Disassemble All Nuclear Power Plants NOW!

Try life without electricity and internet, first.

no need to do that, just need to find safer ways to generate power. its stupid to have such a huge risk hanging over our heads

This earth has vast rescources so that we all could have free unlimited power, harmless to us and the environment! but of course there will be no profit for the profit makers, this world is corrupt.

the technology is there for solar power, but they WANT us as slaves to gas, the supply chain, nuclear power.

Indeed, I have quit gas and oil all together. I am heating with wood now. A lot of people in Denmark do, guess what the government does: Put's taxes on wood for heating!

Do you know how long it takes a tree to grow for you to burn it? Years. Ignorance rules.

bump..5..and pin request

Oh an what do we use in the meantime retard derrrrr

You are very right. It's stupid having all these nuclear power plants around.

Yeah, nuclear power is perfectly safe... Until the containment vessels crack open. They say its safe because of it's redundant security, people fail to realize how dangerous it is; it's so dangerous it needs redundant security. We need to go to a cleaner energy with less dangerous resources.

There's plenty of other energy production methods; geo-thermal, wind, hydro, ethanol, hydro-thermal, solar, etc. We just need to remove funding from war and all these entitlement programs to seriously research them.

5*'s and green karma for you OP!

Last Edited by InfiniteTopHat on 12/26/2012 08:15 AM

What I use for heating is NOTHING compared to the industrial chop down of trees around the world, and the destruction of rain forests.

How long does it take for the oil to come back beneeth the surface of the ocean? Or how long does it take for earth to recover after a nuclear accident?

Let's not talk about ignorance.

Pinned it for ya..opie..for a better future for all..
Merry Christmas..

Any idea where to put the hundreds of thousands of ton extremely radioactive waste then?

List the other ways.

Coal? Most coal has uranium in it - when burnt the uranium goes up with the smoke and get spread around the world.
[link to www.scientificamerican.com]

Shall we burn more coal?

Dams kill fish. Salmon are on the way out, why? Because we dammed up their rivers. Several species of salmon are extinct, with more on the endangered list.


And sadly its not just the salmon that are dying, salmon were (past tense) one of the key stones of how the ecology of most of the pacific northwest operated, their swimming up stream brought nutrients which were carried around by bears and deposited all over. The loss of those nutrients lead to devastating changes in ecology which has lead to contemporary tree (forest) die offs due to disease because those trees were no longer getting those nutrients.

[link to www.google.com] Start reading.

Here is the terrible truth, there is no replacement for nuclear power that is less dangerous than nuclear power. Each potential 'alternative' carries with it its own set of risks and devastation to the environment.

Solar power cells - sorry, the materials needed to make cheap solar cells is deadly to the environment, and the by product of manufacturing does more damage per year than all of the nuclear 'accidents' we have seen to date.

[link to www.google.com]

Wind - those magnets that make the generation possible are hard to get off and release thorium - oddly enough rare earth metals are often all but saturated with thorium. Thorium is radioactive. Processing of those rare earth metals include chemicals which cause cancer - you are more likely to develop cancer living next to a rare earth magnet factory than you are next to a nuclear power plant.

[link to www.pbs.org]

Thorium: [link to www.google.com]

Anyway you want to slice the 'problem' of power as in replacing was to produce power, you end up hitting deadly consequences.

When you start really looking at these technologies, you discover that the impact of even the primative solid fuel fission reactors poise less risks and dangers than solar cells and wind - which are considered 'green' and 'sustainable'.

The only way to actually do the energy thing and not harm or have a huge risk factor is for everyone to cut back on energy usage.

But we all know that ain't gonna happen.

Hopefully (and if you looked at thorium) we will move toward using thorium reactors in the near future. This suddenly makes the use of wind power less radioactive (as in we are using the waste which is thorium of mining rare earths).

But since its really, really hard to build bombs with thorium reactors, we most likely won't see that for a long time to come.

Last Edited by Bowyn Aerrow on 12/26/2012 08:24 AM

Are you going to power the industry with wood as well? OMG you ppl are without any sense for reality, really.

how about we dump the radioactive waste in your back yard? still happy with it?

How about you stop using the nuclear electricity now?

The simple solution is to use less electricity. Like for cooking food and such.. where gasol could be used instead.

Read "Atomic Suicide?" by Walter Russell for the dangers of nuclear power plants. It's an eye opener...

This would be the hardest part... Currently there is no method of altering radioactive half-life. This radioactive waste has such a long half-life that there isn't a feasible way for us to dispose of it in our lifetime sans jettisoning it into space. Which is an idea I'm kind of against, we don't know what we may piss off sending that stuff off into space or if it'll catch an orbit somewhere and return to fuck us down the road.

If this stuff causes so much trouble and is so hard to get rid of don't you agree it is pretty stupid we continue to extract and use it?

We managed for thousands of years till recently without..I dont see why we cant manage without nuclear electricity again

after Japan..in my opinion..we have no option..the risks I think are just too high

Besides I dont know about your neck of the woods..but here my electricity bills keep getting higher and higher..go figure

15kw system, do it your self system, coupled with 2 2.5kw residential winds linked to a residential battery storage system and there she blows. Just a little thought goes along way.

Do not do it for the environment do it so you do not have to pay it to the man.


Or just get a couple of the mars rover, power devices

or a zpe

Or hitch a ride on Destiny on the way past and leave this shit hole we call earth.

Surprise Surprise!

All nations in the world could shut them all down, and the next day there would STILL be electricity. It was like this in Japan for many months.

Except for France, maybe, but they have always been the odd ones out.

Retail is not the problem. It´s the industrial consuption. If you want the industrial revolution to progress much energy is necessary.

I did not say that. There are other powers like solar and water f ex.

But I cannot afford to buy a bunch of solar panels to place on my roof! So I have to rely on wood. OR I CHOOSE to rely on wood, instead of oil and gas. It's my contribution to a greener world.

Right you are OP!
5 pins and a star!

Kinda hard to argue with the Op unless you're a little bit retarded. Nuke plants will be humanities eventual demise.

Thorium reactors!