Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 2,552 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,053,131
Pageviews Today: 1,599,276Threads Today: 457Posts Today: 10,024
03:02 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation

 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 11360402
United States
12/26/2012 05:33 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation
I think they banned it because that kind of speculation is disrespectful to the victims
 Quoting: Kat Woman


Pointing out numerous material inconsistencies in the official story is disrespectful to victims? In what way?
 Quoting: GladioDaddy-O


There's No official story.

Your information gathering is inconsistent,that's why Your so wrong.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 11360402


Check my information gathering on the threads I've posted, shill.
 Quoting: GladioDaddy-O


You Call everybody a Shill in your threads.
GladioDaddy-O

User ID: 22439147
United States
12/26/2012 05:33 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation
They probably were worried about being sued because you freaks are dragging totally innocent people into this shit with KNOWN FALSE INFO.

You should all be ashamed.

bumpbumpbump
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30842846


Another paid shill. If any of the info I've posted is false, it's because the media issued fales reports. All I've done is repeat what the "reputable" media outlets have reported, which has been all over the map.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1561710
Sweden
12/26/2012 05:34 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation
A very well-known conspiracy site has banned speculation about the Sandy Hook shooting.

I'm not sure I should explicitly name this site, but I'll just say that it's got the words "Top Secret" in its name. You know the one I mean.

The site has not banned discussion of the topic altogether, however, it looks like they have prohibited certain TYPES of speculation. It's okay to talk about, but NOT okay to speculate that it was a false flag, or that any of the participants are actors.

Basically they're allowing speculation WITHIN THE REALM OF THE OFFICIAL STORY ONLY, it seems!!!!


The administrators even made a couple highly empassioned posts about this, and sent a mass mailer to all memebers. In the posts they pretty much guilt tripped, and shame-on-you'ed everyone who was speculating, ridiculed them, and warned that bans or all-out-topical-prohibition may result if it continues.

It looks like they may have deleted more threads, too. Long ones, with tons of interested participants. Not 100% about that one, as I haven't looked too hard yet. But threads which were getting a new reply every few minutes, and were on the front page for days are now impossible to find after browsing a few pages back.

For those of you who follow this site, you will know the last time the admins spoke this strongly about an issue, and tried to steer its discussion in one particular direction (or I should say AWAY from one particular direction) was regarding 9/11 discussion. Go ahead and try to start some "non plane theory" threads over there and see what happens.

I don't know about you, but to my nose this stinks to high heaven.

What say you?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 19868668



i know of which "very well-known conspiracy site" you speak since i tried to post a thread with the same topic as i tried here( Thread: The Dark Knight Rises Prediction (Rogue Wave + Eiffel Tower + Statue of Liberty) ).. a thread that died, too soon/in my opinion), without me getting the right minds involved.
Not Sandy Hook related.
No profanity.
No Terms-of-use breach.
still.
thrown out.
NO explanation.

touchy subject nsa-illuminati-lizards?
GladioDaddy-O

User ID: 22439147
United States
12/26/2012 05:35 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation
...


Pointing out numerous material inconsistencies in the official story is disrespectful to victims? In what way?
 Quoting: GladioDaddy-O


There's No official story.

Your information gathering is inconsistent,that's why Your so wrong.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 11360402


Check my information gathering on the threads I've posted, shill.
 Quoting: GladioDaddy-O


You Call everybody a Shill in your threads.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 11360402


Nope, just the shills. If you aren't a shill, then you are impuning my motives and mischaracterizing my intent.

But hey, thanks for checking out my threads:)
Chris12138

User ID: 30911853
United States
12/26/2012 05:38 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation
Those scanner vids and multiple shooter theories are really picking up steam. Conservative talk radio shows have been getting calls about it all day and the hosts didn't really fight em over it.

I personally think that there is a big coverup afoot.

Last Edited by Gator! on 12/26/2012 05:38 PM
GladioDaddy-O

User ID: 22439147
United States
12/26/2012 05:40 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation
ATTENTION SHILLS:

Do you know how I know you are shills, fakes, frauds, whatever-you-want-to-call-it?

Because you always identify yourself by leveling infantile insults at posters, including me, WITHOUT ACTUALLY ADDRESSING ANY OF THE POINTS I'VE RAISED!!!
Chris12138

User ID: 30911853
United States
12/26/2012 05:40 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation
So? all kinds of shit is banned on glp here.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 27515407


Not really. Trin unbanned pretty much everything because it was counterproductive and just fueling further conspiracy against the site.

