THIS IS IT ... The reason for all the extreme weather across the world, plus every other anomaly currently happening.

If anyone else has been monitoring the Neutron Bartol monitor you would of have noticed them scrubbing data and values.

Well it is a University after all and we all know who runs and owns them.


Aside from them not updating live anymore we have a descent spike on the right.




[link to neutronm.bartol.udel.edu]

[link to s1277.beta.photobucket.com]
[link to s1277.beta.photobucket.com]
[link to s1277.beta.photobucket.com]
[link to s1277.beta.photobucket.com]
[link to s1277.beta.photobucket.com]

Did you read any of this study?

"Globally, CO2 is the strongest driver of climate change compared to other changes in the atmospheric
composition, and changes in surface conditions. Its relative contribution has further increased since the
1980s and by far outweighs the contributions from natural drivers. CO2 concentrations and rates of increase
are unprecedented in the last 800,000 years and at least 20,000 years, respectively. Other drivers also
influence climate on global and particularly regional scales. {5.2.2, 8.3.2, 8.5.1, Figure 8.6, Figure 8.17}" PG.7

[link to stopgreensuicide.com]




Present-day concentrations of atmospheric greenhouse gases (CO2, CH4, and N2O) exceed the range of
variability recorded in ice core records during past 800,000 years. Past changes in atmospheric greenhouse33
gas concentrations can be determined with high confidence from polar ice cores. New data extend the AR4
statement that present-day concentrations likely exceed the natural range of variability back to 800,000 years
ago {5.2.2}. While orbital forcing is the primary driver of glacial cycles, climate-ice sheet models of
different complexities as well as reconstructions show that the internal feedback of CO2 accounts for a
significant fraction of glacial-interglacial climate variability. Since AR4, leads and lags between temperature
and CO2 have been revised. New Antarctic data and dating methods depict simultaneous increases in
Antarctic temperature and CO2 during the last glacial termination, preceding Northern Hemisphere warming
due to the bipolar seesaw (high confidence) {5.3.2}.

Further near-term warming from past emissions is unavoidable due to thermal inertia of the oceans. This
warming will be increased by ongoing emissions of GHGs over the near term, and the climate observed in
the near term will also be strongly influenced by the internally generated variability of the climate system.
Previous IPCC Assessments only described climate-change projections wherein the externally forced
component of future climate was included but no attempt was made to initialize the internally generated
climate variability. Decadal climate predictions, on the other hand, are intended to predict both the externally
forced component of future climate change, and the internally generated component. Near-term predictions
do not provide detailed information of the evolution of weather. Instead they can provide estimated changes
in the time evolution of the statistics of near-term climate.

Last Edited by noseovertail on 12/31/2012 07:57 PM

OP is full of shit

"There is overall low confidence that over the next few decades there will be global and regional increases in
the intensity of the strongest tropical cyclones and a decrease in global frequency. This low confidence
reflects the small number of studies exploring near-term tropical cyclone activity, and the larger relative
influence of internal variability and non-greenhouse forcing up to the mid-21st century than at the end of the
21st century. Increased tropical cyclone intensity is projected by studies focusing on the North Atlantic and
South Pacific, although there is only medium confidence in these projections. It is very likely that tropical
cyclone frequency, intensity and spatial distribution globally and in individual basins will vary from year-to14
year and decade-to-decade in association with natural modes of variability including e.g., ENSO, Atlantic
Multidecadal Oscillation (AMO) and the Inter-decadal Pacific Oscillation (IPO)."

"There is high confidence that higher concentrations of greenhouse gases and lower amounts of sulphate
30 aerosol lead to greater warming, but in the near term the differences between projections for different RCP
31 scenarios are typically smaller than the differences between projections from different climate models."

>>>> Thread: Is The Water Evaporating More Than Normal?



]

bump

any new updates??

were halfway- January, Feb is coming... is the trend gonna come back???/

Check with Luisport for the current extreme weather, the neutron bartol remains elevated.

Storms in the south, below freezing in southern cali.

All the while its around 60-65 from SD to Ohio. Many of the northern states report little to no snow.

It's still happening, could it all go back to normal tom?

perhaps

I think we haven't seen anything yet.

The ride has only just begun.



Last Edited by Da fuq on 01/15/2013 07:58 PM

thanks bro for the updates..

I guess all the tornadoes in the southern states, as well as boulder size hail in India is normal?


Lets not forget all the russian bears that froze to death.

There is a reason why it goes from 75 one day, to 30 over night.


:24ftr3::254f4::143d342::341rwd2:

[link to www.foxnews.com]



Way ahead of you ass clowns.








Last Edited by Da fuq on 02/03/2013 01:54 AM

You guys scared?

Thread: M8.0 Santa Cruz Islands (Page 19)

Thread: Breaking 8.0 - Santa Cruz Islands !!!! Now a 6.4 = A tsunami warning was issued !!

damn damn damn...

lo and behold, ask for a big EQ and here it is...

[link to earthquake.usgs.gov]

[link to online.wsj.com]

[link to www.channelnewsasia.com]

the trend continues..that guy on youtube is on to something...

[link to neutronm.bartol.udel.edu]

This website is a joke.

And... do not forget Louis Boutard!He found it all!
The greatest of all times.Yes!
XXXLOVE you ALL!

Louis found nothing to do with this.

I said refer to louis for earths weather.


He does a hell of a lot, but cut me some slack..damn lol

Last Edited by Da fuq on 02/06/2013 02:01 PM

[link to neutronm.bartol.udel.edu]


105 even though they won't show it.

:bertbook::bertbook:

[link to neutronm.bartol.udel.edu]


Liars

This thread needs pinned again for the 5th time.


Best xmas thread hands down.

I was lethargic today. I think flares have something to do with it.

The a universe is a holographic projection based on perception.

There is a Synergy of Cosmic Radiation and Solar Radiation!
Think of the Solar Radiation creating a bubble around the Solar System that keeps out Cosmic Radiation.
No think of a Sun that has gone into Solar Minimum and stayed there for 17 years!

1. Solar Radiation decreases to nearly zero
2. The Solar Bubble decreases in effectiveness.
3. Less Solar Radiation impacts the Earth
4. MORE Cosmic Radiation impacts the Earth.

Cosmic Radiation causes LOW LEVEL Clouds.
Hence, it traps and warmth under them, and/or, prevents the weak Solar Radiation from penetrating, and therefore COOLS that region.

The Science has been there for as long as Plasma Physics was a Science.
These Global Warming Social Marxists know this and have hidden it from the Public.
Not for much longer.