Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 1,719 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 146,919
Pageviews Today: 273,998Threads Today: 72Posts Today: 1,500
01:52 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation

 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 30899012
United Kingdom
12/26/2012 02:16 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation
Well just a thought anyway...

I'm sure you will all continue to think that a certain conspiracy site is attempting to cover things up regardless of what is said here.
 Quoting: Kat Woman




In this case, yes I will. And I'm far from the only one. Nothing said HERE is likely to make me believe otherwise. They would need to change or drastically clarify this policy.

It is obvious censorship.

The stated reasons are logically unsound.

They are also engaging in classic cointelpro tactics (ridicule, shame) as if threat of the ban hammer were not enough.

As stated, the only other time I've seen them react this strongly in the way of trying to threaten long-time members (there's that alienating the audience again) and steer discussion was the 9/11 no planes thing... and look how many people think THAT was a conspiracy.

What else are we supposed to believe?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 19868668


Well what do you believe?

Why do you think they would ban it there and not HERE.
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 19868668
United States
12/26/2012 02:19 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation
I should point out the truly ironic thing here is that I was completely on the fence, and even leaning toward "this was a genuine tragedy," until they pulled this crap.

But I've read enough of their denials and guilt-tripping (re: 9/11 "no planes" and re: they = cointelpro) to see the stark similarities between those incidents, and their reaction to the speculation on this subject.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 30899012
United Kingdom
12/26/2012 02:41 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation
bump
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 30894122
Australia
12/26/2012 02:53 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation
That particular site, along with most of the others, fosters crap in youngsters and actively rids itself of anyone of above average (or even average) IQ

Good for a laugh and that's all
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 12269654
United States
12/26/2012 03:18 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation
I think they banned it because that kind of speculation is disrespectful to the victims
 Quoting: Kat Woman


Pointing out numerous material inconsistencies in the official story is disrespectful to victims? In what way?
 Quoting: GladioDaddy-O


If the parents of the dead children are not acting and going through horrific trauma do you not think that it's disrespectful to conspire against them online.

There is no proof the victims are in on it, i for one do believe real children with loving families were killed during this massacre and the subject should be approached with compassion.
 Quoting: Kat Woman


he never said anything about the victims famlies being "in on it" (WHICH THERE IS SOME PROOF OF)

Discussing a topic whether each person has their facts straight or not doesn't mean they are "conspiring against" anyone or anything. discussing this issue is not a conspiracy.

everyone's opinion on each even that took place that day and how are not all right so don't try to roll all the theories, ideas, and evidence into one lump and say they all impliment the victims.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 23409930
United Kingdom
12/26/2012 03:26 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation
Ok. So how come it is banned on one conspiracy website and not this one
HippyAwakened

User ID: 1667285
United States
12/26/2012 03:26 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation
Maybe the admins/owners are afraid they might get shut down completely (by TPTB) if they allow those threads?
Tomato-tard
GladioDaddy-O

User ID: 22439147
United States
12/26/2012 03:39 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation
Maybe the admins/owners are afraid they might get shut down completely (by TPTB) if they allow those threads?
 Quoting: HippyAwakened


If that's the reason, then their credibility is destroyed.
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 19868668
United States
12/26/2012 03:46 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation
Ok. So how come it is banned on one conspiracy website and not this one
 Quoting: Kat Woman



I'm not necessarily saying I believe this, but some people speculate that the site in question is run by the NSA or a similar group.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 30906758
United States
12/26/2012 03:51 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation
The site has not banned discussion of the topic altogether, however, it looks like they have prohibited certain TYPES of speculation.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 19868668


They just got sick of you fantasizing, and using their bandwidth to drool your mental issues on to the net...
Taboo
User ID: 30905817
Spain
12/26/2012 03:51 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation
Unlawful Killing is banned in the UK.

At every upload on the net, it is being pulled down even to this day.

I managed to watch it about 4 days ago, sent the web link to a couple of friends and my friend in Australia said half way through watching it got pulled down, and the other friend I sent it to never got to see it.

This film was aired in Cannes last year and covers Princess Dianas death (murder) in depth that gives some very telling information about the royals and the media cover up.