Tavistock! See?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 30662905
United States
12/26/2012 05:43 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation
I think they banned it because that kind of speculation is disrespectful to the victims
 Quoting: Kat Woman


Pointing out numerous material inconsistencies in the official story is disrespectful to victims? In what way?
 Quoting: GladioDaddy-O


exactly.....basically any one trying to get to the truth these days are disrespectful.
 Quoting: Paco Lips 30683467


Note that this thread was slammed with shills almost immediately and they haven't stopped in the 4 hours it has been active.

It is easy to tell the posts of the shills. And some people may not be paid or officially employed shills, but just naive brainwashed sheep who get tweaked when their neat little reality is threatened, so they lash out at anyone who is actively revealing reality to them.

Their posts are full of projections and generalizations, as they attempt to shame people into accepting unproven media reports, and toe the "official" line.

This thread is a perfect example of a full court press by shilldom. That "other" conspiracy site is exactly as many have characterized it here. Controlled opposition, cointelpro.

Which is why its name may not be mentioned on this forum, because that sites owners harrass the shit out of GLP's owner and mods.

Happy Hunting to GLP's finest Sleuths (speculators) who are HOT on this case. Just don't be a dipshit and stand by your speculations when they prove to be false. Drop your false ego, and move on to the next hypothesis, because there is plenty to go on with this OP.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 30662905
United States
12/26/2012 05:50 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation
ATTENTION SHILLS:

Do you know how I know you are shills, fakes, frauds, whatever-you-want-to-call-it?

Because you always identify yourself by leveling infantile insults at posters, including me, WITHOUT ACTUALLY ADDRESSING ANY OF THE POINTS I'VE RAISED!!!
 Quoting: GladioDaddy-O


The reason for this is because this is how they were raised. These poor cowards were brainwashed (mental abuse/mind control) through shame/humiliation (emotional abuse), and then placed into positions of power over others in their twisted hierarchy.

Then they are set loose on truth seekers. They are not intelligent enough to counter propagandize, all they really do is waste our time, and mark us. That's it. And when they get flustered and start spazzing out and spitting venom, they declare conclusive victory, and then you won't hear from them for a while. This means they had to take a break, go snort some blow, drink some alky and find someone to vent on, like their kids or wife.

The naive shills, well, not so much like that, but their lifestyles are not that much different in principle.

Nuff said.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 11360402
United States
12/26/2012 05:56 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation
ATTENTION SHILLS:

Do you know how I know you are shills, fakes, frauds, whatever-you-want-to-call-it?

Because you always identify yourself by leveling infantile insults at posters, including me, WITHOUT ACTUALLY ADDRESSING ANY OF THE POINTS I'VE RAISED!!!
 Quoting: GladioDaddy-O


You Post Information from 19 different sources and Then Claim numerous material inconsistencies in the "Offical Story".

Then If anyone disagrees with you they get Cussed out and Called a Shill..

Post The "Offical Story " and Point out the inconsistencies.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 30662905
United States
12/26/2012 06:04 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation
ATTENTION SHILLS:

Do you know how I know you are shills, fakes, frauds, whatever-you-want-to-call-it?

Because you always identify yourself by leveling infantile insults at posters, including me, WITHOUT ACTUALLY ADDRESSING ANY OF THE POINTS I'VE RAISED!!!
 Quoting: GladioDaddy-O


You Post Information from 19 different sources and Then Claim numerous material inconsistencies in the "Offical Story".

Then If anyone disagrees with you they get Cussed out and Called a Shill..

Post The "Offical Story " and Point out the inconsistencies.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 11360402


You are the type of person who points out a person's spelling mistakes in order to attempt to smear them in a negative light and hope to discredit them that way.

Either that or you are extremely naive and uninformed about the state of mass media in this country.

See, I gave you the benefit of the doubt.

So, here is the deal.

Any mass media publication is owned by one of a handful of parent companies, who have placed loyal editor's in chief who are bound by ideology and private contract to frame a narrative via the "journalism" they publish.

This includes almost all print newspapers to a one, major magazines, and their online satellites.

So all together, whatever they report, is the "official" story. A person who is paying attention will note that they all say the same thing, and if not, then eventually, over time, they will get on the same page with their final conclusive coverage on any major event.

Wake up. Gladio has.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 25910886
United States
12/26/2012 06:06 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation
So? all kinds of shit is banned on glp here.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 27515407


Agreed!!

There is more banned here than at 'that site'.

So why is the OP complaining?

scratching
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 30913094
Germany
12/26/2012 06:10 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation
So? all kinds of shit is banned on glp here.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 27515407


yeah
GladioDaddy-O

User ID: 22439147
United States
12/26/2012 06:10 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation
ATTENTION SHILLS:

Do you know how I know you are shills, fakes, frauds, whatever-you-want-to-call-it?

