Once again, your response is "I've spent 6 months Wikipedia'ing solar phenemona, and now I'm an expert astronomer. I don't have to provide any references, any direct links, nor much evidence to support and refute my claims because, I am an expert. I can tell you what is right, and what is wrong, without telling you why, because, I am an expert.... I don't even have to prove im an expert, because indeed, I am an expert......". Your circular argumentation gets very old, very quick. Speaking of paid shills, does a PAID SHILL BRING SOMETHING LIKE THIS TO EVERYONES ATTENTION? DOES A PAID SHILL POINT OUT THAT NASA IS DELETING FOOTAGE? DOES A PAID SHILL QUESTION THE "OFFICIAL" RESPONSES WE GET AND GOES OUT TO FIND HIS OWN ANSWERS?? No. But a paid shill DOES , at all costs, TRY TO DISPELL THE FACTS THAT THE SUN IS GOING THROUGH MANY CHANGES, and a paid shill DOES TRY TO, at all costs, MAKE IT SEEM LIKE ALL IS USUAL, ALL IS FINE, AND THERE IS NOTHING TO LOOK AT, telling us the sun is quiet and/or saying we are in a quote "solar minimum" (should I remind you of who said that, or do you have the ability to recall that?), even when THE OFFICIALS are now saying try have NO EXPLANATION as to why the sun is still ACTING UP.

But since you are such an EXPERT, it should be easy for ou to explain, with all your experience and knowledge, why that circle STILL DOES NOT DISSIPATE; and why if it were a cme, WHY THE ENERGY IS SELF CONTAINED AND OBVIOUSLY UNIFORM, allowing it to keep its shape for millions of miles AWAY FROM the sun??? Your the expert, enlighten me.