Unilateral censorship of anything is always curious and very telling.
Whether it be the establishment in the UK or the establishment in the US (and we all know they are intrinsically linked) "they" are running a test to expose and eliminate those who are awake to their antics aswell as measuring to what extent their antics are not discernible to the average "joe public"

The Internet is the only consciousness they haven't managed to fully control so they are trying to find ways to subvert "free speech" without waking "average joe" (who is in the majority) in the process.

"They" exploit the fact that so many cannot wield their intuition or critically analyse anything independent to what they have been offered by the "authority" of the controlled media...visually.
Suntar

User ID: 29216381
United States
12/26/2012 03:52 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation
The site has not banned discussion of the topic altogether, however, it looks like they have prohibited certain TYPES of speculation.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 19868668


They just got sick of you fantasizing, and using their bandwidth to drool your mental issues on to the net...
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30906758


Well now, that's objective...
sheep sheep sheep
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 30906758
United States
12/26/2012 03:54 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation
The site has not banned discussion of the topic altogether, however, it looks like they have prohibited certain TYPES of speculation.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 19868668


They just got sick of you fantasizing, and using their bandwidth to drool your mental issues on to the net...
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30906758


Well now, that's objective...
sheep sheep sheep
 Quoting: Suntar



Aww...Did I upset you?
Taboo
User ID: 30905817
Spain
12/26/2012 03:56 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation
And for the shills who constantly harp on about "speculation" and "no facts".... Pay attention to the fact that we are in a time of alleged democracy and freedom where your freedoms can be revoked indefinitely under speculation by the us government or military without due process if they deem it necessary (which is increasing it would seem)

Yet this is quietly overlooked, and a "truther" or "conspiracist" is demonised and/or censored.

Go figure.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 30906758
United States
12/26/2012 03:58 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation
And for the shills who constantly harp on about "speculation" and "no facts".... Pay attention to the fact that we are in a time of alleged democracy and freedom where your freedoms can be revoked indefinitely under speculation by the us government or military without due process if they deem it necessary (which is increasing it would seem)

Yet this is quietly overlooked, and a "truther" or "conspiracist" is demonised and/or censored.

Go figure.
 Quoting: Taboo 30905817


Demonized?

Not letting you pollute their privately owned website is 'censoring' you?

laugh

Fucking children...
Suntar

User ID: 29216381
United States
12/26/2012 04:06 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation
Aww...Did I upset you?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30906758


No, but your stupid is showing. May want to cover it up. It's disgusting to look at.

sbus
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 30896588
United Kingdom
12/26/2012 04:20 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation
And for the shills who constantly harp on about "speculation" and "no facts".... Pay attention to the fact that we are in a time of alleged democracy and freedom where your freedoms can be revoked indefinitely under speculation by the us government or military without due process if they deem it necessary (which is increasing it would seem)

Yet this is quietly overlooked, and a "truther" or "conspiracist" is demonised and/or censored.

Go figure.
 Quoting: Taboo 30905817


Demonized?

Not letting you pollute their privately owned website is 'censoring' you?

laugh

Fucking children...
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30906758


Obvious shill is obvious.

shill
Ralph--a house dog

User ID: 25802009
United States
12/26/2012 04:21 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation
I think they banned it because that kind of speculation is disrespectful to the victims
 Quoting: Kat Woman


Bullshit.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 29338719


If I were a victim of something like that I'd come back and haunt everybody's ass until the truth came out!

Don't you think their souls deserve it?

Last Edited by Ralph--a house dog on 12/26/2012 04:24 PM
"Who decides?"
---Robert A. Heinlein

[link to www.westcoasttruth.com]

"Do Not Go Gentle into that Good Night.....Rage, rage against the dying of the light"
----Dylan Thomas
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1375041
United States
12/26/2012 04:37 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation
Isn't every conspiracy speculation? Isn't that what makes it a conspiracy, the fact all of the facts are unprovable.
Anonymous Cowherder
FEMA Region IX.

User ID: 28230270
United States
12/26/2012 04:42 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation
And for the shills who constantly harp on about "speculation" and "no facts".... Pay attention to the fact that we are in a time of alleged democracy and freedom where your freedoms can be revoked indefinitely under speculation by the us government or military without due process if they deem it necessary (which is increasing it would seem)

Yet this is quietly overlooked, and a "truther" or "conspiracist" is demonised and/or censored.