Because you always identify yourself by leveling infantile insults at posters, including me, WITHOUT ACTUALLY ADDRESSING ANY OF THE POINTS I'VE RAISED!!!
 Quoting: GladioDaddy-O


You Post Information from 19 different sources and Then Claim numerous material inconsistencies in the "Offical Story".

Then If anyone disagrees with you they get Cussed out and Called a Shill..

Post The "Offical Story " and Point out the inconsistencies.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 11360402


I know I'm wasting time, but here goes:

No I haven't cited "19" different source. I've been citing ONE source consistently, the Hartford Courant. AND THEIR REPORTING IS A DISGRACE!!!
Thread: SANDY HOOK - Ms. Soto's Class - Details Change AGAIN!!

Now, if you have the courage, read what I posted, and the articles I cite, and then come back and tell me I'm crazy.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 11360402
United States
12/26/2012 06:11 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation
ATTENTION SHILLS:

Do you know how I know you are shills, fakes, frauds, whatever-you-want-to-call-it?

Because you always identify yourself by leveling infantile insults at posters, including me, WITHOUT ACTUALLY ADDRESSING ANY OF THE POINTS I'VE RAISED!!!
 Quoting: GladioDaddy-O


You Post Information from 19 different sources and Then Claim numerous material inconsistencies in the "Offical Story".

Then If anyone disagrees with you they get Cussed out and Called a Shill..

Post The "Offical Story " and Point out the inconsistencies.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 11360402


You are the type of person who points out a person's spelling mistakes in order to attempt to smear them in a negative light and hope to discredit them that way.

Either that or you are extremely naive and uninformed about the state of mass media in this country.

See, I gave you the benefit of the doubt.

So, here is the deal.

Any mass media publication is owned by one of a handful of parent companies, who have placed loyal editor's in chief who are bound by ideology and private contract to frame a narrative via the "journalism" they publish.

This includes almost all print newspapers to a one, major magazines, and their online satellites.

So all together, whatever they report, is the "official" story. A person who is paying attention will note that they all say the same thing, and if not, then eventually, over time, they will get on the same page with their final conclusive coverage on any major event.

Wake up. Gladio has.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30662905


So You can't Find the "Offical Story" either??
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 30895595
United States
12/26/2012 06:18 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation
I think they banned it because that kind of speculation is disrespectful to the victims
 Quoting: Kat Woman


What kind of Statist BS is that?
Seeking the Truth is disrespectful to the victims?
How disrespectful(to the innocent) is it to let the REAL perpetrators get away with their Murder?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 30662905
United States
12/26/2012 06:25 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation
ATTENTION SHILLS:

Do you know how I know you are shills, fakes, frauds, whatever-you-want-to-call-it?

Because you always identify yourself by leveling infantile insults at posters, including me, WITHOUT ACTUALLY ADDRESSING ANY OF THE POINTS I'VE RAISED!!!
 Quoting: GladioDaddy-O


You Post Information from 19 different sources and Then Claim numerous material inconsistencies in the "Offical Story".

Then If anyone disagrees with you they get Cussed out and Called a Shill..

Post The "Offical Story " and Point out the inconsistencies.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 11360402


You are the type of person who points out a person's spelling mistakes in order to attempt to smear them in a negative light and hope to discredit them that way.

Either that or you are extremely naive and uninformed about the state of mass media in this country.

See, I gave you the benefit of the doubt.

So, here is the deal.

Any mass media publication is owned by one of a handful of parent companies, who have placed loyal editor's in chief who are bound by ideology and private contract to frame a narrative via the "journalism" they publish.

This includes almost all print newspapers to a one, major magazines, and their online satellites.

So all together, whatever they report, is the "official" story. A person who is paying attention will note that they all say the same thing, and if not, then eventually, over time, they will get on the same page with their final conclusive coverage on any major event.

Wake up. Gladio has.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30662905


So You can't Find the "Offical Story" either??
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 11360402


Typical snide and sarcastic shill response to a perfectly reasonable explanation of the way things work.

Such responses play to their only audience. Those like themselves, or naive lazy casual forum readers. The lowest common denominator.

I actually have quite a bit of pity for such people who have such a delusional sense of self due to various mental/emotional traumas and upbringing, coupled with brain numbing diets. Sad. But they still must be revealed and identified for the sad subhumans they have become.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 30662905
United States
12/26/2012 06:29 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation
I think they banned it because that kind of speculation is disrespectful to the victims
 Quoting: Kat Woman


What kind of Statist BS is that?
Seeking the Truth is disrespectful to the victims?
How disrespectful(to the innocent) is it to let the REAL perpetrators get away with their Murder?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30895595


Kat Woman is a classic example of a naive traumatized mind controlled person. Such a person will say anything in hopes they might persuade others to stop revealing the truth.

