This is yet another statement that was retracted. They now say it was police that shot their way in.
Let me tell you....shooting a .223 at safety glass would not be a good idea. The round is not designed for such a task.
If you used a shot gun, now that may get the job done. But that didn't fit with the story line....it keeps getting better as each day passes.
The reason they put a 90 day court order on the case is so they can deal with all the inconsistencies.
Time will tell...so far it looks like they'll pass a Bill before the evidence of the case is open to the public.
Quoting: ohnonotagain Very interesting.
I knew that Lt.Vance stated that it sounded suspicious about all the windows the cops were breaking to get in.
I had not thought they were shooting them out.
That explains something else.
The person injured shot in the foot. I remember hearing or reading that it was a cop who was shot in the foot and dismissed it, until now.
No wonder this person sought treatment well away from the scene. Remember how we read that the peson injured in the foot went to a hospital 45 minutes away in a different direction?
I also remember hearing early on that of the 3 persons injured or killed that one was a man, they may have even said the principal or I assumed it was the principal and then lo and behold there were no men who worked there.
So who was the adult male injured in the foot.
Answer: Evidently a cop meaning they were using live ammo, or he wasn't shot, and a large piece of glass cut his foot.
Need to follow up on this.
