Fact. "Pre humans" are "pre bigfoots", meaning we are a genetically engineered species.

Hominids like:

Sahelanthropus tchadensis
Orrorin tugenensis
Ardipithecus ramidus
Australopithecus anamensis
Australopithecus afarensis
Kenyanthropus platyops
Australopithecus africanus
Australopithecus garhi
Australopithecus sediba New
Australopithecus aethiopicus
Australopithecus robustus
Australopithecus boisei
Homo habilis
Homo georgicus
Homo erectus
Homo ergaster
Homo antecessor
Homo heidelbergensis
Homo neanderthalensis
Homo floresiensis
Homo sapiens sapiens

Yeah and how exactly are they going to dismantle Evolution as a theory, when each new find pretty much adds credence to the overall theory of evolution?

Also in Voice Chat!! Room: "Den of the Iconoclast"

We supposedly evolved from four types of "pre humans"

Now, thousands of reports every year from all
over the world make very clear 4 pertinent
distinctions in the appearance of these
bipedal hair covered creatures.

Let me be very clear... This contradiction has
the potential to bring everything we know about
Primate Evolution to a bone jarring, teeth shattering
halt.

Hominoids.... (a more appropriate term other than
"Bigfoot") are one of two “fantasy” creatures
that can dismantle Evolutionary Theory in one
fell swoop (off-world aliens are the other).
The day a hominoid is presented to the world
for analysis—dead or alive—is the day science
can no longer prop up its evolutionary dogma.
When macroevolution clatters into history’s
dustbin, Divine Creation and Intelligent Design
will follow right behind it. Intervention Theory
will become the most plausible explanation for
how humans came to be on Earth.

I hope to offer my fellow GLP'rs one of the more
thought provoking "Ask me a question" threads
they have taken part in... in a while.

I will more than likely copy and paste my own
material from past threads to answer some questions.

This is very interesting. I have been following Bigfoot/Sasquatch for a year or two now, and it just keeps getting more interesting.

About the bigfoot shot dead, see here: [link to bigfootevidence101.blogspot.dk]
I wouldn't led it much credibility though, but lets see.

A more interesting project is the DNA project by Dr. Melba Ketchum, which correlates with your information.
This might also be the reason that authorities wants to keeps Bigfoot a secret. It would jeopardize modern evolution theory's credibility.

I'm also subscribing to the thesis, that evolution is occurring, but humans is in a totally different league, and possibly is an engineered specie.

OP - whats your take on the evolution on man from early days. How did we get out of the stone age, and why did we end up starting from there in the first place?

the bigfoot they allegedly killed and have on ice has had DNA samples taken which theyll have results on by 15th of january apparently.I also think its a 'we'll see'thing mainly due to the fact of Ricks other hoax in 2008, although the BBC were apparently there and account for this being true.
Ketchums work is also very interesting, i agree.

and for all the naysayers please go do some homework heretic has explained all this over and over in his threads.
If youre too lazy go watch Lloyd Pyes"Everything You Know is Wrong"its a bit under 2hrs out of your life for a lil understanding.

This is very interesting. I have been following Bigfoot/Sasquatch for a year or two now, and it just keeps getting more interesting.

About the bigfoot shot dead, see here: [link to bigfootevidence101.blogspot.dk]
I wouldn't led it much credibility though, but lets see.

A more interesting project is the DNA project by Dr. Melba Ketchum, which correlates with your information.
This might also be the reason that authorities wants to keeps Bigfoot a secret. It would jeopardize modern evolution theory's credibility.

I'm also subscribing to the thesis, that evolution is occurring, but humans is in a totally different league, and possibly is an engineered specie.

OP - whats your take on the evolution on man from early days. How did we get out of the stone age, and why did we end up starting from there in the first place?

This thread is total BS. Not that the subject is BS,just the thread. All that is presented is Your thesis op no links from credible or otherwise to give any scientific support to your thinking.

This thread could have been good, but op dont know how to do research, so 1 star.

Go get something to at least give a little support to your argument and try again next year.

I believe that evolution is true and fact. We do see it in play in the animal kingdom, all around us and is very hard to dispute.

HOWEVER

I believe present day Humans are a genetically 'improved' species, with all the evidence out there (reputable evidence, not just crackpots)it makes so much sense. I can understand why people don't buy into this though. We do look quite like the great apes, certain behaviours etc...

My question is, have you seen an evolutionary 'jump' in history that was so huge and profound that is comparable to the difference between Humans and Apes?

Something that may just explain that evolution/nature can select a species and enhance it much moreso than for example the peppered moth and that can prove that every now and then in history a huge change just happens.

Thanks.

I love this subject!

Where the hell have I been..

Sorry I kinda disappeared, I just finished reading practically everything on the site.

BBC might tear science a new asshole if this is true.

Usually only after the major extinctions, other than that, we only have micro evolution, like the changes of beaks to finches in the Galapagos, to suit their diets.

But stair step evolution, or "punctuated equilbrium" tries to show macro evolution in stair steps.

Between extinctions, the only REAL transformation, is none other than humans, we truly do not have a place in the natural scheme of life.

I believe the fulfillness of time will go to show that alternative researchers like Lloyd Pye, and Zechariah Sitchin, have been more right than as opposed to these godforsaken dogmas of Darwin, creation... etc.

Also in Voice Chat!! Room: "Den of the Iconoclast"

We supposedly evolved from four types of "pre humans"

Now, thousands of reports every year from all
over the world make very clear 4 pertinent
distinctions in the appearance of these
bipedal hair covered creatures.

Let me be very clear... This contradiction has
the potential to bring everything we know about
Primate Evolution to a bone jarring, teeth shattering
halt.

Hominoids.... (a more appropriate term other than
"Bigfoot") are one of two “fantasy” creatures
that can dismantle Evolutionary Theory in one
fell swoop (off-world aliens are the other).
The day a hominoid is presented to the world
for analysis—dead or alive—is the day science
can no longer prop up its evolutionary dogma.
When macroevolution clatters into history’s
dustbin, Divine Creation and Intelligent Design
will follow right behind it. Intervention Theory
will become the most plausible explanation for
how humans came to be on Earth.

I hope to offer my fellow GLP'rs one of the more
thought provoking "Ask me a question" threads
they have taken part in... in a while.

I will more than likely copy and paste my own
material from past threads to answer some questions.

You've probably seen this OP, but if not its well worth your time if you're into this theory...