opinion? obviously you have a problem with freedom of speech... |