THIS IS IT ... The reason for all the extreme weather across the world, plus every other anomaly currently happening.

So, let me get this right....

Since we have moved a bit in our little galaxy we are going to be bombarded with new and exciting stuff that we usually miss because of our planetary placement? Also, all this new stuff is being amplified by the sun?

Not trying to be an a** by any means. This is a legit question if anybody cares to expand or refer me to something to study.

*The IPCC’s (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s) 5th Assessment Report due for release in September of 2013, has now been leaked publicly over 9 months in advance on an internet publication called “Stop Green Suicide“.
One of the reports 800 expert reviewers, a man by the name of Alex Rawls, apparently leaked the report and is backing it with written evidence that cosmic rays are actually the cause of climate change and warming patterns, thus possibly blowing the lid off the whole entire global warming fraud pushed by figureheads such as Al Gore and others.


This is from the Leaker's analysis:

**Lead story from the Second Order Draft: strong evidence for solar forcing beyond TSI now acknowledged by IPCC

Compared to the First Order Draft, the SOD now adds the following sentence, indicated in bold (page 7-43, lines 1-5, emphasis added):

Many empirical relationships have been reported between GCR or cosmogenic isotope archives and some aspects of the climate system (e.g., Bond et al., 2001; Dengel et al., 2009; Ram and Stolz, 1999). The forcing from changes in total solar irradiance alone does not seem to account for these observations, implying the existence of an amplifying mechanism such as the hypothesized GCR-cloud link. We focus here on observed relationships between GCR and aerosol and cloud properties.

The Chapter 7 authors are admitting strong evidence ("many empirical relationships") for enhanced solar forcing (forcing beyond total solar irradiance, or TSI), even if they don't know what the mechanism is. This directly undercuts the main premise of the report, as stated in Chapter 8 (page 8-4, lines 54-57):

There is very high confidence that natural forcing is a small fraction of the anthropogenic forcing. In particular, over the past three decades (since 1980), robust evidence from satellite observations of the TSI and volcanic aerosols demonstrate a near-zero (–0.04 W m–2) change in the natural forcing compared to the anthropogenic AF increase of ~1.0 ± 0.3 W m–2.

The Chapter 8 authors (a different group than the Chapter 7 authors) are explicit here that their claim about natural forcing being small compared to anthropogenic forcing is based on an analysis in which the only solar forcing that is taken into account is TSI. This can be verified from the radiative forcing table on page 8-39 where the only solar variable included in the IPCC's computer models is seen to be "solar irradiance."

This analysis, where post-1980 warming gets attributed to the human release of CO2 on the grounds that it cannot be attributed to solar irradiance, cannot stand in the face of the Chapter 7 admission of substantial evidence for solar forcing beyond solar irradiance. Once the evidence for enhanced solar forcing is taken into account we can have no confidence that natural forcing is small compared to anthropogenic forcing.

The Chapter 8 premise that natural forcing is relatively small leads directly to the main conclusion of the entire report, stated in the first sentence of the Executive Summary (the very first sentence of the entire report): that advances since AR4 "further strengthen the basis for human activities being the primary driver in climate change" (p.1-2, lines 3-5). This headline conclusion is a direct descendant of the assumption that the only solar forcing is TSI, a claim that their own report no longer accepts.

The report still barely hints at the mountain of evidence for enhanced solar forcing, or the magnitude of the evidenced effect. Dozens of studies (section two here) have found between a .4 and .7 degree of correlation between solar activity and various climate indices, suggesting that solar activity "explains" in the statistical sense something like half of all past temperature change, very little of which could be explained by the very slight variation in TSI. At least the Chapter 7 team is now being explicit about what this evidence means: that some mechanism of enhanced solar forcing must be at work.

Complete Leaked 5th Assessment Report w/ analysis:

[link to stopgreensuicide.com]


Now pay close attention to when there is a spike in cosmic ray density.
[link to neutronm.bartol.udel.edu]


The 23rd!? *credit goes to hugh from Thread: SOLAR WATCH * Huge X8.2 Flare Sept. 10, 2017! (Updated Daily) for the article*

So, let me get this right....

Since we have moved a bit in our little galaxy we are going to be bombarded with new and exciting stuff that we usually miss because of our planetary placement? Also, all this new stuff is being amplified by the sun?

Not trying to be an a** by any means. This is a legit question if anybody cares to expand or refer me to something to study.

Are you trying to say that SUV's arent killing the planet? LOL

I had a feeling Al Gore was running a scam. Carbon Tax my ass

Seriously, I have been expelling some toxic gasses today

so be it Global warming is not man made. however dumping millions of tons of carbon monoxide a gas that kills cannot be a good thing in any case. it still needs to be addressed.

so be it Global warming is not man made. however dumping millions of tons of carbon monoxide a gas that kills cannot be a good thing in any case. it still needs to be addressed.

so be it Global warming is not man made. however dumping millions of tons of carbon monoxide a gas that kills cannot be a good thing in any case. it still needs to be addressed.

I live in Florida . The atmospheric engineering with frequency and aerosols is obvious. This technology is not unrelated to cosmic rays or extremes in weather.

Here I assume the primary purposes have military functions, but the effects reach into other areas

There is a big rip in the Magnetosphere. Where's the hole. That will show where they are Chemtrailing. The rays are getting in. The chemtrailing has always been isolated to specific regions. Where I have lived for 29 years we have NEVER been chemtrailed.

Where's the HOLE. Find the HOLE find the CHEMTRAILS. Its getting really obvious.

Thread: Siberian permafrost melts, methane seeping out!


-