Go figure.
 Quoting: Taboo 30905817


Demonized?

Not letting you pollute their privately owned website is 'censoring' you?

laugh

Fucking children...
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30906758


way to prove a point.
I'm a Libertarian Constitutionalist.

I don't give a shit what you do with your own life, whether you make it a success or a failure, that is an outcome of the choices you make, but please take responsibility for yourself and don't make ME pay for YOUR choices and we're all good.

Repeal the 17th Amendment and the Apportionment Act of 1911!

Thread: First steps down the road to a return to the Constitutional Republic that we were intended to be.

Restore the Republic.

It's a flower, not something to be feared.

cow - Moo!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 23409930
United Kingdom
12/26/2012 04:42 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation
I think they banned it because that kind of speculation is disrespectful to the victims
 Quoting: Kat Woman


Bullshit.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 29338719


If I were a victim of something like that I'd come back and haunt everybody's ass until the truth came out!

Don't you think their souls deserve it?
 Quoting: Ralph--a house dog


I think they banned it because that kind of speculation is disrespectful to the victims
 Quoting: Kat Woman


Bullshit.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 29338719


If I were a victim of something like that I'd come back and haunt everybody's ass until the truth came out!

Don't you think their souls deserve it?
 Quoting: Ralph--a house dog



of course, im refering to the speculations about that some of the victims are not victims at all but in on it. This may be why they have put a stop to it over there, what if people have seen it and complained etc.
black calx
schweddy

User ID: 1216538
United States
12/26/2012 04:51 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation
That website is awful. The censorship is ridiculous and hardly anyone posts anything useful. They probably get their best stories from here.
"We're chained to the world and we all gotta pull." - Tom Waits
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 4032947
United States
12/26/2012 04:53 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1188564
United Kingdom
12/26/2012 04:56 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation
That website can go suck a fuck after I criticised their stupid 'conspiracy girls' agenda. I stated that a conspiracy show shouldn't isolate genders or stereotype against others and was promptly permabanned for arguing my case.

If I was trolling, posting graphic images, or porn then it's understandable. But to be permabanned just for questioning 'their' motives is retarded.
Suntar

User ID: 29216381
United States
12/26/2012 05:19 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation
The one active thread left... angry bear keeps referring to only wanting the official story to be discussed.
lmao
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 11360402
United States
12/26/2012 05:29 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation
I think they banned it because that kind of speculation is disrespectful to the victims
 Quoting: Kat Woman


Pointing out numerous material inconsistencies in the official story is disrespectful to victims? In what way?
 Quoting: GladioDaddy-O


There's No official story.

Your information gathering is inconsistent,that's why Your so wrong.
GladioDaddy-O

User ID: 22439147
United States
12/26/2012 05:31 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation
I think they banned it because that kind of speculation is disrespectful to the victims
 Quoting: Kat Woman


Pointing out numerous material inconsistencies in the official story is disrespectful to victims? In what way?
 Quoting: GladioDaddy-O


There's No official story.

Your information gathering is inconsistent,that's why Your so wrong.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 11360402


Check my information gathering on the threads I've posted, shill.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 30842846
United States
12/26/2012 05:31 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation
They probably were worried about being sued because you freaks are dragging totally innocent people into this shit with KNOWN FALSE INFO.

You should all be ashamed.

bumpbumpbump
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 25635188
United States
12/26/2012 05:32 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation
"The victims of Sandy Hook deserve to know the truth".YOU ASS CLOWN, YOU ARE NOT A VICTIM OF SANDY HOOK!!!!!!!!!!!! You are a moron destroying the lives of innocent people whose children were gunned down by a fucking maniac. You are pure evil.I hope they hunt you people down and prosecute every last one of you.If I were one of those poor parents I can fucking assure I would get you. Pure fucking evil to be revictimized by pack of conspiracy keyboard morons. Pure unaldulterated evil.Karma's a bitch baby, you'd better watch out.
Paco Lips
User ID: 30683467
United States
12/26/2012 05:32 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation
I think they banned it because that kind of speculation is disrespectful to the victims
 Quoting: Kat Woman


Pointing out numerous material inconsistencies in the official story is disrespectful to victims? In what way?
 Quoting: GladioDaddy-O


exactly.....basically any one trying to get to the truth these days are disrespectful.