|
REPORT ABUSIVE REPLY
|
|
Message Subject
|
Gun confiscation??? I think not!
|
|
Poster Handle
|
Anonymous Coward |
|
Post Content
|
...The problem is, any resistance to confiscation would have to be co-ordinated, preferably by military vets. If it isn't, the militarized SWAT teams and foreign military mercs will just sweep-up weapons, piecemeal. Sure, there would be plenty of "cold, dead handers", but on their own, they won't have a chance.  Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30826600 No, your wrong. Hitler had gun confiscation, lots of trained soldiers, SS and Gestapo, yet the Resistance movement still survived and thrived. Much to Hitler's dismay, he could not destroy the Resistance. Even without the Allies help, they would probably have eventually retaken Europe from Him. It might have taken another 10 years, but like Castro in Cuba, they would have prevailed against all odds. Yes, but the French Resistance was a very organized group of die-hard citizens (5% or less of the general pop), aided and abetted by the Allies with unlimited air-drops of weapons and materiel, fighting against a ruthless foreign invader. We are talking about American gun owners being made to give up their weapons to their own government, not some brutal foreign invasion force. Obviously, the Obarkyfraud "government" is an enemy "domestic", as outlined in the military Oaths, but most Americans still regard it as legitimate, for some reason. Only 3% of the American Colonists took up arms against your beloved King George. Just sayin'. Not my "beloved King George", I can assure you. And any analogy to the Revolutionary War is total crap! Just think of the surveillance that your government has on you, and you don't have on your government. No, if they come, you had better be well-organized. Individualistic stands won't cut it.
|
|
|
Please verify you're human:
|
|
|
Reason for reporting:
|
