Has anyone here gone into the report and searched for the phrase "solar forcing"?

Here is the only mention of that phrase in Chapter 7:
"The response of the hydrological cycle to the partitioning of radiation between the surface and atmosphere
partly explains why forcings having the same AF do not produce the same precipitation responses. Increased
solar forcing does not strongly affect the net atmospheric cooling, and thus the hydrological cycle feels only
the associated warming with little rapid adjustment (Andrews et al., 2009), despite a small atmospheric
absorption of additional solar radiation (Takahashi, 2009). As a result, solar radiation management schemes
that maintain a constant surface temperature will lead to a reduction in globally averaged precipitation and
potentially substantially different regional distributions (Schmidt et al., 2012b; Section 7.7)."

But Alec Rawls claims it says...

"The Chapter 7 authors are admitting strong evidence ("many empirical relationships") for enhanced solar forcing (forcing beyond total solar irradiance, or TSI), even if they don't know what the mechanism is."
[link to stopgreensuicide.com]

It doesn't add up folks.
Is Rawls "leaking" this in order to make fools out of you?