She will play on any potential guilt an investigator has. Simple but often effective, as that sort of shaming/humiliation tactic is what was used on her at a young age when she innocently questioned the hypocritical authority figures who were handling her.

Bad Karma sucks. And then you become a shill for the matrix.

Wittingly or unwittingly, the result is the same.

Blue pill.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 30912042
Australia
12/26/2012 06:30 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation
when the political debate starts in earnest, the speculation will be used to demonstrate the lengths guntards will go to to try and hang on to their semi automatic weapons.

all they really have is lies, propaganda and speculation.

accusing bereaved parents of fakery will aid gun control .
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1524722
United States
12/26/2012 06:32 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation
A very well-known conspiracy site has banned speculation about the Sandy Hook shooting.

I'm not sure I should explicitly name this site, but I'll just say that it's got the words "Top Secret" in its name. You know the one I mean.

The site has not banned discussion of the topic altogether, however, it looks like they have prohibited certain TYPES of speculation. It's okay to talk about, but NOT okay to speculate that it was a false flag, or that any of the participants are actors.

Basically they're allowing speculation WITHIN THE REALM OF THE OFFICIAL STORY ONLY, it seems!!!!


The administrators even made a couple highly empassioned posts about this, and sent a mass mailer to all memebers. In the posts they pretty much guilt tripped, and shame-on-you'ed everyone who was speculating, ridiculed them, and warned that bans or all-out-topical-prohibition may result if it continues.

It looks like they may have deleted more threads, too. Long ones, with tons of interested participants. Not 100% about that one, as I haven't looked too hard yet. But threads which were getting a new reply every few minutes, and were on the front page for days are now impossible to find after browsing a few pages back.

For those of you who follow this site, you will know the last time the admins spoke this strongly about an issue, and tried to steer its discussion in one particular direction (or I should say AWAY from one particular direction) was regarding 9/11 discussion. Go ahead and try to start some "non plane theory" threads over there and see what happens.

I don't know about you, but to my nose this stinks to high heaven.

What say you?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 19868668



Walk away, walk away. If they don't want to be part of the alternative REALITY BASED MEDIA, then they will die out along with the captive Main Stream Faith Based Media. I rarely look at that site as there's seldom anything of interest. People just aren't interested in listening to propaganda anymore. We've seen too much.
INK3

User ID: 25650162
United States
12/26/2012 06:33 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation
I think they banned it because that kind of speculation is disrespectful to the victims
 Quoting: Kat Woman


Yeah, right.
"When tyrants tremble in their fear, and hear their death knell ringing,
When friends rejoice both far and near, how can I keep from singing"

page7
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1524722
United States
12/26/2012 06:34 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation
I think they banned it because that kind of speculation is disrespectful to the victims
 Quoting: Kat Woman



To not question the official story is the ultimate disrespect to the victims as it allows their murderers and the co-conspirators to get away free and probably kill again. WAKE UP, you're sleep walking again.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 30912042
Australia
12/26/2012 06:34 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation
I think they banned it because that kind of speculation is disrespectful to the victims
 Quoting: Kat Woman


What kind of Statist BS is that?
Seeking the Truth is disrespectful to the victims?
How disrespectful(to the innocent) is it to let the REAL perpetrators get away with their Murder?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30895595


the american NRA is just as guilty as the shooter, without them, the massacre could not have occured.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 30912042
Australia
12/26/2012 06:36 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation
I think they banned it because that kind of speculation is disrespectful to the victims
 Quoting: Kat Woman



To not question the official story is the ultimate disrespect to the victims as it allows their murderers and the co-conspirators to get away free and probably kill again. WAKE UP, you're sleep walking again.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1524722


and you are plain lying.

you think anyone considers for one minute you believe what you are claiming?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 11360402
United States
12/26/2012 06:37 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation
...


You Post Information from 19 different sources and Then Claim numerous material inconsistencies in the "Offical Story".

Then If anyone disagrees with you they get Cussed out and Called a Shill..

Post The "Offical Story " and Point out the inconsistencies.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 11360402


You are the type of person who points out a person's spelling mistakes in order to attempt to smear them in a negative light and hope to discredit them that way.

Either that or you are extremely naive and uninformed about the state of mass media in this country.

See, I gave you the benefit of the doubt.

So, here is the deal.

Any mass media publication is owned by one of a handful of parent companies, who have placed loyal editor's in chief who are bound by ideology and private contract to frame a narrative via the "journalism" they publish.

This includes almost all print newspapers to a one, major magazines, and their online satellites.

So all together, whatever they report, is the "official" story. A person who is paying attention will note that they all say the same thing, and if not, then eventually, over time, they will get on the same page with their final conclusive coverage on any major event.

Wake up. Gladio has.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30662905


So You can't Find the "Offical Story" either??
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 11360402


Typical snide and sarcastic shill response to a perfectly reasonable explanation of the way things work.

Such responses play to their only audience. Those like themselves, or naive lazy casual forum readers. The lowest common denominator.

I actually have quite a bit of pity for such people who have such a delusional sense of self due to various mental/emotional traumas and upbringing, coupled with brain numbing diets. Sad. But they still must be revealed and identified for the sad subhumans they have become.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30662905


So I'm Typical,snide and sarcastic,a Shill.

I'm naive and lazy,a casual forum reader.

You Pitty me,I'm delusional,I have mental/emotional traumas
and a brain Numbing Diet, and I'm a sad subhuman...

Damn!!yeahsure

If You and your friends are going to Claim that there are inconsistencies in the Offical Story,Why Can't Any of you Just Post the "Offical Story"

You've spent Day's putting the "Evidence" together,What's The Problem??
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 29652787
Canada
12/26/2012 06:41 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation
GLP > That site.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 30662905
United States
12/26/2012 06:42 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation
I think they banned it because that kind of speculation is disrespectful to the victims
 Quoting: Kat Woman


What kind of Statist BS is that?
Seeking the Truth is disrespectful to the victims?
How disrespectful(to the innocent) is it to let the REAL perpetrators get away with their Murder?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30895595


the american NRA is just as guilty as the shooter, without them, the massacre could not have occured.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30912042


says the sub-human clone/robot
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 30911508
United States
12/26/2012 06:47 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation
It's the hand of GOD...

The Gold...OIL...Drug...cartels, and your basic letter agencies.

They are putting a CLAMP on speculation because of the sloppy half-assed operation they undertook trying to pull off this story.

What a cluster?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 11360402
United States
12/26/2012 06:48 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation
I think they banned it because that kind of speculation is disrespectful to the victims
 Quoting: Kat Woman


What kind of Statist BS is that?
Seeking the Truth is disrespectful to the victims?
How disrespectful(to the innocent) is it to let the REAL perpetrators get away with their Murder?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30895595


the american NRA is just as guilty as the shooter, without them, the massacre could not have occured.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30912042


says the sub-human clone/robot
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30662905


Do You Ever reply without Flaming somebody??
GladioDaddy-O

User ID: 22439147
United States
12/26/2012 06:48 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Conspiracy Site Bans "Sandy Hook" Speculation
...


You are the type of person who points out a person's spelling mistakes in order to attempt to smear them in a negative light and hope to discredit them that way.

Either that or you are extremely naive and uninformed about the state of mass media in this country.

See, I gave you the benefit of the doubt.

So, here is the deal.

Any mass media publication is owned by one of a handful of parent companies, who have placed loyal editor's in chief who are bound by ideology and private contract to frame a narrative via the "journalism" they publish.

This includes almost all print newspapers to a one, major magazines, and their online satellites.

So all together, whatever they report, is the "official" story. A person who is paying attention will note that they all say the same thing, and if not, then eventually, over time, they will get on the same page with their final conclusive coverage on any major event.

Wake up. Gladio has.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30662905


So You can't Find the "Offical Story" either??
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 11360402


Typical snide and sarcastic shill response to a perfectly reasonable explanation of the way things work.

Such responses play to their only audience. Those like themselves, or naive lazy casual forum readers. The lowest common denominator.

I actually have quite a bit of pity for such people who have such a delusional sense of self due to various mental/emotional traumas and upbringing, coupled with brain numbing diets. Sad. But they still must be revealed and identified for the sad subhumans they have become.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30662905


So I'm Typical,snide and sarcastic,a Shill.

I'm naive and lazy,a casual forum reader.

You Pitty me,I'm delusional,I have mental/emotional traumas
and a brain Numbing Diet, and I'm a sad subhuman...

Damn!!yeahsure

If You and your friends are going to Claim that there are inconsistencies in the Offical Story,Why Can't Any of you Just Post the "Offical Story"

You've spent Day's putting the "Evidence" together,What's The Problem??
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 11360402


The Hartford Courant is the OLDEST newspaper in the U.S. I consider what they publish to be the "official story." AND IT IS FULL OF HOLES!!!
Thread: SANDY HOOK - Ms. Soto's Class - Details Change AGAIN!!

Address the points I raise, if you dare.